Drug interactions with oral antineoplastic drugs: The role of the pharmacist.

The main objective of the study is to determine the pharmacist detection of drug-drug and drug-food interactions in patients receiving oral antineoplastic drugs (OADs). Descriptive, prospective study in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. The study population included patients who received OADs from the Outpatient Pharmacy of the hospital. The study population was attended by a pharmacist who checked potential interactions. The severity of interactions was evaluated using the summary of product characteristics of each drug and three different databases. We included 219 patients with a total of 736 concomitant medications. A total of 34 drug-drug or food-drug interactions were recorded. The most common interaction detected was between erlotinib and ranitidine (major interaction). In 19 of the 34 interactions detected in the experimental group, the pharmacist prevented them from reaching the patient. Interactions were resolved by drug suspensions, drug changes, or changes in schedules always according to the attending physician or the patient. In the remaining 15 interactions, the doctor was not contacted because the interactions were considered to be of little relevance or because they only required surveillance. Hospital pharmacist can improve the patient's safety and the efficiency of oral cytostatic treatment by detecting and preventing drug-drug and drug-food interactions.

Rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy prolongs survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia independently of the time of administration.

BACKGROUND: The combination of purine analogues (PA) and rituximab (chemoimmunotherapy) is considered the treatment of choice for CLL. The aim of this study was to determine whether chemoimmunotherapy prolonged the overall survival in patients with CLL from a single center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1980 to 2010, 273 patients with CLL received: (1) PA (n = 159); and (2) PA plus rituximab (PA+R) (n = 114). All treated patients were included in the analysis, regardless of time at which treatment was administered, duration of therapy, and response. RESULTS: Patients from the PA and PA+R groups were well balanced for demographic, clinical, and biologic features. At 8 years, the survival from diagnosis of the PA+R group was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-94%) compared with 68% (95% CI, 60-76%) for the PA group (P < .001). When survival of patients treated with PA+R was analyzed according to the time of treatment administration (first- [n = 55] vs. second or more lines [n = 59]), no significant differences were observed (8-year overall survival 89% vs. 87%, respectively; P = .8). CONCLUSION: Chemoimmunotherapy prolonged the survival of patients with CLL and this effect was independent of the phase of the disease at which treatment was given.

Interactions between oral antineoplastic agents and concomitant medication: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, the number of oral antitumoral agents has considerably increased. Oral administration increases the risk of interactions, because most oral anticancer drugs are taken on a daily basis. Interactions can increase exposure to antitumoral agents or cause treatment failure. Many antitumoral drugs undergo enzymatic metabolism by cytochrome P450. As some act as inducers or inhibitors of one or more isoenzymes, they can lead to decreases or increases in plasma concentrations of concomitant drugs. Hence, cytostatic drugs can act not only as victims but also as perpetrators. P-glycoprotein, an efflux transporter, can also be involved in pharmacokinetic interactions. AREAS COVERED: A Medline search was performed to summarize the available evidence of the most clinically relevant interactions between oral chemotherapy agents and other drugs. The search covered the period from 1966 until August 2012 for each antitumoral drug using the medical subject headings 'Drug Interactions' OR 'Pharmacokinetics'. While the present review is not exhaustive, it aims to increase clinicians' awareness of potential drug-drug interactions. EXPERT OPINION: As cancer patients are often polymedicated and treated by different physicians, the risk of drug interactions between antitumoral agents and other medications is high. More clinical interaction studies are encouraged to ensure appropriate antineoplastic pharmacokinetics in clinical practice.

Overdose of pegfilgrastim: case report.

BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim is a G-CSF that can be administered in a single dose 24 h after each cycle of chemotherapy. CASE: 59 years-old man with a stage III-B peripheral T lymphoma with CD4 expression. Dose-dense chemotherapy was started with CHOP-14 combined with pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis. An error in the dispensing system meant that the patient received pegfilgrastim for 4 consecutive days. He remained under observation in hospital. During the 3 days after the last dose of pegfilgrastim, the patient remained stable, with no remarkable symptoms or associated laboratory abnormalities, and was discharged. CONCLUSION: The case we describe and the available literature lead us to suggest close monitoring as the main measure to be adopted when treating a patient for pegfilgrastim overdose.