Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 35(3): 397-411, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30413920

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This review aims to (1) assess the breadth of pediatric orthopaedic research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and (2) determine the impact of academic collaboration (an LMIC and a non-LMIC investigator) in published LMIC research. METHODS: Pediatric orthopaedic clinical studies conducted in LMICs from 2004 to 2014 were extracted from Embase, Cochrane, and Pubmed databases. Of 22,714 searched studies, 129 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: 85% generated low-quality evidence (level IV or lower). 21% were collaborative, and these were more likely than non-collaborative papers to generate level III evidence or higher (25% vs 13%, p = 0.141). DISCUSSION: Pediatric orthopaedic research produced by LMICs rarely achieves level I-III evidence, but collaborative studies are associated with higher levels of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Países em Desenvolvimento , Ortopedia/métodos , Criança , Humanos , Pobreza
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 32 Suppl 7: S35-S37, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30247398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although orthopaedic trauma occurs at higher rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), most research on this topic is conducted in high-resource settings. Few initiatives exist to promote local research in LMICs. Investigators created the Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology (IGOT) International Research Symposium to promote local research initiatives by surgeons practicing in low-resource environments. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of this symposium in teaching orthopaedic surgeons practicing in LMICs how to conduct clinical research. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, orthopaedic surgeons from LMICs with no formal research training were recruited to attend the 1-day IGOT International Research Symposium in San Francisco. A survey was administered immediately before and after the symposium to inquire about the participants' confidence in different aspects related to research using a 1-5 Likert scale. A second survey, conducted 2 years later, recorded the attendees' research productivity after the workshop. RESULTS: Forty-three participants representing 10 different LMICs from Africa and Asia attended the 2013 course. At 2 year postcourse, participants reported starting 25 research projects, authored 7 "accepted or published manuscripts" (vs. 1 before the course; P < 0.01), and were selected for 12 podium or poster presentations (vs. 3 before the course; P < 0.01). Two research symposium attendees received "Top International Forum Paper" at the 2015 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meeting. DISCUSSION: A 1-day research course resulted in increased participant confidence in conducting research. This was associated with greater research productivity by participants 2 years later. These results suggest that the IGOT International Research Symposium can improve the number of initiated research projects by surgeons in LMICs.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/educação , Países em Desenvolvimento , Ortopedia , Traumatologia , Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
SICOT J ; 3: 6, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28134090

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the quality of orthopaedic investigations conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Academic collaboration is one model to build research capacity and improve research quality. Our study aimed to determine (1) the quality of clinical orthopaedic research conducted in LMICs, (2) the World Bank Regions and LMICs that publish the highest quality studies, (3) the pattern of collaboration among investigators and (4) whether academic collaboration between LMIC and non-LMIC investigators is associated with studies that have higher levels of evidence. METHODS: Orthopaedic studies from 2004 to 2014 conducted in LMICs were extracted from multiple electronic databases. The World Bank Region, level of evidence and author country-affiliation were recorded. Collaboration was defined as a study that included an LMIC with non-LMIC investigator. RESULTS: There were 958 studies that met inclusion criteria of 22,714 searched. Ninety-seven (10.1%) of included studies achieved Level 1 or 2 evidence, but case series (52.3%) were the most common. Collaboration occurred in 14.4% of studies and the vast majority of these (88.4%) were among academic institutions. Collaborative studies were more likely to be Level 1 or 2 (20.3% vs. 8.4%, p < 0.01), prospective (34.8% vs. 22.9% p = 0.04) and controlled (29.7% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.01) compared to non-collaborative studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although orthopaedic studies in LMICs rarely reach Level 1 or 2 evidence, studies published through academic collaboration between LMIC and non-LMIC investigators are associated with higher levels of evidence and more prospective, controlled designs.

4.
J Orthop Trauma ; 29 Suppl 10: S17-9, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26356207

RESUMO

Orthopaedic injuries from trauma are increasingly common in Low to Middle Income Countries secondary to the increase in road traffic. These injuries commonly contain a soft tissue component, which complicates treatment of bony injuries and increases amputation rate. Specialized care using plastic surgery techniques is required to effectively treat these injuries. Historically medical mission models have been used to provide specialists to help provide soft tissue coverage where plastic surgeons are not available. This type of care is inherently unsustainable. We present an approach where a course was designed to teach soft tissue coverage techniques to orthopaedic surgeons. The course was given annually over 5 years, serving approximately 300 participants. Data collected from participants demonstrated that they found the course useful, learned techniques that allowed them to care for patients, and disseminate the knowledge further. Participants endorsed that they had performed 594 flaps with a 93% success rate at 1 year of follow-up from the course. We find that this type of intervention has the potential to address the need for soft tissue coverage in countries where this need is present, and resources are unavailable.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Currículo , Educação Médica Continuada/organização & administração , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/educação , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/educação , California , Feminino , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Ortopedia/educação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA