Clinically relevant dosing and pharmacokinetics of DNA-encoded antibody therapeutics in a sheep model.

DNA-encoded delivery and in vivo expression of antibody therapeutics presents an innovative alternative to conventional protein production and administration, including for cancer treatment. To support clinical translation, we evaluated this approach in 18 40-45 kg sheep, using a clinical-matched intramuscular electroporation (IM EP) and hyaluronidase-plasmid DNA (pDNA) coformulation setup. Two cohorts of eight sheep received either 1 or 4 mg pDNA encoding an ovine anti-cancer embryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibody (mAb; OVAC). Results showed a dose-response with average maximum serum concentrations of respectively 0.3 and 0.7 µg/ml OVAC, 4-6 weeks after IM EP. OVAC was detected in all 16 sheep throughout the 6-week follow-up, and no anti-OVAC antibodies were observed. Another, more exploratory, cohort of two sheep received a 12 mg pOVAC dose. Both animals displayed a similar dose-dependent mAb increase and expression profile in the first two weeks. However, in one animal, an anti-OVAC antibody response led to loss of mAb detection four weeks after IM EP. In the other animal, no anti-drug antibodies were observed. Serum OVAC concentrations peaked at 4.9 µg/ml 6 weeks after IM EP, after which levels gradually decreased but remained detectable around 0.2 to 0.3 µg/ml throughout a 13-month follow-up. In conclusion, using a delivery protocol that is currently employed in clinical Phase 1 studies of DNA-based antibodies, we achieved robust and prolonged in vivo production of anti-cancer DNA-encoded antibody therapeutics in sheep. The learnings from this large-animal model regarding the impact of pDNA dose and host immune response on the expressed mAb pharmacokinetics can contribute to advancing clinical translation.

Real-world Endoscopic and Histological Outcomes Are Correlated with Ustekinumab Exposure in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Histo-endoscopic outcomes are being proposed as new treatment targets in ulcerative colitis [UC]. Little is known about the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynnamic [PK-PD] relationship of ustekinumab [UST] in UC patients or whether serum UST concentrations reflect tissue drug exposure. We aimed to study UST serum concentrations and their relation to tissue exposure and drug effectiveness in a real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 42 UC patients starting UST were prospectively followed by clinical, endoscopic and histological assessments at Week 16. Histological remission was defined as Nancy Histology Index of 0. Analogous to the UNIFI programme, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement was defined as a combination of histological improvement [Geboes ≤3.1] and endoscopic improvement [MES ≤1]. Paired trough serum samples and colonic mucosal biopsies were collected for UST levels measurement. RESULTS: After 16 weeks [IQR 15.8-16.4] of therapy, histological remission and histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement were observed in 19 [45%] and 18 [43%] patients, respectively. Patients who achieved these outcomes had higher serum UST levels than those who did not. Patients with shorter disease duration and clinical response at Week 8 had higher odds to achieve histological remission. UST concentrations from paired serum and biopsy samples revealed a strong positive correlation [r = 0.88, p < 0.001], in both inflamed and uninflamed tissue. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort of refractory UC patients initiating UST, more than a third of the patients achieved histological remission. A drug exposure-response relationship was observed for histo-endoscopic outcomes, with no added value of measuring tissue exposure given the strong correlation with serum exposure.

Endoscopic remission can be predicted by golimumab concentrations in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with the changed label.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) replaced a fixed 50 mg every 4-week maintenance regimen of golimumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients weighing <80 kg with new, flexible dosing that allows reactive dose optimization to 100 mg if clinically needed. We analyzed the endoscopic remission rates and pharmacokinetics of this new dosing regimen in real-life settings. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 30 consecutive (17 with body weight <80 kg) patients with UC who received golimumab with the new EMA label. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission (Mayo ≤1) assessed by centrally-read endoscopy at week 14 and year 1. Golimumab concentrations, measured at nine prespecified timepoints, were correlated with endoscopic remission and identified cut-offs. RESULTS: Endoscopic remission was achieved in 15/30 (50%) and 10/30 (33%) patients at week 14 and year 1, respectively. Reactive dose optimization to 100 mg maintenance was needed in 13/17 (76%) patients. Golimumab concentrations at week 6 predicted week 14 and year 1 endoscopic remission. Week 6 concentrations >10.7 µg/ml were a strong predictor for achievement and maintenance of endoscopic remission during the first year of treatment, while concentrations <5.1 µg/ml identified the opposite. CONCLUSION: One-third of the patients reached and maintained endoscopic remission during the first year of golimumab treatment, but the need for dose optimization to 100 mg every 4 weeks of maintenance was high in patients weighing <80 kg. Golimumab concentrations <5.1 µg/ml at week 6 identified patients who are unlikely to reach and maintain endoscopic remission with the new, flexible EMA label.

Development and validation of immunoassays for monitoring of guselkumab and anti-guselkumab antibodies in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring, which is the measurement of drug concentrations in the blood, is a useful tool to guide clinical decision-making and treatment adjustments, on the condition that drug concentrations are correlated with treatment response. For guselkumab, an anti-IL-23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, such a concentration-response relationship could not yet be determined as no commercial assays for the quantification of this drug or antibodies against this drug are available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate immunoassays for the quantification of guselkumab and anti-guselkumab antibodies according to the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A diverse panel of 20 highly specific anti-guselkumab monoclonal antibodies (MA-GUS) was generated of which eight revealed a neutralizing capacity of ≥65 %. At least seven different antibody clusters were identified based on their epitope binning profile. Using MA-GUS9F6 as the capture antibody and MA-GUS12G12 as the detection antibody, an ELISA was developed with a dose-response curve ranging from 0.08 to 5 ng/mL. The assay was specific, selective and could accurately and precisely quantify guselkumab concentrations in spiked healthy control serum and serum from guselkumab-treated psoriasis patients with a cut-off for quantification of 0.014 µg/mL. The presence of IL-23 in physiological concentrations or of non-neutralizing antibodies did not impact the quantification of guselkumab, while the presence of neutralizing antibodies did. Using MA-GUS12A9 as a calibrator, two anti-guselkumab antibody assays were developed to detect anti-guselkumab antibodies, which differ in the threshold for detection and quantification and the tolerance to the presence of guselkumab. Together, these validated immunoassays are essential to establish a concentration-response relationship and will allow the future implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients receiving guselkumab treatment.

Anti-infliximab antibodies: How to compare old and new data?

BACKGROUND: Anti-drug-antibodies (ADA) against infliximab are frequently measured in patients receiving infliximab treatment with loss of response and undetectable infliximab concentrations. Different ADA bridging assays (1st generation, 2nd generation and ready-to-use kit) have been developed successively and were applied over the last 10 years, making comparison between ADA concentrations very challenging. A cutoff of 8 µg/ml was established to discriminate low from high ADA concentrations using the 1st generation ADA bridging assay. The objective of this study was to enable comparison of ADA concentrations determined with the different assays that were developed over the years. METHODS: 166 serum samples were collected from patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab. 98 samples were measured simultaneously with the 1st and 2nd generation ADA assay, 67 serum samples were measured with the 2nd generation assay and the ready-to-use kit. RESULTS: From our ADA concentration comparison experiments, we deduced that the previously established cutoff of 8 µg/ml with the 1st generation ELISA has a similar impact as the cutoff of 374 ng/ml with the 2nd generation ELISA and a cutoff of 119 ng/ml in the ready-to-use ELISA kit. CONCLUSION: ADA concentrations measured with the different assays were compared and a cutoff concentration was determined for each of them to distinguish between low and high ADA concentrations. These cutoff concentrations may serve as a tool for clinicians to make treatment decisions for patients with a loss of response to infliximab and undetectable infliximab serum concentrations.

Evaluating Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics After Switching From Infliximab Originator to Biosimilar CT-P13: Experience From a Large Tertiary Referral Center.

BACKGROUND: The use of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 has increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Nevertheless, doubts about switching from infliximab originator to biosimilar still exist among patients and health care professionals. METHODS: Our tertiary referral center underwent a mandatory switch from infliximab originator to CT-P13 in 2017. We investigated pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of this switch. The primary endpoint was infliximab discontinuation within 6 months of switching. Secondary endpoints included loss of clinical remission, need for treatment optimization, adverse events, evolution of patient-reported outcome, C-reactive protein, infliximab trough levels, and antidrug-antibodies. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients (54.0% male, 70.0% Crohn's disease, 55.6% in clinical remission) were enrolled. Infliximab discontinuation within 6 months was observed in 4%. Loss of clinical remission, adverse events, and antidrug-antibodies were identified in only 2.0%, 2.2%, and 1.1% of patients, respectively. C-reactive protein concentrations and infliximab trough levels remained stable. Independent factors associated with remission at 6 months were lower PRO2 at switch (HR 6.024; 95% CI, 4.878-8.000; P < 0.0001) and higher hemoglobin levels (HR 1.383; 95% CI, 1.044-2.299; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from infliximab originator to CT-P13 was not associated with an increased risk of treatment discontinuation, loss of clinical remission, or adverse events. No significant changes in infliximab trough levels or immunogenicity could be identified.

Early vedolizumab trough levels predict combined endoscopic and clinical remission in inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: The relationship between vedolizumab trough levels and combined endoscopic and clinical remission is unknown. Objective: To compare vedolizumab trough levels in patients with and without combined remission within the first year of treatment. Methods: We prospectively collected vedolizumab trough levels in 51 consecutive patients (28 Crohn's disease (CD) and 23 ulcerative colitis (UC)) before all infusions up to week 22, and at weeks 38 and 54, with concentrations measured after study completion. Centrally read endoscopy was performed at a median of 46 weeks. The primary outcome was combined endoscopic (CD: Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) < 4 without ulceration; UC: Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤ 1) and clinical remission (CD: resolution of abdominal pain; UC: resolution of rectal bleeding; both: resolution of altered bowel habit). Results: Median vedolizumab trough levels at weeks 6 (25.7 vs 15.6 µg/mL; P = 0.015) and 22 (15.1 vs 4.9 µg/mL; P = 0.001) were higher in patients with combined remission. A threshold of 22 µg/mL at week 6 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.733; 95% confidence interval 0.567-0.899) and 8 µg/mL at week 22 (AUC 0.819; 95% confidence interval 0.692-0.946) predicted combined remission. Conclusion: Early vedolizumab trough levels predicted combined endoscopic and clinical remission highlighting their possible use in clinical practice.

Subcutaneous Absorption Contributes to Observed Interindividual Variability in Adalimumab Serum Concentrations in Crohn's Disease: A Prospective Multicentre Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to optimise adalimumab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease [CD]. However, the interindividual variability in drug absorption and the quantitative effect on drug clearance of anti-adalimumab antibodies [AAA], measured with a drug-resistant assay, are unclear. We aimed to characterise adalimumab population pharmacokinetics [PopPK] and identify determinants of interindividual variability in patients with CD. METHODS: In a prospective multicentre open-label cohort study in 28 patients with CD starting adalimumab therapy peak, intermediate, and trough serum samples were analysed for adalimumab and AAA concentrations using a drug resistant assay. Adalimumab concentration-time data were analysed by non-linear mixed effects modelling and were adequately described by a PopPK model with first-order absorption and one-compartment disposition with linear elimination. Clinical remission at Week 12 [W12] was defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw index ≤4. RESULTS: The absorption rate, volume of distribution, and clearance estimates of a typical patient were respectively 0.343 /day, 7.8 L, and 0.330 L/day. A 4-fold difference in the range of adalimumab concentrations was observed 7 days after the first dose and found to be inversely correlated with baseline lean body weight [LBW], soluble tumour necrosis factor [s-TNF], and s-TNF receptor-1 whereas positive AAA and higher LBW were found to be important predictors of accelerated clearance. An adalimumab concentration at W12 of >7.3 µg/mL was significantly associated with achieving clinical remission at W12. CONCLUSION: Variability in subcutaneous drug absorption is an important contributor to the observed interindividual variability in adalimumab concentrations, in addition to drug clearance [ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02450513].

Ustekinumab Exposure-outcome Analysis in Crohn's Disease Only in Part Explains Limited Endoscopic Remission Rates.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ustekinumab, an anti-IL12/23p40 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for Crohn's disease [CD]. Real-life data in CD patients receiving ustekinumab intravenously [IV] during induction, followed by subcutaneous [SC] maintenance, are lacking. We assessed efficacy of ustekinumab and studied exposure-response correlations. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 86 CD patients predominantly refractory or intolerant to anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and/or vedolizumab. All received ustekinumab 6 mg/kg IV induction, with 90 mg SC every 8 weeks thereafter. Endoscopic response (50% decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD] at Week 24), endoscopic remission [SES-CD ≤2], and clinical remission [daily stool frequency ≤2.8 and abdominal pain score ≤1] were assessed at weeks 4,8,16, and 24. Further serial analyses included patient-reported outcomes [PRO2], faecal calprotectin [fCal], and ustekinumab serum levels. RESULTS: SES-CD decreased from 11.5 [8.0-18.0] at baseline to 9.0 [6.0-16.0] at week [w]24 [p = 0.0009], but proportions of patients achieving endoscopic response [20.5%] or endoscopic remission [7.1%] were low. Clinical remission rates were 39.5% at w24. After IV induction, fCal dropped from baseline [1242.9 µg/g] to w4 [529.0 µg/g] and w8 [372.2 µg/g], but increased again by w16 [537.4 µg/g] and w24 [749.0 µg/g]. A clear exposure-response relationship was observed, both during induction and during maintenance therapy, with different thresholds depending on the targeted outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of refractory CD patients, ustekinumab showed good clinical remission rates but limited endoscopic remission after 24 weeks. Our data suggest that higher doses may be required to achieve better endoscopic outcomes.

Evidence to Support Monitoring of Vedolizumab Trough Concentrations in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Trough concentrations of vedolizumab were found to correlate with clinical response in phase 3 studies of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, there are no solid data to support monitoring of vedolizumab trough concentrations in treated patients. We investigated the correlation between vedolizumab exposure and response in a real-world population and aimed to identify patient factors that affect exposure and response. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 179 consecutive patients (66 with UC and 113 with CD) who began vedolizumab therapy from September 1, 2015, through October 1, 2016, at University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Serum concentrations of vedolizumab were measured before all infusions up to week 30. Effectiveness endpoints included endoscopic healing (UC, Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1; CD, absence of ulcers), clinical response (physicians' global assessment), and biologic response or remission (based on level of C-reactive protein) and were assessed at week 14 (for patients with UC) and week 22 (for patients with CD). A stepwise forward addition-backward elimination modeling approach was performed to identify factors independently associated with vedolizumab exposure and response. RESULTS: Vedolizumab trough concentrations >30.0 µg/mL at week 2, >24.0 µg/mL at week 6, and >14.0 µg/mL during maintenance therapy associated with a higher probability of attaining the effectiveness endpoints for patients with UC or CD (P < .05). Higher body mass and more severe disease (based on high level of C-reactive protein and low level of albumin and/or hemoglobin) at the start of vedolizumab therapy associated with lower trough concentrations of vedolizumab over the 30-week period and a lower probability of achieving mucosal healing (P < .05). Mucosal healing was achieved in significantly more patients with UC than patients with CD, even though a diagnosis of UC was not an independent predictor of higher vedolizumab trough concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of 179 patients with CD or UC, we observed a correlation between vedolizumab exposure and response. These findings support monitoring of vedolizumab trough concentrations to predict patients' outcome.

Antibodies Toward Vedolizumab Appear from the First Infusion Onward and Disappear Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab (VDZ) has been approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The GEMINI trials reported a low prevalence of anti-VDZ antibodies (AVA). However, the AVA assays used in GEMINI were drug sensitive, resulting in a possible underestimation of the rate of AVA formation. This study aimed to monitor immunogenicity of VDZ in a real-life cohort using a drug-resistant AVA assay. METHODS: Using a combination of VDZ/AVA complex precipitation and acid dissociation, a drug-resistant assay for AVA detection in the presence of high VDZ concentrations has been developed and analytically validated. The assay was applied on serum samples of 179 VDZ-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease to evaluate the prevalence and time course of AVA. RESULTS: A dose-response curve ranging from 25 to 1600 ng/mL using 1/125 diluted serum was obtained, allowing the detection of AVA concentrations up to 200 µg/mL of MA-VDZ19C11 equivalents, a calibrator antibody to VDZ. This assay was highly AVA specific and drug resistant. Four of 179 VDZ-treated patients (2.2%) were AVA positive and AVA were detected already after the first VDZ infusion. AVA were all transient in these patients without need for any dosage optimization. There was no correlation between VDZ and AVA concentrations in the AVA-positive samples. CONCLUSIONS: AVA appear from the first VDZ infusion onward and disappear over time. The low prevalence of AVA suggests that immunogenicity does not influence response to treatment.

Prediction and Reduction of the Aggregation of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Protein aggregation remains a major area of focus in the production of monoclonal antibodies. Improving the intrinsic properties of antibodies can improve manufacturability, attrition rates, safety, formulation, titers, immunogenicity, and solubility. Here, we explore the potential of predicting and reducing the aggregation propensity of monoclonal antibodies, based on the identification of aggregation-prone regions and their contribution to the thermodynamic stability of the protein. Although aggregation-prone regions are thought to occur in the antigen binding region to drive hydrophobic binding with antigen, we were able to rationally design variants that display a marked decrease in aggregation propensity while retaining antigen binding through the introduction of artificial aggregation gatekeeper residues. The reduction in aggregation propensity was accompanied by an increase in expression titer, showing that reducing protein aggregation is beneficial throughout the development process. The data presented show that this approach can significantly reduce liabilities in novel therapeutic antibodies and proteins, leading to a more efficient path to clinical studies.

Bioassay Development for Ultrasensitive Detection of Influenza A Nucleoprotein Using Digital ELISA.

Flu is caused by the influenza virus that, due to mutations, keeps our body vulnerable for infections, making early diagnosis essential. Although immuno-based diagnostic tests are available, they have low sensitivity and reproducibility. In this paper, the prospect of detecting influenza A virus using digital ELISA has been studied. To appropriately select bioreceptors for this bioassay, seven commercial antibodies against influenza A nucleoprotein were methodically tested for their reactivity and binding affinity. The study has been performed on two markedly different platforms, being an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a surface plasmon resonance system. The selected antibodies displayed completely different behavior on the two platforms and in various assay configurations. Surprisingly, the antibodies that showed overall good reactivity on both platforms had the highest dissociation constant among the tested antibodies, suggesting that, although important, binding affinity is not the only parameter to be considered when selecting antibodies. Moreover, only one antibody had the capacity to capture the nucleoprotein directly in lysis buffer used for releasing this viral protein, which might pose a huge advantage when developing assays with a fast time-to-result. This antibody was implemented on an in-house developed digital ELISA platform for ultrasensitive detection of recombinant nucleoprotein, reaching a detection limit of 4 ± 1 fM in buffer and 10 ± 2 fM in 10-fold diluted nasopharyngeal swabs, which is comparable to currently available fast molecular detection techniques. These results point to a great potential for ultrasensitive immuno-based influenza detection.

Generation and characterization of a unique panel of anti-adalimumab specific antibodies and their application in therapeutic drug monitoring assays.

A number of assays are currently available to support therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab. A complete characterization of the assays and comparison of different assays has not been performed. The aim of this study, therefore, is to generate and characterize of a panel of monoclonal antibodies towards adalimumab (MA-ADM); to use this panel to develop novel assays to determine adalimumab concentrations; to assess the impact of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and (non-)neutralizing antibodies on adalimumab detection and to compare the performance of assays. In total, ten specific MA-ADM were generated of which four revealed a neutralizing potency of >78%. At least six different clusters were identified using principal component analysis. MA-ADM40D8 was selected as detecting antibody to determine adalimumab in the TNF-coated ELISA (A) and the MA-ADM28B8/MA-ADM40D8 antibody pair was chosen for use in the MA-coated ELISA (B). The impact of TNF and (non-) neutralizing antibodies was similar in both ELISAs. Finally, serum samples of adalimumab-treated Crohn's disease patients were collected and used for an external validation using the assay of Sanquin (C) and the apDia kit (D). All adalimumab assays showed excellent Pearson correlation: r=0.96 for A versus B, 0.96 for A versus C, 0.94 for A versus D, 0.97 for B versus C, 0.95 for B versus D and 0.94 for C and D. The excellent agreement with the two commercially available ELISAs allows harmonization of treatment algorithms in and between different hospitals/infusion centers.

An Optimized Anti-infliximab Bridging Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Harmonization of Anti-infliximab Antibody Titers in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The formation of anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI) is associated with loss of response and adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, leading to the introduction of ATI monitoring for guiding treatment adjustments. However, a lack of standardization among current available assays exists, hampering comparison of results from different studies. This study aimed to improve the harmonization of clinically validated ATI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) by introducing a monoclonal anti-infliximab antibody (MA-IFX). METHODS: A panel of MA-IFX was evaluated as calibrator in the first generation ATI ELISA. After selection of 1 MA-IFX, assay conditions were optimized and biotin-streptavidin-enhanced detection of bound infliximab was introduced. The novel second generation ELISA was used for reanalysis of 127 serum samples from a cohort of 12 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, previously identified as ATI positive. RESULTS: Of 55 MA-IFX, MA-IFX10F9 was selected as calibrator in the ATI ELISA. After optimization of the assay conditions, a 4-fold improvement in sensitivity was obtained. Reanalysis of 127 serum samples revealed that in 5 of 12 patients (46%), ATI were detected at least 1 time point earlier with the second generation ELISA compared with the first generation ELISA. In 1 patient, the second generation ELISA allowed to detect ATI before the reinitiation of IFX after a drug holiday. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the improved sensitivity and specificity of the second generation ATI ELISA, MA-IFX10F9 can serve as a universal calibrator to achieve assay harmonization. Moreover, the superiority of the second generation assay in analyzing serum of restarters was demonstrated.

Trough concentrations of infliximab guide dosing for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor antagonist, is effective for treating patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to determine whether dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring increases rate of remission and whether continued concentration-based dosing is superior to clinically based dosing of infliximab for maintaining remission in patients with CD and UC. METHODS: We performed a 1-year randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral center, including 263 adults (178 with CD and 85 with UC) with stable responses to maintenance infliximab therapy. Doses were escalated or reduced using an algorithm to reach a target trough concentration (TC) of 3-7 µg/mL in all patients (optimization phase). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups that received infliximab dosing based on their clinical features (n = 123) or continued dosing based on TCs (n = 128) (maintenance phase). The primary end point was clinical and biochemical remission at 1 year after the optimization phase. RESULTS: At screening, 115 of 263 patients had a TC of infliximab of 3-7 µg/mL (43.7%). Of 76 patients with TCs <3 µg/mL, 69 patients (91%) achieved TCs of 3-7 µg/mL after dose escalation. This resulted in a higher proportion of CD patients in remission than before dose escalation (88% vs 65%; P = .020) and a decrease in the median concentration of C-reactive protein, compared with before the dose increase (3.2 vs 4.3 mg/L; P < .001); these changes were not observed in patients with UC. Of 72 patients with TCs >7 µg/mL, 67 patients (93%) achieved TCs of 3-7 µg/mL after dose reduction. This resulted in a 28% reduction in drug cost from before dose reduction (P < .001). Sixty-six percent of patients whose dosing was based on clinical features and 69% whose dosing was based on TC achieved remission, the primary end point (P = .686). Disease relapsed in 21 patients who received clinically based dosing (17%) and 9 patients who received concentration-based dosing (7%) (P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Targeting patients' infliximab TCs to 3-7 µg/mL results in a more efficient use of the drug. After dose optimization, continued concentration-based dosing was not superior to clinically based dosing for achieving remission after 1 year, but was associated with fewer flares during the course of treatment. ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu number: 2011-002061-38.

Withdrawal of immunomodulators after co-treatment does not reduce trough level of infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The addition of immunomodulators increases the efficacy of maintenance therapy with infliximab for up to 1 year in patients with Crohn's disease who have not been previously treated with immunomodulators. However, there are questions about the effect of withdrawing immunomodulator therapy from these patients. We studied the effects of treatment with infliximab and immunomodulators (co-treatment) and then immunomodulator withdrawal on long-term outcomes of patients, as well as trough levels of infliximab and formation of anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI). METHODS: In a retrospective study with the median follow-up period of 34 months (interquartile range, 19-58 months), we analyzed data from 223 patients treated for Crohn's disease between May 1999 and December 2010 at the University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium (65 received infliximab monotherapy, 158 received infliximab and an immunomodulator). Trough levels of infliximab and levels of ATI were measured in blood samples collected from 117 patients throughout co-treatment, as well as the time of immunomodulator withdrawal and after withdrawal. RESULTS: Patients receiving co-treatment had higher trough levels of infliximab (adjusted mean increase, 1.44-fold) than those receiving infliximab monotherapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.92; P = .02). A smaller percentage of patients receiving co-treatment developed ATI (35 of 158, 22%) than those receiving infliximab monotherapy (25 of 65, 38%; P = .01). Among co-treated patients, levels of infliximab remained stable after immunomodulators were withdrawn (before: 3.2 µg/mL; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8 µg/mL and after: 3.7 µg/mL; 95% CI, 1.3-6.3 µg/mL; P = .70). After withdrawal of immunomodulators, 45 of 117 patients (38%) required increasing doses of infliximab, and 21 of 117 (18%) discontinued infliximab. At the time of immunomodulator withdrawal, trough levels of infliximab and C-reactive protein were most strongly associated with response to infliximab thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis, we confirmed that withdrawal of immunomodulators after at least 6 months (median, 13 months) of co-treatment with infliximab does not reduce the trough levels of infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease. Detectable trough levels of infliximab at the time of immunomodulator withdrawal are associated with long-term response.

Development of a universal anti-adalimumab antibody standard for interlaboratory harmonization.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab (ADM) has been introduced recently. When no detectable ADM serum concentrations can be found, the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADA) should be investigated. A variety of assays to measure the occurrence of ADA have been developed. Results are expressed as arbitrary units or as a titration value. The aim was to develop a monoclonal antibody (MA) that could serve as a universal calibrator to quantify the amount of ADA in ADM-treated patients. METHODS: Hybridoma technology was used to generate a MA toward ADM. The functionality of the MA was tested in a bridging enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) setup and in a cell-based assay. Sera from 25 anti-tumor necrosis factor naive patients with inflammatory bowel disease were used to determine the cutoff values. Sera from 9 ADM-treated patients with inflammatory bowel disease, with undetectable serum concentrations of ADM were used to quantify the ADA response. RESULTS: In this study, MA-ADM6A10, an IgG1 that can be used as a calibrator in both an ELISA to quantify the amount of binding antibodies and in a cell-based assay to quantify the amount of neutralizing antibodies, was generated. Combining the results of both assays showed that the sera with high concentrations of anti-ADM binding antibodies also had the highest neutralizing capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a universal calibrator could facilitate the interlaboratory harmonization of antibody titers in patients who develop anti-adalimumab antibodies.

Maximal PAI-1 inhibition in vivo requires neutralizing antibodies that recognize and inhibit glycosylated PAI-1.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) regulates the activity of t-PA and u-PA and is an important inhibitor of the plasminogen activator system. Elevated PAI-1 levels have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases. Prior to the evaluation of PAI-1 inhibitors in humans, there is a strong need to study the effect of PAI-1 inhibition in mouse models. In the current study, four monoclonal antibodies previously reported to inhibit recombinant PAI-1 in vitro, were evaluated in an LPS-induced endotoxemia model in mice. Both MA-33H1F7 and MA-MP2D2 exerted a strong PAI-1 inhibitory effect, whereas for MA-H4B3 and MA-124K1 no reduced PAI-1 activity was observed in vivo. Importantly, the lack of PAI-1 inhibition observed for MA-124K1 and MA-H4B3 in vivo corresponded with the absence of inhibition toward glycosylated mouse PAI-1 in vitro. Three potential N-glycosylation sites were predicted for mouse PAI-1 (i.e. N209, N265 and N329). Electrophoretic mobility analysis of glycosylation knock-out mutants before and after deglycosylation indicates the presence of glycan chains at position N265. These data demonstrate that an inhibitory effect toward glycosylated PAI-1 is a prerequisite for efficient PAI-1 inhibition in mice. Our data also suggest that PAI-1 inhibitors for use in humans must preferably be screened on glycosylated PAI-1 and not on recombinant non-glycosylated PAI-1.