Long-Term Effectiveness of Vestibulectomy for the Treatment of Vulvodynia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and complication rate of vestibulectomy for vulvodynia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in a teaching and university hospital analyzing patients with vulvodynia with insufficient response to conservative treatment who underwent a vestibulectomy. Data from 114 consecutive vestibulectomy procedures done between September 2009 and October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon.The primary outcome was difference in pain scale (6-point Q-tip test, Nociceptive Rating Scale) between preoperative consultation, postoperative visit, and last follow-up consultation. The secondary outcome was surgical complications, such as wound dehiscence and hematoma. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 80 patients. There was a significant reduction in median pain scores of between 65% and 80% on all 6 evaluated vestibular points during Q-tip tests. The median follow-up was 21 months, ranging from 1 to 92 months (interquartile range [IQR]). Overall, 75% of patients needed no further treatment at the end of the follow-up period. In 22.6% (18/80), a limited wound dehiscence was noted. No other complications were reported nor were there any cases of worsening of the complaints. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: In this retrospective cohort study, a significant pain reduction occurred after vestibulectomy in patients who were not responding to conservative treatment. The complication rate of this surgical procedure is low. Vestibulectomy seems to be an effective technique for management of vulvodynia.

Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproductive outcomes in women treated for retained products of conception (RPOC) by hysteroscopy (morcellation vs loop resection). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: A teaching and university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients included in a previous randomized controlled trial on hysteroscopic removal of RPOC comparing morcellation (n = 46) with loop resection (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic morcellation versus loop resection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measures were live birth and pregnancy complications (including abnormal placentation [placenta accreta/increta/percreta], placenta previa, vasa previa, retained placenta after delivery or incomplete expulsion with the need for manual removal or curettage, and RPOC), uterine rupture, and other complications (blood loss, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and intrauterine growth restriction). The live birth rate was 88.9% in the morcellation group and 68.2% in the loop resection group (p = .09). Uterine rupture occurred in 1 patient in the morcellation group (4.2%) (p = 1.00). Placental complications were found in 20.8% and 22.2% of the hysteroscopic morcellation and loop resection groups, respectively (p = .33), and other pregnancy complications were seen in 33.3% and 16.6% of the 2 groups (p = .33). The secondary outcome was time to pregnancy. The median time to pregnancy was 14 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 5-33 weeks) in the morcellation group and 15 weeks (IQR, 6-37 weeks) in the loop resection group (p = .96). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic removal of RPOC seems to have no detrimental effect on reproductive outcome and no significant effect on pregnancy rate.