Ocular, Visual, and Anatomical Outcomes in Eyes Requiring Incisional Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Surgery Following the 0.19-mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess ocular, visual, and anatomical outcomes following the 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®) and incisional intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering surgery in diabetic macular edema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a 36-month, phase 4, open-label, observational study (N = 202 eyes, 159 patients), 8 eyes (7 patients) required IOP-lowering surgery post-FAc; eyes were segregated by FAc-induced (n = 5, 2.47%) versus neovascular glaucoma (NVG)-related (n = 3, 1.49%) IOP elevations and assessed for IOP, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and cup-to-disc ratio (c/d). RESULTS: Changes at 36 months were +5.4 letters BCVA (P > 0.05) and +0.09 c/d (P = 0.0217); IOP and CST were unchanged. FAc-induced-group eyes required fewer IOP-lowering medications than NVG-group eyes (2.0 versus 4.0; P < 0.01) but for longer duration (15.2 versus 2.6 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Post-FAc IOP-lowering surgery, regardless of cause, largely did not affect the outcomes measured; these procedures, then, may not meaningfully threaten positive outcomes. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:22-29.].

Long-Term Control of Retinal Thickness Variability and Vision Following the 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant.

Purpose: To assess the impact of retinal thickness variability (RTV) control on visual and treatment burden outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who received the 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien, Alimera Sciences). Methods: This post hoc analysis examined the outcomes of a 3-year, phase 4, nonrandomized, open-label observational study. Retinal thickness was measured as central subfield thickness (CST). RTV was quantified by CST area under the curve (CST-AUC), retinal thickness amplitude (RTA), and retinal thickness standard deviation (RTSD). Visual outcomes were measured as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and treatment burden was measured as the number of yearly supplemental DME treatments. Results: The percentage of eyes with a CST ≤300 µm fluctuated throughout the study but was significantly increased relative to baseline at 36 months (baseline: 32.9% vs 36 months: 46.8%; P < .05). FAc significantly reduced RTV in all measures more than 36 months (P < .0001). When divided into quartiles, eyes with the best RTV control post FAc had the greatest BCVA gains and improved disease control (ie, reduced need for supplemental therapy). The last-observed BCVA letter score exhibited linear correlations with CST-AUC (R2 = -0.100), RTA (R2 = -0.125), and RTSD (R2 = -0.162). A multivariate linear regression with baseline BCVA as a covariate displayed improved correlations with the last-observed BCVA, CST-AUC (R2 = -0.448), RTA (R2 = -0.432), and RTSD (R2 = -0.436). Conclusions: The sustained corticosteroid release of the 0.19 mg FAc implant reduced RTV in patients with DME, which directly correlated with significantly improved vision and a reduced supplemental treatment burden.

Ranibizumab Alters Levels of Intraocular Soluble Cytokine Receptors in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: Ranibizumab, an anti-VEGF-A (vascular endothelial cell growth factor-A) monoclonal antibody fragment, is a well-established treatment for diabetic patients with macular edema. However, very little is known about the effect of ranibizumab on intraocular regulation of pro - and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways and their regulation of VEGF family members, which was the aim of this study.Materials and Methods: Diabetic patients (n = 10) aged ≥18 years with central diabetic macular edema, BCVA >24 and <78, and central macular thickness (CMT) greater than 250 µm were enrolled in this study. Following a full eye exam, imaging, and an aqueous tap, patients received ranibizumab (0.3 mg/0.05 mL) injections at day one and weeks four and eight. At week 12, a full eye exam, imaging, and a second aqueous tap was obtained prior to the last injection of ranibizumab. Pre - and post-treatment aqueous humor samples were then analyzed using Milliplex MAP magnetic bead assays.Results: As expected, ranibizumab lowered levels of VEGF-A, decreased CMT, and improved VA (visual acuity). In addition, it significantly lowered aqueous levels of IL-10, IFNγ, sIL-1R1, sIL-1R2, sRAGE, and VEGF-D. Changes in levels of VEGF-A and VEGF-C strongly correlated with changes in soluble receptors, sgp130 and sIL-6R, associated with IL-6 signaling pathways. In contrast, changes in VEGF-D correlated with sIL-1R1 and sIL-1R2, soluble receptors participating in IL-1 signaling. Changes in CMT and VA did not correlate with changes in levels of VEGF family members. However, post-treatment values of CMT correlated with post-treatment levels of VEGF-C. Post-treatment VA values correlated with a wide variety of potential biomarkers linked to inflammation.Conclusions: Ranibizumab treatment had strong effects on regulating levels of soluble receptors closely linked to IL-1 and IL-6 signaling pathways. Therefore, a complete understanding of the actions of ranibizumab will further the development of additional therapies to support treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) mediates protection against glucose toxicity in human Müller cells via activation of VEGF-A signaling.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has become a target of interest for drug development aiming to treat diabetic retinopathy. Since IL-6 signaling can promote beneficial as well as detrimental effects via two different signaling pathways, the objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of classical IL-6 and IL-6 trans-signaling on human Müller cells (HMC), which are important for the development of diabetic retinopathy. HMCs were cultured in normal (5 mmol/L) and high (25 mmol/L) glucose plus or minus IL-6 or IL-6/sIL-6R. IL-6 receptor expression using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry and cytokine release using magnetic bead assays were determined. HMCs express the membrane bound form of the IL-6 receptor (mIL-6R), gp130, and can release the soluble forms sIL-6R and sgp130 demonstrating that HMCs are capable of responding to classical IL-6 and IL-6 trans-signaling. IL-6 protected HMCs from glucose toxicity via VEGF-A signaling. IL-6/sIL-6R caused only modest protection, which was not mediated by VEGF-A. Our data show for the first time that classical IL-6 signaling exerts its beneficial effects through VEGF-A action contrary to IL-6 trans-signaling, which was VEGF-A independent. These results have clinical implications for drug development targeting IL-6 since strict anti-IL-6 therapies might further decrease neuroretinal functions in the diabetic retina.

Müller cells and diabetic retinopathy.

Müller cells are one of the primary glial cell types found in the retina and play a significant role in maintaining retinal function and health. Since Müller cells are the only cell type to span the entire width of the retina and have contact to almost every cell type in the retina they are uniquely positioned to perform a wide variety of functions necessary to maintaining retinal homeostasis. In the healthy retina, Müller cells recycle neurotransmitters, prevent glutamate toxicity, redistribute ions by spatial buffering, participate in the retinoid cycle, and regulate nutrient supplies by multiple mechanisms. Any disturbance to the retinal environment is going to influence proper Müller cell function and well being which in turn will affect the entire retina. This is evident in a disease like diabetic retinopathy where Müller cells contribute to neuronal dysfunction, the production of pro-angiogenic factors leading to neovascularization, the set up of a chronic inflammatory retinal environment, and eventual cell death. In this review, we highlight the importance of Müller cells in maintaining a healthy and functioning retina and discuss various pathological events of diabetic retinopathy in which Müller cells seem to play a crucial role. The beneficial and detrimental effects of cytokine and growth factor production by Müller cells on the microvasculature and retinal neuronal tissue will be outlined. Understanding Müller cell functions within the retina and restoring such function in diabetic retinopathy should become a cornerstone for developing effective therapies to treat diabetic retinopathy.