Where do pulse oximeter probes break?

Pulse oximetry, a non-invasive method for accurate assessment of blood oxygen saturation (SPO2), is an important monitoring tool in health care facilities. However, it is often not available in many low-resource settings, due to expense, overly sophisticated design, a lack of organised procurement systems and inadequate medical device management and maintenance structures. Furthermore medical devices are often fragile and not designed to withstand the conditions of low-resource settings. In order to design a probe, better suited to the needs of health care facilities in low-resource settings this study aimed to document the site and nature of pulse oximeter probe breakages in a range of different probe designs in a low to middle income country. A retrospective review of job cards relating to the assessment and repair of damaged or faulty pulse oximeter probes was conducted at a medical device repair company based in Cape Town, South Africa, specializing in pulse oximeter probe repairs. 1,840 job cards relating to the assessment and repair of pulse oximeter probes were reviewed. 60.2 % of probes sent for assessment were finger-clip probes. For all probes, excluding the neonatal wrap probes, the most common point of failure was the probe wiring (>50 %). The neonatal wrap most commonly failed at the strap (51.5 %). The total cost for quoting on the broken pulse oximeter probes and for the subsequent repair of devices, excluding replacement components, amounted to an estimated ZAR 738,810 (USD $98,508). Improving the probe wiring would increase the life span of pulse oximeter probes. Increasing the life span of probes will make pulse oximetry more affordable and accessible. This is of high priority in low-resource settings where frequent repair or replacement of probes is unaffordable or impossible.

[Encoding of diagnosis by medical documentation assistant or ward physician. Influence on the mapping of Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) performance]. / Diagnosenverschlüsselung durch Medizinische Dokumentationsassistentin oder Stationsarzt. Einfluss auf die Abbildung der DRG-Leistung.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Starting in 2004 the patient budget in Germany will be calculated according to the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) system, by which system the monetary reward of a unit will be directly related to the quality of documentation e. g. diagnosis and procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of documentation by a medical documentation assistant (MDA) with the usual practice of documentation by the ward physician (WP). Additionally, the effect of introducing a completely changed organizational process was tested. METHODS: In a prospective study on the ward of a gastroenterology unit two different approaches of medical documentation were compared. In a first six-month period diagnosis and procedures were encoded by WP. In the following six months an MDA was introduced and involved in the encoding process. RESULTS: In the first six months 221 patients (mean age 55 +/- 16,2 years, 55,7 % males) were evaluated, whereas in the following six months 305 patients (mean age 53 +/- 15,4 years, 59,9 % males) were included. The introduction of an MDA improved medical documentation and economical reference numbers: with an increase of diagnosis per case to 7,43 (in first six months 5,53), patient complexity and comorbidity level (PCCL) to 2,5 (in first six months 2,13), case-mix index to 1,04 (in first six months 0,98). Additionally the medial hospitalization time decreased from 11,2 to 8,1 days. The average daily reimbursement increased in the MDA group from 423 Euro to 603 Euro. This was calculated on the basis of a basic case factor of 2900 Euro. CONCLUSION: Introduction of an MDA in a gastroenterology ward increases the quality of documentation and results in an improved presentation of DRG-relevant efforts with a better reimbursement of medical costs.