Long-term safety profile of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of long-term belimumab therapy combined with standard therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with active disease. METHODS: Patients who were randomized to receive intravenous placebo or belimumab 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg, plus standard therapy, and completed the initial 52-week double-blind treatment period were then allowed to enter a 24-week open-label extension phase. During the extension period, patients in the belimumab group either received the same dose or were switched to 10 mg/kg and patients in the placebo group were switched to belimumab 10 mg/kg. Patients who achieved a satisfactory response during the 24-week extension period were allowed to participate in the long-term continuation study of monthly belimumab 10 mg/kg. Adverse events (AEs) and abnormal laboratory results were analyzed per 100 patient-years in 1-year intervals. RESULTS: Of the 364 patients who completed the 52-week double-blind treatment period, 345 entered the 24-week extension, and 296 continued treatment with belimumab in the long-term continuation study. Safety data through 4 years of belimumab exposure (1,165 cumulative patient-years) are reported. Incidence rates of AEs, severe/serious AEs, infusion reactions, infections, malignancies, grades 3/4 laboratory abnormalities, and discontinuations due to AEs were stable or declined during 4-year belimumab exposure. The most common AEs included arthralgia, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, fatigue, and nausea. Serious infusion reactions were rare: only 1 occurred during the 4-year followup period. Rates of serious infection decreased from 5.9/100 patient-years to 3.4/100 patient-years, and no specific type of infection predominated. CONCLUSION: Belimumab added to standard therapy was generally well-tolerated over the 4-year treatment period in patients with SLE, which suggests that belimumab can be administered long term with an acceptable safety profile.

Omalizumab in severe allergic asthma inadequately controlled with standard therapy: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting ß(2)-agonists (LABAs) are recommended in patients with asthma that is not well-controlled; however, many patients continue to have inadequately controlled asthma despite this therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with inadequately controlled severe asthma who are receiving high-dose ICS and LABAs, with or without additional controller therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00314575). SETTING: 193 investigational sites in the United States and 4 sites in Canada. PATIENTS: 850 patients aged 12 to 75 years who had inadequately controlled asthma despite treatment with high-dose ICS plus LABAs, with or without other controllers. INTERVENTION: Omalizumab (n = 427) or placebo (n = 423) was added to existing medication regimens for 48 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was the rate of protocol-defined exacerbations over the study period. Secondary efficacy end points included the change from baseline to week 48 in mean daily number of puffs of albuterol, mean total asthma symptom score, and mean overall score on the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ[S]). Safety end points included the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: During 48 weeks, the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations was significantly reduced for omalizumab compared with placebo (0.66 vs. 0.88 per patient; P = 0.006), representing a 25% relative reduction (incidence rate ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92]). Omalizumab improved mean AQLQ(S) scores (0.29 point [CI, 0.15 to 0.43]), reduced mean daily albuterol puffs (-0.27 puff/d [CI, -0.49 to -0.04 puff/d]), and decreased mean asthma symptom score (-0.26 [CI, -0.42 to -0.10]) compared with placebo during the 48-week study period. The incidence of adverse events (80.4% vs. 79.5%) and serious adverse events (9.3% vs. 10.5%) were similar in the omalizumab and placebo groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: The results are limited by early patient discontinuation (20.8%). The study was not powered to detect rare safety events or the treatment effect in the oral corticosteroid subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this study, omalizumab provided additional clinical benefit for patients with severe allergic asthma that is inadequately controlled with high-dose ICS and LABA therapy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Genentech and Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA 134A MDI in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) (44 microg)/salmeterol (21 microg) delivered as two inhalations twice daily via a single hydrofluoroalkane (HFA 134a) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (FSC) with that of placebo HFA 134a (PLA), fluticasone propionate 44 microg chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) alone and salmeterol 21 microg CFC alone (S) in patients (n=360) with persistent asthma previously treated with beta2-agonists (short- or long-acting) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). After 12 weeks of treatment, patients treated with FSC had a significantly greater increase (p < or = 0.006) in mean FEV1 AUC(bl) compared with PLA, FP, or S. At end point, mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV1 for FSC (0.58 L) was significantly (p < or = 0.004) greater than PLA (0.14 L), FP (0.36 L), and S (0.25 L). Patients treated with FSC also had a significantly higher probability of remaining in the study without being withdrawn due to worsening asthma (2%) compared with those in the PLA (29%) and S (25%) groups (p < 0.001). Finally, treatment with FSC resulted in significantly (p < or = 0.007) greater improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, need for rescue albuterol, and asthma symptom scores compared with FP, S, and PLA. The safety profile of FSC was also similar to FP or S alone. Initial maintenance treatment of the two main components of asthma, inflammation, and smooth muscle dysfunction (e.g., bronchoconstriction), with FSC results in greater overall improvements in asthma control compared with treatment of either individual component alone.

Tolerability of retreatment with omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, during a second ragweed pollen season in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies have shown clinical benefit with omalizumab (Xolair), a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, at a dose of 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. The present open-label, 12-week study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of retreatment with omalizumab in 287 patients previously treated with this agent in one of the latter studies. Omalizumab, 300 mg, was administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks (three injections) to patients with IgE levels < or = 150 IU/mL (n = 182) and every 3 weeks (four injections) to patients with IgE levels > 150 IU/mL (n = 105) at screening before retreatment. Reported adverse events were monitored and blood samples were analyzed for laboratory safety (hematology and serum chemistry) and IgE levels. Urinalysis also was completed as part of the laboratory safety evaluation. The overall incidence and pattern of adverse events were similar to those reported in the primary study. There were no severe or serious adverse events related to omalizumab treatment and no anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected in any patient. Two patients withdrew from treatment because of adverse events (skin rash and nausea; facial erythema and edema) related to study treatment. Free IgE levels decreased to the levels associated with symptom reduction in the core study. In summary, retreatment during a second pollen season with omalizumab, 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks, was well tolerated and was not associated with any significant immunologic reactions.

Hepatic metabisulfite sensitivity in a patient with sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis is an uncommon chronic cholestatic liver disease with a poor prognosis in symptomatic cases. Genetic and immunologic alterations have been identified, and many possible etiologies have been entertained. Most treatments have limited benefit, and primary sclerosing cholangitis is a common cause for liver transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To describe a patient with documented primary sclerosing cholangitis associated with chronic ulcerative colitis, who developed hepatic toxicity following ingestion of metabisulfite. RESULTS: A placebo-controlled oral challenge suggested metabisulfite hypersensitivity with liver toxicity. He was treated with cobalamin (to prevent sulfite toxicity), low-sulfite diet, steroids, and antibiotics and has had an unusually benign course for 19 years. CONCLUSIONS: The hypersensitivity to oral metabisulfite in our patient appeared to be a significant trigger to flare-ups of his disease. Controlling the response to metabisulfite (along with recurrent antibiotic and steroid therapy) may have contributed significantly to the remarkably good outcome in this patient.

The health-related quality of life effects of once-daily cetirizine HCl syrup in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) can adversely impact children's physical, psychological, and social functioning and well-being, that is, their health-related quality of life (HRQL). This study assessed HRQL in children 6 to 11 years treated with cetirizine HCl syrup, while concurrently assessing symptomatic relief and safety. In an open-label, non-comparative study, 544 children from 124 centers in the United States were instructed to take cetirizine HCl syrup (10 cc of 1 mg/mL) each evening for 4 weeks. Children experienced statistically significant improvements in HRQL with significant reductions in mean symptom score (p < 0.001) during the treatment period. Results were consistent across age groups (6-7, 8-9, 10-11 years). These results suggest that the symptomatic relief and tolerability profile of cetirizine HC1 syrup daily translates into improvements in the HRQL of children with SAR. This 4-week open label study is among the first to evaluate the effect of antihistamine treatment on HRQL outcomes in children.

Allergic reactions to natural rubber latex at home, to rubber products, and to cross-reacting foods.

The prevalence of clinical sensitivity to natural rubber latex (NRL) has increased dramatically in the last 15 years. In the health care setting this has been associated with the increased use of latex gloves. It does not, however, explain the observation that IgE antibodies to NRL are detected in equal rates in both health care workers and the general population, with the numerous reactions occurring in homes and in health care settings in non-health care workers. This increase in NRL sensitivity has occurred at the same time as our observation of an increase in atopy. In addition, atopy is a definite risk factor that has been associated with NRL sensitivity in all studies. Exposure to NRL products outside the health care environment is significant and ubiquitous. Exposure to NRL epitopes also occurs by ingestion of foods, food additives, and pollen. This exposure is sufficient to induce IgE antibodies to both the food and NRL proteins. It is therefore difficult in an individual patient to implicate any single product as the cause of NRL sensitization leading to the development of symptoms. Outside of the health care environment there does not appear to be an increase in exposure to NRL products or to cross-reacting materials. This would suggest that there is an increase in the susceptible population, which clearly appears to be the atopic individual. A great deal of attention is devoted to reducing exposure to latex gloves in the health care setting, which may be only the visible portion of the iceberg. More attention should be devoted to reducing the antigens present in all NRL products and consideration given to developing vaccines for the food-sensitive individuals.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of cevimeline in Sjögren's syndrome patients with xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 dosages of cevimeline for the treatment of xerostomia and keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. METHODS: A 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo, 15 mg of cevimeline 3 times daily, or 30 mg of cevimeline 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline and throughout the study for their global assessment of dryness (mouth, eyes, overall) as well as their subjective assessment of the specific symptoms of dry mouth and dry eyes. Total saliva and tear flow also were measured. RESULTS: Patients taking 30 mg of cevimeline 3 times daily had statistically significant improvements in their subjective global assessment of dry eyes (P = 0.0453), dry mouth (P = 0.0004), and increased salivary flow (P = 0.007). Patients receiving the 30-mg dosage also showed greater objective improvement (increased salivary and lacrimal flow rates, as measured by Schirmer's test) than did patients receiving placebo. Frequently reported adverse events included headache, increased sweating, abdominal pain, and nausea. CONCLUSION: Treatment with cevimeline at a dosage of 30 mg 3 times daily resulted in substantive improvement by increasing the rate of saliva and tear flow in patients with Sjögren's syndrome, as well as improving subjective symptoms of dry mouth, dry eyes, and overall dryness. The 15-mg dosage relieved some symptoms, and both dosages were well tolerated.