Supra-therapeutic Linezolid Trough Concentrations in Elderly Patients: A Call for Action?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: According to the drug label, linezolid dosage adjustments are not needed in geriatric patients. Nevertheless, clinical evidence suggests that elderly patients may benefit from the use of reduced linezolid doses to limit drug overexposure. Here, we aimed to describe the results of the last 5 years of therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in our institution with a special focus on elderly patients. METHODS: Linezolid therapeutic drug monitoring requests collected between January 2016 and June 2020 were considered. Linezolid trough concentrations were considered both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable, clustering data according to the therapeutic range proposed by available literature (< 2, 2-8, and > 8 mg/L, respectively). Patients' age and sex were considered as categorical variables. Comparisons of linezolid trough concentrations between groups of patients stratified according to age were performed using an analysis of variance; comparisons in the frequency distributions were performed using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2020, we collected 3250 linezolid TDM requests. A highly significant, progressive increment in the linezolid trough concentrations was observed moving from patients aged < 50 years (5.8 ± 5.6 mg/L) to those aged > 90 years (16.6 ± 10.0 mg/L), with an overall increment of 30% per decade of age. Nearly 30%, 50%, and 65% of patients aged < 65 years, 65-80 years, and > 80 years, respectively, had supra-therapeutic linezolid trough concentrations at the first therapeutic drug monitoring assessment. This trend did not change significantly moving from 2016 to 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients given linezolid at the conventional 600-mg twice-daily dose might be at a high risk of being overexposed to treatment, eventually increasing their risk to experience drug-related hematological toxicity. Reduced linezolid dosing schemes should be potentially considered in elderly patients at a low risk of treatment failure, ideally guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiretroviral Drugs in Routine Clinical Management of People Living With HIV: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of HIV infection has evolved significantly since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. As a result, a response rate of 90%-95% now represents a realistically achievable target. Given this background, it is difficult to imagine the additional benefits that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could provide in the management of HIV infection. METHODS: This article is not intended to provide a systematic literature review on TDM of antiretroviral agents; rather, the authors aim to discuss the potential added value of TDM in the optimal management of people living with HIV (PLWH) in selected real-life clinical scenarios based on data collected over 10 years by their TDM service. RESULTS: Some clinical situations, in which the selection of the optimal antiretroviral therapy is challenging, have been identified. These include poorly compliant patients, suboptimal antiretroviral therapies (in terms of both efficacy and toxicity), polypharmacy with a high risk of drug-drug interactions, and different patient populations, such as pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: The transformation of HIV infection from a near-universally fatal illness to a lifelong chronic disease has resulted in an HIV population that is growing and aging, placing new and increasing demands on public programs and health services. Increasingly, the management of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and drug-drug interaction, and their impact on antiretroviral therapy will have to be undertaken. These clinical settings represent some of the new frontiers for the use of TDM with the goal of achieving optimal prescription and outcome for PLWH.

Drug-Drug Interactions Between Antiretrovirals and Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine: A Real-Life Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are potent modulators of metabolic enzymes. Hence, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur between these 2 drugs and antiretrovirals. Here, we aimed to assess the relevance of these drug-drug interactions in real-life clinical settings. METHODS: Patients treated concomitantly with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine and antiretrovirals for at least 3 months were considered. Data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of both antiepileptic and antiretrovirals as trough concentrations were collected. HIV-infected patients not concomitantly treated with antiepileptic drugs and who underwent TDM for antiretrovirals in the previous 2 years were considered as controls. RESULTS: Eleven HIV-positive patients prescribed carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine were identified. All the TDM evaluations for carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine that resulted were within the therapeutic ranges. TDM results of darunavir measured in these patients were comparable with values usually measured in the control group. Conversely, the trough concentrations for atazanavir and dolutegravir demonstrated significantly lower values when compared with values usually measured in HIV-infected patients not treated with antiepileptic drugs (190 ± 91 versus 546 ± 380 ng/mL; -65%, P < 0.001; 191 ± 78 versus 1096 ± 510 ng/mL; -83%, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine with atazanavir or dolutegravir should be avoided owing to the potential risk of virological failure; in case of these 2 drugs, the adoption of TDM is strongly advisable, eventually combining with increased antiretroviral doses.

Assessment of Antiepileptic Drug Concentrations in HIV-Infected versus HIV-Negative Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: A higher rate of subtherapeutic psychotropic drug concentrations was recently found in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients. In this study, we sought to investigate if this trend could also apply to antiepileptic drugs. METHODS: Overall, 700 HIV-infected patients were screened during the first 2 years after the introduction of our outpatient polytherapy management service (Gestione Ambulatoriale Politerapie [GAP]) in the search for subjects with antiepileptic drug trough concentration assessments. The distribution of such concentrations was compared with that in HIV-negative patients monitored over the same period. RESULTS: The search identified 97 HIV-infected patients concomitantly receiving antiretroviral and antiepileptic drugs, for a total of 310 drug measurements. Overall, 30%, 64% and 6%, versus 28%, 65% and 7%, of the antiepileptic concentrations measured in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients (1090 patients, for a total of 3488 antiepileptic concentrations measured) were below, within, or above the therapeutic targets, respectively. The antiepileptic drug valproate was associated with the highest risk of subtherapeutic drug concentrations, with 57% and 46% of determinations below the therapeutic range in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, respectively. Remarkably, the concentrations of valproate were significantly lower in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients (47.9 ± 21.2 versus 53.9 ± 21.6 mg/L; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our retrospective study, most HIV-infected patients had antiepileptic drug concentrations falling within the therapeutic targets, with the exception of valproate, which was associated with a higher rate of subtherapeutic concentrations compared with other antiepileptic drugs.

Intrathecal nusinersen treatment for SMA in a dedicated neuromuscular clinic: an example of multidisciplinary and integrated care.

Nusinsersen is now available in Italy for all SMA types. We describe the experience with intrathecal treatment with nusinersen in 50 patients with SMA at the NEMO Center (NEuroMuscular Omniservice Clinical Center) in Milan, a neuromuscular patient-centered clinic hosted within Niguarda Hospital, a National Public General Hospital. Our results indicate that the pathway of care described outweighs the burden due to the repeated intrathecal injections. Irrespective of age and severity, the treatment is feasible, accessible, and replicable provided that there is a multidisciplinary team having experience and training in SMA.

Clinical and genetic determinants of nevirapine plasma trough concentration.

BACKGROUND: Only few data are available on the influence of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4/A5 polymorphisms on nevirapine plasma concentrations in the Caucasian population. Our aim was to assess the impact of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4/A5 polymorphisms on nevirapine plasma concentrations consecutively collected. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of all HIV-positive patients who were followed at the Infectious Diseases Unit, DIBIC Luigi Sacco, University of Milan between January 2000 and December 2015. All patients with at least one nevirapine plasma trough concentration (NVP Cmin) determination were tested for CYP2B6 c.516 G>T, CYP3A4*22C>T and CYP3A5*3 A>G polymorphisms. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were carried out considering NVP Cmin as the dependent variable and genetic polymorphisms and clinical characteristics as independent variables. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were evaluated. Most of them were males (61.5%) and Caucasian (92.3%). Overall, NVP Cmin varied from 1571 to 14,189 ng/mL (median = 5063 ng/mL, interquartile range = 3915-6854). The median NVP Cmin significantly differed in patients with different CYP2B6 genotypes, but did not vary in those with different CYP3A phenotypes. In the final general linear model, factors significantly associated with a higher NVP Cmin were each extra unit of T alleles of CYP2B6 rs3745274 (ß = 0.328, 95% confidence interval = 0.172-0.484; p < 0.0001), older age (ß = 0.362, 95% confidence interval = 0.193-0.532; p < 0.0001) and hepatitis C virus coinfection (ß = 0.161, 95% confidence interval = 0.006-0.315; p < 0.041). CONCLUSION: Our study, conducted in a prevalent Caucasian population, highlighted the importance of CYP2B6 genetic variants in influencing nevirapine plasma trough concentration. Furthermore, older age and hepatitis C virus coinfection significantly increase exposure to nevirapine.

Comparison of the ARK Immunoassay With High-Performance Liquid Chromatography With Ultraviolet Detection for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid.

BACKGROUND: An enzymatic immunoassay is under development by ARK Diagnostics, Inc for the quantification of plasma concentrations of linezolid (LZD). In this study, the authors aimed to assess the performance of this immunoassay using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ultraviolet method as reference. METHODS: Within- and between-day in vitro inaccuracy and imprecision of the ARK LZD assay were firstly tested using spiked quality controls (QC) provided by the kit manufacturer. Subsequently, the performance of the immunoassay was verified in vivo by analyzing 170 trough LZD plasma samples from patients on antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Imprecision of the spiked QCs resulted in every instance less than 7.0% and the inaccuracy ranged from -1.5% to 6.6%. The linear correlation between the 2 methods was documented by the Pearson analysis of plasma samples from patients on LZD therapy (coefficient = 0.9619). By Bland-Altman comparison, 8.2% of the patient samples resulted out of the limits ranging from -27.0% to +33.5%, with most of them having LZD concentrations exceeding 10 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable analytical performance of the ARK LZD immunoassay has been demonstrated both with spiked QC and patients' samples, making it a viable alternative to HPLC for the therapeutic drug monitoring of LZD in clinical practice in laboratory hospitals that do not have HPLC equipment.

Dolutegravir plasma concentrations according to companion antiretroviral drug: unwanted drug interaction or desirable boosting effect?

BACKGROUND: Studies in healthy volunteers have shown that the recently approved HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has limited drug-to-drug interaction profile. Here we carried out a pharmacokinetic survey in HIV-infected patients given dolutegravir as part of their antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations were measured in 78 HIV-infected patients given the drug in combination with a protease inhibitor, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or abacavir/lamivudine. Drug concentrations were assessed by high performance liquid chromatography method with UV-detection. RESULTS: All patients were given dolutegravir at 50 mg once daily, with median trough drug concentrations of 1,096 (664-2,356) ng/ml (interindividual coefficient of variation: 85.3%). Patients given dolutegravir with atazanavir had significantly higher drug concentrations compared with those given darunavir, rilpivirine or abacavir/lamivudine (2,399 [1,929-4,070] versus 738 [552-1,048], 603 [432-1,373] or 1,045 [856-1,115] ng/ml; P<0.001 for all comparisons). By multivariate analyses, only companion antiretroviral drug resulted in significant association with dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir coadministration significantly inhibited dolutegravir metabolism, ultimately resulting in a two- to fourfold increase in drug disposition compared with other antiretroviral drugs. This boosting effect of atazanavir could be used to optimize dolutegravir dosing in particular clinical settings.

Therapeutic drug management of linezolid: a missed opportunity for clinicians?

Some studies have shown that adjustments to the linezolid dose guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can reduce interindividual variability in drug exposure and improve linezolid tolerability. In this study, 6 years of linezolid TDM, a diagnostic service for our hospital and others in the Milan (Italy) area, is described. Samples were collected immediately before the morning dose intake (trough concentrations) in steady-state conditions. Linezolid concentrations were quantified by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Four hundred linezolid trough concentrations from 220 patients were collected. A 20-fold variability in linezolid levels was observed. Positive and significant correlations between linezolid trough concentrations and patient age (r = 0.325, P <0.01) or serum creatinine (r = 0.511, P <0.01) were found. A progressive increase in linezolid concentrations with time was observed in a subgroup of patients with more than one TDM assessment. Elderly patients, especially those aged >80 years and with impaired renal function, are at a higher risk of overexposure to linezolid. Despite the observed progressive increase in linezolid concentrations over time, most physicians did not change the drug dose according to the TDM results, even in the presence of frank overexposure to linezolid.

Development and Validation of a Chromatographic Ultraviolet Method for the Simultaneous Quantification of Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine in Human Plasma.

BACKGROUND: We have developed and validated a high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous quantification, in human plasma, of dolutegravir, a new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase inhibitor, and rilpivirine, a novel HIV nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. METHODS: An internal standard (quinoxaline) was added to plasma aliquots (500 µL), and a simple solid-phase extraction procedure was applied. Chromatographic separation of the drugs and internal standard was achieved with a gradient of acetonitrile and acetate buffer, and with an analytical run time of 25 minutes using an XBridge C18 column. The column eluate was monitored at 260 nm for dolutegravir and the internal standard and at 305 nm for rilpivirine. RESULTS: The method was linear in the range of 20-8000 and 20-2000 ng/mL for dolutegravir and rilpivirine, respectively (mean r ≥ 0.993 on 10 replicates for both analytes). Mean intraday and interday precision and inaccuracy were <15% for both compounds. The mean recovery was 73% and 80% for dolutegravir and rilpivirine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method we developed showed a good analytical performance required for therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals, leading to potential improvements in HIV-infected patient care and laboratory management.

Development of an HPLC-UV assay method for the simultaneous quantification of nine antiretroviral agents in the plasma of HIV-infected patients.

A new method using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with ultra violet detection (HPLC-UV) was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of atazanavir, dolutegravir, darunavir, efavirenz, etravirine lopinavir, raltegravir, rilpivirine and tipranavir in human plasma. For the first time we reported here the development and validation of an HPLC-UV assay to quantify the frequently administered 9 antiretroviral compounds including dolutegravir and rilpivirine. A simple solid phase extraction procedure was applied to 500 µL aliquots of plasma. The chromatographic separation of the drugs and internal standard (quinoxaline) was achieved with a gradient of acetonitrile and sodium acetate buffer on a C18 reverse-phase analytical column with a 25 min analytical run time. Calibration curves were optimised according to the therapeutic range of drug concentrations in patients, and the coefficient of determination (r2) was higher than 0.99 for all analytes. Mean intraday and interday precisions (RSD) for all compounds were less than 15.0%, and the mean accuracy (% deviation from nominal concentration) was also found to be less than 15.0%. Extraction recovery range was between 80% and 120% for all drugs analysed. The solid phase extraction and HPLC-UV method enable a specific, sensitive, and reliable simultaneous determination of nine antiretroviral agents in plasma. Good extraction efficiency and low limit of HPLC-UV quantification make this method suitable for use in clinical trials and therapeutic drug monitoring.