Effect of a patient support program on access to oral therapy for hematologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: The results of a study assessing the effectiveness of a manufacturer-sponsored assistance program for patients prescribed oral cancer therapies are presented. METHODS: Rates of dispensing success were evaluated in a random sample of patients (n = 1000) who enrolled in the Celgene Patient Support (CPS) program for assistance obtaining lenalidomide or thalidomide over a two-year period and a control group of patients (n = 1000) who registered to receive the drugs under restricted-distribution protocols but did not receive CPS assistance. The main study outcomes were (1) the proportion of patients who actually received medication and (2) the time from prescription approval to the initial dispensing of medication. RESULTS: Despite the complex access issues faced by program enrollees, the proportion of CPS participants who received medication (89%) was comparable to the proportion of patients who received medication in the control cohort (91%). The median time from the approval of prescriptions to the initial dispensing of medication was also comparable in the CPS and control groups (eight days versus five days). The study also evaluated the reasons why medication was not dispensed to CPS enrollees in some cases. CONCLUSION: The percentage of patients who were dispensed prescriptions for lenalidomide or thalidomide did not differ significantly between those who were enrolled in a patient assistance program and those who were not. The median time between prescription authorization and first dispensing was comparable among program and nonprogram patients.

Estimating costs of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study examines the resource use patterns and costs of care for patients with incident metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on analyses of retrospective claims data from selected health plans in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A case-control analysis was performed using claims from years 1998-2004. Incident mCRC cases were identified based on evidence of a colorectal cancer diagnosis and a metastatic disease diagnosis. Incident mCRC cases could have no other evidence of cancer in the 1-year period before the date of their first mCRC diagnosis. Cases were matched to non-mCRC controls based on age, sex, geographic region, and duration of plan enrollment. Costs were evaluated by phase of disease: diagnosis, treatment, or death phases. Ordinary least squares regressions were performed to evaluate impact of covariates in each phase. RESULTS: Total costs in the follow-up period averaged $97,031 more for mCRC cases than for controls. The main cost drivers for mCRC were hospitalizations ($37,369) and specialist visits ($34,582), which included chemotherapy administration. Approximately 40% of the 672 patients with mCRC who qualified for the phase analysis were identified with a fatal event during follow-up. Monthly costs were similar in the diagnostic phase ($12,205) and death phase ($12,328), but were significantly lower in the treatment phase ($4722). Both mean/median monthly costs increased over time during the study period, regardless of disease phase. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of mCRC is substantial for patients with commercial health plans in the United States, and costs of care have increased substantially in recent years.