RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis typically presents as a silent chronic anterior uveitis and can lead to blindness. Adherence to current screening guidelines is hampered by complex protocols which rely on the knowledge of specific JIA characteristics. The Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood identified the need to simplify screening to enable local eye care professionals (ECPs), who carry the main burden, to screen children with JIA appropriately and with confidence. METHODS: A consensus meeting took place in January 2023 in Barcelona, Spain, with an expert panel of 10 paediatric rheumatologists and 5 ophthalmologists with expertise in paediatric uveitis. A summary of the current evidence for JIA screening was presented. A nominal group technique was used to reach consensus. RESULTS: The need for a practical but safe approach that allows early uveitis detection was identified by the panel. Three screening recommendations were proposed and approved by the voting members. They represent a standardised approach to JIA screening taking into account the patient's age at the onset of JIA to determine the screening interval until adulthood. CONCLUSION: By removing the need for the knowledge of JIA categories, antinuclear antibody positivity or treatment status, the recommendations can be more easily implemented by local ECP, where limited information is available. It would improve the standard of care on the local level significantly. The proposed protocol is less tailored to the individual than the 'gold standard' ones it references and does not aim to substitute those where they are being used with confidence.
RESUMO
The approval of disease-modifying treatment in spinal muscular atrophy made the condition less severe. The course of the disease changed, but some new concerns occurred with the different new therapies. The side effects of onasemnogene aboparvovec therapy can raise differential diagnostic challenges and necessitate immune therapy, leading to immunosuppression affecting response to vaccines. We provide a pretherapy screening proposal from an infectological point of view separately for newborns treated presymptomatically and children diagnosed with symptoms at any age. Furthermore, we summarise the guidelines on the vaccination before, during, and after immune therapy (steroids) in onasemnogene aboparvovec-treated patients.
Assuntos
Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Vacinação , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Atrofias Musculares Espinais da Infância/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is an orphan disease with a prevalence of 3 in 1,000,000 children. Currently there is only one consensus treatment guideline concerning skin, pulmonary and vascular involvement for jSSc, the jSSc SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe) initiative, which was based on data procured up to 2014. Therefore, an update of these guidelines, with a more recent literature and expert experience, and extension of the guidance to more aspects of the disease is needed. AREAS COVERED: Treatment options were reviewed, and opinions were provided for most facets of jSSc including general management, some of which differs from adult systemic sclerosis, such as the use of corticosteroids, and specific organ involvement, such as skin, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and gastroenterology. EXPERT OPINION: We are suggesting the treat to target strategy to treat early to prevent cumulative disease damage in jSSc. Conclusions are derived from both expert opinion and available literature, which is mostly based on adult systemic sclerosis (aSSc), given shared pathophysiology, extrapolation of results from aSSc studies was judged reasonable.
Assuntos
Esclerodermia Localizada , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Criança , Humanos , Consenso , Escleroderma Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the coronavirus 2 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) has significantly affected people around the world, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. Although the pandemic has affected people of all ages, there is increasing evidence that children are less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and are more likely to experience milder symptoms than adults. However, children with COVID-19 can still develop serious complications, such as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). This narrative review of the literature provides an overview of the epidemiology and immune pathology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and MIS-C in children. The review also examines the genetics of COVID-19 and MIS-C in children, including the genetic factors that can influence the susceptibility and severity of the diseases and their implications for personalized medicine and vaccination strategies. By examining current evidence and insights from the literature, this review aims to contribute to the development of effective prevention and treatment strategies for COVID-19, MIS-C, and long COVID syndromes in children.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Juvenile systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an orphan disease, associated with high morbidity and mortality. New treatment strategies are much needed, but clearly defining appropriate outcomes is necessary if successful therapies are to be developed. Our objective here was to propose such outcomes. METHODS: This proposal is the result of 4 face-to-face consensus meetings with a 27-member multidisciplinary team of pediatric rheumatologists, adult rheumatologists, dermatologists, pediatric cardiologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a statistician, and patients. Throughout the process, we reviewed the existing adult data in this field, the more limited pediatric literature for juvenile SSc outcomes, and data from 2 juvenile SSc patient cohorts to assist in making informed, data-driven decisions. The use of items for each domain as an outcome measure in an open label 12-month clinical trial of juvenile SSc was voted and agreed upon using a nominal group technique. RESULTS: After voting, the domains agreed on were global disease activity, skin, Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and gastrointestinal involvement, and quality of life. Fourteen outcome measures had 100% agreement, 1 item had 91% agreement, and 1 item had 86% agreement. The domains of biomarkers and growth/development were moved to the research agenda. CONCLUSION: We reached consensus on multiple domains and items that should be assessed in an open label, 12-month clinical juvenile SSc trial as well as a research agenda for future development.
Assuntos
Doença de Raynaud , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Consenso , Qualidade de Vida , Doença de Raynaud/tratamento farmacológico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicaçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to provide evidence of validity and reliability for 4 parent/child-reported outcome measures included in the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology juvenile idiopathic arthritis core domain set: the evaluation of the child's pain and level of disease activity, the assessment of morning stiffness duration, and an active joint count for proxy/self-assessment. METHODS: Patients were included in the multinational study Epidemiology Treatment and Outcome of Childhood Arthritis. Criterion validity was assessed by examining the correlation of the 4 tested measures with physician measures and the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10) in the whole sample and after grouping patients by International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) category, geographic area, and education level. Reliability was assessed comparing 2 visits 7-14 days apart with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: A total of 8,643 parents and 6,060 patients had all the evaluations available. Correlations of tested measures were moderate (0.4-0.7) with physician-reported measures. The level of correlation with the cJADAS10 remained stable after grouping patients by ILAR category, geographic areas, and level of education of the parent filling the questionnaire. In 442 parents and 344 children, ICCs ranged between 0.79 and 0.87 for parents and 0.81 and 0.88 for children. CONCLUSION: The 4 tested parent/child-reported outcomes showed good criterion validity and excellent reliability. These tools can be considered for remote patient assessment, when in-person evaluation might not be possible.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil , Reumatologia , Humanos , Artrite Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artrite Juvenil/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Pais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Psicometria , Nível de Saúde , Avaliação da DeficiênciaRESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with autoimmunity and systemic inflammation. Patients with autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD) may be at high risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In this review, based on evidence from the literature, as well as international scientific recommendations, we review the relationships between COVID-19, autoimmunity and patients with autoimmune RMDs, as well as the basics of a multisystemic inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19. We discuss the repurposing of pharmaceutics used to treat RMDs, the principles for the treatment of patients with autoimmune RMDs during the pandemic and the main aspects of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in autoimmune RMD patients.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Autoimunidade , COVID-19/complicações , Humanos , Inflamação , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency in which the physician provides a global assessment of disease activity (PhGA) >0 and an active joint count (AJC)=0 in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and search for determinants of divergence between the two measures. METHODS: Data were extracted from a multinational cross-sectional dataset of 9966 patients who had JIA by International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, were recruited between 2011 and 2016, and had both PhGA and AJC recorded by the caring paediatric rheumatologist at the study visit. Determinants of discordance between PhGA>0 and AJC=0 were searched for by multivariable logistic regression and dominance analyses. RESULTS: The PhGA was scored >0 in 1647 (32.3%) of 5103 patients who had an AJC of 0. Independent associations with discordant assessment were identified for tender or restricted joint count >0, history of enthesitis, presence of active uveitis or systemic features, enthesitis-related or systemic arthritis, increased acute phase reactants, pain visual analogue scale (VAS)>0, and impaired physical or psychosocial well-being. In dominance analysis, tender joint count accounted for 35.43% of PhGA variance, followed by pain VAS>0 (17.72%), restricted joint count >0 (16.14%) and physical health score >0 (11.42%). CONCLUSION: We found that many paediatric rheumatologists did not mark a score of 0 for patients who they found not to have active joints. The presence of pain in joints not meeting the definition of active joint used in JIA was the main determinant of this phenomenon.
Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil , Médicos , Artrite Juvenil/complicações , Artrite Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artrite Juvenil/epidemiologia , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Dor , Medição da DorRESUMO
Összefoglaló. A krónikus autoimmun betegségben szenvedokben a súlyos COVID-19 kialakulásának kockázata magasabb, a SARS-CoV-2-fertozés pedig a krónikus alapbetegség progressziójához, fellángolásához vezethet. A COVID-19 elkerülésének legbiztonságosabb, legköltséghatékonyabb módszere a vakcináció, illetve az emellett alkalmazott higiénés szabályok betartása, a megfelelo maszk viselése. A hiedelemmel ellentétben önmagában az autoimmun megbetegedés nem jelent oltási ellenjavallatot, sot a rizikóállapot miatt ezek a betegek az elsok között oltandók. A COVID-19 elleni vakcina alkalmazásának egyetlen egyértelmu kontraindikációja az anamnézisben szereplo súlyos allergiás reakció (anafilaxia) a vakcina valamelyik alkotórészével szemben. A betegek olthatóságát többek között befolyásolja az aktuális betegségaktivitás és az alkalmazott kezelés. Az immunizáció idejét a legbiztonságosabban a gondozó orvos tervezheti meg. Az autoimmun betegek immunizációja során észlelheto oltási reakciók és szövodmények incidenciája megegyezik az egészséges populációban is tapasztalt elofordulási gyakorisággal. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(11): 414-423. Summary. The risk of developing severe COVID-19 is higher in patients with autoimmune diseases, and SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to progression and exacerbation of the underlying chronic disease. The safest and most cost-effective way to avoid COVID-19 is to be vaccinated, to follow the hygiene rules and to wear an appropriate mask. Contrary to belief, autoimmune disease alone is not a contraindication to vaccination and, in fact, patients should be among the first to be vaccinated because of the risk. The only clear contraindication to the use of COVID-19 vaccine is a history of severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) to any of the components of the vaccine. Indication of vaccination migh be influenced by, among other things, the current disease activity and the treatment applied. The timing of immunization can be the most safely planned by the attending physician. The incidence of vaccination reactions and complications during immunization in autoimmune patients is similar to that seen in the healthy population. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(11): 414-423.
Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe risk factors for IBD development in a cohort of children with JIA. METHODS: JIA patients who developed IBD were identified from the international Pharmachild register. Characteristics were compared between IBD and non-IBD patients and predictors of IBD were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Incidence rates of IBD events on different DMARDs were calculated, and differences between therapies were expressed as relative risks (RR). RESULTS: Out of 8942 patients, 48 (0.54% ) developed IBD. These were more often male (47.9% vs 32.0%) and HLA-B27 positive (38.2% vs 21.0%) and older at JIA onset (median 8.94 vs 5.33 years) than patients without IBD development. They also had more often a family history of autoimmune disease (42.6% vs 24.4%) and enthesitis-related arthritis (39.6% vs 10.8%). The strongest predictors of IBD on multivariable analysis were enthesitis-related arthritis [odds ratio (OR): 3.68, 95% CI: 1.41, 9.40] and a family history of autoimmune disease (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 4.54). Compared with methotrexate monotherapy, the incidence of IBD on etanercept monotherapy (RR: 7.69, 95% CI: 1.99, 29.74), etanercept with methotrexate (RR: 5.70, 95% CI: 1.42, 22.77) and infliximab (RR: 7.61, 95% CI: 1.27, 45.57) therapy was significantly higher. Incidence on adalimumab was not significantly different (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.15, 13.89). CONCLUSION: IBD in JIA was associated with enthesitis-related arthritis and a family history of autoimmune disease. An increased IBD incidence was observed for etanercept therapy regardless of concomitant methotrexate use.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Juvenil , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Juvenil/epidemiologia , Criança , Etanercepte/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with mevalonate kinase deficiency during the open label extension (weeks 41-113) of the randomized controlled CLUSTER trial. METHODS: During a 72-week period, patients received open-label canakinumab 150 or 300 mg, every 4 or 8 weeks. The disease activity was evaluated every 8 weeks using physician global assessment and counting the number of flares. Concentrations of CRP and serum amyloid A protein were measured. The safety was studied by determination and classification of observed adverse events. The safety and efficacy were analysed separately in three subgroups of patients receiving a cumulative dose of less than <35 mg/kg, ≥35 to <70 mg/kg or ≥70 mg/kg. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients who started the CLUSTER study, 66 entered Epoch 4 and 65 completed it. During the 72-week period, 42 (64%) patients experienced no flares, while 13 (20%) had one flare, as compared with a median of 12 flares per year reported at baseline. Low physician global assessment scores were seen at the end of the study for all groups with >90% reporting minimal disease activity or none at all. Median CRP concentrations were consistently equal or lower than 10 mg/l, while median serum amyloid A concentrations remained only slightly above the normal range of 10 mg/l. The study showed no new or unexpected adverse events. CONCLUSION: Canakinumab proved effective to control disease activity and prevent flares in mevalonate kinase deficiency during the 72-week study period. No new safety concerns were reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02059291. https://clinicaltrials.gov.
Assuntos
Deficiência de Mevalonato Quinase , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Deficiência de Mevalonato Quinase/tratamento farmacológico , Proteína Amiloide A Sérica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Összefoglaló. Az új típusú koronavírus-fertozés (COVID-19) nagy terhet ró az egészségügyi ellátórendszerre és a társadalomra. A betegségnek három nagy szakasza van, melyek alapvetoen meghatározzák a kezelést. Az I-IIA fázisban az antivirális, míg a IIB-III. fázisban a gyulladásgátló kezelés áll elotérben, melyhez intenzív terápiás, szupportív kezelés csatlakozik. A jelen ajánlás kizárólag a gyógyszeres kezelésre vonatkozik, és a rendelkezésre álló bizonyítékok alapján foglalja össze a terápiás lehetoségeket. Emellett egy javasolt kezelési algoritmust is tartalmaz. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(17): 643-651. Summary. The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) places a heavy burden on the health care system and our society. There are three major stages in the disease that fundamentally determine treatment approaches. Phases I-IIA require primarily antiviral treatment. In phases IIB-III, anti-inflammatory treatment is needed accompanied by intensive and supportive care. This recommendation applies only to pharmacotherapy and summarizes the therapeutic options based on the available evidence. It also includes a proposed treatment algorithm. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(17): 643-651.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios , Antivirais , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , HumanosRESUMO
Összefoglaló. A SARS-CoV-2-fertozés ritka gyermekkori szövodménye a sokszervi gyulladás, angol terminológiával paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS). Két vagy több szerv érintettségével járó, súlyos tünetekkel induló betegségrol van szó, amelynek tünetei átfedést mutatnak a Kawasaki-betegséggel, a toxikus sokk szindrómával és a makrofágaktivációs szindrómával. A PIMS-betegek intenzív terápiás osztályon vagy intenzív terápiás háttérrel rendelkezo intézményben kezelendok, ahol biztosítottak a kardiológiai ellátás feltételei is. A szükséges immunterápia a klinikai prezentációtól függ. A jelen közleményben a szerzok a releváns nemzetközi irodalom áttekintését követoen ajánlást tesznek a PIMS diagnosztikai és terápiás algoritmusára. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(17): 652-667. Summary. Pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) is a rare complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. PIMS is a severe condition, involving two or more organ systems. The symptoms overlap with Kawasaki disease, toxic shock syndrome and macrophage activation syndrome. PIMS patients should be treated in an intensive care unit or in an institution with an intensive care background, where cardiological care is also provided. The required specific immunotherapy depends on the clinical presentation. In this paper, after reviewing the relevant international literature, the authors make a recommendation for the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for PIMS. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(17): 652-667.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica , Algoritmos , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virologia , Criança , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/terapia , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/virologiaRESUMO
Juvenile systemic sclerosis (JSSc) is a rare disease of childhood and currently no international consensus exists with regard to its assessment and treatment. This SHARE (Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe) initiative, based on expert opinion informed by the best available evidence, provides recommendations for the assessment and treatment of patients with JSSc with a view to improving their outcome. Experts focused attention not only on the skin assessment but also on the early signs of internal organ involvement whose proper treatment can significantly affect the long-term outcome. A score for disease severity is proposed in order to perform a structured assessment of outcome over time but a validation in a wider patient population is recommended. Finally, a stepwise treatment approach is proposed in order to unify the standard of care throughout Europe with the aim to reduce morbidity and mortality in this disease.
Assuntos
Esclerodermia Localizada/tratamento farmacológico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Consenso , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Esclerodermia Localizada/diagnóstico , Escleroderma Sistêmico/diagnóstico , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 canakinumab monotherapy tapering regimens in order to maintain complete clinical remission in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: The study was designed as a 2-part phase IIIb/IV open-label, randomized trial. In the first part, patients received 4 mg/kg of canakinumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks and discontinued glucocorticoids and/or methotrexate as appropriate. Patients in whom clinical remission was achieved (inactive disease for at least 24 weeks) with canakinumab monotherapy were entered into the second part of the trial, in which they were randomized 1:1 into 1 of 2 treatment arms. In arm 1, the dose of canakinumab was reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg and then to 1 mg/kg, followed by discontinuation. In arm 2, the 4 mg/kg dose interval was prolonged from every 4 weeks, to every 8 weeks, and then to every 12 weeks, followed by discontinuation. In both arms, canakinumab exposure could be reduced provided systemic JIA remained in clinical remission for 24 weeks with each step. The primary objective was to assess whether >40% of randomized patients in either arm maintained clinical remission of systemic JIA for 24 weeks in the first part of the study. RESULTS: In part 1 of the study, 182 patients were enrolled, with 75 of those patients randomized before entering part 2 of the trial. Among the 75 randomized patients, clinical remission was maintained for 24 weeks in 27 (71%) of 38 patients in arm 1 (2 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and 31 (84%) of 37 patients in arm 2 (4 mg/kg every 8 weeks) (P ≤ 0.0001 for arm 1 versus arm 2 among those meeting the 40% threshold). Overall, 25 (33%) of 75 patients discontinued canakinumab, and clinical remission was maintained for at least 24 weeks in all 25 of these patients. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: Reduction of canakinumab exposure may be feasible in patients who have achieved clinical remission of systemic JIA, but consistent interleukin-1 inhibition appears necessary to maintain this response.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Redução da Medicação/métodos , Adolescente , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/fisiopatologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Desprescrições , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Indução de RemissãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab and explore prediction of response in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with or without fever at treatment initiation. METHODS: At enrollment, patients with active systemic JIA (ages 2 to <20 years) started open-label canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks subcutaneously). Efficacy measures included the adapted American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 50/70/90 criteria, the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS), and clinically inactive disease and clinical remission on medication, evaluated by either the JADAS or ACR criteria. RESULTS: Of the 123 patients (70 with fever and 52 without fever [fever status was not reported for 1 patient]), 84 (68.3%) completed the study (median duration 1.8 years). Comparable efficacy (adapted ACR Pediatric 50/70/90/100) was observed by day 15 in both subgroups (60.0%/48.6%/37.1%/24.3% in those with fever and 67.3%/48.1%/34.6%/19.2% in those without fever), and further increased thereafter. By month 6, clinical remission according to the JADAS or the ACR criteria was achieved in 17 (24.3%) and 26 (37.1%), respectively, of patients with fever and 9 (17.3%) and 12 (23.1%), respectively, of patients without fever. Median time to onset of clinical remission according to the JADAS or ACR criteria was 57 and 30 days, respectively, in those with fever, and 58 and 142 days, respectively, in those without fever. An adapted ACR Pediatric 50 response by day 15 was the strongest predictor of achieving clinical remission according to the JADAS (odds ratio [OR] 13 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4, 42]; P < 0.0001) or glucocorticoid discontinuation (OR 19 [95% CI 3, 114]; P = 0.002). Of the 71 of 123 patients (57.7%) who received glucocorticoids at study entry, 27 (38.0%) discontinued glucocorticoids and 21 (29.6%) reached a dose of <0.2 mg/kg/day, with no difference between those with and those without fever; 13 patients (10.6%) tolerated a sustained canakinumab dose reduction to 2 mg/kg every 4 weeks. No new safety findings were observed. CONCLUSION: Canakinumab provided rapid and sustained improvement of active systemic JIA irrespective of the presence of fever at treatment initiation.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Juvenil/complicações , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Febre/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To derive a list of opportunistic infections (OI) through the analysis of the juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients in the Pharmachild registry by an independent Safety Adjudication Committee (SAC). METHODS: The SAC (3 pediatric rheumatologists and 2 pediatric infectious disease specialists) elaborated and approved by consensus a provisional list of OI for use in JIA. Through a 5 step-procedure, all the severe and serious infections, classified as per MedDRA dictionary and retrieved in the Pharmachild registry, were evaluated by the SAC by answering six questions and adjudicated with the agreement of 3/5 specialists. A final evidence-based list of OI resulted by matching the adjudicated infections with the provisional list of OI. RESULTS: A total of 772 infectious events in 572 eligible patients, of which 335 serious/severe/very severe non-OI and 437 OI (any intensity/severity), according to the provisional list, were retrieved. Six hundred eighty-two of 772 (88.3%) were adjudicated as infections, of them 603/682 (88.4%) as common and 119/682 (17.4%) as OI by the SAC. Matching these 119 opportunistic events with the provisional list, 106 were confirmed by the SAC as OI, and among them infections by herpes viruses were the most frequent (68%), followed by tuberculosis (27.4%). The remaining events were divided in the groups of non-OI and possible/patient and/or pathogen-related OI. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant number of OI in JIA patients on immunosuppressive therapy. The proposed list of OI, created by consensus and validated in the Pharmachild cohort, could facilitate comparison among future pharmacovigilance studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01399281; ENCePP seal: awarded on 25 November 2011.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Infecções Oportunistas/diagnóstico , Artrite Juvenil/complicações , Artrite Juvenil/patologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Herpes Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções Oportunistas/etiologia , Farmacovigilância , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/etiologiaRESUMO
Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified that the author Joan Calzada should not have been included to the team of authors. The authors' team, thus, should be as follows.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: JIA-associated uveitis (JIAU) is a serious, sight-threatening disease with significant long-term complications and risk of blindness, even with improved contemporary treatments. The MIWGUC was set up in order to propose specific JIAU activity and response items and to validate their applicability for clinical outcome studies. METHODS: The group consists of 8 paediatric rheumatologists and 7 ophthalmologists. A consensus meeting took place on November 2015 in Barcelona (Spain) with the objective of validating the previously proposed measures. The validation process was based on the results of a prospective open, international, multi-centre, cohort study designed to validate the outcome measures proposed by the initial MIWGUC group meeting in 2012. The meeting used the same Delphi and nominal group technique as previously described in the first paper from the MIWGUC group (Arthritis Care Res 64:1365-72, 2012). Patients were included with a diagnosis of JIA, aged less than 18 years, and with active uveitis or an uveitis flare which required treatment with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug. The proposed outcome measures for uveitis were collected by an ophthalmologist and for arthritis by a paediatric rheumatologist. Patient reported outcome measures were also measured. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were enrolled into the validation cohort. Fifty four percent (n = 44) had persistent oligoarthritis followed by rheumatoid factor negative polyarthritis (n = 15, 18%). The mean uveitis disease duration was 3.3 years (SD 3.0). Bilateral eye involvement was reported in 65 (79.3%) patients. The main findings are that the most significant changes, from baseline to 6 months, are found in the AC activity measures of cells and flare. These measures correlate with the presence of pre-existing structural complications and this has implications for the reporting of trials using a single measure as a primary outcome. We also found that visual analogue scales of disease activity showed significant change when reported by the ophthalmologist, rheumatologist and families. The measures formed three relatively distinct groups. The first group of measures comprised uveitis activity, ocular damage and the ophthalmologists' VAS. The second comprised patient reported outcomes including disruption to school attendance. The third group consisted of the rheumatologists' VAS and the joint score. CONCLUSIONS: We propose distinctive and clinically significant measures of disease activity, severity and damage for JIAU. This effort is the initial step for developing a comprehensive outcome measures for JIAU, which incorporates the perspectives of rheumatologists, ophthalmologists, patients and families.