Associations Between Socioeconomic Context and Congenital Heart Disease Related Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults.

Little is known about the relation between socioeconomic factors and health outcomes in adults and adolescents with congenital heart defects (CHD). Population-level data from the Colorado CHD surveillance system from 2011 to 2013 was used to examine the association between area deprivation and outcomes including hospitalizations, emergency department visits, cardiac procedures, all-cause and cardiac-related mortality, and major adverse cardiac events. Socioeconomic context was measured by the Area Deprivation Index at census tract level. Missing race/ethnicity was imputed using the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding algorithm. Generalized linear models were utilized to examine health disparities across deprivation quintiles after adjusting for insurance type, race/ethnicity, age, gender, urbanicity, and CHD severity in 5,748 patients. Cases residing in the most deprived quintile had 51% higher odds of inpatient admission, 74% higher odds of emergency department visit, 41% higher odds of cardiac surgeries, and 45% higher odds of major adverse cardiac events compared with cases in the least deprived quintile. Further, rates of hospitalizations, emergency department admissions, and cardiac surgeries were elevated in the most deprived compared with the least deprived quintile. Mortality was not significantly different across quintiles. In conclusion, findings suggest significant health equity issues for adolescent and adults with CHD based on area-based deprivation.

Population-level surveillance of congenital heart defects among adolescents and adults in Colorado: Implications of record linkage.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to describe the design of a population-level electronic health record (EHR) and insurance claims-based surveillance system of adolescents and adults with congenital heart defects (CHDs) in Colorado and to evaluate the bias introduced by duplicate cases across data sources. METHODS: The Colorado CHD Surveillance System ascertained individuals aged 11-64 years with a CHD based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic coding between 2011 and 2013 from a diverse network of health care systems and an All Payer Claims Database (APCD). A probability-based identity reconciliation algorithm identified duplicate cases. Logistic regression was conducted to investigate bias introduced by duplicate cases on the relationship between CHD severity (severe compared to moderate/mild) and adverse outcomes including all-cause mortality, inpatient hospitalization, and major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular event). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate bias introduced by the sole use or exclusion of APCD data. RESULTS: A total of 12,293 unique cases were identified, of which 3,476 had a within or between data source duplicate. Duplicate cases were more likely to be in the youngest age group and have private health insurance, a severe heart defect, a CHD comorbidity, and higher health care utilization. We found that failure to resolve duplicate cases between data sources would inflate the relationship between CHD severity and both morbidity and mortality outcomes by ~15%. Sensitivity analyses indicate that scenarios in which APCD was excluded from case finding or relied upon as the sole source of case finding would also result in an overestimation of the relationship between a CHD severity and major adverse outcomes. DISCUSSION: Aggregated EHR- and claims-based surveillance systems of adolescents and adults with CHD that fail to account for duplicate records will introduce considerable bias into research findings. CONCLUSION: Population-level surveillance systems for rare chronic conditions, such as congenital heart disease, based on aggregation of EHR and claims data require sophisticated identity reconciliation methods to prevent bias introduced by duplicate cases.

Estimating the prevalence of congenital heart disease among adolescents and adults in Colorado adjusted for incomplete case ascertainment.

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart defects (CHDs), the most common type of birth defect in the United States, are increasing in prevalence in the general population. Though CHD prevalence at birth has been well described in the United States at about 1%, little is known about long-term survival and prevalence of CHDs beyond childhood. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of CHDs among adolescents and adults in Colorado. METHODS: The prevalence of CHDs among adolescents and adults residing in Colorado during 2011 to 2013 was estimated using log-linear capture-recapture methods to account for incomplete case ascertainment. Five case-finding data sources were used for this analysis including electronic health record data from 4 major health systems and a state-legislated all payer claims database. RESULTS: Twelve thousand two hundred ninety-three unique individuals with CHDs (2481 adolescents and 9812 adults) were identified in one or more primary data sources. We estimated the crude prevalence of CHDs in adolescents and adults in Colorado to be 3.22 per 1000 individuals (95% CI 3.19-3.53). After accounting for incomplete case ascertainment, the final capture-recapture model yielded an estimated total adolescent and adult CHD population of 23,194 (95% CI 22,419-23,565) and an adjusted prevalence of 6.07 per 1000 individuals (95% CI 5.86-6.16), indicating 47% of the cases in the catchment area were not identified in the case-identifying data sources. CONCLUSION: This statewide study yielded new information on the prevalence of CHDs in adolescents and adults. These high prevalence rates underscore the need for additional specialized care facilities for this population with CHDs.