Mid-Term Outcomes of a Hybrid Approach Involving Open Surgery Plus TEVAR of the Descending Aorta in the Treatment of Complex Type A Dissection.

OBJECTIVES: Type A aortic dissection with true lumen collapse and malperfusion downstream is associated with a devastating prognosis. This study compares the clinical outcomes of two operative strategies for this disease: hybrid approach of ascending aorta (and hemiarch replacement) supplemented with retrograde stenting of the descending aorta (thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR]) and standard ascending aorta (and hemiarch) replacement without stent placement. METHODS: From January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019, 81 patients with type A aortic dissection were studied. The hybrid technique was applied in 30 patients (group 1), while 51 patients received standard surgical repair (group 2). Patient demographics, clinical and operative findings, postoperative outcome, follow-up interventions, and mid-term survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among the groups, except that more preoperative malperfusion was evident in group 1. The postoperative incidence of visceral malperfusion (0 vs. 15.7%, p = 0.02) and low cardiac output syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (3.3 vs. 19.6%, p = 0.04) was significantly less in group 1. In-hospital mortality was also significantly lower in group 1 as in group 2 (13.3 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.04). At follow-up, the need for secondary endovascular stenting (3.3 vs. 7.8%, p = 0.65) and surgical aortic reintervention (6.7 vs. 2.0%, p = 0.55) was comparable. One-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 83.3, 83.3, and 62.5% in group 1, and 58.7, 58.7, and 52.6% in group 2 (p = 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of open surgical replacement of the ascending aorta (and hemiarch) with TEVAR of the descending aorta for true lumen compromise is a feasible treatment option for patients with type A aortic dissection and is associated with a better perioperative outcome and improved mid-term survival rate.

Association of high volumes of hydroxyethyl starch with acute kidney injury in elderly trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Initial fluid resuscitation in trauma is still controversial. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES), a commonly used fluid for resuscitation in trauma patients, has potential nephrotoxic effects. Advancing age is a known risk factor for acute kidney injury (AKI) in trauma patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of large volumes of HES 130/0.4 on renal function in trauma patients, with a particular focus on the significance of age. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients admitted to the Trauma Centre of the University Hospital Regensburg from September 1, 2007 to December 31, 2012 was performed. This investigation used data from the TraumaRegister of the German Trauma Society (DGU®), including preclinical data from the prehospital emergency physician's protocol, the patient data management system of the intensive care units and the anaesthesia protocols of the emergency room and the operating room. AKI was evaluated according to the risk, injury, failure, loss, or end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria. The rate of AKI and the rate of renal replacement therapy (RRT) were compared between patients who received<2000ml HES 130/0.4 during the first 24h (L-HES) after trauma and patients who received≥2000ml HES 130/0.4 during the first 24h (H-HES) after trauma. An additional sub analysis of patients older than 59 years of age was performed. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were included. Although patients in the H-HES group showed a higher injury severity score, the incidence of AKI and RRT were comparable. Furthermore, the sub analysis of patients older than 59 years of age also demonstrated similar results regarding incidence of AKI and the rate of RRT. CONCLUSIONS: Fluid resuscitation with more than 2000ml HES (130kD/0.4) during the first twenty four hours after trauma was not associated with an increased incidence of AKI or need for RRT in trauma patients compared to patients who were administered<2000ml HES (130kD/0.4). The analysis of patients older than 59 years of age did not demonstrate any difference in the incidence of AKI or the need for RRT.

Peri-operative anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a long and complex procedure with significant blood and fluid loss during debulking and important pathophysiological alterations during the HIPEC phase. We performed a retrospective analysis of 78 consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC at a university hospital. Our data demonstrate large intra-operative fluid turnover, with 51% of patients requiring a blood transfusion. During HIPEC, airway pressure and central venous pressure increased with a lower oxygenation ratio as a result of increased intra-abdominal pressure with the closed abdomen technique. As a consequence of the raised body temperature, heart rate, end tidal carbon dioxide and arterial lactate levels increased with a slight metabolic acidosis. Peri-operative analysis of routine clotting parameters revealed disturbances of the coagulation status. For pain management, 72% of patients received supplementary thoracic epidural analgesia with consequential peri-operative opioid sparing and a reduced duration of postoperative ventilation.