Bimagrumab to improve recovery after hip fracture in older adults: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2a/b trial.

BACKGROUND: Older adult patients (ie, those aged ≥60 years) undergoing surgery for hip fracture repair frequently experience loss of muscle mass and strength due to poor mobility and delayed functional recovery. No proven treatment is currently available to enhance recovery of physical function in this growing patient population. This study aimed to investigate whether bimagrumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting activin type 2 receptors, can improve post-surgical recovery. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2a/b trial was done at 50 clinical research centres in 18 countries. Participants aged 60 years or older with a body-mass index of 15-35 kg/m2 who had undergone internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty for a proximal femoral fracture (confirmed by radiography) in the previous 6 weeks were eligible. Patients with a history of a high-energy subtrochanteric fracture or any other lower limb fracture in the past 6 months, or any major surgery of the lower limbs in the past 3 months were excluded. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1:2:2) via interactive response technology to receive intravenous treatment with placebo, bimagrumab 70 mg, bimagrumab 210 mg, or bimagrumab 700 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. Participants, investigators, site personnel, and study sponsor personnel in participating countries were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in total lean body mass, measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, at week 24 in the full analysis set, which included all randomised participants who had received at least one dose of the assigned treatment. Key secondary endpoints included changes in habitual gait speed (measured in m/s) and short physical performance battery score between baseline and 24 weeks. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events and vital signs on weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48, and by laboratory assessments and electrocardiography at the screening visit and on days 1, 84, and 168. Safety was assessed in all randomised participants who had received at least one dose of study drug, analysed according to treatment received. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02152761. FINDINGS: Between Sept 16, 2014, and Dec 15, 2017, 384 patients were screened, of whom 250 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the placebo group (n=72), the bimagrumab 70 mg group (n=34), the bimagrumab 210 mg group (n=69), or the bimagrumab 700 mg group (n=75). A total of 207 (83%) participants completed the 24-week treatment period. There was a significant absolute increase in lean body mass from baseline compared with placebo (0·2 kg [SD 2·0]) in the bimagrumab 210 mg group (1·9 kg [1·7]; p<0·0001) and in the bimagrumab 700 mg group 2·8 kg [2·2]; p<0·0001) but not in the bimagrumab 70 mg group (0·6 kg [SD 2·2]; significance not assessed). Changes in habitual gait speed and short physical performance battery scores between baseline and week 24 were not significantly different across the treatment groups, suggesting no enhancement of physical recovery with bimagrumab over placebo. Bimagrumab was safe and well tolerated. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were falls (six [18%] of 34 participants in the bimagrumab 70 mg group; 12 [17%] of 69 participants in the bimagrumab 210 mg group; 14 [19%] of 75 participants in the bimagrumab 700 mg group; and 13 [18%] of 72 participants in the placebo group), muscle spasms (two [6%] in the bimagrumab 70 mg group; 17 [25%] in the bimagrumab 210 mg group; 12 [16%] in the bimagrumab 700 mg group; and six [8%] in the placebo group), and arthralgia (five [15%] in the bimagrumab 70 mg group; six [9%] in the bimagrumab 210 mg group; nine [12%] in the bimagrumab 700 mg group; and five [7%] in the placebo group). Six deaths were reported during the study, none of which were considered by investigators as related to the study drug. INTERPRETATION: Bimagrumab treatment for 24 weeks led to dose-dependent, significant increases in lean body mass in older patients recovering from hip fracture surgery when compared with placebo. However, no functional benefit was observed in recovery of mobility or lower extremity function following bimagrumab treatment compared with placebo. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.

Long-term results from a phase 2 extension study of fingolimod at high and approved dose in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Fingolimod safety and efficacy data in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are available up to 5 years, from an extension of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 study, at a dose higher (5.0/1.25 mg) than the approved dose of 0.5 mg. The objective of the study is to present the end-of-study data (>7 years) from the open-label extension of the phase 2 study. In the core phase (6 months), patients (N = 281) were randomized to placebo or fingolimod 1.25/5 mg. In the extension, placebo patients were randomized to fingolimod 1.25/5 mg. All patients received open-label 1.25 mg fingolimod after month 24 and 0.5 mg after month 60. Clinical visits were performed every 3 months, expanded disability status scale (EDSS) every 6 months and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) annually. 122 (48.8%) patients completed the extension study; overall fingolimod exposure was 1230.7 patient-years. The most common (>10%) reasons for study discontinuation were adverse events (19.6%) and consent withdrawal (16.4%). Fingolimod treatment for >7 years was associated with sustained low clinical and MRI disease activity. Over 60% of patients remained relapse free and about 80% were free from any MRI activity. Overall annualized relapse rate was 0.18. Long-term fingolimod treatment was not associated with new safety concerns. Long-term fingolimod was well tolerated and associated with a sustained low level of disease activity.

FTY720 versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplantation: six-month results of a double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator that was developed to produce optimal graft protection with improved safety and tolerability. Phase II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of FTY720 up to the doses of 2.5 mg with full-dose cyclosporine (FDC). METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, Phase IIb, randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 5 mg FTY720 (n=87; Group 1) vs. 2.5 mg FTY720 (n=90; Group 2) vs. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n=94; Group 3) in de novo renal transplant patients receiving FDC and prednisone. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or premature study discontinuation (composite endpoint) within 6 months. The primary endpoint was superior in Group 1 (24%) and statistically noninferior in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (24.1% vs. 29.2% vs. 39.4%; P=0.025 and 0.0039, respectively). FTY720 plus FDC was generally well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across all groups. FTY720 was associated with higher incidence of bradycardia (Group 1: 26.4%, P=0.0002 and Group 2: 15.6%, P=0.046, vs. Group 3: 6.4%), respiratory disorders (Group 1: 40.2%, not significant [P=NS] and Group 2: 34.4%, P=NS vs. Group 3: 28.7%). One macular edema occurred in Group 2. Lower creatinine clearances were observed with FTY720 versus MMF (Group 1: 52.4 ml/min, P=NS and Group 2: 51.7 ml/min, P=0.039 vs. Group 3: 62.5 ml/min). CONCLUSIONS: Although FTY720 with FDC provided adequate protection from acute rejection the safety profile was less favorable for adverse events than current standard immunosuppression in de novo renal transplant patients.

Impact of long-term therapy with FTY720 or mycophenolate mofetil on cardiac conduction and rhythm in stable adult renal transplant patients.

The novel immunomodulator FTY720 has been associated with a mild reduction in heart rate (HR) in clinical trials. A total of 421 patients (FTY720, n=94; mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], n=327) underwent 2-day electrocardiogram and 24-h Holter monitoring. Patients had been maintained on cyclosporine plus MMF or FTY720 (2.5 mg and 5.0 mg) for > or =12 months. No significant differences in mean hourly heart rate (HR) over 24 hrs were noted between groups. Bradycardia (HR 35-50 bpm) and sustained bradycardia (HR <50 bpm for >1 min) were more common with MMF than FTY720 (53% vs. 37% and 34% vs. 21%, respectively). Electrocardiogram parameters did not differ significantly between FTY720 and MMF groups, or between FTY720 groups, supporting the absence of a dose-dependent effect. The absence of any clinically significant effect of FTY720 on cardiac rhythm demonstrates that the reduction in HR seen after the first dose does not persist in the maintenance phase.