Inconsistencies and misleading information in officially approved prescribing information from three major drug markets.

The summary of product characteristics (SPC) should provide information for the safe prescription and use of a drug. We evaluated the consistency of critical interaction warnings, the quality of presentation of undesirable effects as well as concordance of critical information of representative drugs marketed in the United States, the UK, and Germany. Reciprocal warnings regarding drug-drug interactions that constitute contraindications were frequently missing in the SPCs of the drugs concerned (all countries >40%). Most SPCs did not explicitly exclude adverse reactions considered not reasonably attributable to the use of the drug. Comparing SPCs of different generic brands of the same drug, only 60, 10, and 20% of the US, UK, and German SPCs, respectively, provided identical contraindications. Current SPCs contain inconsistencies and misleading data that are not compatible with the purpose of SPCs, which is to provide a basis for the safe prescription and use of drugs.

Memorandum on the use of information technology to improve medication safety.

BACKGROUND: Information technology in health care has a clear potential to improve the quality and efficiency of health care, especially in the area of medication processes. On the other hand, existing studies show possible adverse effects on patient safety when IT for medication-related processes is developed, introduced or used inappropriately. OBJECTIVES: To summarize definitions and observations on IT usage in pharmacotherapy and to derive recommendations and future research priorities for decision makers and domain experts. METHODS: This memorandum was developed in a consensus-based iterative process that included workshops and e-mail discussions among 21 experts coordinated by the Drug Information Systems Working Group of the German Society for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS). RESULTS: The recommendations address, among other things, a stepwise and comprehensive strategy for IT usage in medication processes, the integration of contextual information for alert generation, the involvement of patients, the semantic integration of information resources, usability and adaptability of IT solutions, and the need for their continuous evaluation. CONCLUSION: Information technology can help to improve medication safety. However, challenges remain regarding access to information, quality of information, and measurable benefits.

[Prerequisites for electronic systems evaluating safe and effective drug therapy. A contribution to the Action Plan of the Federal Health Ministry]. / Voraussetzungen für elektronische Systeme zur Prüfung auf Arzneimitteltherapiesicherheit (AMTS). Ein Beitrag zum Aktionsplan des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit.

Evaluation of effective and safe drug therapy assisted by electronic systems is based on certain prerequisites, including structured data of drugs and from patients. These prerequisites were identified in a workshop within the scope of the National Action Plan and have been reported in a 7+1-point plan: medicinal product data must be correct and up-to-date based on the summary of product characteristics approved by the responsible authorities. Product data must be available in an agreed textual structure and must use defined semantic elements within this structure. Identifiers must be allocated to all drugs and substances in order to enable unique identification and exchange across systems. Semantic structures of the product data, on the one hand, and of patient data, on the other, must be defined across system boundaries and for the whole German national health care system, and be available to every stakeholder, up-to-date, and preferably freely accessible. This consensus regarding content and structural conventions is a prerequisite for other scenarios in the health care system, such as transmitting individual case safety reports without system and media discontinuity, and is currently of great importance with respect to the European legislation on pharmacovigilance, which will be implemented nationally.

Readmissions and adverse drug reactions in internal medicine: the economic impact.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show that nearly half of the hospitalized patients are readmitted within 6 months from discharge. No data exist about the relationship between adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and readmittance to a department of internal medicine. OBJECTIVES: The primary aims of the study were to determine if ADRs could be used as predictors for recurrent hospitalizations in internal medicine and to evaluate the economic impact of ADRs on hospitalization costs. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cohort-based, prospective, 18-month pharmacoepidemiological survey was conducted in the Department I of Internal Medicine at the University Hospital of Erlangen. All patients were intensively monitored for ADRs by a pharmacoepidemiological team. ADRs were evaluated for their offending drugs, probability, severity, preventability and classified by WHO-ART. During a 6-month period ADR-positive patients were matched to non-ADR patients applying diagnosis-related group categorization in order to measure the impact of ADRs on the duration and frequency of hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 1000 admissions 424 patients had single admissions and 206 patients had recurrent readmissions (min 1, max 9). The prevalence of readmissions was 37% (n = 370). In 145 (23%) of 630 patients, 305 ADRs were observed. The ADR incidence was similar in first admissions and readmissions. ADRs were not found to predict further readmissions and lack of ADRs did not preclude readmissions. ADRs caused hospitalizations in 6.2% of first admissions and in 4.2% of readmissions. According to the Schumock algorithm 135 (44.3%) ADRs were found to be preventable. The occurrence and numbers of ADRs per admission were found to prolong hospitalization period significantly (r = 0.48 and 0.51, P < 0.001, n = 135). Of 9107 treatment days 20% were caused by in-house (1130 days) and community-acquired ADRs (669 days). In admissions and readmissions 11% (>973 days) of all treatment days were judged to be preventable. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified drug monitoring supported by information technology in internal medicine is essential for early detecting and prevention of ADRs and saving hospital resources.

Implementation of a computer-assisted monitoring system for the detection of adverse drug reactions in gastroenterology.

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of a computer monitoring system that detects adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by laboratory signals in gastroenterology. METHODS: A prospective, 6-month, pharmaco-epidemiological survey was carried out on a gastroenterological ward at the University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg. Two methods were used to identify ADRs. (i) All charts were reviewed daily by physicians and clinical pharmacists. (ii) A computer monitoring system generated a daily list of automatic laboratory signals and alerts of ADRs, including patient data and dates of events. RESULTS: One hundred and nine ADRs were detected in 474 admissions (377 patients). The computer monitoring system generated 4454 automatic laboratory signals from 39 819 laboratory parameters tested, and issued 2328 alerts, 914 (39%) of which were associated with ADRs; 574 (25%) were associated with ADR-positive admissions. Of all the alerts generated, signals of hepatotoxicity (1255), followed by coagulation disorders (407) and haematological toxicity (207), were prevalent. Correspondingly, the prevailing ADRs were concerned with the metabolic and hepato-gastrointestinal system (61). The sensitivity was 91%: 69 of 76 ADR-positive patients were indicated by an alert. The specificity of alerts was increased from 23% to 76% after implementation of an automatic laboratory signal trend monitoring algorithm. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a computer monitoring system is a useful tool for the systematic and automated detection of ADRs in gastroenterological patients.

Adverse drug reactions in patients with gastroenterological diseases: does age increase the risk?

BACKGROUND: It has been claimed that the risk of adverse drug reactions increases with age. However, only limited data exist for disease-group specific risks and none for patients with liver and gastrointestinal diseases. AIMS: To determine the incidence and characteristics of adverse drug reactions and the physicians' awareness of adverse drug reactions. METHODS: During a 7-month period, a prospective survey of 532 male patients (158 aged 65 years or older; 30%) was conducted on a hepatogastroenterological ward of a tertiary-care university hospital, using intensive bedside and computer-assisted drug surveillance methods. RESULTS: No difference was found in the overall rate of adverse drug reactions between older and younger patients (25.9% vs. 24.2%) during 6213 treatment days. However, a significantly higher risk for developing adverse drug reactions could be shown for the elderly with biliary tract diseases (P < 0.01). Independently of age, patients suffering from gastric ulcers, acute episodes of pancreatitis, cholangitis or inflammatory bowel diseases were at high risk of adverse drug reactions. Adverse drug reaction-associated mortality was encountered in four elderly and none of the younger patients. Secondary pharmacological effects and drug toxicity were the main types of adverse drug reactions for both age groups. Although 75.3% of the adverse drug reactions were predictable, only 37.5% of all adverse drug reactions were recognized by the staff physicians. CONCLUSION: In hepatogastroenterological patients, advancing age was not associated with an overall increased risk of adverse drug reactions except for patients with biliary tract diseases. In the elderly, adverse drug reactions were more severe and carried higher mortality. Guidelines and educational programs should be developed to increase the awareness of adverse drug reactions and their prevention, especially in high risk patients and, thus, to improve patient outcomes.

Incidence and costs of adverse drug reactions during hospitalisation: computerised monitoring versus stimulated spontaneous reporting.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a computer-based adverse drug reaction monitoring system and compare its results with those of stimulated spontaneous reporting, and to assess the excess lengths of stay and costs of patients with verified adverse drug reactions. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was used to assess the efficacy of computer-based monitoring, and case-matching was used to assess excess length of stay and costs. SETTING: This was a study of all patients admitted to a medical ward of a university hospital in Germany between June and December 1997. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 379 patients were included, most of whom had infectious, gastrointestinal or liver diseases, or sleep apnoea syndrome. Patients admitted because of adverse drug reactions were excluded. METHODS: All automatically generated laboratory signals and reports were evaluated by a team consisting of a clinical pharmacologist, a clinician and a pharmacist for their likelihood of being an adverse drug reaction. They were classified by severity and causality. For verified adverse drug reactions, control patients with similar primary diagnosis, age, gender and time of admission but without adverse drug reactions were matched to the cases in order to assess the excess length of hospitalisation caused by an adverse drug reaction. RESULTS: Adverse drug reactions were detected in 12% of patients by the computer-based monitoring system and stimulated spontaneous reporting together (46 adverse reactions in 45 patients) during 1718 treatment days. Computer-based monitoring identified adverse drug reactions in 34 cases, and stimulated spontaneous reporting in 17 cases. Only 5 adverse drug reactions were detected by both methods. The relative sensitivity of computer-based monitoring was 74% (relative specificity 75%), and that of stimulated spontaneous reporting was 37% (relative specificity 98%). All 3 serious adverse drug reactions were detected by computer-based monitoring, but only 2 out of the 3 were detected by stimulated spontaneous reporting. The percentage of automatically generated laboratory signals associated with an adverse drug reaction (positive predictive value) was 13%. The mean excess length of stay was 3.5 days per adverse drug reaction. 48% of adverse reactions were predictable and detected solely by computer-based monitoring. Therefore, the potential for savings on this ward from the introduction of computer-based monitoring can be calculated as EUR56 200/year ($US59 600/year) [ 1999 values]. CONCLUSION: Computer monitoring is an effective method for improving the detection of adverse drug reactions in inpatients. The excess length of stay and costs caused by adverse drug reactions are substantial and might be considerably reduced by earlier detection.

Retrospective analysis of the frequency and recognition of adverse drug reactions by means of automatically recorded laboratory signals.

AIMS: To estimate the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) identified through the use of automatic signals generated from laboratory data (ALS) in hospitalised patients. To determine the frequency of spontaneous recognition of these ADRs by the attending physicians and to assess the potential value of ALS for detection of ADRs. METHODS: Laboratory results of patients hospitalised in a nine bed medical ward were automatically recorded over a period of 17 months. Values exceeding defined boundaries were used as ALS. Charts of every third patient were analysed retrospectively with regard to adverse drug related reactions and causality was evaluated as well as whether the ADR had been recognised during the period of hospitalisation. RESULTS: The charts and ALS of 98 patients were analysed. In 18 cases a drug-related adverse reaction was probable. Awareness to the reaction by the treating physicians was evident in 6 out of these 18 ADRs. Approximately 80% of the ADRs were considered predictable. Three ADRs were regarded as serious. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug reactions are common and often preventable. Only one third of ADRs which could have been detected through ALS were recognised by the attending physicians. An increased doctor's awareness of the frequency of drug related abnormal laboratory results by means of ALS is likely to increase the recognition rate of ADRs and might help to prevent them.