Prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension in the French population: data from a survey on high blood pressure in general practice, 1994.

A survey was conducted in a cohort of 235 general practitioners (GP) selected by Sofres Medical who were representative of the French medical population, to measure the percentage of patients with hypertension, treated hypertensives and patients with controlled hypertension. Data were collected over 1 week of office consultation. Practitioners were initially instructed to use the same type of mercury sphygmomanometer, equipped with pneumatic cuffs of different sizes. Three consecutive blood pressure (BP) measurements were made and the last two were recorded. Practitioners had to carry out their own survey over a period of 1 week on all patients > 18 years of age who visited their offices. Patients were considered as hypertensive (HP) if the mean of the two recorded BP measurements was > or = 140/90 mm Hg or if they were taking antihypertensive drug treatment. Three cutoff points were used to define controlled hypertension: < 140/90 mm Hg (overall population of HP), < 160/95 mm Hg (HP < 65 years of age), and < 160/90 mm Hg (HP > or = 65 years of age). Among 12,351 patients (mean age, 48.6 years; women, 58%), 5020 were HP, (41%) of whom 2035 were without treatment (41%) and 2985 were receiving antihypertensive drug treatment (59%). Two hundred-thirty patients (4.6%) remained at high risk with moderate or severe hypertension (BP > or = 180 [systolic] or 105 [diastolic] mm Hg), ie, 1 patient/week/GP. The study confirms the high prevalence of hypertension in general practice and shows that 7 of 10 patients have an acceptable control of their BP (< 160/95 or < 160/90 mm Hg according to age) but only 24% of treated HP achieved the target of a BP level < 140/90 mm Hg, representing 28% of the 18 to 64 year old group and 21% of the elderly group. French GP did not choose an optimal control, and the medical community is waiting for answers to crucial questions, ie, does optimal BP control significantly improve the absolute cardiovascular risk? How far should blood pressure be lowered?

An attempt to improve blood pressure control in the French population: information and outcome awareness at the general practitioner level.

To improve blood pressure (BP) control in general practice, 3122 general practitioners agreed to participate in a result awareness program. A survey carried out 6 months after participating physicians had been informed of the outcome of treatments they had given showed that blood pressure control (cut-off point: BP < 140/90 mm Hg) had not improved. However, using less stringent criteria, a slight improvement in blood pressure control could be observed. Although this improvement was marginal, results are sufficiently encouraging to warrant another study after a new awareness campaign among the medical population.

Isoniazid dose adjustment in a pediatric population.

This retrospective analysis was designed to evaluate the inactivation index (I3) method used to adjust the isoniazid dose during long-term administration in a pediatric population. Before starting on antituberculosis therapy, sixty-one children received one 10 mg.kg-1 isoniazid test-dose (D). The isoniazid and acetyl isoniazid concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography on a plasma sample collected 3 hours (C3h) after administration. The patients were separated into slow and fast acetylator groups according to the metabolic ratio. The dose adjustment method using the I3 is based on the assumption that there is a linear correlation between C3h and D [C3h = (I3 x D) - 0.6] in which the slope is I3 and the Y intercept is equal to -0.6 mg.l-1. I3 was determined from a single plasma concentration determination and used to calculate the dose recommended to obtain a desired C3h equal to 1.5 micrograms.ml-1: recommended dose (mg.kg-1) = (1.5 + 0.6)/I3.I3 was significantly higher in the slow acetylator group (0.55 +/- 0.16) than in the fast one (0.26 +/- 0.13), which leads us to recommend a significantly lower dose in the slow acetylator group (4.2 +/- 1.5 mg.kg-1) than in the fast one (10.3 +/- 4.6 mg.kg-1). The data obtained in a subgroup of 21 patients who had at least three consecutive determinations of C3h after different dosages allowed us to verify that there was a linear correlation between C3h and the dose. The mean slope of the correlation lines in that subgroup was 0.61 +/- 0.25 and the 95% confidence interval of the estimated Y-intercept include the theoretical value of -0.60, which shows that our data are consistent with those previously reported in adults. The percentage of patients with a C3h plasma concentration within the expected range (1.5 +/- 0.5 micrograms.ml-1) was significantly higher (69%) in those whose dose was derived from the calculation than in the others (25%). Within each acetylator group, the range of the recommended dose varied widely, and these results emphasize the usefulness of individual dose adjustment based on the inactivation index method.

Isoniazid acetylation metabolic ratio during maturation in children.

Isoniazid acetylation metabolic ratio (MR) was studied in 61 children with tuberculosis after administration of isoniazid. MR was calculated as the molar acetylisoniazid to isoniazid concentration ratio. MR was used as a probe for N-acetyltransferase activity and to determine the acetylation phenotype. MR had a bimodal distribution with an antimode between 0.48 and 0.77. MR and the percentage of fast acetylators increased significantly with age. The cumulative frequency of fast acetylators increased with age, with a plateau reached around 4 years. MR value was checked during treatment in 44 children. All children but one who initially appeared as fast acetylators remained in this group after repeated testing. Among the 30 slow acetylators, 12 became fast acetylators, and 10 showed a variable phenotyping at different ages. A bimodal distribution of the isoniazid acetylation MR was shown in children, with an antimode close to that described in the literature and a maturation of isoniazid acetylation during the first 4 years.

[Prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension in family practice patients in France during 1994]. / Prévalence, traitement et contrôle de l'hypertension artérielle chez les consultants en médecine générale en France en 1994.

The aim of this study was to measure the percentage of patients with hypertension, treated hypertension and controlled hypertension, using data collected over one week by 235 general practitioners well representative of the French medical population and selected by SOFRES Médical. Practitioners had to carry out their own survey over a period of one week on all patients above 18 years of age who visited their office. They were initially instructed to use the same type of mercury sphygmomanometer, equiped with the same pneumatic cuffs of different sizes. Three consecutive blood pressure measurements were effected, the last two were recorded. Patients were considered as hypertensive if the mean of the two recorded BP measurements was > or = 140-90 mmHg, or < 140-90 mmHg under pharmacological treatment. Hypertensive patients were considered as controlled when their blood pressure levels were overall < 140-90 mmHg under treatment. According to age, two other control levels were analysed: blood pressure < 160-95 mmHg before 65 years and blood pressure < 160-90 mmHg at 65 years or more. Among 12,351 patients, 5,020 are hypertensive (4%), 2,985 under pharmacological treatment (59%) and 2,035 without treatment (4%). Among untreated patients, 9% had an hypertension above the borderline values. Before 65 years, 28% had an under treatment blood pressure < 140-90 mmHg and 71% < 160-95 mmHg. Among 65 years or more hypertensive patients, 21% had an under treatment blood pressure < 140-90 mmHg and 60% < 160-90 mmHg. Before 65 years, 25% among patients with a monotherapy remained with a blood pressure > 160-95 mmHg and 34% with a blood pressure > 160-90 mmHg among those of 65 years or more; 230 patients (5%) remained in high risk with a blood pressure > 180-105 mmHg. 176 untreated and 54 despite their treatment. This study carried out in French medical practice yield two main conclusions regarding the management of hypertension: as the prevalence of hypertensive patients is 41%: one patient out of two, high blood pressure has to be a main aim for the medical teaching. Even if a reasonable control of the blood pressure is achieved in most cases, blood pressure got a normal level for 24% only of treated hypertensive patients and too many patients were keeping high risk because they have been not or not enough treated. This study, as a real audit, gives some useful informations to general practitioners in order to improve their scores.