Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study.

OBJECTIVES: Antegrade femoral nailing through a piriformis fossa starting point in patients who are obese has been demonstrated to be problematic. Retrograde femoral nailing therefore has been advocated in this patient population, but little data exist to support such a recommendation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare antegrade and retrograde femoral nailing technique in both patients who are and are not obese. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, internal review board (IRB)-approved study. SETTING: Four Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients (151) with a femoral shaft fracture (OTA 32) treated with intramedullary nailing were studied. Thirty-two with a body mass index (BMI) of >or=30 comprised the obese group (OG), and 119 with a BMI of <30 comprised the nonobese group (NOG). Antegrade nailing was performed in 15 patients from the OG and 84 from the NOG. Retrograde nailing was performed in 17 patients from the OG and 35 from the NOG. INTERVENTION: Reamed intramedullary nailing of a femoral shaft fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and fracture characteristics, operative time, fluoroscopy time, healing, complications, and functional outcome based on the lower extremity measure (LEM) were evaluated. RESULTS: Antegrade technique in the OG was associated with a 52% greater average operative time (94 minutes) compared with antegrade nailing in the NOG (62 minutes; P < 0.003). For retrograde nailing technique, there was no difference in the average operative time between the OG (67 minutes) and NOG (62 minutes; P = 0.51). Antegrade technique in the OG was associated with a 79% greater average radiation exposure time (247 seconds) compared with antegrade nailing in the NOG (135 seconds; P < 0.03). For retrograde nailing technique, average fluoroscopy time was similar between the OG (76 seconds) and the NOG (63 seconds; P = 0.44). Within the OG, antegrade nailing required 40% greater average operative time (94 minutes versus 67 minutes, P < 0.02) and more than 3 times more average fluoroscopy time (242 seconds versus 76 seconds, P < 0.002) than retrograde nailing. Thirty-eight patients from the original cohort were not available for follow-up. Of the 113 patients followed (average 9 months, range: 4 to 25 months), healing complications occurred similarly between the 2 groups, with 1 nonunion and 2 delayed unions in the OG (12%), and 3 nonunions and 9 delayed unions in the NOG (14%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence, in the form of decreased operative and radiation exposure times, to support the use of retrograde nailing technique for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in patients who are obese. Also, antegrade nailing was found to require significantly more operative and radiation exposure time in the patient who is obese as opposed to the patients who is not obese. Although having similar baseline functional scores, patients who are obese recovered at a slower rate and more incompletely than patients who are not obese.

Trochanteric versus piriformis entry portal for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare results of femoral shaft fracture treatment with nailing through the greater trochanter to nailing through the piriformis fossa with nails specifically designed for each starting point. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Four level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS: One-hundred and eight patients treated by 1 of 4 surgeons for a femoral shaft or subtrochanteric fracture with antegrade nailing between January 2001 and April 2003 were included. Four patients who expired early in the postoperative period and 13 with insufficient follow-up were excluded from analysis. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with either nailing through a greater trochanter starting point with the Trigen TAN nail (GT group) (n = 38) or through a piriformis fossa starting point with the Trigen FAN nail (PF group) (n = 53). OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, fluoroscopy time, fracture alignment, fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome based on the lower-extremity measure (LEM). RESULTS: Thirty-seven of the 38 fractures from the GT group and 52 of the 53 fractures from the PF group healed after the index procedure. One patient from the GT group had external rotation malalignment of 12 degrees. There were no other malalignments or iatrogenic fracture comminution. There were 2 infectious complications, 1 from each group. The average operative time was 75 minutes for piriformis insertion using the FAN nail and 62 minutes for trochanteric insertion using the TAN nail (P = 0.08). The average fluoroscopy time was 61% greater for the PF group (153 seconds) than for the GT group (95 seconds) (P < 0.05). These differences were magnified in patients who were obese (body mass index > 30) where the operative time was 30% greater (P < 0.05) and the fluoroscopy time was 73% higher in the PF group (P < 0.02). Patients from both groups had a similar initial decline and subsequent improvement in function over time (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A femoral nail specially designed for trochanteric insertion resulted in equally high union rates, equally low complication rates, and functional results similar to conventional antegrade femoral nailing through the piriformis fossa. The greater trochanter entry portal coupled with an appropriately designed nail represents a rational alternative for antegrade femoral nailing with the benefit of decreased fluoroscopy time and decreased operative time in patients who are obese.

Acetabular fractures revisited: a new CT-based classification.

The objective of this investigation is to provide a new CT-based classification of acetabular fractures. The axial CT scans of 112 randomly selected acetabular fracture patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between January 1998 and December 2000 were analyzed by an experienced orthopedic trauma surgeon and two experienced emergency radiologists. When available, 3D reformatted images were analyzed as well. The fracture pattern for each acetabular fracture with respect to column(s) wall(s) and extension superiorly and/or inferiorly from the acetabulum, when present, was recorded. Fracture comminution was not a defining characteristic. Analysis of the acetabular fracture patterns showed that each fracture fell into one of four broad categories: Category 0--wall only; Category 1--single column; Category 2--both columns, with extension subcategories of (A) no extension, (B) superior extension only, (C) inferior extension only, and (D) both superior and inferior extension; and Category 3--the "floating" acetabulum. The axial CT display of acetabular fracture patterns provides a basis for a classification of acetabular fractures that is simple, unambiguous, readily understood by both radiologists and orthopedic surgeons, and provides clear direction for both diagnosis and surgical treatment planning. Category and subcategory fracture specificity creates a mechanism for intra- and interdepartmental postoperative assessment of any of the individual acetabular fracture types.

Acetabular fractures revisited: part 1, redefinition of the Letournel anterior column.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of part 1 of this study is to redefine the Letournel anterior column on the basis of developmental and adult pelvic skeletal anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The axial CT scans of 112 randomly selected patients with acetabular fracture or fracture-dislocations admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1998 and December 2000 were analyzed by an experienced orthopedic trauma surgeon and two experienced emergency radiologists. When available, 3D reformatted images were analyzed as well. The discrepancy between the Letournel definition of the anterior and posterior columns became readily apparent. Standard text books of anatomy and surgical anatomy were referenced relative to the embryologic and adult components of the acetabulum. RESULTS: The anterior column is redefined with its superior border being the anatomic arcuate and iliopectineal lines, thereby coinciding with the superior border (arcuate line) of the Letournel posterior column. CONCLUSION: Redefinition of the anterior column eliminates diagnostic ambiguity of the Letournel elementary anterior column fracture as well as the Letournel associated anterior column or wall with hemitransverse fracture. The redefined anterior column is integral to the CT-based classification described in part 2 of our study.

Acetabular fractures revisited: part 2, a new CT-based classification.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to provide a new CT-based classification of acetabular fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The axial CT scans of 112 randomly selected acetabular fractures in patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center between January 1998 and December 2000 were analyzed by an experienced orthopedic trauma surgeon and two experienced emergency radiologists. When available, 3D reformatted images were analyzed as well. The fracture pattern for each acetabular fracture, with respect to column walls and extension beyond the acetabulum, when present, was recorded. Fracture comminution was not a defining characteristic. RESULTS: Analysis of the 112 acetabular fracture patterns showed that each fracture fell into one of four broad categories. Category 0 included wall fractures only. Category I included acetabular fractures limited to a single (anterior or posterior) column. Category II fractures included those involving both the anterior and posterior columns; category II fractures were further subdivided into those with no fracture extension beyond the acetabulum, those with superior or inferior extension, and those with both superior and inferior extensions beyond the acetabulum. Category III fractures included only the "floating" acetabulum, which is defined as an acetabular fracture in which the acetabulum is separated from the axial skeleton both anteriorly and posteriorly. CONCLUSION: The axial CT display of acetabular fracture patterns provides a basis for a classification of acetabular fractures that is simple, unambiguous, readily understood by both radiologists and orthopedic surgeons and provides clear direction for both diagnosis and surgical treatment planning. Category and subcategory fracture specificity creates a mechanism for intra- and interdepartmental postoperative assessment of any of the individual acetabular fracture types.

Patient-controlled ropivacaine analgesia after arthroscopic subacromial decompression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a subacromial patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine versus saline for postoperative pain control following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. TYPE OF STUDY: Double-blind prospective randomized study. METHODS: A prospective, randomized double-blind study was performed on a consecutive group of 24 patients. All patients had arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Ropivacaine was chosen as the study drug due to the association of cardiac toxicity with the use of bupivacaine. The surgeon, anesthesiologist, and the operating room staff were blinded to the randomization. Immediately before surgery, the pharmacy staff randomized the type of drug infusion. Patients were asked to record their pain score using a visual analog scale (VAS) along with the amount of hydrocodone consumption for the first 2 days after surgery. RESULTS: Nineteen patients completed the study. Ten patients received a subacromial infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL per hour with a bolus dose of 2 mL at a 15-minute lockout period via a microjet PCA pump (group I). Nine patients received saline in the same experimental conditions (group II). The use of a PCA ropivacaine infusion (group I) resulted in a significant reduction of postoperative pain by 34% as measured by VAS scale (P <.05), but no changes in the amount of hydrocodone consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The use of subacromial 0.2% ropivacaine PCA infusion provided effective postoperative pain control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Mechanical testing of small fracture implants for comparison of insertion and failure torques.

INTRODUCTION: Small fracture screws are among the most commonly used implants in the field of orthopedic surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the insertion and failure torques of three screw types: cortical, partially threaded cancellous, and fully threaded cancellous from three manufacturers: Zimmer, Richards, and Synthes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each type of screw was subjected to biomechanical tests to determine the insertion ( n=6/group) and failure ( n=10/group) torques. RESULTS: Two-factor ANOVA tests were run to determine whether the insertion or failure torques were different for the different screw types and manufacturers. In the case of insertion torques, neither the screw nor the manufacturer had any significant effect. In the case of failure torque, significant differences were found based on both the screw type and the manufacturer, with the cortical screws manufactured by Zimmer being the strongest. Although there were strength differences, the most important comparison clinically is between the failure torque and the insertion torque of each screw. In all cases, the failure torques were approximately 20 times larger than the insertion torques, and therefore no failures should occur if only torsional loads are applied during insertion. This comparison shows that factors other than screw strength and manufacturing processes may be involved in cases of screw failure during insertion. CONCLUSION: All three screw types from all three manufacturers appear to be mechanically reliable, with the proper insertion to failure torque ratio. The surgeon's choice of implant should be based on other considerations.

Continuous lumbar plexus block for acute postoperative pain management after open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of postoperative continuous lumbar plexus blocks for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of an acetabular fracture. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an acetabular fracture. DESIGN/PERSPECTIVE: According to a case-control study design, patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 13) received postoperatively a continuous lumbar plexus block with 0.2% ropivacaine (10 mL/hr for 48 hours), and group 2 (n = 13) received postoperatively patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (1 mg; lock-out time, 10 minutes; total 6 mg/hr). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative morphine consumption, time to unassisted ambulation, and clinical and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: No significant differences in demographics, surgical procedure, or duration of surgery were reported between the two groups. The lumbar plexus catheter group showed a lower requirement for morphine in the postanesthesia care unit (6 mg [0-14 mg]) and during the first 2 days (20 mg [6-55 mg] on day 1 and 29 mg [4-56 mg] on day 2) than the control group (51 mg [20-100 mg] on day 1 and 50 mg [10-93 mg] on day 2) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.021). Effective unassisted ambulation was recovered earlier in patients with the lumbar plexus catheter (3 days; range 2-4 days) than in the control group (4 days; range 3-7 days) (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous lumbar plexus block represents an interesting alternative for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of an acetabular fracture.