Using ceftazidime-avibactam for persistent carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens infection highlights antimicrobial stewardship challenges with new beta-lactam-inhibitor combination antibiotics.

The newer beta-lactam-inhibitor combination (BLIC) antibiotics are available in South Africa (SA) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. We describe the successful use of ceftazidime-avibactam (CA) for the treatment of a child with persistent carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens bacteraemia, and the challenges faced using this lifesaving antibiotic, including access to susceptibility testing, procurement process, cost and complexity of deciding when, how and for how long to use it. Furthermore, the burden of carbapenem resistance is increasing in SA, and inappropriate use of CA and other newer BLIC antibiotics, such as ceftolozane-tazobactam, will inevitably endanger their longevity. A careful balance must be struck between removing unnecessary obstacles and delays in initiating these antibiotics for life-threatening infections, and additional antimicrobial stewardship-guided interventions aimed at preserving their therapeutic use.

Short-term outcomes of down-referral in provision of paediatric antiretroviral therapy at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The large scale-up of paediatric HIV care necessitated down-referral of many children receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) from Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (RCWMCH), Cape Town, South Africa. Few published data exist on the outcomes of these children. OBJECTIVES: To assess outcomes of children receiving ART in the first 12 months after down-referral to primary healthcare (PHC) clinics and identify determinants of successful down-referral. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of children <15 years of age who initiated ART at RCWMCH and were subsequently down-referred to one of two PHC clinics between January 2006 and December 2012 was completed. Baseline characteristics of patients and caregivers as well as CD4+ counts, viral loads (VLs) and weights were collected 6 and 12 months after down-referral. Outcomes included retention in care and viral suppression. RESULTS: Of 116 children down-referred to the two study PHC clinics, 81.9% arrived at the designated PHC clinic and a further 8.6% continued care at other clinics, the remaining 9.5% being lost to follow-up. Of those successfully down-referred, 11.4% took >8 weeks to present, possibly experiencing treatment interruption. At 12 months after down-referral, only 81.0% remained in care. No factors were associated with retention in care in multivariable analysis. For children who remained in care at the designated PHC clinics, the clinical and immunological gains achieved prior to down-referral were sustained through 12 months of follow-up, and 54.7% of this cohort had documented viral suppression at 12 months. However, if only children with VL results are considered, 75.9% (41/54) were virally suppressed 12 months after down-referral. CONCLUSIONS: Down-referral of children on ART is complex, with risk of loss to follow-up and treatment interruption.