[Evaluation of trough/peak ratio of indapamide 1.5 mg sustained-release form assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring]. / Evaluation du rapport vallée/pic de l'indapamide 1,5 mg comprimé enrobé a libération prolongée par la mesure ambulatoire de la pression artérielle.

Because of the high variability of casual blood pressure measurements. ABPM has become a complementary clinical tool for evaluating antihypertensive treatment. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical guidelines to interpret the data. A review of the literature shows that ABPM efficacy data are analyzed differently, especially the trough-to-peak ratio proposed by the Food and Drug Administration. Published trough-to-peak ratios are widely disparate due to the diversity of the calculation methods which are most often not justified. Thus inappropriate comparisons of these results can easily produce incorrect conclusions. The aim of this review is to select, through the literature, basic methodological requirements commonly agreed on for accurate assessment of trough-to-peak ratio, and to apply them to the ABPM data on indapamide, a diuretic related to the thiazides. Six methodological requirements commonly agreed on at this time are the following: 1. study design: placebo-controlled study with a placebo run-in period; 2. patients selection: compliance with the study protocol, record obtained before and after treatment for each patient; 3. population analysis: whole and responder population: 4. quality control of the records: 5. placebo effect subtraction; 6. global and individual calculation with the indication of median values. Given that, no T/P ratio, especially for a diuretic, has yet been calculated according to these requirements, the above methodological points were taken into account for the T/P calculation of indapamide, from a placebo-controlled dose-finding study involving 285 patients.

Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure profile of a new slow-release formulation of diltiazem in mild to moderate hypertension.

Twelve patients with a mild to moderate essential hypertension were included in a double-blind, balanced, randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study to assess the efficacy and duration of action of a new slow-release formulation of diltiazem (300 mg) given once daily for 3 weeks. All office blood pressure measurements were done 24 hours after drug intake. In order to improve the accuracy of the trial, 24-hours non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (Spacelabs 90207 system) were performed as well. Diltiazem significantly lowered supine and standing systolic and diastolic office blood pressure (by 16.9/12.7 mmHg and by 17.3/13.8 mmHg, respectively), without changing office heart rate. Diltiazem also significantly lowered ambulatory blood pressure measured over 24 hours, as well as ambulatory heart rate. The blood pressure lowering effect was most pronounced during the daytime period and did not reach statistical significance during the sleeping hours. The treatment was well tolerated, and there were no significant side effects. The results confirm the antihypertensive efficacy of diltiazem LP 300 mg once daily during the daytime and during the early morning blood pressure rise, without inducing nocturnal hypotension.