Social determinants of health-based strategies to address vaccination disparities through a university-public health partnership.

A decline in routine vaccinations, attributed to vaccine hesitancy, undermines preventative healthcare, impacting health and exacerbating vaccine disparities. University-public health partnerships can improve vaccination services. This study describes and evaluates a university-public health use case employing social determinants of health (SDoH)-based strategies to address vaccination disparities. Guided by the Translational Science Benefits Logic Model, the partnership offered no-cost preventative vaccines at community-based organization (CBO) sites, collected CBO clientele's vaccination interest, hesitancy, and demographic data, and conducted descriptive analyses. One hundred seven vaccination events were held, administering 3,021 vaccines. This partnership enhanced health outcomes by addressing disparities through co-located vaccination and SDoH services.

Pharmacist-Led Implementation of Brief Tobacco Cessation Interventions during Mobile Health Access Events.

To address gaps in care for individuals from under-resourced communities disproportionately affected by tobacco use, this pharmacist-led demonstration project evaluated the feasibility of implementing tobacco use screening and brief cessation interventions during mobile health access events. A brief tobacco use survey was administered verbally during events at two food pantries and one homeless shelter in Indiana to assess the interest and potential demand for tobacco cessation assistance. Individuals currently using tobacco were advised to quit, assessed for their readiness to quit, and, if interested, offered a tobacco quitline card. Data were logged prospectively, analyzed using descriptive statistics, and group differences were assessed by site type (pantry versus shelter). Across 11 events (7 at food pantries and 4 at the homeless shelter), 639 individuals were assessed for tobacco use (n = 552 at food pantries; n = 87 at the homeless shelter). Among these, 189 self-reported current use (29.6%); 23.7% at food pantries, and 66.7% at the homeless shelter (p < 0.0001). About half indicated readiness to quit within 2 months; of these, 9 out of 10 accepted a tobacco quitline card. The results suggest that pharmacist-led health events at sites serving populations that are under-resourced afford unique opportunities to interface with and provide brief interventions for people who use tobacco.

Understanding the role of community pharmacies in current medication for opioid use disorder care practices.

BACKGROUND: Many barriers for patient access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) exist in current care practices. Previous literature has evaluated subsets of pharmacists, patients, and prescribers; however, few have collectively evaluated the perspectives of all 3 groups. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement in Indiana community pharmacy MOUD care practices from the perspectives of peer recovery coaches, community pharmacists, and prescribers to optimize patient care. METHODS: Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with each participant. Interviews explored stakeholders' perspectives on their current role in MOUD care practices and how current pharmacy practices could be improved. Data were analyzed using preconceived deductive and iterative inductive codes. The first author analyzed all transcripts, of which 3 were also analyzed separately by the last author to confirm consistent utilization of codes. All transcripts were coded once, followed by a second coding to ensure inductive codes were thoroughly applied. RESULTS: Ten peer recovery coaches, 10 pharmacists, and 6 prescribers were included. Interviews identified barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement in current MOUD care practices. Stigma was a major barrier identified by all groups. Other barriers identified included limited patient engagement at pharmacies and lack of access to patient-specific health information in community pharmacy settings. Pharmacists also identified additional barriers including Drug Enforcement Administration regulations and difficulties balancing patient care with external factors like insurance and legal policies. Positive prescriber/pharmacist relationships were identified as a facilitator of care. Opportunities for improvement included having community MOUD resource information available at pharmacies, further education on MOUD for pharmacists, and increased collaboration between pharmacists and prescribers. CONCLUSION: Many barriers exist in current MOUD care practices. Additional pharmacist MOUD education and intentional collaboration between pharmacists, peer recovery coaches, and prescribers would facilitate better care and leverage the accessibility of pharmacists within their communities.