Early screening for chronic liver disease: impact of a FIB-4 first integrated care pathway to identify patients with significant fibrosis.

Liver fibrosis is often undetected whereas it is the determinant of liver-related mortality. We evaluate a pathway based on the systematic calculation of FIB-4 to screen for advanced hepatic fibrosis. Systematic calculation of FIB-4 was implemented in the centralized laboratory of a French University Hospital in 4 pilot departments. If ≥ 2.67, the FIB-4 result was returned to the prescribers, for patients between 18 and 70 years of age, with an incentive to measure liver stiffness by vibration controlled transient elastography. During a 2-years period, a FIB-4 was calculated in 2963 patients and 135 were ≥ 2.67 (4.6%). After exclusion of patients with a known cause of elevated FIB-4, 47 patients (34.8%) were eligible for elastography. Forty patients underwent elastography, but only 15% (7/47) at the spontaneous request of the referring physician. Fifteen patients were identified with significant fibrosis, among which 8 attended the scheduled specialist consultation, all with a confirmed diagnosis of cirrhosis. A sequential pathway based on the systematic calculation of FIB-4 enables the identification of patients with significant unknown liver fibrosis, allowing to refer them to specialized care. Raising awareness is essential to improve the care pathway.

Effect of long term aspirin use on the incidence of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies found divergent effects of aspirin use on prostate cancer incidence, potentially due to studies with short durations of aspirin use and insufficient adjustment for screening. METHODS: A systematic review on the association between aspirin use ≥3 years and incident prostate cancer was performed in accordance with the PRISMA and MOOSE criteria. RESULTS: In the cohort studies, aspirin use for at least 3 years was associated with a lower incidence rate of prostate cancer (Odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97). No protective association was established for the case-control studies (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.23). Subgroup analysis of advanced and aggressive cancers showed a protective association (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94 and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.97). CONCLUSION: This synthesis of observational studies suggests a potential protective association between long term aspirin use and incident prostate cancer. The current literature is highly heterogenous and suffers from inconsistent aspirin dose definition and measurement.