Acetylcysteine In Diabetes (AID): a randomized study of acetylcysteine for the prevention of contrast nephropathy in diabetics.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of contrast-associated nephropathy irrespective of their baseline creatinine (Cr). We tested the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) relative to hydration in unselected patients (irrespective of baseline Cr) with DM. METHODS: We conducted a randomized open-label study comparing hydration alone (combined oral and rapid intravenous hydration, n = 69) to NAC plus hydration (similar hydration protocol plus NAC 600 mg BID x 4 doses, n = 68) in diabetic patients (mean age 65 +/- 10 years, 65% men) undergoing elective coronary angiography. The primary end point was the mean change in serum Cr measured up to 96 hours postangiography. RESULTS: Baseline Cr was 1.14 +/- 0.43 mg/dL (Cr > or = 1.3 mg/dL in 37 subjects). Baseline characteristics including blood urea nitrogen, Cr, and contrast volume were similar between the 2 groups. The mean Cr change in the NAC group was 0.14 +/- 0.47 versus 0.08 +/- 0.11 mg/dL in the hydration only group (P = NS). Contrast-associated nephropathy, defined as a > or = 0.5 mg/dL increase in Cr, was significantly more common in the NAC group, 9.2% versus 1.4%, P = .043. Similar results were found in the subgroup of participants with either an increased baseline serum Cr (> or = 1.3 mg/dL) or in those receiving high contrast volumes (> 100 mL). CONCLUSIONS: N-Acetylcysteine provides no benefit over an aggressive hydration protocol in patients with DM undergoing coronary angiography.

Venous thromboembolism among United States soldiers deployed to Southwest Asia.

INTRODUCTION: Military operations may represent a high-risk environment for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We sought to identify and describe cases of venous thromboembolism among US military personnel serving in Southwest Asia, and estimate relative disease rates compared to non-deployed personnel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of imaging archives, hospital discharge codes, case logs and autopsy records for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurring from 1 March 2003 through 29 February 2004 among U.S. military personnel deployed to Southwest Asia. Rates of disease in deployed and non-deployed active-duty soldiers were estimated using personnel data and deployment experience obtained from automated rosters. RESULTS: Forty cases of venous thromboembolism were identified. The case-fatality rate was 16% (3/19) among those with pulmonary embolism. Antecedent trauma followed by prolonged air evacuation was present in 55% (22/40). Compared to trauma-associated cases, non-trauma cases were more commonly over 40 years old (44% vs. 5%; p<0.05), assigned to a transportation or quartermaster company (56% vs. 14%; p<0.05), or had a history of remote venous thromboembolism (31% vs. 0%; p<0.05). The overall incidence among deployed active-duty soldiers was 22.1/100,000 person-years. Compared to non-deployed active-duty soldiers, the age-adjusted incidence rate ratio was 1.06 (CI(0.95) 0.68-1.67). CONCLUSIONS: VTE rates among deployed soldiers are relatively low compared to the general population, and are comparable to non-deployed soldiers. Fatalities from PE are not uncommon, and vigilance among clinicians remains warranted. Trauma followed by prolonged air evacuation or ground transport during military operations may represent unique interactive risk factors for venous thromboembolism.

Marked low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction below current national cholesterol education program targets provides the greatest reduction in carotid atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Current National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines recognize low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below 100 mg/dl as an optimal level. Evidence supporting this is scant. Both LDL-C and C reactive protein (CRP) are known correlates of atherosclerosis progression. HYPOTHESIS: We examined the effect of final LDL-C and CRP obtained with statin therapy on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), a valid surrogate for clinical benefit of lipid-lowering therapies. METHODS: In a randomized, single-center trial, 161 patients were assigned to statin therapy of different potencies (pravastatin 40 mg, n = 82; atorvastatin 80 mg, n = 79). The effects on CIMT were assessed in relationship to LDL-C and CRP levels obtained after 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: Changes in CIMT were directly related to the final LDL-C level obtained on statin therapy after 12 months (R = 0.219, p = 0.015). Carotid intima-media thickness regression was seen in 61% of the subjects in the lowest quartile of final LDL-C (< 70 mg/dl) versus 29% of the subjects with the highest quartile of final LDL-C (> or = 114 mg/dl, p = 0.008). No threshold value was seen, with more favorable effects on absolute change in CIMT with lower values of LDL-C (decrease in CIMT of 0.06 +/- 0.17 mm in the lowest quartile compared with an increase of 0.06 +/- 0.09 in the highest quartile of LDL-C, p = 0.008). On-treatment LDL and CRP concentrations both below the group median values were associated with the greatest likelihood of CIMT regression. CONCLUSIONS: Regression of carotid atherosclerosis is directly related to the absolute LDL-C level on statin therapy. The greatest regression was obtained with an LDL-C < 70 mg/dl, supporting marked LDL-C reduction to levels below current NCEP guidelines.

Effect of atorvastatin and pravastatin on serum C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: Extra-lipid effects of statins, such as anti-inflammatory actions, may contribute to their clinical benefit. These effects, with important implications for the concept of a statin "class effect," may be drug specific or may be related to the extent of lipid lowering. METHODS: We randomized 130 patients to treatment with either atorvastatin (80 mg daily, n = 63) or pravastatin (40 mg daily, n = 67), and measured serum lipids, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen at baseline and after 3 months of therapy. RESULTS: Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly reduced in both groups, with a 36% reduction in the atorvastatin group (0.39 +/- 0.36 to 0.25 +/- 0.27, P =.001) and a 22% reduction observed in the pravastatin group (0.40 +/- 0.33 to 0.31 +/- 0.32, P =.003). A reduced or unchanged CRP level was seen in 67.2% of pravastatin-treated patients (45/67) and 73% of atorvastatin- treated patients (46/63) (P =.47). There was no difference between drugs in either the absolute or relative reductions in CRP levels. However, whereas the reduction of CRP with pravastatin was unrelated to the degree of low-density lipoprotein reduction (r = -.05, P =.69), atorvastatin-induced CRP reductions correlated directly to the change in low-density lipoprotein-C (r =.33, P =.009). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose atorvastatin and pravastatin both reduce CRP levels. However, whereas pravastatin's effect on CRP is independent of lipid-lowering efficacy, these data suggest that lipid-dependent mechanisms are, at least in part, active in atorvastatin-treated patients.

ARBITER: Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol: a randomized trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on carotid intima medial thickness.

BACKGROUND: Whether marked LDL reduction to levels well below 100 mg/dL would further reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease is controversial. We compared the effects of 2 statins with widely differing potencies for LDL reduction (pravastatin 40 mg/d and atorvastatin 80 mg/d) on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT). METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single-center, randomized, clinical trial of 161 patients (mean age, 60 years; 71.4% male; 46% with known cardiovascular disease) that met National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) II criteria for lipid-lowering therapy. The effects of atorvastatin (80 mg/d; n=79) and pravastatin (40 mg/d; n=82) on CIMT were compared using blinded, serial assessments of the far wall of the distal common carotid artery. Baseline CIMT and other characteristics were similar between study groups. As anticipated, atorvastatin was substantially more potent for LDL reduction after 12 months: in the atorvastatin group, LDL cholesterol was 76+/-23 mg/dL after 12 months (-48.5%); LDL cholesterol was 110+/-30 mg/dL in the pravastatin group (-27.2%; P<0.001). Atorvastatin induced progressive CIMT regression over 12 months (change in CIMT, -0.034+/-0.021 mm), whereas CIMT was stable in the pravastatin group (change of 0.025+/- 0.017 mm; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Marked LDL reduction (<100 mg/dL) with a high-potency statin provides superior efficacy for atherosclerosis regression at 1 year. This early effect on CIMT, a surrogate for clinical benefit, suggests that marked LDL reduction with synthetic statins may provide enhanced reduction in clinical coronary event rates.