Fallers after stroke: a retrospective study to investigate the combination of postural sway measures and clinical information in faller's identification.

Background: Falls can have devastating effects on quality of life. No clear relationships have been identified between clinical and stabilometric postural measures and falling in persons after stroke. Objective: This cross-sectional study investigates the value of including stabilometric measures of sway with clinical measures of balance in models for identification of faller chronic stroke survivors, and the relations between variables. Methods: Clinical and stabilometric data were collected from a convenience sample of 49 persons with stroke in hospital care. They were categorized as fallers (N = 21) or non-fallers (N = 28) based on the occurrence of falls in the previous 6 months. Logistic regression (model 1) was performed with clinical measures, including the Berg Balance scale (BBS), Barthel Index (BI), and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). A second model (model 2) was run with stabilometric measures, including mediolateral (SwayML) and anterior-posterior sway (SwayAP), velocity of antero-posterior (VelAP) and medio-lateral sway (VelML), and absolute position of center of pressure (CopX abs). A third stepwise regression model was run including all variables, resulting in a model with SwayML, BBS, and BI (model 3). Finally, correlations between independent variables were analyzed. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for model 1 was 0.68 (95%CI: 0.53-0.83, sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 39%) with prediction accuracy of 63.3%. Model 2 resulted in an AUC of 0.68 (95%CI: 0.53-0.84, sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 57%) with prediction accuracy of 65.3%. The AUC of stepwise model 3 was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.60-0.88, sensitivity = 57%, specificity = 81%) with prediction accuracy of 67.4%. Finally, statistically significant correlations were found between clinical variables (p < 0.05), only velocity parameters were correlated with balance performance (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A model combining BBS, BI, and SwayML was best at identifying faller status in persons in the chronic phase post stroke. When balance performance is poor, a high SwayML may be part of a strategy protecting from falls.

Dynamic balance during walking in people with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.

Dynamic balance disorders are common impairments in People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) leading to gait disorders and a higher risk of falling. However, the assessment of dynamic balance is still challenging and instrumented indexes provide objective and quantitative data of CoM movement and Base of Support, which are considered that are two key factors describing dynamic balance. This study aims at validating recent instrumented indexes based on the inverted pendulum model and characterizing dynamic balance disorders in PwMS. We clinically assessed 20 PwMS and we collected instrumented gait data through an optoelectronic system. Data from 20 Healthy Subjects (HS) were also considered as normative reference. Margin of Stability by HoF (MoS_Hof) and by Terry (MoS_Terry) at midstance, and Foot Placement Estimator (DFPE) at heel strike were calculated in mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions, for both less affected and most affected sides for PwMS and for dominant and non-dominant side for HS. MoS_HOF well discriminated between PwMS and HS, followed by MoS_TERRY in ML direction (Mos_HOF: PwMS = 130.0 ± 27.2 mm, HS = 106.5 ± 18.6 mm, p < 0.001, MoS_TERRY: PwMS = 75.1 ± 24.3 mm, HS = 56.5 ± 23.4 mm, p < 0.02). MoS_HOF and MoS_TERRY discriminated between sides in both directions in PwMS. DFPE did not discriminate between groups and sides. Moderate correlations were found between all three indexes and clinical balance scales (from r = 0.02 to r = 0.66), energy recovery (from r = -0.77 to r = -0.11), single stance time (from r = -0.11 to r = 0.80) and step length (from r = -0.83 to r = -0.20). MoS_HOF resulted in the best index to describe dynamic balance disorders in PwMS: they keep CoM position far from the lateral and as close as possible to the anterior boundary of the Base of Support as preventive strategies to control balance perturbations. Furthermore, PwMS seem to use different preventive strategies in accordance with the specific lower limb impairments. This alters the physiological gait mechanisms increasing the energy expenditure and decreasing gait quality and dynamic balance.

Mobility and balance rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits of neurological rehabilitation and the dose-response relationship for the treatment of mobility and balance in multiple sclerosis. METHODS: We included studies investigating the effects of neurological rehabilitation on mobility and balance with the following eligibility criteria for inclusion: Population, People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS); Intervention, method of rehabilitation interventions; Comparison, experimental (specific balance intervention) vs control (no intervention/no specific balance intervention); Outcome, balance clinical scales; Study Design, randomised controlled trials. We conducted a random effects dose-response meta-analysis to assess linear trend estimations and a one stage linear mixed effects meta-regression for estimating dose-response curves. RESULTS: We retrieved 196 studies from a list of 5020 for full text review and 71 studies (n subjects=3306) were included. One study was a cross-over and 70 studies were randomized controlled trials and the mean sample size per study was 46.5 ± 28.6 (mean±SD) with a mean age of 48.3 ± 7.8years, disease duration of 11.6 ± 6.1years, and EDSS of 4.4 ± 1.4points. Twenty-nine studies (40.8%) had the balance outcome as the primary outcome, while 42 studies (59.1%) had balance as secondary outcome or did not specify primary and secondary outcomes. Thirty-three trials (46.5%) had no active intervention as comparator and 38 trials (53.5%) had an active control group. Individual level data from 20 studies (n subjects=1016) were analyzed showing a medium pooled effect size for balance interventions (SMD=0.41; 95% CIs 0.22 to 0.59). Moreover, we analyzed 14 studies (n subjects=696) having balance as primary outcome and BBS as primary endpoint yielding a mean difference of 3.58 points (95% CIs 1.79 to 5.38, p<0.0001). Finally, we performed meta regression of the 20 studies showing an association between better outcome, log of intensity defined as minutes per session (ß=1.26; SEß=0.51; p = 0.02) and task-oriented intervention (ß=0.38; SEß=0.17; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our analyses provide level 1 evidence on the effect of balance intervention to improve mobility. Furthermore, according to principles of neurological rehabilitation, high intensity and task-specific interventions are associated with better treatment outcomes.

Validity of 2 Fall Prevention Strategy Scales for People With Stroke, Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls are a common and persistent concern among people with neurological disorders (PwND), as they frequently result in mobility deficits and may lead to loss of functional independence. This study investigated the ceiling and floor effects, internal consistency, and convergent validity of 2 patient-reported fall prevention strategy scales in PwND. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Two-hundred and ninety-nine PwND (111 people with multiple sclerosis, 94 people with Parkinson's disease, and 94 people with stroke) were seen for rehabilitation and assessed. The number of retrospective and prospective falls, use of walking assistive devices, scores on the Fall Prevention Strategy Survey (FPSS), Falls Behavioural Scale (FaB), and balance and mobility scales (Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, Timed Up and Go, 10-m walking test, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence) were analyzed. RESULTS: Total score distributions showed negligible ceiling and floor effects for both the FPSS (ceiling: 0.3%, floor: 0.3%) and the FaB (ceiling: 0%, floor: 0%). The Cronbach α (CI) was of 0.87 (0.85-0.89) for the FPSS and 0.86 (0.84-0.88) for the FaB. In terms of convergent validity, the FPSS and FaB were moderately correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.65). Moreover, the correlations between the FPSS and FaB and balance and mobility scales ranged from 0.25 to 0.49 ( P < .01). Both scales are slightly better able to distinguish between retrospective fallers/nonfallers [area under the curve, AUC (95% CI): FPSS: 0.61 (0.5-0.7); FaB: 0.60 (0.5-0.6)] compared with prospective fallers/nonfallers [AUC (95% CI): FPSS: 0.56 (0.4-0.6); FaB: 0.57 (0.4-0.6)]. Both scales accurately identified individuals who typically required the use of a walking assistive device for daily ambulation [AUC (95% CI): FPSS: 0.74 (0.7-0.8); FaB: 0.69 (0.6-0.7)]. Multiple regression analysis showed that previous falls, use of an assistive device, and balance confidence significantly predicted participants' prevention strategies (FPSS: R2 = 0.31, F(8,159) = 10.5, P < .01; FaB: R2 = 0.31, F(8,164) = 10.89, P < .01). CONCLUSION: The FPSS and the FaB appear to be valid tools to assess fall prevention strategies in people with neurological disorders. Both scales provide unique and added value in providing information on individual behavior for fall prevention.

Identification of modified dynamic gait index cutoff scores for assessing fall risk in people with Parkinson disease, stroke and multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Balance and gait impairments increase fall rate and injury in people with neurological disorders(PwND). The modified Dynamic Gait Index(mDGI) is a scale assessing dynamic balance during walking, however its ability in identifying Fallers and Recurrent Fallers has not been studied. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate mDGI's ability in identifying retrospective Fallers and Recurrent Fallers establishing cut-off scores for its use in clinical practice. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, the number of retrospective falls and mDGI scores were collected. PwND were categorised as Non-Fallers or Fallers (falls≥1) and as Recurrent Fallers(falls≥2) or Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers(falls<2) according to their number of retrospective falls over two months. Two generalised linear logistic models were developed using a machine learning method to detect Fallers (Model 1) and Recurrent Fallers (Model 2) based on mDGI scores. ROC curves were used to identify mDGI cut-off scores to distinguish between different fall categories. RESULTS: 58 PwND (mean ± standard deviation age: 63.4 ± 12 years) including 28 people with Multiple Sclerosis, 15 people with Parkinson's disease and 15 people with Stroke were analysed. The mDGI score(median (IQR)) for Non-Fallers, Fallers, Recurrent Fallers and Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers was respectively 50(22), 37(22), 26.5(20.25) and 46.5(20.5)points. The cut-off to identify Fallers from Non-Fallers was 49 points(sensitivity:100 %, specificity:50 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off: 53.2 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off: 0%, AUC:0.68), while 29 points(sensitivity:60 %, specificity:79 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off:52.1 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off:16.1 %, AUC:0.70) was the best cut-off to identify Recurrent Fallers. SIGNIFICANCE: People with mDGI score>49 points have low or minimal fall risk, while people with mDGI score≤49 points should be further investigated with other scales before starting a balance-focused rehabilitation intervention. People scoring ≤29 points on the mDGI scale may need a fall prevention intervention, regardless of the results of other balance clinical measures.

Minimal clinically important difference of modified dynamic gait index in people with neurological disorders.

BACKGROUND: The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI) has not yet been determined for People with Neurological Disorders (PwND). RESEARCH QUESTION: To establish the MCID of the mDGI to determine clinically meaningful improvement in balance and gait in PwND. METHODS: In this longitudinal study from a randomised clinical trial, 55 participants both in and outpatients with neurological disorders, received fifteen 40-minute rehabilitation sessions. Inpatients received daily treatments over a period of three weeks while outpatients received three treatments/week over a period of five weeks. An anchor-based method using percentage rating of improvement in balance (Activities Balance Confidence scale, ABC) was used to determine the MCID of mDGI. The MCID was defined as the minimum change in mDGI total score (post - pre intervention) that was needed to perceive at least a 10 % improvement on the ABC scale. A Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to define the cut-off for the optimal MCID of the mDGI discriminating between improved and not improved participants. RESULTS: The MCID of the mDGI total score was 6 points and Area under the Curve was 0.64. For the mDGI time sub-scores the MCID was 2 points and Area under the Curve was 0.6. SIGNIFICANCE: The MCID of balance and gait improvement measured by mDGI was prudently establish at ≥7 points, meaning that this is the minimum improvement score PwND need to get to perceive a clinically relevant change in their balance and gait confidence. These reference values can be a tool incorporated into clinicians daily practice to interpret mDGI change scores helping to determine whether the intervention is effective; to develop clinical tailored intervention goals and to establish meaningful perceived change in PwND.

Sensorimotor Perceptive Rehabilitation Integrated (SPRInt) program: exercises with augmented movement feedback associated to botulinum neurotoxin in idiopathic cervical dystonia-an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD) is a focal dystonia affecting neck muscles. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is the first-line treatment of ICD and different physical therapies (including exercise) are often proposed as adjunct treatments. However, the actual effectiveness of exercise in ICD is unclear. The aim of the current work is to assess the potential effectiveness of the Sensorimotor Perceptive Rehabilitation Integrated (SPRInt) exercise program as adjunct therapy for ICD. METHODS: Fifteen ICD patients received BoNT injections in the neck muscles and, 12 weeks later, received BoNT a second time and SPRInt started. SPRInt consists in 18 exercise sessions in which augmented feedback of movement (including visual and acoustic feedback) is extensively used. Dystonia burden was measured by the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Patients were evaluated immediately before, 6 and 12 weeks after each BoNT injection. RESULTS: Six weeks after the first BoNT injection (i.e., at BoNT peak effect), TWSTRS total score was better than baseline and remained improved at 12 weeks. TWSTRS disability domain slightly improved 6 weeks after the first BoNT injection, but after 6 more weeks returned to its baseline level. Disability improved more at SPRInt end (i.e., 6 weeks after the second BoNT injection), being even lower than after toxin alone. With a single-subject analysis, 4/10 patients who did not improve disability after BoNT improved after SPRInt plus BoNT. CONCLUSIONS: SPRInt plus BoNT can be more effective than BoNT alone in improving cervical dystonia patients' difficulties in the activities of daily living. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03247868 (https://register.clinicaltrials.gov).