Ig knock-in mice producing anti-carbohydrate antibodies: breakthrough of B cells producing low affinity anti-self antibodies.

Natural Abs specific for the carbohydrate Ag Galalpha1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAc-R (alphaGal) play an important role in providing protective host immunity to various pathogens; yet little is known about how production of these or other anti-carbohydrate natural Abs is regulated. In this study, we describe the generation of Ig knock-in mice carrying functionally rearranged H chain and L chain variable region genes isolated from a B cell hybridoma producing alphaGal-specific IgM Ab that make it possible to examine the development of B cells producing anti-carbohydrate natural Abs in the presence or absence of alphaGal as a self-Ag. Knock-in mice on a alphaGal-deficient background spontaneously developed alphaGal-specific IgM Abs of a sufficiently high titer to mediate rejection of alphaGal expressing cardiac transplants. In the spleen of these mice, B cells expressing alphaGal-specific IgM are located in the marginal zone. In knock-in mice that express alphaGal, B cells expressing the knocked in BCR undergo negative selection via receptor editing. Interestingly, production of low affinity alphaGal-specific Ab was observed in mice that express alphaGal that carry two copies of the knocked in H chain. We suggest that in these mice, receptor editing functioned to lower the affinity for self-Ag below a threshold that would result in overt pathology, while allowing development of low affinity anti-self Abs.

Prevention of acute rejection and allograft vasculopathy by everolimus in cardiac transplants recipients: a 24-month analysis.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that reduces cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This report presents the 24-month results of a multicenter trial of everolimus vs azathioprine in heart transplantation. METHODS: A total of 634 patients were randomized to receive 1.5 mg everolimus, 3 mg everolimus or azathioprine, with cyclosporine and steroids. A 12-month, double-blind, double-dummy period was followed by a 12-month open-label period. RESULTS: At 24 months, the percentage of patients reaching the composite efficacy end-points was significantly lower with everolimus (1.5 mg: 45.9%, p = 0.016; 3 mg: 36.0%, p < 0.001) than with azathioprine (57.5%). The change in maximal intimal thickness from baseline to 24 months was significantly smaller with everolimus 1.5 mg (0.07 mm, p = 0.014) and 3 mg (0.06 mm, p = 0.004) compared with azathioprine (0.15 mm). The 24-month incidence of vasculopathy was 33.3% with everolimus 1.5 mg, 45.5% with everolimus 3 mg and 58.3% with azathioprine (p = 0.017 vs everolimus 1.5 mg). Incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 3-fold lower in patients receiving everolimus compared with azathioprine (7.2% and 7.1% in the 1.5-mg and 3-mg everolimus cohorts, respectively, and 21% in the azathioprine group; p < 0.0001). Median serum creatinine levels at 24 months were higher with everolimus than with azathioprine, but decreased when cyclosporine exposure was reduced (everolimus 1.5 mg: baseline 167 micromol, after 6 months 157.5 micromol; everolimus 3 mg: baseline 185.6 micromol, after 6 months 160 micromol; azathioprine: baseline 123.3 micromol, after 6 months 127 micromol). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus significantly reduced acute rejection and limited the progression of allograft vasculopathy at 24 months compared with azathioprine. Although graft and patient survival was comparable at 24 months, everolimus therapy may improve longer-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients.

Everolimus 1.5 or 3 mg/day was compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 2 g/day in a randomized, multicenter 36-month trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n = 588) receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA) and corticosteroids. The study was double-blind until all patients had completed 12 months, then open-label. By 36 months, graft loss occurred in 7.2, 16.7 and 10.7% of patients in the everolimus 1.5, 3 mg/day, and MMF groups, respectively (p = 0.0048 for everolimus 1.5 mg/day vs. 3 mg/day); efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or lost to follow-up) occurred in 33.0, 38.9 and 37.2% of patients (p = 0.455 overall), respectively. Mortality and incidence of BPAR were comparable in all groups. Creatinine values were higher in everolimus groups, requiring a protocol amendment that recommended lower CsA exposure. Diarrhea, lymphocele, peripheral edema and hyperlipidemia were more common among everolimus-treated patients, whereas viral infections, particularly cytomegalovirus infection, increased in the MMF group. Overall safety and tolerability were better with MMF and everolimus 1.5 mg/day than with everolimus 3 mg/day. In conclusion, at 36 months, an immunosuppressive regimen containing everolimus 1.5 mg/day had equivalent patient, and graft survival and rejection rates compared with MMF in de novo renal transplant recipients, whereas everolimus 3 mg/day had inferior graft survival. Renal dysfunction in everolimus cohorts necessitates close monitoring.

Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients: a 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study.

BACKGROUND: This 36-month, randomized, parallel-group study compared safety and efficacy of two doses of everolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo renal-transplant recipients. METHODS: Renal-allograft recipients received 1.5 mg/day or 3 mg/day of everolimus or 2 g/day of MMF, plus full-dose cyclosporine (CsA) and corticosteroids after randomization. For at least their first year, patients received study medication according to a double-blinded, double-dummy design. Concerns over nephrotoxicity led to a protocol amendment to an open-label design with reduced CsA troughs. RESULTS: Incidences of primary efficacy failure at 36 months (biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or loss to follow-up) were everolimus 1.5 mg/day, 33.7% (65/193); everolimus 3 mg/day, 34.0% (66/194); and MMF, 31.1% (61/196) (P=0.810). Antibody-treated acute rejection at 36 months was significantly lower with everolimus 1.5 mg (9.8%) than MMF (18.4%, P=0.014). Discontinuation for adverse events was more frequent with everolimus and hemolytic uremic syndrome, lymphoproliferative disease, and proteinuria, and higher serum creatinine occurred at increased frequency relative to the MMF arm. Creatinine levels in the everolimus arms were stable in follow-up: the mean rise in creatinine over the first 6 months of the open-label phase was 3 micromol/L or greater with everolimus and 7 micromol/L with MMF. However, serum creatinine levels were lower in the MMF group throughout. Death and graft loss were higher in the everolimus arms (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: As part of triple-drug immunosuppression, everolimus (1.5 or 3 mg/day) was as efficacious as MMF, although the side-effect profile featured increased adverse events. Nephrotoxicity/calcineurin-inhibitor-related adverse events will require judicious lowering of CsA exposure with monitoring of everolimus troughs.

Multicenter intravascular ultrasound validation study among heart transplant recipients: outcomes after five years.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the validity of first-year intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome after heart transplantation. BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major impediment to long-term graft survival. Intravascular ultrasound is more sensitive than coronary angiography and detects intimal thickening (early CAV) in the coronary arteries of the donor heart. Single-center studies have suggested first-year IVUS results might be a surrogate marker for long-term outcome. METHODS: First-year IVUS results and subsequent five-year clinical follow-up data were reviewed in 125 heart transplant recipients from five institutions. The IVUS tapes (at baseline and one year) were re-analyzed at a core IVUS laboratory. The change in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to one year was recorded for several matched sites in the same coronary artery. Patients were classified into two groups: those with >/=0.5 mm in the MIT in any matched site (group 1) and those with MIT <0.5 mm (group 2). RESULTS: Group 1 patients compared with group 2 patients had a higher incidence of death or graft loss (D/GL, 20.8% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.007), had more nonfatal major adverse cardiac events and/or D/GL (45.8% vs. 16.8%; p = 0.003), and had more findings of newly occurring angiographic luminal irregularities (65.2% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study suggests that progression of intimal thickening >/=0.5 mm in the first year after transplantation appears to be a reliable surrogate marker for subsequent mortality, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, and development of angiographic CAV through five years after heart transplantation.

Economic evaluation of everolimus vs. azathioprine at one year after de novo heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus decreases acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation. We compared within-trial costs and resource use over 1 yr of follow-up in de novo heart transplant patients randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg/d (n = 209), everolimus 3.0 mg/d (n = 211), or azathioprine (n = 214). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Resource use data were collected prospectively for 634 patients from 14 countries. We used the nonparametric bootstrap method to test for differences in mean costs and to estimate confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Everolimus patients had lower incidence of efficacy failure compared with azathioprine patients (41.6%, everolimus 1.5 mg; 32.2%, everolimus 3.0 mg; 52.8%, azathioprine). Compared with patients receiving azathioprine, everolimus patients spent more days in the hospital [36.3 d for everolimus 1.5 mg/d (p = 0.21); 38.4 d for everolimus 3.0 mg/d (p = 0.01); 32.2 d for azathioprine]. Mean total costs, excluding the study medications, were not significantly different among treatment groups ($72 065 for everolimus 1.5 mg; $72 631 for everolimus 3.0 mg; $70 815 for azathioprine). CONCLUSIONS: Over 1 yr of follow-up after heart transplantation, everolimus did not significantly increase treatment costs, excluding the costs of the study medications, while reducing efficacy failure. Longer follow-up and the cost of everolimus are required to fully evaluate the cost-effectiveness of everolimus vs. azathioprine in post-transplant maintenance.

Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus is a proliferation inhibitor designed to target chronic rejection, including prevention of acute rejection. Everolimus blocks growth factor-mediated transduction signals, preventing organ rejection by a mechanism different than that of calcineurin inhibitors and of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS.: Everolimus (1.5 mg or 3 mg daily) was compared with MMF (2 g daily) in a randomized, multicenter, multinational, 12-month double-blind, double-dummy and 2-year open-label, phase 3 trial in de novo renal allograft recipients (n = 588) who also received cyclosporine and corticosteroids as part of a triple immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: At 12 months, there were no statistically significant differences between doses of 1.5 and 3 mg/day everolimus and MMF (2 g/day) in incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (23.2%, 19.7%, and 24.0%, respectively), graft loss (4.6%, 10.6%, and 9.2%), or death (5.2%, 4.0%, and 2.6%), respectively. Everolimus 1.5 mg/day and MMF were generally equally well tolerated. Both were better tolerated than everolimus 3 mg/day. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was significantly lower in patients receiving either 1.5 or 3 mg/day everolimus than in those receiving MMF (5.2% and 7.6% vs. 19.4%, respectively) (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus is effective in preventing acute rejection and graft loss in de novo renal allograft recipients receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen. Prevention of acute rejection, along with reduction in cytomegalovirus infection, addresses two factors known to contribute to chronic rejection in such patients.

Prevention of type 1 diabetes by gene therapy.

The autoimmune disease type 1 diabetes in humans and NOD mice is determined by multiple genetic factors, among the strongest of which is the inheritance of diabetes-permissive MHC class II alleles associated with susceptibility to disease. Here we examined whether expression of MHC class II alleles associated with resistance to disease could be used to prevent the occurrence of diabetes. Expression of diabetes-resistant MHC class II I-Abeta chain molecules in NOD mice following retroviral transduction of autologous bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells prevented the development of autoreactive T cells by intrathymic deletion and protected the mice from the development of insulitis and diabetes. These data suggest that type 1 diabetes could be prevented in individuals expressing MHC alleles associated with susceptibility to disease by restoration of protective MHC class II expression through genetic engineering of hematopoietic stem cells.

Everolimus with optimized cyclosporine dosing in renal transplant recipients: 6-month safety and efficacy results of two randomized studies.

Two prospective, randomized studies evaluated everolimus 1.5 vs. 3 mg/day with steroids and low-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) (C2 monitoring) in de novo renal transplant patients. Everolimus dosing was adjusted to maintain a minimum trough level of 3 ng/mL. Study 1 (A2306; n=237) had no induction therapy; in Study 2 (A2307; n=256) basiliximab was administered (Days 0 and 4). The primary endpoint was renal function at 6 months. CsA C2 target levels, initially 1200 ng/mL in Study 1 and 600 ng/mL in Study 2, were tapered over time post-transplant. Median creatinine levels in Study 1 were 133 and 132 micromol/L at 6 months in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups, respectively, and 130 micromol/L in both groups in Study 2. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 25.0% and 15.2% of patients in the 1.5 and 3 mg/day groups in Study 1, and 13.7% and 15.1% in Study 2. Incidence of BPAR was significantly higher in patients with an everolimus trough <3 ng/mL. There were no significant between-group differences in the composite endpoint of BPAR, graft loss or death, nor any significant between-group differences in adverse events in either study. Concentration-controlled everolimus with low-exposure CsA provided effective protection against rejection with good renal function.

Immunoglobulin heavy chain transgenic mice expressing Galalpha(1,3)Gal-reactive antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Natural antibodies that bind the carbohydrate antigen Galalpha1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAc-R (alphaGal) mediate rigorous rejection of porcine xenografts and represent a major immunological hurdle to successful discordant xenotransplantation. However, little is known about how production of antibodies specific for alphaGal is regulated. METHODS: Transgenic mice expressing an IgM heavy chain isolated from a B-cell hybridoma that produces antibodies specific for alphaGal were constructed. These mice were bred to mutant mice that lack the alphaGal epitope (GT0 mice) or wild-type (GT+) mice to generate animals in which the transgene is expressed in the presence or absence of alphaGal as a "self"-antigen. Development of transgene-expressing B cells and production of alphaGal-specific serum antibodies were then analyzed in transgenic mice on GT0 and GT+ backgrounds. RESULTS: B cells expressing the transgenic heavy chain and transgene-encoded serum antibodies specific for alphaGal were readily detected in mice on the GT0 background. Most alphaGal-reactive antibodies in GT0 mice used the transgene rather than endogenous Ig heavy chains. In contrast, transgene-encoded serum antibodies specific for alphaGal were not detected in GT+ mice. In transgenic mice on the GT+ background, B cells expressing the transgene underwent deletion as a result of encountering alphaGal during their development, indicating that expression of alphaGal as part of self-mediated efficient negative selection of B cells expressing transgene-encoded alphaGal-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The development of transgenic mice expressing a B cell receptor specific for alphaGal provides a novel system to study developmental regulation of B cells making carbohydrate-specific antibodies. In addition, these mice may be useful for examining methods to prevent production of alphaGal-reactive antibodies.

The role of T cell help in the production of antibodies specific for Gal alpha 1-3Gal.

The majority of xenoreactive natural Abs in humans recognize the carbohydrate Ag present on pig tissue, Galalpha1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAc-R (alphaGal), synthesized by the enzyme UDP galactose:beta-D-galactosyl-1,4-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminide alpha(1-3)galactosyltransferase or alphaGT. Using alphaGT knockout mice (GT(0) mice), which like humans produce serum Abs that bind alphaGal, we examined the role of T cells in production of Abs specific for alphaGal. GT(0) mice were crossed with TCR-beta knockout mice (TCR-beta(0)) to generate double-knockout mice (GT(0)/TCR-beta(0)). While GT(0)/TCR-beta+ mice exhibited an age-dependent increase in the serum titer of natural Abs specific for alphaGal, a similar increase was not observed in GT(0)/TCR-beta(0) mice, and the titer of alphaGal-specific Abs in double knockouts was significantly lower than in age-matched GT(0)/TCR-beta+ mice. Immunization with pig cells resulted in a significant increase in the serum titer of alphaGal-specific Abs in GT(0)/TCR-beta+ mice, but had no effect on the level of alphaGal-specific serum Abs in GT(0)/TCR-beta(0) mice. Treatment of GT(0)/TCR-beta+ mice with anti-CD40L Abs before immunization with pig cells prevented sensitization to alphaGal. Our data suggest that the majority of alphaGal-specific Abs are T cell dependent and that production of alphaGal-specific Abs after sensitization can be prevented by blocking costimulatory pathways.