A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Interactions of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir.

Nirmatrelvir is a potent and selective inhibitor of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease that is used as an oral antiviral coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment. To sustain unbound systemic trough concentrations above the antiviral in vitro 90% effective concentration value (EC90), nirmatrelvir is coadministered with 100 mg of ritonavir, a pharmacokinetic enhancer. Ritonavir inhibits nirmatrelvir's cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism which results in renal elimination becoming the primary route of nirmatrelvir elimination when dosed concomitantly. Nirmatrelvir exhibits absorption-limited nonlinear pharmacokinetics. When coadministered with ritonavir in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, nirmatrelvir reaches a maximum concentration of 3.43 µg/mL (11.7× EC90) in approximately 3 h on day 5 of dosing, with a geometric mean day 5 trough concentration of 1.57 µg/mL (5.4× EC90). Drug interactions with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (PAXLOVIDTM) are primarily attributed to ritonavir-mediated CYP3A4 inhibition, and to a lesser extent CYP2D6 and P-glycoprotein inhibition. Population pharmacokinetics and quantitative systems pharmacology modeling support twice daily dosing of 300 mg/100 mg nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for 5 days, with a reduced 150 mg/100 mg dose for patients with moderate renal impairment. Rapid clinical development of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in response to the emerging COVID-19 pandemic was enabled by innovations in clinical pharmacology research, including an adaptive phase 1 trial design allowing direct to pivotal phase 3 development, fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to delineate absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion profiles, and innovative applications of model-informed drug development to accelerate development.

Patient Centric Microsampling to Support Paxlovid Clinical Development: Bridging and Implementation.

Nirmatrelvir is a potent and selective severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease inhibitor. Nirmatrelvir co-packaged with ritonavir (as PAXLOVID) received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on December 22, 2021, as an oral treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and subsequent new drug application approval on May 25, 2023. Pharmacokinetic (PK) capillary blood sampling at-home using Tasso-M20 micro-volumetric sampling device was implemented in the program, including three phase II/III outpatient and several clinical pharmacology studies supporting the EUA. The at-home sampling complemented venous blood sampling procedures to enrich the PK dataset, to decrease the need for patients' site visit for PK sampling, and to allow different sampling approaches for flexibility and convenience. To demonstrate concordance/equivalence, bridging between venous plasma and Tasso dried blood results was conducted by comparing concentrations and derived PK parameters from both sampling approaches. In addition, a two-compartment population PK model was utilized to bridge the plasma and Tasso data by estimating the PK parameters using blood-to-plasma ratio as a slope parameter. Operational challenges were successfully managed to implement at-home PK sampling in global phase II/III trials. Sample quality was generally very good with less than 3% samples deemed as "not usable" from over 800 samples collected in all the studies. Experience gained from sites and patients will guide future broader implementations.

Dosing recommendation of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir using an integrated population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Protease inhibitor nirmatrelvir coadministered with ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer (PAXLOVID™; Pfizer Inc) became the first orally bioavailable antiviral agent granted Emergency Use Authorization in the United States in patients ≥12 years old with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This population pharmacokinetic analysis used pooled plasma nirmatrelvir concentrations from eight completed phase I and II/III studies to characterize nirmatrelvir pharmacokinetics when coadministered with ritonavir in adults with/without COVID-19. Influence of covariates (e.g., formulation, dose, COVID-19) was examined using a stepwise forward selection (α = 0.05) and backward elimination (α = 0.001) approach. Simulations with 5000 subjects for each age and weight group and renal function category were performed to support dosing recommendations of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for adults with COVID-19 and guide dose adjustments for specific patient populations (e.g., renal insufficiency, pediatrics). The final model was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption, including allometric scaling of body weight and dose-dependent absorption (power function on relative bioavailability). Nirmatrelvir clearance (CL) increased proportionally to body surface area-normalized creatinine CL (nCLCR) up to 70 ml/min/1.73 m2 and was independent of nCLCR above the breakpoint. Significant covariates included carbamazepine or itraconazole coadministration as markers for drug interactions, COVID-19 on CL, formulation on relative bioavailability, and age on central volume of distribution. Simulation results support current dosing recommendations of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300/100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) in adults with normal renal function or mild impairment and pediatrics (12 to <18 years) weighing ≥40 kg and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 150/100 mg b.i.d. in adults with moderate renal impairment.

Effects of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on midazolam and dabigatran pharmacokinetics in healthy participants.

AIMS: To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety after coadministration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone with midazolam (a cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate) and dabigatran (a P-glycoprotein substrate). METHODS: PK was studied in 2 phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence studies in healthy adults. Single oral doses of midazolam 2 mg (n = 12) or dabigatran 75 mg (n = 24) were administered alone and after steady state (i.e. ≥2 days) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg and ritonavir 100 mg. Midazolam and dabigatran plasma concentrations and adverse events were analysed for each treatment. RESULTS: After administration of midazolam with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), midazolam geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increased 14.3-fold and 3.7-fold, respectively. Midazolam coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in 16.5-fold and 3.9-fold increases in midazolam geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax , respectively. After administration of dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (test) or alone (reference), dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax increased 1.9-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively. Dabigatran coadministered with ritonavir (test) or alone (reference) resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in dabigatran geometric mean AUCinf and Cmax . Midazolam or dabigatran exposures were generally comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, with a slightly higher dabigatran Cmax with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir vs. ritonavir alone. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was generally safe when administered with or without midazolam or dabigatran. No serious or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of midazolam or dabigatran with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir increased systemic exposure of midazolam or dabigatran. Midazolam exposures were comparable when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or ritonavir alone, suggesting no incremental effect of nirmatrelvir. Dabigatran Cmax was slightly higher when coadministered with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared with of ritonavir alone, suggesting a minor incremental effect of nirmatrelvir.

Effects of itraconazole and carbamazepine on the pharmacokinetics of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in healthy adults.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of a strong cytochrome P450 family (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) and inducer (carbamazepine) on the pharmacokinetics and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics were measured in two phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence studies in healthy adults. During Period 1, oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 300 mg/100 mg twice daily was administered alone; during Period 2, it was administered with itraconazole or carbamazepine. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered as repeated doses or one dose in the itraconazole and carbamazepine studies, respectively. Nirmatrelvir and ritonavir plasma concentrations and adverse event (AE) rates in both periods were analysed. RESULTS: Each study included 12 participants. Following administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with itraconazole (Test) or alone (Reference), test/reference ratios of the adjusted geometric means (90% CIs) for nirmatrelvir AUCtau and Cmax were 138.82% (129.25%, 149.11%) and 118.57% (112.50%, 124.97%), respectively. After administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir with carbamazepine (Test) or alone (Reference), test/reference ratios (90% CIs) of the adjusted geometric means for nirmatrelvir AUCinf and Cmax were 44.50% (33.77%, 58.65%) and 56.82% (47.04%, 68.62%), respectively. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was generally safe when administered with or without itraconazole or carbamazepine. No serious or severe AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor with a strong CYP3A inhibitor used for pharmacokinetic enhancement (i.e., ritonavir) resulted in small increases in plasma nirmatrelvir exposure, whereas coadministration of a strong inducer substantially decreased systemic nirmatrelvir and ritonavir exposures suggesting a contraindication in the label with CYP3A4 strong inducers. Administration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir alone or with itraconazole or carbamazepine was generally safe.

Multiple switching between the biosimilar adalimumab PF-06410293 and reference adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: An adalimumab biosimilar with an interchangeability designation could increase access to effective treatment for more patients. We aimed to assess the interchangeability of adalimumab biosimilar PF-06410293 (adalimumab-afzb) and reference adalimumab using a multi-switch study design. METHODS: We did an open-label, randomised, parallel-group study at 61 community (n=29), hospital (n=12), and academic (n=20) sites in ten countries (Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czech Republic, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, Ukraine, and USA). Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and met the 2010 American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis for at least 4 months with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis, based on their physician's evaluation. Eligible patients had been receiving methotrexate for at least 12 weeks and been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks before the first dose of study medication. All patients received subcutaneous reference adalimumab (40 mg/0·4 mL [100 mg/mL] every 2 weeks) for 10 weeks before randomisation. At week 10, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either three switches between subcutaneous reference adalimumab (40 mg/0·4 mL [100 mg/mL] every 2 weeks) and adalimumab-afzb (40 mg/0·8 mL [50 mg/mL] every 2 weeks; switching group), or continuous dosing with subcutanous reference adalimumab (40 mg/0·4 mL [100 mg/mL] every 2 weeks; non-switching group) with stratification by bodyweight groups. Patients, investigators, and site personnel were not masked to treatment allocation. Primary endpoints were maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUCτ) during weeks 30-32 in the pharmacokinetic population. Interchangeability was based on geometric mean ratios and corresponding 90% CIs within prespecified equivalence margins of 80-125% for both primary endpoints. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of adalimumab-afzb or reference adalimumab. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04230213. FINDINGS: Of the 569 patients assessed for eligibility between Jan 13, 2020, and June 22, 2021, 445 were enrolled, and 427 completed the first 10 weeks and were randomly assigned (213 to the switching group and 214 to the non-switching group). Participants had a median age of 56 years (IQR 46-63), 354 (83%) of 427 patients were women and 73 (17%) were men, and 422 (99%) were White. In the pharmacokinetic population (n=380), no clinically meaningful differences were observed in mean steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters between the switching and non-switching groups (geometric mean AUC 2237 µg × h/mL in the switching group and 2125 µg × h/mL in the non-switching group; Cmax 8·21 µg/mL in the switching group and 8·00 µg/mL in the non-switching group). Geometric mean ratios and 90% CIs for AUCτ (105·31, 89·16-124·39) and Cmax (102·56, 89·78-117·17) were within prespecified equivalence margins. No meaningful differences were observed in the proportion of patients who had serious adverse events (three [1%] of 213 patients in the switching group vs eight [4%] of 214 patients in the non-switching group), grade 3 or higher adverse events of special interest, discontinuations due to adverse events (eight [4%] vs nine [4%]), or immunogenic reactions in antidrug antibody-positive patients. No deaths were reported during the study. INTERPRETATION: The risk of multiple switches between reference adalimumab and adalimumab-afzb with respect to diminished efficacy (using pharmacokinetics as a surrogate) or safety is not greater than the risk of using reference adalimumab alone. FUNDING: Pfizer. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel-Group Pharmacokinetic Study of PF-06410293 (adalimumab-afzb), an Adalimumab Biosimilar, by Subcutaneous Dosing Using a Prefilled Syringe or a Prefilled Pen in Healthy Subjects.

This open-label, single-dose, randomized, parallel-group, 2-arm phase 1 bioequivalence (BE) study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of PF-06410293 (ADL-PF), an adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar, following administration by prefilled pen (PFP) or prefilled syringe (PFS). A total of 164 healthy adult subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive ADL-PF (40 mg subcutaneously) in the lower abdomen or upper anterior thigh by PFS or PFP; 163 subjects were included in the primary PK analysis. The concentration-time profiles of the ADL-PF PFS and PFP treatment arms were similar. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratios of the primary end points (area under the serum concentration-time profile from time 0 to 2 weeks after dosing and maximum observed serum concentration) fell within the 80.00%-125.00% prespecified margin for BE. Comparable numbers of subjects experienced adverse events (AEs) between treatment groups, and injection-site pain was similar at all times and for the 2 injection-site locations. This study demonstrated the BE of ADL-PF following subcutaneous administration using either a PFS or PFP device. ADL-PF by PFS or PFP injection was well tolerated, with the distribution of AEs, including injection-site reactions, being similar between treatment arms.

Pharmacokinetics of Deutetrabenazine and Tetrabenazine: Dose Proportionality and Food Effect.

Deutetrabenazine (Austedo, Teva), an approved treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia in adult patients, is a rationally designed deuterated form of tetrabenazine. Two studies assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of deutetrabenazine compared with tetrabenazine, and the effects of food on absorption of the deuterated active metabolites, α-dihydrotetrabenazine (α-HTBZ) and ß-dihydrotetrabenazine (ß-HTBZ). One study was an open-label 2-part study in healthy volunteers; the first part included a crossover single dose of two 15 mg candidate deutetrabenazine formulations in fed and fasted states compared with tetrabenazine 25 mg in the fasted state, and the second part included single and repeated dosing of the commercial formulation of deutetrabenazine (7.5, 15, and 22.5 mg) compared with tetrabenazine 25 mg. The second study was an open-label 5-way crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 32) to evaluate relative bioavailability of 4 dose levels of the commercial formulation of deutetrabenazine (6, 12, 18, and 24 mg) with a standard meal and 18 mg with a high-fat meal. Both studies confirmed longer half-lives for active metabolites and lower peak-to-trough fluctuations for the sum of the metabolites (total [α+ß]-HTBZ) following deutetrabenazine compared with tetrabenazine (3- to 4-fold and 11-fold, respectively) in steady-state conditions. Deutetrabenazine doses estimated to provide total (α+ß)-HTBZ exposure comparable to tetrabenazine 25 mg were 11.4-13.2 mg. Food had no effect on exposure to total (α+ß)-HTBZ, as measured by AUC. Although the total (α+ß)-HTBZ Cmax of deutetrabenazine was increased by ≈50% in the presence of food, it remained lower than that of tetrabenazine.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Weight-Based Intravenous Reslizumab Dosing.

Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg has demonstrated efficacy in clinical studies of patients with eosinophilic asthma and a history of exacerbations. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to determine whether 3.0 mg/kg weight-based dosing is appropriate to obtain consistent reslizumab exposures in all patients. PK data in healthy volunteers and patients ≥12 years with moderate to severe asthma, eosinophilic asthma, or nasal polyposis were analyzed from 4 phase 1, 2 phase 2, and 2 phase 3 studies of intravenous (IV) reslizumab (N = 804). Covariates evaluated included age, race, sex, baseline weight, renal and liver function, concomitant medications, and antidrug antibody status. Exposure-response models were developed to characterize key efficacy (blood eosinophil levels, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1 ], Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ-7] scores), and safety end points (muscle disorder adverse events [AEs]). Vial-based dosing was evaluated as an alternative to weight-based dosing. IV reslizumab PK was accurately described by a 2-compartment PK model with 0-order input and first-order elimination. Body weight was the only covariate that significantly influenced PK parameters. However, with weight-based dosing, comparable steady-state exposures were observed across high and low body weights. Greater eosinophil lowering and longer response duration were observed with increasing dose; exposure-related effects on FEV1 and ACQ-7 were also seen, demonstrating the clinical importance of a dosing regimen to optimize reslizumab exposure. The probability of a muscle disorder AE appeared to increase with increasing exposure. Steady-state exposure measures were similar for both dosing regimens, showing vial-based dosing as an alternative method of achieving the benefits of weight-based dosing.

Pharmacokinetic and Metabolic Profile of Deutetrabenazine (TEV-50717) Compared With Tetrabenazine in Healthy Volunteers.

Deutetrabenazine (Austedo, Teva Pharmaceuticals) is a deuterated form of tetrabenazine. It is the first deuterated drug to receive US regulatory approval and is approved for treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease and tardive dyskinesia. Two oral single dose studies comparing deutetrabenazine (25 mg) with tetrabenazine (25 mg) in healthy volunteers evaluated the impact of deuteration on pharmacokinetics of the active metabolites, alpha-dihydrotetrabenazine (α-HTBZ) and beta-dihydrotetrabenazine (ß-HTBZ), metabolite profile, safety, and tolerability. In the two-way, cross-over study, the mean elimination half-life of deuterated total (α + ß)-HTBZ was doubled compared with nondeuterated total (α + ß)-HTBZ, with a twofold increase in overall mean exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf )) and a marginal increase in mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax ). In the mass balance and metabolite profiling study, there were no novel plasma or urinary metabolites of [14 C]-deutetrabenazine relative to [14 C]-tetrabenazine. Specific deuteration in deutetrabenazine resulted in a superior pharmacokinetic profile and an increased ratio of active-to-inactive metabolites, attributes considered to provide significant benefits to patients.

Multiscale modeling and cinematic visualization of photosynthetic energy conversion processes from electronic to cell scales.

Conversion of sunlight into chemical energy, namely photosynthesis, is the primary energy source of life on Earth. A visualization depicting this process, based on multiscale computational models from electronic to cell scales, is presented in the form of an excerpt from the fulldome show Birth of Planet Earth. This accessible visual narrative shows a lay audience, including children, how the energy of sunlight is captured, converted, and stored through a chain of proteins to power living cells. The visualization is the result of a multi-year collaboration among biophysicists, visualization scientists, and artists, which, in turn, is based on a decade-long experimental-computational collaboration on structural and functional modeling that produced an atomic detail description of a bacterial bioenergetic organelle, the chromatophore. Software advancements necessitated by this project have led to significant performance and feature advances, including hardware-accelerated cinematic ray tracing and instanced visualizations for efficient cell-scale modeling. The energy conversion steps depicted feature an integration of function from electronic to cell levels, spanning nearly 12 orders of magnitude in time scales. This atomic detail description uniquely enables a modern retelling of one of humanity's earliest stories-the interplay between light and life.

Crops In Silico: Generating Virtual Crops Using an Integrative and Multi-scale Modeling Platform.

Multi-scale models can facilitate whole plant simulations by linking gene networks, protein synthesis, metabolic pathways, physiology, and growth. Whole plant models can be further integrated with ecosystem, weather, and climate models to predict how various interactions respond to environmental perturbations. These models have the potential to fill in missing mechanistic details and generate new hypotheses to prioritize directed engineering efforts. Outcomes will potentially accelerate improvement of crop yield, sustainability, and increase future food security. It is time for a paradigm shift in plant modeling, from largely isolated efforts to a connected community that takes advantage of advances in high performance computing and mechanistic understanding of plant processes. Tools for guiding future crop breeding and engineering, understanding the implications of discoveries at the molecular level for whole plant behavior, and improved prediction of plant and ecosystem responses to the environment are urgently needed. The purpose of this perspective is to introduce Crops in silico (cropsinsilico.org), an integrative and multi-scale modeling platform, as one solution that combines isolated modeling efforts toward the generation of virtual crops, which is open and accessible to the entire plant biology community. The major challenges involved both in the development and deployment of a shared, multi-scale modeling platform, which are summarized in this prospectus, were recently identified during the first Crops in silico Symposium and Workshop.

A Phase 1/1b Study Evaluating Trametinib Plus Docetaxel or Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This two-part study evaluated trametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in combination with anticancer agents. Inhibition of MEK, a downstream effector of KRAS, demonstrated preclinical synergy with chemotherapy in KRAS-mutant NSCLC cell lines. Part 1 of this study identified recommended phase 2 doses of trametinib combinations. Part 2, reported herein, evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of trametinib combinations in patients with NSCLC with and without KRAS mutations. METHODS: Phase 1b evaluated trametinib plus docetaxel with growth factor support (trametinib, 2.0 mg once daily, and docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or pemetrexed (trametinib, 1.5 mg once daily, and pemetrexed, 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Eligibility criteria for the expansion cohorts included metastatic NSCLC with measurable disease, known KRAS mutation status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or lower, and no more than two prior regimens. RESULTS: The primary end point of overall response rate (ORR) was met for both combinations. A confirmed partial response (PR) was observed in 10 of the 47 patients with NSCLC who received trametinib plus docetaxel (21%). The ORR was 18% (four PRs in 22 patients) in those with KRAS wild-type NSCLC versus 24% (six PRs in 25 patients) in those with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Of the 42 patients with NSCLC treated with trametinib plus pemetrexed, six (14%) had a PR; the ORR was 17% (four of 23) in patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC versus 11% (two of 19) in KRAS wild-type NSCLC. Adverse events-most commonly diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue-were manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Trametinib-plus-chemotherapy combinations were tolerable. Clinical activity exceeding the ORRs previously reported with docetaxel or pemetrexed alone in KRAS-mutated NSCLC and meeting prespecified criteria was observed.

A Phase I/II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Foretinib as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Purpose: This phase I/II single-arm study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and activity of foretinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of MET, ROS, RON, AXL, TIE-2, and VEGFR2, in the first-line setting in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Experimental Design: In the phase I part, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients were dose escalated on foretinib (30-60 mg) every day using the standard 3+3 design. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined, an additional 32 patients were dosed at the MTD in the phase II expansion cohort for assessment of efficacy and safety. Exploratory analyses were conducted to assess potential biomarkers that might correlate with clinical efficacy and survival.Results: The MTD of foretinib was established as 30 mg every day. The most frequent adverse events were hypertension, decreased appetite, ascites, and pyrexia. When dosed at 30 mg every day in the first-line setting, foretinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity. According to the modified mRECIST, the objective response rate was 22.9%, the disease stabilization rate 82.9%, and the median duration of response 7.6 months. The median time to progression was 4.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months. Fifteen candidate biomarkers whose levels in the circulation were significantly altered in response to foretinib treatment were elucidated. Multivariate analyses identified IL6 and IL8 as independent predictors of OS.Conclusions: Foretinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and good tolerability in the first-line setting in Asian advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Baseline plasma levels of IL6 or IL8 might predict the response to foretinib. Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2405-13. ©2016 AACR.

Phase 1 study to evaluate the effect of the MEK inhibitor trametinib on cardiac repolarization in patients with solid tumours.

PURPOSE: Trametinib is a reversible, selective inhibitor of the mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (MEK1) and 2 (MEK2). Cardiotoxicity (congestive heart failure, decreased heart rate, left ventricular dysfunction, and hypertension) related to trametinib is an infrequent, but serious, adverse event (AE). Prolongation of the QT interval increases the risk of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. Thus, the risk of trametinib inducing QT prolongation at putative supratherapeutic exposure was evaluated. METHODS: Eligible patients with solid tumours received placebo on day 1, once-daily trametinib 2-mg doses on days 2-14, and a single trametinib 3-mg dose on day 15 to achieve supratherapeutic dosing for QTc measurement. Electrocardiogram was assessed by 12-lead ambulatory 24-h Holter monitoring pre-dose, and on day 1 and day 15. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) parameters were measured. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 35 patients completed the study. There was no effect of trametinib when compared with time-matched placebo on the change from baseline in QTcF, QTcB, or QTcI interval. Mean AUC0-24 and C max following trametinib 2-mg repeat doses were 364 ng.h/mL and 22.9 ng/mL, respectively; the corresponding values for the 3-mg dose were 454 ng.h/mL and 29.2 ng/mL. Median T max was approximately 2 h for both doses. Statistical analysis and PK/PD modelling showed no significant relationship between QTcF interval and trametinib plasma concentrations. AEs were consistent with those reported previously. No electrocardiogram abnormalities were reported as AEs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest trametinib has no significant effect on QT prolongation at supratherapeutic exposure.

Activity of the oral mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor trametinib in RAS-mutant relapsed or refractory myeloid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: RAS/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase activation is common in myeloid malignancies. Trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1)/MEK2 inhibitor with activity against multiple myeloid cell lines at low nanomolar concentrations, was evaluated for safety and clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias. METHODS: This phase 1/2 study accrued patients with any relapsed/refractory leukemia in phase 1. In phase 2, this study accrued patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with NRAS or KRAS mutations (cohort 1); patients with AML, MDS, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) with a RAS wild-type mutation or an unknown mutation status (cohort 2); and patients with CMML with an NRAS or KRAS mutation (cohorts 3). RESULTS: The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, rash, nausea, and increased alanine aminotransferase levels. The phase 2 recommended dose for Trametinib was 2 mg orally daily. The overall response rates were 20%, 3%, and 27% for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and this indicated preferential activity among RAS-mutated myeloid malignancies. Repeated cycles of trametinib were well tolerated with manageable or reversible toxicities; these results were similar to those of other trametinib studies. CONCLUSIONS: The selective, single-agent activity of trametinib against RAS-mutated myeloid malignancies validates its therapeutic potential. Combination strategies based on a better understanding of the hierarchical role of mutations and signaling in myeloid malignancies are likely to improve the response rate and duration. Cancer 2016;122:1871-9. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma.

PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of oral trametinib, a first in class MEK inhibitor, identify covariates, and describe the relationship between exposure and clinical effects in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Trametinib concentrations obtained in three clinical studies were included in the population pharmacokinetic analysis. Trametinib 2 mg once daily was administered in the Phase 2 and 3 studies. The impact of exposure [trough (C min) or average concentration] on response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) was examined. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations (n = 3120) obtained in 493 patients were described using a two-compartment model. Trametinib oral clearance was lower in women relative to men (1.26-fold) and increased with body weight. There was no significant effect of age, mild or moderate renal impairment, or mild hepatic impairment on oral clearance. Between-subject variability was low (24 %). The number of responders was consistent across median exposure range, although tended to be lower at trough concentration <10 ng/mL. Disease stage was found to be a significant predictor of response with a lower response rate in patients with disease stage of M1c. Lactate dehydrogenase was significant in the analysis of PFS. Patients with observed C min above the median had longer PFS than those below median based on Phase 2 study (median 10.6 ng/mL), while the effect of exposure was not statistically significant in the Phase 3 study (median 13.6 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: No dosage adjustments are required with any of the covariates tested. Clinical efficacy was associated with trametinib trough concentrations greater than 10 ng/mL.

Population pharmacokinetics modeling and analysis of foretinib in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

Foretinib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including MET and VEGFR, with the potential for treatment of solid tumors. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pathogenesis is associated with overexpression of MET, and physiologic changes in the livers of HCC patients may decrease CYP3A isozyme-mediated metabolism of foretinib. A population pharmacokinetic model of foretinib was developed to explore the effect of tumor type, formulation, and other covariates. Data from 1 HCC study in Asia and 3 non-HCC studies in the United States with varying foretinib regimens and formulations were used for analysis. A 2-compartment model with a linear first-order absorption and elimination and lag time in absorption adequately described foretinib pharmacokinetics in 132 advanced non-HCC and HCC patients and identified an effect of formulations on bioavailability. The bisphosphate salt capsules and freebase tablets had a relative bioavailability 37% and 20% higher, respectively, than the solution formulation. HCC patients had ≈19.6% lower mean clearance (70.14 L/h), ≈16% lower mean volume of distribution (1725.6 L), and higher dose-normalized exposure compared with non-HCC patients. This could be a result of differences in metabolism in HCC patients, body weight, or activity of CYP3A isozymes between Asian and Western cancer patients.

Relative bioavailability of pediatric oral solution and tablet formulations of trametinib in adult patients with solid tumors.

Trametinib (Mekinist®) is a selective inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) approved in the United States as a single agent and in combination with dabrafenib (Tafinlar®) for treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a positive BRAF V600E/V600K mutation for which a pediatric oral solution formulation is being developed. This open-label, two-period, two-treatment, randomized, crossover study assessed the relative bioavailability of the trametinib pediatric oral solution compared to the tablet formulation after a single-dose administration to adult patients with solid tumors. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints derived from standard non-compartmental methods were AUC0-inf , AUC0-t , and Cmax . As expected, Cmax was higher and Tmax earlier for the pediatric oral solution compared to the tablet formulation. Administration of the trametinib pediatric oral solution resulted in a 12%, 10%, 18%, and 71% higher AUC0-inf , AUC0-last , AUC0-24 , and Cmax , respectively, as compared to the tablet formulation. Safety results were aligned with the known safety profile of trametinib. No serious or non-serious adverse events resulted in study drug withdrawal. Palatability of the pediatric oral solution was evaluated and found to be acceptable to most adult patients, but may differ in the pediatric population.

Trametinib, a first-in-class oral MEK inhibitor mass balance study with limited enrollment of two male subjects with advanced cancers.

1. This study assessed the mass balance, metabolism and disposition of [(14)C]trametinib, a first-in-class mitogen-activated extracellular signal-related kinase (MEK) inhibitor, as an open-label, single solution dose (2 mg, 2.9 MBq [79 µCi]) in two male subjects with advanced cancer. 2. Trametinib absorption was rapid. Excretion was primarily via feces (∼81% of excreted dose); minor route was urinary (∼19% of excreted dose). The primary metabolic elimination route was deacetylation alone or in combination with hydroxylation. Circulating drug-related component profiles (composed of parent with metabolites) were similar to those found in elimination together with N-glucuronide of deacetylation product. Metabolite analysis was only possible from <50% of administered dose; therefore, percent of excreted dose (defined as fraction of percent of administered dose recovery over total dose recovered in excreta) was used to assess the relative importance of excretion and metabolite routes. The long elimination half-life (∼10 days) favoring sustained targeted activity was important in permitting trametinib to be the first MEK inhibitor with clinical activity in late stage clinical studies. 3. This study exemplifies the challenges and adaptability needed to understand the metabolism and disposition of an anticancer agent, like trametinib, with both low exposure and a long elimination half-life.