[Diabetes and pancreas or islet transplantation: psychological issues]. / Diabète et transplantation du pancréas ou d'îlots de Langerhans : enjeux psychologiques.

Diabetes is a chronic and progressive disease that affects an increasing number of patients. The prevalence of associated psychological comorbidities is high and often requires the implementation of targeted psychological interventions. Pancreas or islet transplantation remains a therapeutic option to consider, for a part of patients with type 1 diabetes unstable disease or established complications. From the clinical indication to the waiting period for a transplantation, then to the postoperative and long-term care, the diabetic patient is found to experience perpetual changes that may test his adaptability. In this article, the psychological aspects of the pancreas or islet transplantation, as well as the role of a liaison psychiatrist in a transplantation unit will be discussed.

Le diabète est une maladie chronique et évolutive atteignant un nombre croissant de patients. La prévalence des comorbidités psychiques associées est élevée et nécessite souvent l'implémentation d'interventions psychologiques ciblées. La transplantation du pancréas ou d'îlots de Langerhans est une option thérapeutique à considérer pour certains patients avec un diabète de type 1 instable ou des complications installées. De l'indication clinique à la période d'attente pour une greffe, puis des suites postopératoires jusqu'à la vie d'après la greffe, le patient diabétique vit des transitions multiples le mettant à l'épreuve. Dans cet article, nous discutons les aspects psychologiques de ces transplantations ainsi que les interventions du psychiatre de liaison au sein d'un service de transplantation.

Lysophosphatidylinositols Are Upregulated After Human ß-Cell Loss and Potentiate Insulin Release.

In this study, we identified new lipid species associated with the loss of pancreatic ß-cells triggering diabetes. We performed lipidomics measurements on serum from prediabetic mice lacking ß-cell prohibitin-2 (a model of monogenic diabetes) patients without previous history of diabetes but scheduled for pancreaticoduodenectomy resulting in the acute reduction of their ß-cell mass (∼50%), and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We found lysophosphatidylinositols (lysoPIs) were the main circulating lipid species altered in prediabetic mice. The changes were confirmed in the patients with acute reduction of their ß-cell mass and in those with T2D. Increased lysoPIs significantly correlated with HbA1c (reflecting glycemic control), fasting glycemia, and disposition index, and did not correlate with insulin resistance or obesity in human patients with T2D. INS-1E ß-cells as well as pancreatic islets isolated from nondiabetic mice and human donors exposed to exogenous lysoPIs showed potentiated glucose-stimulated and basal insulin secretion. Finally, addition of exogenous lysoPIs partially rescued impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in islets from mice and humans in the diabetic state. Overall, lysoPIs appear to be lipid species upregulated in the prediabetic stage associated with the loss of ß-cells and that support the secretory function of the remaining ß-cells. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS: Circulating lysophosphatidylinositols (lysoPIs) are increased in situations associated with ß-cell loss in mice and humans such as (pre-)diabetes, and hemipancreatectomy. Pancreatic islets isolated from nondiabetic mice and human donors, as well as INS-1E ß-cells, exposed to exogenous lysoPIs exhibited potentiated glucose-stimulated and basal insulin secretion. Addition of exogenous lysoPIs partially rescued impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in islets from mice and humans in the diabetic state. LysoPIs appear as lipid species being upregulated already in the prediabetic stage associated with the loss of ß-cells and supporting the function of the remaining ß-cells.

Immunotherapy and Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of Basic and Clinical Data.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the management of patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage HCC, even making some of them potential candidates for liver transplantation. However, acute rejection has been observed after ICI therapy, challenging its safety in transplant settings. We summarize the key basic impact of immune checkpoints on HCC and liver transplantation. We analyze the available case reports and case series on the use of ICI therapy prior to and after liver transplantation. A three-month washout period is desirable between ICI therapy and liver transplantation to reduce the risk of acute rejection. Whenever possible, ICIs should be avoided after liver transplantation, and especially so early after a transplant. Globally, more robust prospective data in the field are required.

Psychological care of patients during the pancreas transplantation process: issues and prospects.

Pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes is a therapeutic option when other treatments are not effective and physical complications occur. Psychological burden is prominent in patients, and non-adherence to treatment is often one manifestation of such difficulties. Time projection is an important factor affected by chronic disease. The prospect of transplantation has the potential to repair this disruption. It could re-establish a continuity in the patient's self and history, by connecting the future to a life that was only about past and present. Taking care of oneself, adhering to treatment, being part of a long-term therapeutic project and going through transplantation are all processes that need a good ability to self-project in time. This is specifically a domain of psychotherapeutic interventions. In this article, the psychological implications of pancreas transplantation for patients and caregivers alike will be discussed, as well as the role of the psychiatrist in the transplantation process.

Utilization of livers donated after circulatory death for transplantation - An international comparison.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver graft utilization rates are a hot topic due to the worldwide organ shortage and the increasing number of transplant candidates on waiting lists. Liver perfusion techniques have been introduced in several countries, and may help to increase the organ supply, as they potentially enable the assessment of livers before use. METHODS: Liver offers were counted from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors (Maastricht type III) arising during the past decade in eight countries, including Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the US. Initial type-III DCD liver offers were correlated with accepted, recovered and implanted livers. RESULTS: A total number of 34,269 DCD livers were offered, resulting in 9,780 liver transplants (28.5%). The discard rates were highest in the UK and US, ranging between 70 and 80%. In contrast, much lower DCD liver discard rates, e.g. between 30-40%, were found in Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland. In addition, we observed large differences in the use of various machine perfusion techniques, as well as in graft and donor risk factors. For example, the median donor age and functional donor warm ischemia time were highest in Italy, e.g. >40 min, followed by Switzerland, France, and the Netherlands. Importantly, such varying risk profiles of accepted DCD livers between countries did not translate into large differences in 5-year graft survival rates, which ranged between 60-82% in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, DCD liver discard rates across the eight countries were high, although this primarily reflects the situation in the Netherlands, the UK and the US. Countries where in situ and ex situ machine perfusion strategies were used routinely had better DCD utilization rates without compromised outcomes. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: A significant number of Maastricht type III DCD livers are discarded across Europe and North America today. The overall utilization rate among eight Western countries is 28.5% but varies significantly between 18.9% and 74.2%. For example, the median DCD-III liver utilization in five countries, e.g. Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, and Spain is 65%, in contrast to 24% in the Netherlands, UK and US. Despite this, and despite different rules and strategies for organ acceptance and preservation, 1- and 5-year graft survival rates remain fairly similar among all participating countries. A highly varying experience with modern machine perfusion technology was observed. In situ and ex situ liver perfusion concepts, and application of assessment tools for type-III DCD livers before transplantation, may be a key explanation for the observed differences in DCD-III utilization.

Impact of the presence of median arcuate ligament on biliary complications after liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of median arcuate ligament (MAL) during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may cause a significant reduction in the arterial hepatic flow. The aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of MAL on biliary complications in patients who underwent OLT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study among patients who underwent OLT in Geneva University Hospital between 2007 and 2017, depending on the presence or absence of MAL. The matching was performed according to age, gender, lab-MELD score at the time of OLT and type of donor (living or dead). The presence of MAL was assessed by an expert liver radiologist on the preoperative CT angiographic evaluation. RESULTS: The incidence of MAL was 6.1% (19 patients). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. No significant difference in biliary complications was found between patients with and without MAL (37% and 24%, respectively). No patient presented hepatic artery thrombosis. After logistic regression, in patients with MAL, the MAL release and gastroduodenal artery preservation compared to no treatment, showed an odds ratio for post-OLT biliary complications of 1.5 and 1.25, respectively. There was no difference in overall graft survival and in hazard for biliary complications between patients with and without MAL. CONCLUSION: In the present study, we did not find any difference in the prevalence of biliary and arterial complications between patients with and without MAL. The choice of MAL treatment did not influence in a significant way the overall outcome and development of complications. However, if, at the end of arterial reconstruction, the arterial flow is not adequately established, MAL needs to be treated with the least invasive technique.

Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation.

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer algorithms used to complete tasks that usually require human intelligence. Typical examples include complex decision-making and- image or speech analysis. AI application in healthcare is rapidly evolving and it undoubtedly holds an enormous potential for the field of solid organ transplantation. In this review, we provide an overview of AI-based approaches in solid organ transplantation. Particularly, we identified four key areas of transplantation which could be facilitated by AI: organ allocation and donor-recipient pairing, transplant oncology, real-time immunosuppression regimes, and precision transplant pathology. The potential implementations are vast-from improved allocation algorithms, smart donor-recipient matching and dynamic adaptation of immunosuppression to automated analysis of transplant pathology. We are convinced that we are at the beginning of a new digital era in transplantation, and that AI has the potential to improve graft and patient survival. This manuscript provides a glimpse into how AI innovations could shape an exciting future for the transplantation community.

[Malignant lesions of the extrahepatic biliary system]. / Prise en charge du cholangiocarcinome extrahépatique.

This article provides an overview of recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (EH-CCAs), focusing on the role of endoscopy, surgery, and transplantation. It reviews optimal evaluation and management of patients with EH-CCA, including a careful integration of clinical information, imaging studies, cytology and/or histology, as well as a coordinated multidisciplinary approach. It reviews additional therapy such as radio- or chemotherapy either in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. Furthermore, it addresses palliative approaches as well as emerging targeted therapy and immunotherapy. EH-CCAs account for nearly 90% of biliary tract malignancies and present an ongoing challenge for hepatobiliary surgeons.

Cet article apporte une vision globale des avancées récentes dans le diagnostic et la prise en charge des cholangiocarcinomes extrahépatiques (CCA-EH), en décrivant les rôles respectifs de l'endoscopie, de la chirurgie et de la transplantation. L'évaluation et la prise en charge sont abordées en intégrant les informations cliniques, les différentes modalités d'imagerie, la cytologie et/ou la pathologie, à travers une approche multidisciplinaire. Nous abordons également les tendances épidémiologiques et les facteurs de risque nouvellement identifiés ainsi que l'apport de la radiochimiothérapie. L'approche palliative, tout comme les thérapies ciblées ou l'immunothérapie sont également discutées. Les CCA-EH représentent 90 % des cancers des voies biliaires et constituent un défi permanent pour les chirurgiens hépatobiliaires.

Effect of Centralization on Surgical Outcome of Children Operated for Liver Tumors in Switzerland: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric liver surgery is complex, and complications are not uncommon. Centralization of highly specialized surgery has been shown to improve quality of care. In 2012, pediatric liver surgery was centralized in Switzerland in one national center. This study analyses results before and after centralization. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric comparative study. Analysis of medical records of children (0-16 years) operated for any liver tumor between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2020. Forty-one patients were included: 14 before centralization (before 1 January 2012) and 27 after centralization (after 1 January 2012). Epidemiological, pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were collected. Fischer's exact and t-test were used to compare groups. RESULTS: The two cohorts were homogeneous. Operating time was reduced, although not significantly, from 366 to 277 min. Length of postoperative stay and mortality were not statistically different between groups. Yet, after centralization, overall postoperative complication rate decreased significantly from 57% to 15% (p = 0.01), Clavien > III complications decreased from 50% to 7% (p < 0.01), and hepatic recurrences were also significantly reduced (40% to 5%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Centralization of the surgical management of liver tumors in Switzerland has improved quality of care in our center by significantly reducing postoperative complications and hepatic recurrence.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Transplantation: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal, evidence-based, program of care developed to minimize the response to surgical stress, associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and hospital stay. This study presents the specific ERAS Society recommendations for liver transplantation (LT) based on the best available evidence and on expert consensus. METHODS: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in April 2019 for published and ongoing randomized clinical trials on LT in the last 15 y. Studies were selected by 5 independent reviewers and were eligible if focusing on each validated ERAS item in the area of adult LT. An e-Delphi method was used with an extended interdisciplinary panel of experts to validate the final recommendations. RESULTS: Forty-three articles were included in the systematic review. A consensus was reached among experts after the second round. Patients should be screened for malnutrition and treated whenever possible. Prophylactic nasogastric intubation and prophylactic abdominal drainage may be omitted, and early extubation should be considered. Early oral intake, mobilization, and multimodal-balanced analgesia are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The current ERAS recommendations were elaborated based on the best available evidence and endorsed by the e-Delphi method. Nevertheless, prospective studies need to confirm the clinical use of the suggested protocol.

Renoportal Anastomosis During Liver Transplantation in Patients With Portal Vein Thrombosis: First Long-term Results From a Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of RPA in a large multicentric series. SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The current knowledge on RPA for portal reconstruction during LT in patients with diffuse PVT and a large splenorenal shunt is poor and limited to case reports and small case series. METHODS: All consecutive LTs with RPA performed in 5 centers between 1998 and 2020 were included. RPA was physiological provided it drained the splanchnic venous return through a large splenorenal shunt (≥ 1 cm diameter). Complications of PHT, long-term RPA patency, and patient and graft survival were assessed. RPA success was achieved provided the 3 following criteria were all fulfilled: patients were alive with patent RPA and without clinical PHT. RESULTS: RPA was attempted and feasible in 57 consecutive patients and was physiological in 51 patients (89.5%). Ninety-day mortality occurred in 5 (8.5%) patients, and PHT-related complications occurred in 42.9% of patients. With a median follow-up of 63 months, the 1-, 3- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 87%, 83%, and 76% and 82%, 80%, and 73%, respectively. The primary and primary-assisted patency rates at 5 years were 84.5% and 94.3%, respectively. Success was achieved in 90% (27/30) of patients with a follow-up ≥5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high rate of PHT-related complications, excellent long-term patient and graft survival could be achieved. RPA could be considered successful in the vast majority of patients. The expanded use of RPA is warranted.

Predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation using a novel model that incorporates tumor and donor-related factors.

Evidence suggests that liver graft quality impacts on posttransplant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). As of today, selection criteria only use variables related to tumor characteristics. Within the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation between 2004 and 2016 (development cohort, n = 10 887). Based on tumor recurrence rates, we fitted a competing-risk regression incorporating tumor- and donor-related factors, and we developed a prognostic score. Results were validated both internally and externally in the Australia and New Zealand Liver Transplant Registry. Total tumor diameter (subhazard ratio [sub-HR] 1.52 [1.28-1.81]), alpha-feto protein (sub-HR 1.27 [1.23-1.32], recipient male gender (sub-HR 1.43 [1.18-1.74]), elevated donor body mass index (sub-HR 1.26 [1.01-1.58]), and shared graft allocation policy (sub-HR 1.20 [1.01-1.43]) were independently associated with tumor recurrence. We next developed the Darlica score (sub-HR 2.72 [2.41-3.08] P < 0.001) that allows identifying risky combinations between a given donor and a given recipient. Results were validated internally (n = 3 629) and externally in the Australia and New Zealand Liver Transplant Registry (n = 370). The current score is based on variables that are readily available at the time of graft offer. It allows identifying hazardous donor-recipient combinations in terms of risk of tumor recurrence and overall survival.

Should we use liver grafts repeatedly refused by other transplant teams?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In France, liver grafts that have been refused at least 5 times can be "rescued" and allocated to a centre which chooses a recipient from its own waiting list, outside the patient-based allocation framework. We explored whether these "rescued" grafts were associated with worse graft/patient survival, as well as assessing their effect on survival benefit. METHODS: Among 7,895 candidates, 5,218 were transplanted between 2009 and 2014 (336 centre-allocated). We compared recipient/graft survival between patient allocation and centre allocation, considering a selection bias and the distribution of centre-allocation recipients among the transplant teams. We used a propensity score approach and a weighted Cox model using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. We also explored the survival benefit associated with centre-allocation grafts. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher risk of graft loss/death in the centre allocation group compared to the patient allocation group (hazard ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.22). However, this difference was no longer significant for teams that performed more than 7% of the centre-allocation transplantations. Moreover, receiving a centre-allocation graft, compared to remaining on the waiting list and possibly later receiving a patient-allocation graft, did not convey a poorer survival benefit (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.60-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: In centres which transplanted most of the centre-allocation grafts, using grafts repeatedly refused for top-listed candidates was not detrimental. Given the organ shortage, our findings should encourage policy makers to restrict centre-allocation grafts to targeted centres. LAY SUMMARY: "Centre allocation" (CA) made it possible to save 6 out of 100 available liver grafts that had been refused at least 5 times for use in the top-listed candidates on the national waiting list. In this series, the largest on this topic, we showed that, in centres which transplanted most of the CA grafts, using grafts repeatedly refused for top-listed candidates did not appear to be detrimental. In the context of organ shortage, our results, which could be of interest for any country using this CA strategy, should encourage policy makers to reassess some aspects of graft allocation by restricting CA grafts to targeted centres, fostering the "best" matching between grafts and candidates on the waiting list.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma after successful treatment of macrovascular invasion - a multi-center retrospective cohort study.

Macrovascular invasion is considered a contraindication to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to a high risk of recurrence. The aim of the present multicenter study was to explore the outcome of HCC patients transplanted after a complete radiological regression of the vascular invasion by locoregional therapies and define sub-groups with better outcomes. Medical records of 45 patients were retrospectively reviewed, and imaging was centrally assessed by an expert liver radiologist. In the 30 patients with validated diagnosis of macrovascular invasion, overall survival was 60% at 5 years. Pretransplant alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) value was significantly different between patients with and without recurrence (P = 0.019), and the optimal AFP cutoff was 10ng/ml (area under curve = 0.78). Recurrence rate was 11% in patients with pretransplant AFP < 10ng/ml. The number of viable nodules (P = 0.008), the presence of residual HCC (P = 0.036), and satellite nodules (P = 0.001) on the explant were also significantly different between patients with and without recurrence. Selected HCC patients with radiological signs of vascular invasion could be considered for transplantation, provided that they previously underwent successful treatment of the macrovascular invasion resulting in a pretransplant AFP < 10 ng/ml. Their expected risk of post-transplant HCC recurrence is 11%, and further prospective validation is needed.

Liver Transplantation with "Hors Tour" Allocated Versus Standard MELD Allocated Grafts: Single-Center Audit and Impact on the Liver Pool in France.

BACKGROUND: The French transplant governing system defined "Rescue" (the so-called "Hors Tour") livers as those livers which were declined for the five top-listed patients. This study compares the outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) in patients who received a donor liver through a rescue allocation (RA) procedure or according to MELD score priority (standard allocation, SA) and evaluates the impact on the graft pool of a proactive policy to accept RA grafts. METHODS: Data from all consecutive patients who underwent LT with SA or RA grafts from 2011 to 2015 were compared in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: The 249 elective first LTs were performed with 64 (25.7%) RA and 185 (74.3%) SA grafts. RA grafts were obtained from older donors and were associated with a longer cold ischemia time. Recipients of RA livers were older and had lower MELD scores. The rates of delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, retransplantation, complications, and mortality were similar between the RA and SA groups. At 1 and 3 and 5 years, graft and patient survival rates were similar between the groups. These results were maintained after matching on recipient characteristics. Our proactive policy to accept RA grafts increased the liver pool for elective first transplantation by 25%. CONCLUSIONS: RA livers can be safely transplanted into selected recipients and significantly expand the liver pool.

[Outpatient follow-up of liver transplant recipients: the essential role of the general practitioner]. / Suivi ambulatoire du patient transplanté hépatique: le rôle essentiel du médecin généraliste.

The population of liver transplant recipients has increased in Switzerland over the last few years. Morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation are due, in the early post-transplant period, to surgical and infectious complications as well as to rejection, whereas cardiovascular, metabolic, renal and oncologic complications are the most frequent complications in the late post-transplant period. The role of the general practitioner in the long-term follow-up of liver transplant recipients is of the highest importance and can represent the first-line care of these patients as soon as 6 to 12 months post-transplantation, while maintaining a close and regular collaboration with the transplant center. Multidisciplinary and structured follow-up, along with some specific screening tests, is warranted in order to refine patient management in a timely manner and to optimize outcomes.

Les patients greffés hépatiques représentent une population croissante en Suisse. La morbidité et la mortalité après cette procédure sont liées, dans la phase précoce, aux complications chirurgicales et infectieuses ainsi que, dans une moindre mesure, au rejet, puis surviennent dans la phase tardive les complications cardiovasculaires, métaboliques, rénales et oncologiques, liées en grande partie aux traitements immunosuppresseurs. Le rôle du médecin généraliste dans le suivi médical du patient greffé hépatique est essentiel et peut être de premier recours dès 6 à 12 mois après la transplantation, tout en gardant une collaboration étroite et régulière avec le centre de transplantation. Un suivi multidisciplinaire, régulier et structuré, associé à certaines mesures de dépistage, est indispensable, afin d'adapter précocement la prise en charge et ainsi d'optimaliser le devenir des patients après la greffe.

[Abdominal surgery in patients with portal hypertension†: clinical implication and management]. / Chirurgie abdominale chez les malades avec hypertension portale†: implications et prise en charge.

Abdominal surgery is sometimes needed in patients with portal hypertension. The indication may be related to the underlying liver disease, including liver resection for liver cancer and parietal surgery. Surgery may also be performed for another indication, unrelated to the liver disease. Portal hypertension increases both morbidity and mortality after abdominal surgery, and it should be taken into account when planning surgery timing and surgical strategy. This article provides an overview of the main etiologies of portal hypertension, and the post-operative outcomes after liver resection and non-hepatic abdominal surgery, underlining the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

Une chirurgie abdominale est parfois nécessaire chez les patients atteints d'hypertension portale. Son indication peut être en lien avec une complication de la maladie du foie, comme une résection de tumeur hépatique ou une chirurgie pariétale, ou avec une affection non liée à la pathologie hépatique. L'hypertension portale augmente la morbidité et la mortalité de cette chirurgie, et l'indication ainsi que la stratégie doivent être définies avec soin. Cet article décrit les causes d'hypertension portale, les risques associés à sa présence lors d'une résection hépatique ou d'une chirurgie abdominale non hépatique. Enfin, il propose une approche multidisciplinaire, associant les chirurgiens, les hépatologues, les anatomopathologistes et les anesthésistes-réanimateurs.

Downstaging prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: advisable but at the price of an increased risk of cancer recurrence - a retrospective study.

The use of downstaging prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still needs refinement. This study included patients with HCC listed for transplantation according to the Total Tumour Volume (TTV) ≤115 cm3 and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) ≤400 ng/ml criteria, with and without previous downstaging. Overall, 455 patients were listed, and 286 transplanted. Post-transplant follow-up was 38.5 ± 1.7 months. Patients downstaged to TTV115/AFP400 (n = 29) demonstrated similar disease-free survivals (DFS, 74% vs. 80% at 5 years, P = 0.949), but a trend to more recurrences (14% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.10) than those always within TTV115/AFP400 (n = 257). Similarly, patients downstaged to Milan criteria (n = 80) demonstrated similar DFS (76% vs. 86% at 5 years, P = 0.258), but more recurrences (11% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.001) than those always within Milan (n = 177). Among patients downstaged to Milan, those originally beyond TTV115/AFP400 (n = 27) had similar outcomes as those originally beyond Milan, but within TTV115/AFP400 (n = 53). However, the likelihood of being within Milan at transplant was lower for patients with more advanced original HCCs (P < 0.0001). Overall, despite an expected increase in post-transplant HCC recurrence, similar survivals can be achieved with and without downstaging, using the TTV115/AFP400 transplantation criteria, and including patients with advanced original HCCs. Downstaging should continue to be performed.

Optimal oncologic management and mTOR inhibitor introduction are safe and improve survival in kidney and liver allograft recipients with de novo carcinoma.

Prognosis and oncologic treatment feasibility in solid organ transplant patients with de novo cancer remain poorly described. We investigated the impact of immunosuppressive therapy modifications after de novo cancer diagnosis on oncologic treatment feasibility, toxicities, and prognosis. Patients with de novo cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) were selected from a monocentric cohort of 4,637 kidney and liver allograft recipients. We assessed oncologic treatment optimality according to guidelines and analyzed immunosuppressive drug modifications and oncologic treatment impacts on treatment feasibility, toxicities, and graft/patient survivals. A total of 180 patients with 205 cancers were included: mean age 60 years, median delay from transplantation to first de novo cancer 5 years. In 46% of cases, immunosuppressive therapy was modified after cancer diagnosis: 24% dose reduction and 22% mTOR inhibitor introduction. Optimal oncologic treatment was performed in 80% and 38% of patients with localized and advanced cancer respectively. Transplantation and immunosuppression hindered optimal oncologic treatment in 11% instances. Immunosuppressive therapy modifications did not affect oncologic treatment tolerance nor graft survival. In multivariate analysis, optimal oncologic treatment and mTOR inhibitor introduction improved survival of patients with de novo carcinoma. Optimal oncologic treatment is feasible in kidney and liver allograft recipients without safety concerns. Optimal oncologic treatment and mTOR inhibitor introduction seem to markedly improve survival of patients with de novo carcinoma.