Can We Reach a Consensus on the Appropriate Use of Before and After Photos in Breast Surgery?

Breast surgery is an area of practice where patients value before and after photographs (BAPs). Consensus is needed to develop guidelines to address the deficit in the literature regarding appropriate use of BAPs, as these may ultimately play a significant role in the breast surgery consent process. METHODS: Expert breast reconstructive surgeons participated in a modified nominal group technique (NGT) to establish expert consensus on categories and criteria to be used when evaluating appropriate use of BAPs as part of informed consent. Endorsement rate of 75% and coefficients of variance within and between rounds were conducted to determine validity of each criteria item's rank order. RESULTS: Eight experts participated in the NGT in-person meeting and subsequent online survey. five of seven categories were endorsed for discussion: purpose, image type, anatomy, results, and photographic integrity. Overall consensus was obtained for six of 11 criteria. Criteria items found to have consensus were: patients considering surgery being the intended photograph audience (100% endorsement, CV1 - CV2 = 0.01), use of photographic images (75% endorsement, CV1 - CV2 = 0.04), defining the standard clinical photograph by having patients in the same body position (100% endorsement, CV1 - CV2 = 0.14), anonymizing images by removing all digital tags (88% endorsement, CV1 - CV2 = 0.03) and patient identifiers (75% endorsement, CV1 - CV2 = 0.00), not limiting the number of photograph sets needed for sufficient representation (100% endorsement, CV1 - CV2 = 0.07), and representing average outcomes (100%, CV1 - CV2 = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Early use of this validated and effective technique helps identify potential consensus categories and criteria that surgeons recommend for the use of BAPs in the informed consent process. Further study is required.

Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and Dwell in Breast Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: The use of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has expanded over the last 3 decades, paralleled and documented by an increase in research. This article discusses the evolution and current applications of NPWT in modern breast reconstruction. Negative-pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) technology can be used to remove infectious material, facilitate salvaging compromised tissue, and stabilize the soft-tissue environment. Published consensus NPWTi-d guidelines can aid in treatment selection and implementation of this new technology. The therapeutic approach of simultaneously removing infectious material and actively improving mastectomy flap perfusion and thickness is a burgeoning concept, and illustrative cases are presented. NPWTi-d preliminary use has led to reconstruction salvage with reproducible early experience and outcomes, and it is hoped that it will raise interest and awareness of this promising application of the technology to improve breast reconstruction outcomes.

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation: International consensus guidelines update.

The use of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) has gained wider adoption and interest due in part to the increasing complexity of wounds and patient conditions. Best practices for the use of NPWTi-d have shifted in recent years based on a growing body of evidence and expanded worldwide experience with the technology. To better guide the use of NPWTi-d with all dressing and setting configurations, as well as solutions, there is a need to publish updated international consensus guidelines, which were last produced over 6 years ago. An international, multidisciplinary expert panel of clinicians was convened on 22 to 23 February 2019, to assist in developing current recommendations for best practices of the use of NPWTi-d. Principal aims of the meeting were to update recommendations based on panel members' experience and published results regarding topics such as appropriate application settings, topical wound solution selection, and wound and patient characteristics for the use of NPWTi-d with various dressing types. The final consensus recommendations were derived based on greater than 80% agreement among the panellists. The guidelines in this publication represent further refinement of the recommended parameters originally established for the use of NPWTi-d. The authors thank Karen Beach and Ricardo Martinez for their assistance with manuscript preparation.