The French National Authority for Health reports on thoracic stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of stent grafts in the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. METHOD: Our health technology assessment method combined a critical review of the literature with experts' opinions. Several databases, useful Web sites, and the gray literature were searched from January 1995 to December 2004. Some manually retrieved major articles published in 2005 were also included. The draft report was submitted to and discussed by a working group of 12 members nominated by relevant medical societies. The amended report was submitted to a multidisciplinary group of 12 peer reviewers for comment. RESULTS: Endovascular stent grafting (ESG) repair for lesions of the thoracic aorta, including aneurysms, dissections, and aortic isthmus ruptures, is probably beneficial in terms of operative mortality and severe morbidity, with an incidence of paraplegia of 2.1% (range 0%-7%) for ESG vs 5% (range, 3%-15%) for surgery, provided that there is a rigorous medium-term assessment and that anatomic factors are favorable. A proximal neck length of at least 2 cm is needed to insert the stent graft. Indications for ESG in thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection are similar to those for surgery. Endovascular stent grafting is particularly appropriate in patients with multiple traumas to the thoracic aorta in whom concomitant lesions are a contraindication to open surgery. Endovascular stent graft repair can only be done in public or private centers with expertise in both endovascular and surgical procedures and with adequate technical facilities. Patients should be informed of the advantages and drawbacks of both methods. A multidisciplinary discussion should address risks of converting to open surgery and possible need for a cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients should be monitored annually by computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiographs because long-term results are uncertain (possible stent graft deterioration, onset of aortic disease). They should be told of the need for surveillance and possible further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A prospective registry of all thoracic aorta procedures (endovascular treatment, open surgery, thoracic ESG plus extra-anatomic bypass) needs to be set up. All practitioners and stent graft manufacturers should contribute to this registry. It should include information on patient monitoring in order to (1) select patients who could be treated by ESG repair, (2) assess the feasibility of a randomized controlled study comparing ESG and surgery, (3) assess the medium-term outcome of different devices, and (4) obtain a better understanding of the health economics aspects.

Modalities of preoperative imaging of the internal carotid artery used in France.

A survey of the 382 members of the Société de Chirurgie Vasculaire de Langue Française was conducted to determine preferred imaging techniques for preoperative assessment of the proximal internal carotid artery. A total of 180 questionnaires were returned concerning 9390 carotid stenoses treated in the year 2000. Doppler ultrasound (DUS), angiography, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and computed tomography angiography (CTA) were routinely used in 99%, 51.5%, 4%, and 3% of cases. Usual work-up methods involved DUS and angiography in 64% of cases, DUS and MRA in 7%, and DUS and CTA in 4% of cases. Indications for endarterectomy were based on DUS and angiography findings in 69% of cases, on DUS and MRA findings in 14%, on DUS and CTA findings in 9%, and on DUS findings alone in 8%. In-house access to CTA or MRA was more frequent at state-run institutions (p = 0.00001). Indication of endarterectomy based on DUS and MRA was more common at institutions equipped with technical facilities for MRA (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.001). An inverse correlation was observed between the number of carotid artery procedures performed and use of DUS and angiography work-up. The number of carotid endarterectomies without angiography is increasing in France. Preoperative DUS is still routinely used. Combined DUS and MRA is the preferred work-up for endarterectomy without angiography. Lack of access to MRA is still a limiting factor. Further study will be needed to evaluate the benefits and risks of endarterectomy without angiography.