Modulation of Cyclic AMP Levels in Fallopian Tube Cells by Natural and Environmental Estrogens.

Autocrine/paracrine factors generated in response to 17ß-estradiol (E2) within the fallopian tube (FT) facilitate fertilization and early embryo development for implantation. Since cyclic AMP (cAMP) plays a key role in reproduction, regulation of its synthesis by E2 may be of biological/pathophysiological relevance. Herein, we investigated whether cAMP production in FT cells (FTCs) is regulated by E2 and environmental estrogens (EE's; xenoestrogens and phytoestrogens). Under basal conditions, low levels of extracellular cAMP were detectable in bovine FTCs (epithelial cells and fibroblasts; 1:1 ratio). Treatment of FTCs with forskolin (AC; adenylyl cyclase activator), isoproterenol (ß-adrenoceptor agonist) and IBMX (phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor) dramatically (>10 fold) increased cAMP; whereas LRE1 (sAC; soluble AC inhibitor) and 2',5'-dideoxyadenosine (DDA; transmembrane AC (tmAC)) inhibitor decreased cAMP. Comparable changes in basal and stimulated intracellular cAMP were also observed. Ro-20-1724 (PDE-IV inhibitor), but not milrinone (PDE-III inhibitor) nor mmIBMX (PDE-I inhibitor), augmented forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels, suggesting that PDE-IV dominates in FTCs. E2 increased cAMP levels and CREB phosphorylation in FTCs, and these effects were mimicked by EE's (genistein, 4-hydroxy-2',4',6'-trichlorobiphenyl, 4-hydroxy-2',4',6'-dichlorobiphenyl). Moreover, the effects of E2 and EE were blocked by the tmAC inhibitor DDA, but not by the ERα/ß antagonist ICI182780. Moreover, BAPTA-AM (intracellular-Ca2+ chelator) abrogated the effects of E2, but not genistein, on cAMP suggesting differential involvement of Ca2+. Treatment with non-permeable E2-BSA induced cAMP levels and CREB-phosphorylation; moreover, the stimulatory effects of E2 and EEs on cAMP were blocked by G15, a G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) antagonist. E2 and IBMX induced cAMP formation was inhibited by LRE1 and DDA suggesting involvement of both tmAC and sAC. Our results provide the first evidence that in FTCs, E2 and EE's stimulate cAMP synthesis via GPER. Exposure of the FT to EE's and PDE inhibitors may result in abnormal non-cyclic induction of cAMP levels which may induce deleterious effects on reproduction.

Natural and environmental oestrogens induce TGFB1 synthesis in oviduct cells.

Autocrine/paracrine factors generated in response to 17ß-oestradiol (E2), within the oviduct, facilitate early embryo development for implantation. Since transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) plays a key role in embryo implantation, regulation of its synthesis by E2 may be of biological/pathophysiological relevance. Here, we investigated whether oviduct cells synthesize TGFB1 and whether E2 and environmental oestrogens (EOEs; xenoestrogens and phytoestrogens) modulate its synthesis. Under basal conditions, bovine oviduct cells (OCs; oviduct epithelial cells and oviduct fibroblasts; 1:1 ratio) synthesized TGFB1. E2 concentration-dependent induced TGFB1 levels in OCs and these effects were mimicked by some, but not all EOEs (genistein, biochanin A and 4-hydroxy-2',4',6'-trichlorobiphenyl, 4-hydroxy-2',4',6'-dichlorobiphenyl); moreover, EOEs enhanced (P < 0.05) the stimulatory effects of E2 on TGFB1 synthesis. The OCs expressed oestrogen receptors alpha and beta and aryl hydrocarbon; moreover, co-treatment with ER antagonist ICI182780 blocked the stimulatory effects of E2 and EOEs on TGFB1 synthesis. Treatment with non-permeable E2-BSA failed to induce TGFB1, thereby ruling out the involvement of membrane ERs. Cycloheximide (protein synthesis inhibitor) blocked E2-induced TGFB1 synthesis providing evidence for de novo synthesis. The stimulatory effects of E2 and EOEs, were inhibited (P < 0.05) by MAPK inhibitor (PD98059), whereas intracellular-Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) and adenylyl cyclase inhibitor (SQ22536) abrogated the effects of E2, but not EOEs, suggesting that post-ER effects of E2 and EOEs involve different pathways. Our results provide the first evidence that in OCs, E2 and EOEs stimulate TGFB1 synthesis via an ER-dependent pathway. Exposure of the oviduct to EOEs may result in continuous/sustained induction of TGFB1 levels in a non-cyclic fashion and may induce deleterious effects on reproduction.

Randomized controlled trial comparing highly purified (HP-hCG) and recombinant hCG (r-hCG) for triggering ovulation in ART.

BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing highly purified human Choriogonadotrophin (HP-hCG) and recombinant hCG (r-hCG) both administered subcutaneously for triggering ovulation in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). METHODS: Multi-centre (n = 4), prospective, controlled, randomized, non-inferiority, parallel group, investigator blind design, including 147 patients. The trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov, using the identifier: NCT00335569. The primary endpoint is the number of oocytes retrieved, while the secondary endpoints include embryo implantation, pregnancy and delivery rates as well as safety parameters. RESULTS: The number of retrieved oocytes was not inferior when HP-hCG was used as compared to r-hCG: the mean number was 13.3 (6.8) in HP-hCG and 12.5 (5.8) in the r-hCG group (p = 0.49) with a 95% CI (-1.34, 2.77). Regarding the secondary outcomes, there were also no differences in fertilization rate at 57.3% (467/815) vs. 61.3% (482/787) (p = 0.11), the number of embryos available for transfer and cryopreservation (2PN stage) and implantation, pregnancy and delivery rates. Furthermore, there were no differences in the number and type of adverse events reported. HP-hCG was therefore not inferior to r-hCG. CONCLUSIONS: HP-hCG and r-hCG are equally efficient and safe for triggering ovulation in ART and, both being administered subcutaneously, equally practical and well tolerated by patients.