Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64059, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39114187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the context of an increasing older population, knowing the surgical outcomes of older patients is of paramount importance to define a comprehensive strategy for colon cancer treatment in these patients. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes and survival of patients over 80 years old undergoing surgery for colon cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational retrospective longitudinal study of patients over 80 years old with colon cancer diagnosis who underwent surgery for this condition, between 2018 and 2021, in a Portuguese hospital. Demographic and clinical features were characterized. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Out of 90 patients in the study, 41.1% were female. The majority (56.7%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or 0, with a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 7.0. Tumors were primarily located in the right colon (52.2%) and sigmoid colon (25.6%), with most patients having stage II (35.6%) or stage III (25.5%) disease. Elective surgeries accounted for 73% of procedures, and 80.0% had curative intent, with laparoscopic surgery performed in 66.7% of cases. Only 8.3% of those undergoing curative-intent procedures received adjuvant chemotherapy. Emergent admissions were associated with more advanced cancer stages, higher rates of palliative intent procedures (45.8% versus 10.6%, p < 0.001), and more open surgeries (75.0% versus 9.1%, p < 0.001) when compared to elective procedures. Postoperative mortality was higher in the emergent group (20.8% versus 10.6%), though there was no association between the type of admission and postoperative complications. Median overall survival for all patients was 36.7 (95% CI 28.1 to 45.3) months, with significant differences between curative-intent and palliative surgeries (median of 39.8 (95% CI 32.6 to 47.0) versus 10.6 (95% CI 0.67 to 20.5) months, p = 0.015). The elective group of patients had significantly better overall survival compared to the emergent group (median of 36.7 (95% CI 30.7 to 42.7) versus 11.9 (95% CI 6.0 to 17.8) months, p = 0.01). Among the patients who underwent curative-intent procedures, there were no significant differences in overall or disease-free survival between elective and emergent groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased complexity of managing older patients, particularly in emergent cases, these findings emphasize the importance of elective, curative-intent surgeries to optimize overall survival. Effective treatment strategies and perioperative management tailored to this age group are essential for improving surgical outcomes and extending survival in elderly colon cancer patients.

2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 29(24): 3883-3898, 2023 Jun 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37426319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery is a safe, organ-sparing surgery that achieves full-thickness resection with adequate margins. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these procedures. However, these techniques are limited by the exposure of the tumor and mucosa to the peritoneal cavity, which could lead to viable cancer cell seeding and the spillage of gastric juice or enteric liquids into the peritoneal cavity. Non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS) is highly accurate in determining the resection margins to prevent intraperitoneal contamination because the tumor is inverted into the visceral lumen instead of the peritoneal cavity. Accurate intraoperative assessment of the nodal status could allow stratification of the extent of resection. One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) can provide a rapid method of evaluating nodal tissue, whilst near-infrared laparoscopy together with indocyanine green can identify relevant nodal tissue intraoperatively. AIM: To determine the safety and feasibility of NEWS in early gastric and colon cancers and of adding rapid intraoperative lymph node (LN) assessment with OSNA. METHODS: The patient-based experiential portion of our investigations was conducted at the General and Oncological Surgery Unit of the St. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital (Avellino, Italy). Patients with early-stage gastric or colon cancer (diagnosed via endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and computed tomography) were included. All lesions were treated by NEWS procedure with intraoperative OSNA assay between January 2022 and October 2022. LNs were examined intraoperatively with OSNA and postoperatively with conventional histology. We analyzed patient demographics, lesion features, histopathological diagnoses, R0 resection (negative margins) status, adverse events, and follow-up results. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients (5 males and 5 females) with an average age of 70.4 ± 4.5 years (range: 62-78 years) were enrolled in this study. Five patients were diagnosed with gastric cancer. The remaining 5 patients were diagnosed with early-stage colon cancer. The mean tumor diameter was 23.8 ± 11.6 mm (range: 15-36 mm). The NEWS procedure was successful in all cases. The mean procedure time was 111.5 ± 10.7 min (range: 80-145 min). The OSNA assay revealed no LN metastases in any patients. Histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 9 patients (90.0%). There was no recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: NEWS combined with sentinel LN biopsy and OSNA assay is an effective and safe technique for the removal of selected early gastric and colon cancers in which it is not possible to adopt conventional endoscopic resection techniques. This procedure allows clinicians to acquire additional information on the LN status intraoperatively.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Laparoscopia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias do Colo/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/genética , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(3)2022 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35292550

RESUMO

Rectal duplications are rare congenital anomalies that represent 1%-6% of alimentary tract duplications. We report a case of a woman in her 50s who presented to our hospital with perianal pain and urinary retention. She had a history of imperforate anus repaired after birth and dynamic graciloplasty performed during her adulthood for faecal incontinence. Abdominal CT scan showed a fluid collection extending from the electrostimulator, placed in a subcutaneous pocket in the abdomen, to the rectouterine pouch. Infection related to the electrostimulator was assumed and, after a course of antibiotics without patient improvement, the electrostimulator was removed. The symptoms and the pelvic fluid collection persisted, and diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Diagnosis of rectal duplication cyst was made intraoperatively, and the cyst was completely resected. Patient fully recovered after surgery. This is a rare case of a rectal duplication cyst presenting during adulthood and associated with imperforate anus.


Assuntos
Cavidade Abdominal , Anus Imperfurado , Cistos , Adulto , Anus Imperfurado/complicações , Anus Imperfurado/diagnóstico , Anus Imperfurado/cirurgia , Cistos/complicações , Cistos/diagnóstico , Cistos/cirurgia , Escavação Retouterina , Feminino , Trato Gastrointestinal , Humanos
6.
Clin Colorectal Cancer ; 19(3): 178-190.e1, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653470

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus that emerged in December 2019 causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to the sudden national reorganization of health care systems and changes in the delivery of health care globally. The purpose of our study was to use a survey to assess the global effects of COVID-19 on colorectal practice and surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ISUCRS) selected 22 questions, which were included in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to ISUCRS fellows and other surgeons included in the ISUCRS database and was advertised on social media sites. The questionnaire remained open from April 16 to 28, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 287 surgeons completed the survey. Of the 287 respondents, 90% were colorectal specialists or general surgeons with an interest in colorectal disease. COVID-19 had affected the practice of 96% of the surgeons, and 52% were now using telemedicine. Also, 66% reported that elective colorectal cancer surgery could proceed but with perioperative precautions. Of the 287 respondents, 19.5% reported that the use of personal protective equipment was the most important perioperative precaution. However, personal protective equipment was only provided by 9.1% of hospitals. In addition, 64% of surgeons were offering minimally invasive surgery. However, 44% reported that enough information was not available regarding the safety of the loss of intra-abdominal carbon dioxide gas during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, 61% of the surgeons were prepared to defer elective colorectal cancer surgery, with 29% willing to defer for ≤ 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: The results from our survey have demonstrated that, globally, COVID-19 has affected the ability of colorectal surgeons to offer care to their patients. We have also discussed suggestions for various practical adaptation strategies for use during the recovery period.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19 , Cirurgia Colorretal/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Global , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) ; 7(1): 24-31, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30792863

RESUMO

In recent years, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in the treatment of colorectal cancer has attracted widespread attention. The potential benefits of NOSES including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesic, faster recovery of bowel function, shorter length of hospital stay, better cosmetic and psychological effect have been described in colorectal surgery. Despite significant decrease in surgical trauma of NOSES have been observed, the potential pitfalls of this technique have been demonstrated. Particularly, several issues including bacteriological concerns, oncological outcomes and patient selection are raised with this new technique. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to reach a consensus as an industry guideline to standardize the implementation of NOSES in colorectal surgery. After three rounds of discussion by all members of the International Alliance of NOSES, the consensus is finally completed, which is also of great significance to the long-term progress of NOSES worldwide.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA