Insurance payor status and risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after metabolic and bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance receive metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) at lower rates than privately insured (PI) patients. Although studies on some surgical procedures report that Medicare/Medicaid insurance confers increased postoperative complication rates and a longer length of stay, less is known about these outcomes after MBS. Among often-feared postoperative complications are major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACEs). Although these events are rare after MBS, they have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the effect of insurance payor status on MACEs after MBS. SETTING: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS). METHODS: HCUP-NIS was queried for cases including sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between 2012 and 2019. Bivariate associations between patient-level factors and MACEs were assessed via Rao-Scott χ2 tests. Adjusted and unadjusted risks of insurance payor status for MACEs were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Incidence of MACEs was higher in both Medicare (.75% versus .11%; P < .001) and Medicaid (.15% versus .11%; P < .001) groups than in the PI group. After adjustment for high-risk demographics, high-risk co-morbidities, socioeconomic variables, and hospital factors, insurance status of Medicare (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23, 2.07; P = .0026) or Medicaid (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.16; P = .0026) remained an independent risk factor for MACEs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the significance of Medicaid/Medicare payor status as an independent predictor of postoperative MACEs in MBS. The results of this study can have a significant impact on deepening our understanding of socioeconomic and health system-related issues that can be targeted to improve outcomes in both MBS and other surgical specialties.

Limitations of the 2015-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database for emergency bariatric operations.

BACKGROUND: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) is the largest bariatric surgery-specific clinical data set. OBJECTIVES: In 2020, the definition of emergency cases was altered to include only revisional or conversion cases and not primary cases. The aim of this study was to examine how this change affects the utility of the data set for emergency case tracking. SETTING: MBSAQIP database. METHODS: Emergency cases were extracted from available MBSAQIP data (2015-2021). A comparison of co-morbidity profiles was done, specifically before and after the recent change to how "emergency" is defined in the data set. RESULTS: Eleven thousand and twenty-nine of the 1,048,575 total cases were coded as "emergency cases." From 2015 to 2019, 10,574 emergency cases were performed (∼2115 cases/yr), markedly decreasing in 2020 and 2021 to 455 cases (∼228 cases/yr). Before 2020, the most common procedures were the unlisted procedure of the stomach (45.14%, n = 3101), gastric band removal (25.3%, n = 2676), and reduction of internal hernia (11.8%, n = 1244). Between 2020 and 2021, this distribution changed with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the most common emergency procedure (29.23%, n = 133). As expected from the change that captured only revisional cases, the average operative length was greater between 2020 and 2021 (127.6 versus 86.5 min). CONCLUSIONS: Capturable emergency cases declined in 2020, a trend related to changing the definition of emergency as part of MBSAQIP standards. This change excludes data on internal hernia reduction and does not likely reflect a real change in the prevalence of emergency bariatric cases. Because capture for emergency cases has diminished, so has any prior utility of using MBSAQIP data for studying emergency cases.

FGF21 acts in the brain to drive macronutrient-specific changes in behavioral motivation and brain reward signaling.

Dietary protein restriction induces adaptive changes in food preference, increasing protein consumption over carbohydrates or fat. We investigated whether motivation and reward signaling underpin these preferences. In an operant task, protein-restricted male mice increased their responding for liquid protein rewards, but not carbohydrate, fat, or sweet rewards. The protein restriction-induced increase in operant responding for protein was absent in Fgf21-KO mice and mice with neuron-specific deletion of the FGF21 co-receptor beta-Klotho (KlbCam2ka) mice. Fiber photometry recording of VTA dopamine neurons revealed that oral delivery of maltodextrin triggered a larger activation of dopamine neurons as compared to casein in control-fed mice, while casein produced a larger response in protein-restricted mice. This restriction-induced shift in nutrient-specific VTA dopamine signaling was lost in Fgf21-KO mice. These data demonstrate that FGF21 acts in the brain to induce a protein-specific appetite by specifically enhancing the reward value of protein-containing foods and the motivation to consume them.

The Effect of a Microlearning Module on Knowledge Acquisition in Surgery Clerkship Students.

OBJECTIVE: Microlearning has been found to be beneficial in other areas of healthcare education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a microlearning module compared to a traditional online learning module in undergraduate medical education. DESIGN: A microlearning module was developed to cover the etiology and management of gallbladder disease. Surgery clerkship students were randomized into 2 groups. One group began with the microlearning module (MLM). The second group began with a 45 minute commercially available module centered on gallbladder disease (WISE-MD™). Halfway through the clerkship, the groups crossed over to the other learning intervention. Student knowledge was assessed with a test at three time points (pre-test, post-test1, post-test2). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Third year surgery clerkship students at George Washington University. RESULTS: There were 56 students in the MLM and 57 in WISE-MDTM groups. In the MLM group, mean scores significantly increased from pre-test to post-test1 and pre-test to post-test2, but significantly decreased from post-test1 to post-test2. In the WISE-MD™ group, mean scores significantly increased from pre-test to post-test1 and pre-test to post-test2, with no significant change from post-test1 to post-test2. After the initial intervention, test scores of post-test1 of the MLM group were significantly higher than the WISE-MD™ group, while there were no significant differences between groups at the pre-test or post-test2 time points. CONCLUSIONS: Students exposed to the microlearning module first performed significantly better on a post intervention test than students that used a commercially available product in our standard curriculum. Therefore, the use of microlearning modules may lead to improved knowledge acquisition in surgery clerkship students.