Simultaneous SGLT2 inhibition and caloric restriction improves insulin resistance and kidney function in OLETF rats.

SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are emerging as a novel therapy for type 2 diabetes due to their effective hypoglycemic and potential cardio- and nephroprotective effects, while caloric restriction (CR) is a common behavioral modification to improve adiposity and insulin resistance. Therefore, both interventions simultaneously may potentially further improve metabolic syndrome by enhancing carbohydrate metabolism. To test this hypothesis, cohorts of 10-week old, male Long Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) and Otsuka Long Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats were treated with SGLT2i (10 mg luseoglifozin/kg/day x 4 wks) (OLETF only) and/or 30% CR (2 wks at 12 weeks of age). CR maintained body mass in both strains while SGLT2i alone did not have any effect on body mass. Simultaneous treatments decreased SBP in OLETF vs SGLT2i alone, decreased insulin resistance index (IRI), and increased creatinine clearance vs OLETF ad lib. Conversely, CR decreased albuminuria independent of SGLT2i. In conclusion, SGLT2i treatment by itself did not elicit significant improvements in insulin resistance, kidney function or blood pressure. However, when combined with CR, these changes where more profound than with CR alone without inducing chronic hypoglycemia.

Mass recovery following caloric restriction reverses lipolysis and proteolysis, but not gluconeogenesis, in insulin resistant OLETF rats.

Caloric restriction (CR) is one of the most important behavioral interventions to reduce excessive abdominal adiposity, which is a risk factor for the development of insulin resistance. Previous metabolomics studies have characterized substrate metabolism during healthy conditions; however, the effects of CR and subsequent mass recovery on shifts in substrate metabolism during insulin resistance (IR) have not been widely investigated. To assess the effects of acute CR and the subsequent mass recovery on shifts in substrate metabolism, a cohort of 15-week old Long Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) and Otsuka Long Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats were calorie restricted (CR: 50% × 10 days) with or without partial body mass recovery (PR; 73% x 7 days), along with their respective ad libitum controls. End-of-study plasma samples were analyzed for primary carbon metabolites by gas chromatography (GC) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) data acquisition. Data analysis included PCA, Pearson correlation vs previously reported variables (adipose and body masses, and insulin resistance index, IRI), and metabolomics maps (MetaMapp) generated for the most significant group comparisons. All treatments elicited a significant group differentiation in at least one principal component. CR improved TCA cycle in OLETF, and increased lipolysis and proteolysis. These changes were reversed after PR except for gluconeogenesis. Plasma lipid concentrations were inversely correlated to IRI in LETO, but not OLETF. These shifts in substrate metabolism suggest that the CR-induced decreases in adipose may not be sufficient to more permanently alter substrate metabolism to improve IR status during metabolic syndrome.

Body mass cycling and predictors of body mass regain and its impact on cardiometabolic health.

Caloric restriction (CR) is the first line intervention to reduce adiposity and total body mass (BM) to improve insulin resistance and ameliorate metabolic derangements. However, the lost adipose mass is difficult to maintain reduced in the long term due to several factors including compensatory changes in orexigenic hormones, adipokine release, pro-inflammatory state, adipose tissue morphology, and resting metabolic rate as a consequence of the caloric deficit. Hence, most patients undergoing a BM reduction intervention ultimately regain the lost mass and too often additional adipose mass overtime, which is hypothesized to have increased deleterious effects chronically. In this mini-review we describe the effects of BM cycling (loss and regain) on insulin resistance and cardiometabolic health and factors that may predict BM regain in clinical studies. We also describe the factors that contribute to the chronic deleterious effects of BM cycling in rodent models of diet-induced obesity (DIO) and other metabolic defects. We conclude that most of the improvements in insulin resistance are observed after a profound loss in BM regardless of the diet and that BM cycling abrogates these beneficial effects. We also suggest that more BM cycling studies are needed in rodent models resembling the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in humans.

Partial Body Mass Recovery After Caloric Restriction Abolishes Improved Glucose Tolerance in Obese, Insulin Resistant Rats.

Caloric restriction, among other behavioral interventions, has demonstrated benefits on improving glycemic control in obesity-associated diabetic subjects. However, an acute and severe intervention without proper maintenance could reverse the initial benefits, with additional metabolic derangements. To assess the effects of an acute caloric restriction in a metabolic syndrome model, a cohort of 15-week old Long Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) and Otsuka Long Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats were calorie restricted (CR: 50% × 10 days) with or without a 10-day body mass (BM) recovery period, along with their respective ad libitum controls. An oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) was performed after CR and BM recovery. Both strains had higher rates of mass gain during recovery vs. ad lib controls; however, the regain was partial (ca. 50% of ad lib controls) over the measurement period. Retroperitoneal and epididymal adipose masses decreased 30% (8.8 g, P < 0.001) in OLETF; however, this loss only accounted for 11.5% of the total BM loss. CR decreased blood glucose AUC 16% in LETO and 19% in OLETF, without significant decreases in insulin. Following CR, hepatic expression of the gluconeogenic enzyme, PEPCK, was reduced 55% in OLETF compared to LETO, and plasma triglycerides (TG) decreased 86%. Acute CR induced improvements in glucose tolerance and TG suggestive of improvements in metabolism; however, partial recovery of BM following CR abolished the improvement in glucose tolerance. The present study highlights the importance of proper maintenance of BM after CR as only partial recovery of the lost BM reversed benefits of the initial mass loss.