Clinical Outcome Assessments in Encephalitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most patients with encephalitis experience persisting neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric sequelae in the years following this acute illness. Reported outcomes are often based on generic clinical outcome assessments that rarely capture the patient perspective. This may result in an underestimation of disease-specific sequelae. Disease-specific clinical outcome assessments can improve clinical relevance of reported outcomes and increase the power of research and trials. There are no patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) developed or validated specifically for patients with encephalitis. The primary objective of this systematic literature review was to identify PROMs that have been developed for or validated in patients with encephalitis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature published from inception until May 2023 in 3 large international databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries). Eligible studies should have developed or validated a PROM in patients with encephalitis or encephalopathy. Methodologic quality was evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments study design checklist for PROMs. RESULTS: We identified no disease-specific PROMs developed or validated for patients with encephalitis. We identified one study on the development and validation of a disease-specific PROM for hepatic encephalopathy, although this disease course is substantially different to that of patients with encephalitis. The methodologic quality of the included study was generally rated as "doubtful." We identified 30 PROMs that have been applied in 46 studies on encephalitis or encephalopathy, although not validated in these populations. The most commonly applied PROMs for measuring Health-Related Quality of Life were the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and the Sickness Impact Profile. Emotional well-being was often assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Sporadically, PROMs were applied to address other aspects of outcome including daily functioning and sleep quality. DISCUSSION: This systematic review confirms a critical gap in clinical outcome assessments in patients with encephalitis, failing to identify a validated measuring tool for detecting neurocognitive, functional, and health status. It is therefore essential to develop and/or validate disease-specific PROMs for the population with encephalitis to capture relevant information for patient management and clinical trials about the effects of disease that are at risk of being overlooked.

Predictive Value of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels in Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Determinants of disease activity and prognosis are limited in anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. Neurofilament light chains (NfL) are markers of axonal damage and have been identified as valuable biomarkers for neurodegenerative and other neuroinflammatory disorders. We aimed to investigate serum NfL levels in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis as a biomarker for disease severity and outcome. METHODS: In this retrospective study, NfL values were measured in all available pretreatment serum and paired CSF samples of the nationwide anti-NMDAR encephalitis cohort. The values were analyzed in duplicate using single-molecule array and compared with measurements in healthy references. Follow-up sera were tested to analyze longitudinal responsiveness, if at least available from 2 time points after diagnosis. Serum NfL levels were compared with data on disease activity (seizures, MRI, and CSF findings), severity (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score, admission days, and intensive care unit admission), and outcome (mRS score and relapses), using regression analysis. RESULTS: We have included 71 patients (75% female; mean age 31.4 years, range 0-85 years) of whom pretreatment serum samples were analyzed. Paired CSF samples were available of 33 patients, follow-up serum samples of 20 patients. Serum NfL levels at diagnosis were higher in patients (mean 19.5 pg/mL, 95% CI 13.7-27.7) than in references (mean 6.4 pg/mL, 95% CI 5.8-7.2, p < 0.0001). We observed a good correlation between serum and CSF NfL values (R = 0.84, p < 0.0001). Serum NfL levels and age correlated in patients (Pearson R = 0.57, p < 0.0001) and references (R = 0.62, p < 0.0001). Increased NfL values were detected in patients post-herpes simplex virus 1 encephalitis (mean 248.8 vs 14.1 pg/mL, p < 0.0001) and in patients with brain MRI lesions (mean 27.3 vs 11.1 pg/mL, p = 0.019). NfL levels did relate to the long-term follow-up (mRS score at 12 months; ßNfL = 0.55, p = 0.013), although largely explained by the effect of age on NfL levels and prognosis. In serial samples, NfL values did roughly follow clinical disease activity, albeit with delay. DISCUSSION: Increased serum NfL levels reflect neuroaxonal damage in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. No relationship was identified with disease severity, whereas the association with outcome was confounded by age. The implied role of sampling timing on NfL levels also limits the applicability of NfL as a prognostic marker.

Brain stem encephalitis is a rare complication of COVID-19.

Here, we describe the clinical phenotype of SARS-CoV-2-related CNS disease and evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 antibody index as a tool to differentiate between a direct (viral) and indirect etiology. Out of >4000 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, we included 13 patients with neurological symptoms with suspicion of neuroinflammation. On clinical grounds, eight were classified as having a possible/probable relationship between neurological symptoms and COVID-19. A clinically distinctive phenotype of brainstem and cerebellar symptoms was seen in 6/8 patients. As we found a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody index in 3/5 patients, indicating specific intrathecal SARS-CoV-2 IgG production, a direct link with SARS-CoV-2 is likely.

Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis in the Netherlands, Focusing on Late-Onset Patients and Antibody Test Accuracy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical features of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, emphasizing on late-onset patients and antibody test characteristics in serum and CSF. METHODS: Nationwide observational Dutch cohort study, in patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis between 2007 and 2019. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were included with a median age of 24 years (range 1-86 years). The mean annual incidence was 1.00/million (95% CI 0.62-1.59). Patients ≥45 years of age at onset (19%) had fewer seizures (46% vs 71%, p = 0.021), fewer symptoms during disease course (3 vs 6 symptoms, p = 0.020), and more often undetectable serum antibodies compared with younger patients (p = 0.031). In the late-onset group, outcome was worse, and all tumors were carcinomas (both p < 0.0001). CSF was more accurate than serum to detect anti-NMDAR encephalitis (sensitivity 99% vs 68%, p < 0.0001). Using cell-based assay (CBA), CSF provided an unconfirmed positive test result in 11/2,600 patients (0.4%); 6/11 had a neuroinflammatory disease (other than anti-NMDAR encephalitis). Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, who tested positive in CSF only, had lower CSF antibody titers (p = 0.003), but appeared to have an equally severe disease course. DISCUSSION: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurs at all ages and is less rare in the elderly patients than initially anticipated. In older patients, the clinical phenotype is less outspoken, has different tumor association, and a less favorable recovery. Detection of antibodies in CSF is the gold standard, and although the CBA has very good validity, it is not perfect. The clinical phenotype should be leading, and confirmation in a research laboratory is recommended, when in doubt.

Phase II trial of natalizumab for the treatment of anti-Hu associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes with anti-Hu antibodies (Hu-PNS) have a very poor prognosis: more than half of the patients become bedridden and median survival is less than 12 months. Several lines of evidence suggest a pathogenic T cell-mediated immune response. Therefore, we conducted a prospective open-label phase II trial with natalizumab. METHODS: Twenty Hu-PNS patients with progressive disease were treated with a maximum of three monthly natalizumab cycles (300 mg). The primary outcome measure was functional improvement, this was defined as at least one point decrease in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the last treatment visit. In addition, treatment response was assessed wherein a mRS score ≤3 after treatment was defined as treatment responsive. RESULTS: The median age at onset was 67.8 years (SD 8.4) with a female predominance (n = 17, 85%). The median time from symptom onset to Hu-PNS diagnosis was 5 months (IQR 2-11). Most patients had subacute sensory neuronopathy (n = 15, 75%), with a median mRS of 4 at baseline. Thirteen patients had a tumor, all small cell lung cancer. After natalizumab treatment, two patients (10%) showed functional improvement. Of the remaining patients, 60% had a stable functional outcome, while 30% showed further deterioration. Treatment response was classified as positive in nine patients (45%). CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab may ameliorate the disease course in Hu-PNS, but no superior effects above other reported immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory were observed. More effective treatment modalities are highly needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2014-000675-13/NL.

Autoimmune Encephalitis Resembling Dementia Syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: As autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) can resemble neurodegenerative dementia syndromes, and patients do not always present as encephalitis, this study evaluates how frequently AIE mimics dementia and provides red flags for AIE in middle-aged and older patients. METHODS: In this nationwide observational cohort study, patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR), anti-gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABABR), or anti-contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2) encephalitis were included. They had to meet 3 additional criteria: age ≥45 years, fulfillment of dementia criteria, and no prominent seizures early in the disease course (≤4 weeks). RESULTS: Two-hundred ninety patients had AIE, of whom 175 were 45 years or older. Sixty-seven patients (38%) fulfilled criteria for dementia without prominent seizures early in the disease course. Of them, 42 had anti-LGI1 (48%), 13 anti-NMDAR (52%), 8 anti-GABABR (22%), and 4 anti-CASPR2 (15%) encephalitis. Rapidly progressive cognitive deterioration was seen in 48 patients (76%), whereas a neurodegenerative dementia syndrome was suspected in half (n = 33). In 17 patients (27%; 16/17 anti-LGI1), subtle seizures had been overlooked. Sixteen patients (25%) had neither inflammatory changes on brain MRI nor CSF pleocytosis. At least 1 CSF biomarker, often requested when dementia was suspected, was abnormal in 27 of 44 tested patients (61%), whereas 8 had positive 14-3-3 results (19%). Most patients (84%) improved after immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Red flags for AIE in patients with suspected dementia are: (1) rapidly progressive cognitive decline, (2) subtle seizures, and (3) abnormalities in ancillary testing atypical for neurodegeneration. Physicians should be aware that inflammatory changes are not always present in AIE, and that biomarkers often requested when dementia was suspected (including 14-3-3) can show abnormal results. Diagnosis is essential as most patients profit from immunotherapy.

[Clinical symptoms of patients with autoimmune encephalitis: a guide to timely recognition and treatment]. / Symptomen van een auto-immuunencefalitis: Leidraad tot tijdige herkenning en behandeling.

In recent years, there have been many developments in the field of autoimmune encephalitis. Autoimmune encephalitis is often treatable, and fast recognition and treatment are essential to prevent irreversible damage. Identification of patients with autoimmune encephalitis is challenging because patients display various symptoms and consequently present to different medical specialists. We describe 3 cases of autoimmune encephalitis due to different antibodies. A 23-year-old woman presented with acute psychosis, followed by seizures and autonomic dysfunction. She was diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis caused by antibodies that were triggered by ovarian teratoma. A 59-year-old man developed severe behavioural changes, memory deficits, and subtle faciobrachial dystonic seizures. He had anti-LGI1 encephalitis and recovered completely. The third patient was a 57-year-old man who presented with diarrhea and weight loss, and gradually developed progressive rigidity, myoclonus and ataxia over the course of several months. He was ultimately diagnosed with anti-DPPX encephalitis. All patients responded well to immunotherapy with (near-)complete recovery within months to years.

Early effect of intra-arterial treatment in ischemic stroke on aphasia recovery in MR CLEAN.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intra-arterial treatment (IAT) on early recovery from aphasia in acute ischemic stroke. We hypothesized that the early effect of IAT on aphasia is smaller than the effect on motor deficits. METHODS: We included patients with aphasia from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN), in which 500 patients with a proximal anterior circulation stroke were randomized to usual care plus IAT (<6 hours after stroke, mainly stent retrievers) or usual care alone. We estimated the effect of IAT on the shift on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) item language and the NIHSS item motor arm at 24 hours and 1 week after stroke with multivariable ordinal logistic regression as a common odds ratio, adjusted for prognostic variables (acOR). Differences between the effect of IAT on aphasia and on motor deficits were tested in a multilevel model with a multiplicative interaction term. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients with aphasia, 126 were assigned to IAT and 162 to usual care alone. The acOR for improvement of language score at 24 hours was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.60), and at 1 week 1.86 (95% CI 1.18-2.94). The acOR for improvement of motor deficit at 24 hours was 2.44 (95% CI 1.54-3.88), and at 1 week 2.32 (95% CI 1.43-3.77). The effect of IAT on language deficits was significantly different from the effect on motor deficits at 24 hours and 1 week (p = 0.005 and p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: IAT results in better early recovery from aphasia than usual care alone. The early effect of IAT on aphasia is smaller than the effect on motor deficits. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute ischemic stroke IAT increases early recovery from aphasia and that the early effect on aphasia, as measured by the NIHSS, is smaller than the effect on motor deficits.