Association between pregnancy-related changes in serum creatinine and preeclampsia diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, affecting 2-8% of all pregnancies. Typically, the increased glomerular filtration rate of pregnancy results in a decrease in serum creatinine. It is unknown if women without the expected decrease in serum creatinine during pregnancy are more likely to be diagnosed with preeclampsia. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if the absence of a pregnancy-related decrease in serum creatinine was associated with the development of preeclampsia in patients deemed to be at high risk for developing preeclampsia. We hypothesized that the absence of the expected decrease in serum creatinine may be a marker of impaired renal function and therefore may be associated with increased risk of preeclampsia in this cohort. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of deliveries between November 2, 2017 and June 30, 2020 at a single institution. Pregnancies were included if a baseline serum creatinine (measured between one year prior to conception through 6 weeks gestation), and another serum creatinine value prior to 20 weeks of gestation were measured. Decrease in serum creatinine was defined as any decrease (at least 0.01 mg/dL) from baseline. The primary outcome was diagnosis of preeclampsia. Exclusion criteria included fetal anomalies, fetal demise, multiple gestation, or delivery prior to 20 weeks. Bivariable analyses were performed using Chi-square, ANOVA, and Student's t test. Logistic regression was used to determine odds of developing preeclampsia controlling for confounders. RESULTS: We identified 392 pregnancies that met inclusion criteria. Preeclampsia was diagnosed in 56 (14.3%) pregnancies. Patients diagnosed with preeclampsia were more likely to have a history of preeclampsia in a prior pregnancy, chronic hypertension (HTN), and diabetes. They were also more likely to have aspirin prescribed in the current pregnancy. Prevalence of advanced maternal age, multiparity, obesity, smoking, history of autoimmune disease, history of CKD, gestational HTN, or multiple pregnancy were not significantly different between patients with and without a diagnosis of preeclampsia. After controlling for confounders, a decrease in serum creatinine from baseline was not significantly associated with a diagnosis of preeclampsia (OR 0.76, CI 0.32-1.78). CONCLUSION: After controlling for risk factors associated with preeclampsia, a decrease in serum creatinine from baseline was not significantly associated with a diagnosis of preeclampsia in this high-risk cohort.

Electroencephalogram background and head ultrasound together stratify seizure risk in neonates undergoing hypothermia.

The benefits of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU) are increasingly appreciated, though expanding indications for cEEG may strain resources. The current standard of care in babies with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH) includes cEEG monitoring throughout the entire TH and rewarming process (at least 72 h). Recent cEEG data demonstrate that most seizures occur within the first 24 h of monitoring. We hypothesized that abnormal head imaging and EEG background could stratify seizure risk in babies with HIE undergoing TH to identify candidates for early cEEG discontinuation. In this retrospective review of 126 neonates undergoing TH and cEEG, we identified seizures in 38 (30%) neonates, 33 (87%) of whom seized within the first 24 h of cEEG monitoring. EEG background was graded and demonstrated that 90% of neonates with seizures had a moderately/markedly abnormal background versus 33% of neonates who did not seize (p < 0.0001). Additionally, while head ultrasound (HUS) obtained before EEG did not stratify seizure risk alone, no neonates with both a normal/mildly abnormal EEG background and a normal HUS (0/25) experienced seizures in contrast to 60% (24/40) neonates with both an abnormal EEG background and an abnormal HUS (p < 0.0001). Our data suggest that neonates with abnormal EEG backgrounds and abnormal HUS should be monitored for seizures throughout TH and rewarming, while neonates with normal/mildly abnormal EEG backgrounds and normal HUS are at low risk of seizures after 24 h of monitoring, and thus would be candidates for early cEEG discontinuation.