RESUMO
Objective: Assessment of the utility of smartphone fundoscopy in diagnosing posterior pole pathologies. Methods: An iPhone 12 and a 20D Volk lens were used for smartphone fundoscopy. Patients needing bedside consultation were examined with direct ophthalmoscopy and smartphone fundoscopy. Some patients were examined with this technique after slit lamp examination. Results: Over one year 23 bedside fundus examinations were performed and 2 papilledema were diagnosed. After initial slit lamp examination, photos of various pathologies were taken: age-related macular degeneration, branch retinal artery occlusion, arterial embolus, branch retinal vein occlusion, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, myelinated retinal nerve fiber layer, choroidal naevus. Discussion: With the 20D lens, the image is overturned, magnified 3,13X, and the field of view is 46°. The utility was demonstrated in literature by teaching students this technique and using it in screening for retinopathy of prematurity. The weighted retinal irradiance was measured in two studies. It was 4,6 mW/cm2 in one and from 0,58 to 2,30 mW/cm2 in the other, within safe limits. Conclusions: Smartphone fundoscopy is a fast, accessible, and safe technique for fundus examinations. Other departments could use it for the diagnosis of papilledema.
Assuntos
Fundo de Olho , Oftalmoscopia , Smartphone , Humanos , Oftalmoscopia/métodos , Doenças Retinianas/diagnóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Desenho de EquipamentoRESUMO
Objectives: The first purpose is to present the diagnosis and therapeutic approach in a patient with sterile endophthalmitis associated with triamcinolone acetonide injection. The secondary objective is to assess the incidence of this complication and to summarize the risk factors described in the literature. Case presentation: A 76-year-old male patient presented for painless, unilateral, decreased visual acuity, four days after cataract surgery and simultaneously intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for diabetic macular edema in the right eye. The diagnosis of sterile endophthalmitis was made. Eight days after the presentation, the symptoms subsided, the maximum corrected visual acuity reaching that before the procedures. Discussions: The incidence of sterile endophthalmitis varies in the literature between 0% and 23.8%. Visual prognosis is good, although the pathogenesis is not fully understood. Preservatives in injectable solutions have been suggested, however, there are studies in which inflammation was also present with preservative-free products. The particle size of triamcinolone was analyzed, demonstrating an association between smaller particles and an increased frequency of adverse reactions of this type. History of uveitis, posterior capsule rupture following cataract surgery, and Irvine-Gass syndrome are other associations described. Conclusion: The physiopathological mechanism of sterile endophthalmitis is not fully understood. However, the visual prognosis is good, the final vision being dependent on the underlying pathology.