Wild meat consumption in tropical forests spares a significant carbon footprint from the livestock production sector.

Whether sustainable or not, wild meat consumption is a reality for millions of tropical forest dwellers. Yet estimates of spared greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from consuming wild meat, rather than protein from the livestock sector, have not been quantified. We show that a mean per capita wild meat consumption of 41.7 kg yr-1 for a population of ~ 150,000 residents at 49 Amazonian and Afrotropical forest sites can spare ~ 71 MtCO2-eq annually under a bovine beef substitution scenario, but only ~ 3 MtCO2-eq yr-1 if this demand is replaced by poultry. Wild meat offtake by these communities could generate US$3M or US$185K in carbon credit revenues under an optimistic scenario (full compliance with the Paris Agreement by 2030; based on a carbon price of US$50/tCO2-eq) and US$1M or US$77K under a conservative scenario (conservative carbon price of US$20.81/tCO2-eq), representing considerable incentives for forest conservation and potential revenues for local communities. However, the wild animal protein consumption of ~ 43% of all consumers in our sample was below the annual minimum per capita rate required to prevent human malnutrition. We argue that managing wild meat consumption can serve the interests of climate change mitigation efforts in REDD + accords through avoided GHG emissions from the livestock sector, but this requires wildlife management that can be defined as verifiably sustainable.

Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought humanity's strained relationship with nature into sharp focus, with calls for cessation of wild meat trade and consumption, to protect public health and biodiversity.1,2 However, the importance of wild meat for human nutrition, and its tele-couplings to other food production systems, mean that the complete removal of wild meat from diets and markets would represent a shock to global food systems.3-6 The negative consequences of this shock deserve consideration in policy responses to COVID-19. We demonstrate that the sudden policy-induced loss of wild meat from food systems could have negative consequences for people and nature. Loss of wild meat from diets could lead to food insecurity, due to reduced protein and nutrition, and/or drive land-use change to replace lost nutrients with animal agriculture, which could increase biodiversity loss and emerging infectious disease risk. We estimate the magnitude of these consequences for 83 countries, and qualitatively explore how prohibitions might play out in 10 case study places. Results indicate that risks are greatest for food-insecure developing nations, where feasible, sustainable, and socially desirable wild meat alternatives are limited. Some developed nations would also face shocks, and while high-capacity food systems could more easily adapt, certain places and people would be disproportionately impacted. We urge decision-makers to consider potential unintended consequences of policy-induced shocks amidst COVID-19; and take holistic approach to wildlife trade interventions, which acknowledge the interconnectivity of global food systems and nature, and include safeguards for vulnerable people.

Gall midge attack intensity and host-plant response in a Neotropical coastal ecosystem / Intensidade do parasitismo de inseto galhador e resposta da planta hospedeira em um ecossistema neotropical costeiro

The gall inducer Clusiamyia nitida Maia, 1996 (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) often infests the shrub Clusia lanceolata (Camb.) (Clusiaceae) in the Neotropical vegetation of restinga of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Leaves of Clusia lanceolata host up to 20 spheroid galls and show variation in their shape. We aimed to evaluate the effect of gall's intensity on leaves of Clusia lanceolata, and the extension of gall's impact on adjacent non-galled leaves. We analyzed the effect of the number of galls on leaf area, biomass, specific area and leaf appearance from 509 leaves of 14 individual plants. The results showed that differences of individual plants, pairs of leaves, and gall presence were responsible for more then 90 percent of variation on infested leaves. Variation on parasitic intensity level created differences in leaf response. Under moderate gall attack characterized by scattered galls on a leaf, the increase of the number of galls caused an increase of leaf biomass and area, and a decrease of specific area. The specific area was smaller also under high attack intensity, characterized by coalescent galls on a leaf. In those cases of extremely high parasitic intensity, galled leaves became deformed and the surface area was severely reduced. Leaf deformation due to gall attack led to early leaf abscission, indicated by the 90 percent of deformed leaves found in the youngest leaf pair of the branch. There was insufficient evidence that the impact of galls on leaf morpho-physiological parameters extended beyond the attacked leaves, because ungalled leaves did not change significantly when their opposite leaf had been galled.

O inseto galhador Clusiamyia nitida, 1996 (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) freqüentemente infesta o arbusto Clusia lanceolata (Camb.) (Clusiaceae) na vegetação Neotropical de restinga do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. As folhas de Clusia lanceolata hospedam até 20 galhas esferóides e apresentam variações em sua forma. Buscamos avaliar o efeito da intensidade de galhas nas folhas de Clusia lanceolata, e a extensão do impacto de galhas em folhas adjacentes não-galhadas. Analisamos o efeito do número de galhas sobre a área foliar, biomassa, área específica e aparência foliar de 509 folhas de 14 indivíduos. Os resultados indicaram que diferenças individuais entre plantas, nos pares de folhas e na presença de galhas, foram responsáveis por mais de 90 por cento de variação entre folhas infestadas. A variação na intensidade de parasitismo criou diferenças de resposta foliar. Sob ataque moderado, caracterizado pela presença de galhas esparsas nas folhas, o aumento do número de galhas provocou o aumento de biomassa e área foliar e a diminuição da área específica. A área específica também foi menor sob ataque de alta intensidade, caracterizado por galhas unidas. Nos casos de parasitismo extremo, as folhas galhadas tornaram-se deformadas, apresentando a superfície foliar severamente reduzida. A deformação das folhas geradas pela presença de galhas provocou abscisão precoce, indicada pelos 90 por cento de folhas deformadas encontradas apenas nos pares mais jovens de folhas. Não houve evidencias suficientes que indicassem o impacto das galhas em parâmetros morfo-fisiológicos além das folhas atacadas, já que folhas não galhadas não sofreram alterações quando opostas a folhas galhadas.

New gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) associated with two species of Eugenia (Myrtaceae)

Jorgenseniella eugeniae, gen. nov., sp. nov. e Dasineura marginalis, sp. nov. são descritos com base em material obtido de galhas foliares em Eugenia umbelliflora e E. rotundifolia (Myrtaceae). Ilustracões dos adultos, fases imaturas e galhas são fornecidas. Trotteria sp. (inquilino) e Lestodiplosis sp. (predador) estão associados com as espécies galhadoras. Aspectos ecológicos das galhas e das espécies de cecidógenos são também apresentados.