Effect of transcutaneous aortic valve implantation on the Heyde's syndrome.

The association between aortic valve stenosis and gastrointestinal bleeding, traditionally known as Heyde's syndrome, is the result of a quantitative loss of the highest molecular weight von Willebrand multimers (type 2A von Willebrand syndrome). This results in bleeding from areas of high shear stress such as gastrointestinal angiodysplasias. Correction of this bleeding diathesis after surgical aortic valve replacement has been well described. The effect of transcutaneous aortic valve implantation on Heyde's syndrome has yet to be studied. Herein, we report a patient with severe aortic stenosis, type 2A von Willebrand syndrome, and hemorrhagic shock from gastrointestinal bleeding who underwent successful transcutaneous aortic valve implantation.

Percutaneous management of RetroFlex 3 balloon rupture and separation of the Edwards Sapien delivery system.

We report the case of an 85-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with use of the Edwards Sapien(®) valve system. The procedure was complicated by rupture of the valve-deployment balloon, with separation and retention of the nose cone of the RetroFlex 3(®) delivery system in the iliac artery. Our endovascular retrieval of the equipment was successful, and we achieved access-site hemostasis by deploying a covered stent. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the endovascular retrieval of a malfunctioning delivery system during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous life support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, refractory cardiogenic shock and in-laboratory cardiopulmonary arrest.

BACKGROUND: High-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), refractory cardiogenic shock and in-lab cardiac arrest are all associated with significant mortality. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD) and CPS (cardiopulmonary support) have been used to support such patients. However, the extent to which the use of these devices can improve outcomes in this patient subset is not known. METHODS: We evaluated clinical features, efficacy and safety outcomes in a retrospective cohort of 39 patients, treated either with pLVAD or CPS for support of high-risk PCI, cardiogenic shock or in-lab cardiac arrest. The Tandem-Heart and a new versatile Multifunctional Percutaneous Heart (MPH) system, with both CPS and LVAD capability, were used and assessed. RESULTS: 19 patients received the TandemHeart and 20 received the MPH system. The MPH system was used as a pLVAD in 12 and to provide CPS in 8 patients. Procedural efficacy was 100%. Emergent institution of CPS, in the setting of cardiac arrest, was able to support 7 out of 8 patients and resulted in a 50% survival to hospital discharge rate. Overall, in-hospital death and 30-day major adverse cardiac event rates were 28.2% and 35.9%, respectively. The risk of vascular complications and bleeding was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: pLVADs are effective in supporting patients during high-risk cardiac (coronary and structural heart) interventions, with a low risk of device-related complications. Further, the expeditious use of CPS in the catheterization laboratory can improve survival in a selected subset of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest.