Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 8(5): 851-859, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31992537

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity lymphedema is frequently encountered in the vascular clinic. Established dogma purports that cancer is the most common cause of lower extremity lymphedema in Western countries, whereas chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is often overlooked as a potential cause. Moreover, lymphedema is typically ascribed to a single cause, yet multiple causes can coexist. METHODS: A 3-year retrospective analysis was conducted of demographic and clinical characteristics of 440 eligible patients with lower extremity lymphedema who presented for lymphatic physiotherapy to a university medical center's cancer-based physical therapy department. RESULTS: The four most common causes of lower extremity lymphedema were CVI (phlebolymphedema; 41.8%), cancer-related lymphedema (33.9%), primary lymphedema (12.5%), and lipedema with secondary lymphedema (11.8%). The collective cohort was more likely to be female (71.1%; P < .0001), to be white (78.9%; P < .0001), to demonstrate bilateral distribution (74.5%; P < .0001), and to have involvement of the left leg (bilateral, 69.1% [P < .0001]; unilateral, 58.9% [P = .0588]). Morbid obesity was pervasive (mean weight and body mass index, 115.8 kg and 40.2 kg/m2, respectively) and significantly correlated with a higher International Society of Lymphology lymphedema stage (stage III mean weight and body mass index, 169.2 kg and 57.3 kg/m2, respectively, vs stage II, 107.8 kg and 37.5 kg/m2, respectively; P < .0001). Approximately one in three (35.7%) of the population sustained one or more episodes of cellulitis, but patients with stage III lymphedema had roughly twice the rate of soft tissue infection as patients with stage II, 61.7% vs 31.8%, respectively (P < .001). Multifactorial lymphedema was present in 25%. Approximately half of the patients with lipedema with secondary lymphedema (48.1%) or primary lymphedema (45.5%) had a superimposed cause of swelling that was usually CVI. Total knee arthroplasty was the most common cause of noncancer surgery-mediated worsening of pre-existing lymphedema. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients treated in a cancer-affiliated physical therapy department, CVI (phlebolymphedema), not cancer, was the predominant cause of lower extremity lymphedema. One in four patients had more than one cause of lymphedema. Notable clinical characteristics included a proclivity for female patients, bilateral distribution, left limb, cellulitis, and nearly universal morbid obesity.


Assuntos
Lipedema/complicações , Linfedema/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Insuficiência Venosa/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Celulite (Flegmão)/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Lipedema/diagnóstico , Lipedema/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Inferior , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/fisiopatologia , Linfedema/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/fisiopatologia , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Venosa/fisiopatologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Surg Oncol ; 120(3): 348-358, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31197851

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We describe a multidisciplinary approach for comprehensive care of amputees with concurrent targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) at the time of amputation. METHODS: Our TMR cohort was compared to a cross-sectional sample of unselected oncologic amputees not treated at our institution (N = 58). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (NRS, PROMIS) were used to assess postamputation pain. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent amputation with concurrent TMR during the study; 27 patients completed pain surveys; 15 had greater than 1 year follow-up (mean follow-up 14.7 months). Neuroma symptoms occurred significantly less frequently and with less intensity among the TMR cohort. Mean differences for PROMIS pain intensity, behavior, and interference for phantom limb pain (PLP) were 5.855 (95%CI 1.159-10.55; P = .015), 5.896 (95%CI 0.492-11.30; P = .033), and 7.435 (95%CI 1.797-13.07; P = .011) respectively, with lower scores for TMR cohort. For residual limb pain, PROMIS pain intensity, behavior, and interference mean differences were 5.477 (95%CI 0.528-10.42; P = .031), 6.195 (95%CI 0.705-11.69; P = .028), and 6.816 (95%CI 1.438-12.2; P = .014), respectively. Fifty-six percent took opioids before amputation compared to 22% at 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary care of amputees including concurrent amputation and TMR, multimodal postoperative pain management, amputee-centered rehabilitation, and peer support demonstrates reduced incidence and severity of neuroma and PLP.


Assuntos
Cotos de Amputação/inervação , Amputação Cirúrgica/métodos , Amputação Cirúrgica/reabilitação , Músculo Esquelético/inervação , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Transferência de Nervo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/reabilitação , Neoplasias Ósseas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/reabilitação , Osteossarcoma/reabilitação , Osteossarcoma/cirurgia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Membro Fantasma/prevenção & controle , Sarcoma/reabilitação , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...