How I treat HER2-positive early breast cancer: how long adjuvant trastuzumab is needed?

Since its first approval in 2006, 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab has been the standard of care for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of adjuvant trastuzumab was uncertain, and the standard 12-month duration has been questioned by a number of different trials. Although most of these studies were formally negative, a patient-level meta-analysis presented at the 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) meeting first showed the non-inferiority of 6-month trastuzumab. Through this review, we sought to take a closer look at the meta-analysis and the included trials to explain why we believe that non-inferiority should be interpreted with caution. Indeed, here we underline how the meta-analysis' results were mainly driven by the PERSEPHONE study, an old trial that tested non-standard chemo-trastuzumab regimens in a relatively low-risk population with doubtful endpoints. In summary, considering all the limitations of this analysis and the increasing use of effective anthracycline-free de-escalation strategies, we are convinced that 1-year trastuzumab should remain the standard of care.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with special histology subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality in women, worldwide; triple-negative BC (TNBC) is a subtype traditionally associated with poorer prognosis. TNBC special histology subtypes present distinct clinical and molecular features and sensitivity to antineoplastic treatments. However, no consensus has been defined on the best adjuvant therapy. The aim of the review is to study the evidence from literature to inform the choice of adjuvant treatments in this setting. METHODS: We systematically searched literature assessing the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC special histotypes (PROSPERO: CRD42020153818). RESULTS: We screened 6404 records (15 included). All the studies estimated the benefit of different chemotherapy regimens, in retrospective cohorts (median size: 69 patients (range min-max: 17-5142); median follow-up: 51 months (range: 21-268); mostly in Europe and USA). In patients with early-stage adenoid cystic TNBC, a marginal role of chemotherapy was reported. Similar for apocrine TNBC. Medullary tumors exhibited an intrinsic good prognosis with a limited role of chemotherapy, suggested to be modulated by the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. A significant impact of chemotherapy on the overall survival was estimated in patients with metaplastic TNBC. Limitations were related to the retrospective design of all the studies and heterogeneous treatments received by the patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is potential opportunity to consider treatment de-escalation and less intense therapies in some patients with early, special histology-type TNBC. International efforts are indispensable to validate prospective clinical decision models.

Impact of COVID-19 on social media as perceived by the oncology community: results from a survey in collaboration with the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the OncoAlert Network.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted all aspects of modern-day oncology, including how stakeholders communicate through social media. We surveyed oncology stakeholders in order to assess their attitudes pertaining to social media and how it has been affected during the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 40-item survey was distributed to stakeholders from 8 July to 22 July 2020 and was promoted through the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the OncoAlert Network. RESULTS: One thousand and seventy-six physicians and stakeholders took part in the survey. In total, 57.3% of respondents were medical oncologists, 50.6% aged <40 years, 50.8% of female gender and mostly practicing in Europe (51.5%). More than 90% of respondents considered social media a useful tool for distributing scientific information and for education. Most used social media to stay up to date on cancer care in general (62.5%) and cancer care during COVID-19 (61%) given the constant flow of information. Respondents also used social media to interact with other oncologists (78.8%) and with patients (34.4%). Overall, 61.1% of respondents were satisfied with the role that social media was playing during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, 41.1% of respondents reported trouble in discriminating between credible and less credible information and 30% stated social networks were a source of stress. For this reason, one-third of respondents reduced its use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regarding meeting attendance, a total of 59.1% of responding physicians preferred in-person meetings to virtual ones, and 51.8% agreed that virtual meetings and social distancing could hamper effective collaboration. CONCLUSION: Social media has a useful role in supporting cancer care and professional engagement in oncology. Although one-third of respondents reported reduced use of social media due to stress during the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority found social media useful to keep up to date and were satisfied with the role social media was playing during the pandemic.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lobular breast cancer: A systematic review of the literature and metanalysis.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) for patients with localized lobular breast cancer (ILC) is still controversial. It is unclear what is the magnitude of benefit of the CT in this setting. In this systematic review of the literature and metanalysis, we aimed to estimate the benefit of aCT in addition to the standard treatments in the early ILC setting. We identified the records by searching Medline, CENTRAL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar, and the meeting proceeding of the principal oncology meetings of the last 10 years, with no language or time restriction. A research strategy was developed with mapped and MeSH terms. Studies on the clinical use of aCT reporting survival outcomes in the ILC setting were double-screened and tabulated. PRISMA methodology was used for data extraction and synthesis. We extracted information on the study design and setting, eligible population and population size, histology variants, menopausal status, treatment regimens, follow-up duration. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted and transformed into logHR and corresponding standard error to obtain the Summary HR (SHR). Heterogeneity (I2 statistics) and publication bias (Macaskill test) were tested; a random effect models provided by SAS Proc Mixed was used for data analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the impact of inclusion criteria on the summary results. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were the primary endpoints of the investigation. The systematic review and metanalysis included 38,387 patients across 8 clinical studies. aCT was not associated with an improvement of OS (SHR 0.99; 95%CI 0.86-1.14), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 28%) and no publication bias (p = 0.43). Sensitivity analysis resulted in unchanged conclusions. We did not perform a metanalysis of the DFS estimates, as only reported in 3 studies. The value of aCT in improving DFS was unconfirmed, consistently with the OS results. Our research did not confirm a certain role of aCT for patients with ILC. Research gaps were identified, warranting the development of prospective, controlled ad hoc investigations.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The prognostic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is debated. We evaluated the association of TILs and clinico-pathological features with distant disease-free survival (DDFS) in patients with ER+/HER2- BC treated at a single institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A mono-institutional case-cohort series of 987 patients with early ER+/HER2- BC was retrospectively analyzed. TILs were considered both as continuous variable, and dichotomized in low (< 5%) vs high (≥ 5%). The main outcome was DDFS. Median follow-up was 7.5 years (0.1-10). Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse sub-cohort sampling probability weighting were used to evaluate the risk across groups. RESULTS: Median TIL count was 2% (Q1-Q3 1-4%). Higher TILs were positively associated with number of lymph nodes involved (p = 0.003), tumor grade (p < 0.0001), peritumoral vascular invasion (p = 0.003), higher Ki-67 (p = 0.0001), luminal B subtype (p < 0.0001), and chemotherapy use (p < 0.00019). In multivariable regression analysis, only higher Ki-67 expression retained significant association with TILs. At univariate Cox regression analysis, TIL expression (≥ 5% vs. < 5%) was not associated with DDFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.46, p = 0.62). In patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, high TILs were associated with better DDFS (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.33-0.83, p = 0.006), particularly in the group with Ki-67 ≥ 20% (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.29-0.86, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: High TILs in ER+/HER2- BC are significantly associated with clinico-pathological features of dismal outcome. TIL prognostic value seems different in patients treated with or without chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that the high-risk subgroup might be more immunogenic, thus deserving the exploration of immunotherapy approaches.

Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Although stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have been considered an important prognostic factor in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there have been limited data on their prognostic value in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis was carried out using four cohorts of TNBC patients not treated with chemotherapy. sTILs were evaluated in the most representative tumoral block of surgical specimens. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (D-DFS), and overall survival (OS), fitting sTILs as a continuous variable adjusted for clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: We analyzed individual data of 476 patients from 4 centers diagnosed between 1989 and 2015. Their median age was 64 years. The median tumor size was 1.6 cm and 83% were node-negative. The median level of sTILs was 10% (Q1-Q3, 4%-30%). Higher grade was associated with higher sTILs (P < 10-3). During follow-up, 107 deaths, and 173 and 118 events for iDFS and D-DFS were observed, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, sTILs obtained an independent prognostic value for all end points (likelihood ratio χ2 = 7.14 for iDFS; P < 10-2; χ2 = 9.63 for D-DFS, P < 10-2; χ2 = 5.96 for OS, P = 0.015). Each 10% increment in sTILs corresponded to a hazard ratio of 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 - 0.97] for iDFS, 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 - 0.95) for D-DFS, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 - 0.98) for OS, respectively. In patients with pathological stage I tumors with sTILs ≥30% (n = 74), 5-year iDFS was 91% (95% CI 84% to 96%), D-DFS was 97% (95% CI 93% to 100%), and OS was 98% (95% CI 95% to 100%). CONCLUSION: sTILs add important prognostic information in systemically untreated early-stage TNBC patients. Notably, sTILs can identify a subset of stage I TNBC patients with an excellent prognosis without adjuvant chemotherapy.

Palbociclib as single agent or in combination with the endocrine therapy received before disease progression for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: TREnd trial.

Background: The activity of palbociclib as a single agent in advanced breast cancer has not been extensively studied, with the only available clinical data limited to heavily pretreated patients. Preclinical data suggests palbociclib may partially reverse endocrine resistance, though this hypothesis has not been evaluated in previous clinical studies. This phase II, open-label, multicenter study examined the activity of palbociclib monotherapy, as well as palbociclib given in combination with the same endocrine therapy (ET) that was received prior to disease progression, in postmenopausal women with moderately pretreated, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer. Patients and methods: Eligible women with advanced disease which had progressed on one or two prior ETs were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either palbociclib alone, or palbociclib in combination with the ET as previously received. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Between October 2012 and July 2016, a total of 115 patients were randomized. The CBR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI): 41.5-63.7] for combination therapy, and 60% (95% CI: 47.8-72.9) for monotherapy. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 5.6-12.7) for combination therapy, and 6.5 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.5) for monotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI: 0.4-1.1, exploratory P-value = 0.12]. Exploratory analyses revealed the PFS advantage for combination therapy was seen in the subgroup of patients who received prior ET for >6 months (HR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, exploratory P-value = 0.02), but not in those who received prior ET for ≤6 months. Conclusion: Palbociclib has clinical activity as a single agent in women with moderately pretreated, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Palbociclib may have potential to reverse endocrine resistance in patients with a history of previous durable response to ET. Clinical trial information: NCT02549430.

A gene signature to predict high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Background: In patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the extent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with better prognosis. Our objective was to develop a gene signature from pretreatment samples to predict the extent of TILs after NACT and then to test its prognostic value on survival. Patients and methods: Using 99 pretreatment samples, we generated a four-gene signature associated with high post-NACT TILs. Prognostic value of the signature on distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) was first assessed on the training set (n = 99) and then on an independent validation set (n = 115). Results: A four-gene signature combining the expression levels of HLF, CXCL13, SULT1E1, and GBP1 was developed in baseline samples to predict the extent of lymphocytic infiltration after NACT. In a multivariate analysis performed on the training set, this signature was associated with DRFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.28, for a one-unit increase in the value of the four-gene signature, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.63)]. In a multivariate analysis performed on an independent validation set, the four-gene signature was significantly associated with DRFS (HR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.43). The four-gene signature added significant prognostic information when compared with the clinicopathologic pretreatment model (likelihood ratio test in the training set P = 0.004 and in the validation set P = 0.002). Conclusions: A four-gene signature predicts high levels of TILs after anthracycline-containing NACT and outcome in patients with TNBC and adds prognostic information to a clinicopathological model at diagnosis.

The use of breast imaging for predicting response to neoadjuvant lapatinib, trastuzumab and their combination in HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from Neo-ALTTO.

AIM: To determine the value of mammography and breast ultrasound (US) in predicting outcomes in HER2 positive breast cancer patients (pts) within Neo-ALTTO trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mammography and US were required at baseline, week 6 and surgery. Two independent blinded investigators reviewed the measurements and assigned the corresponding response category. Pts showing complete or partial response according to RECIST (v1.1) were classified as responders. The association between imaging response at week 6 or prior to surgery was evaluated with respect to pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free Survival (EFS). RESULTS: Of the 455 pts enrolled in the trial, 267 (61%) and 340 (77%) had evaluable mammography and US at week 6; 248 (56%) and 309 (70%) pts had evaluable mammography and US prior to surgery. At week 6, 32% and 43% of pts were classified as responders by mammography and US, respectively. pCR rates were twice as high for responders than non-responders (week 6: 46% versus 23% by US, p < 0.0001; 41% versus 24% by mammography, p = 0.007). Positive and negative predictive values of mammography and US prior to surgery were 37% and 35%, and 82% and 70%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between response by mammography and/or US at week 6/surgery and EFS. CONCLUSIONS: Mammography and US were underused in Neo-ALTTO although US had the potential to assess early response whereas mammography to detect residual disease prior to surgery. Our data still emphasise the need for further imaging studies on pts treated with neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy.

Breast conservation following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the modern era: Are we losing the opportunity?

The main rationale for neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer is to provide effective systemic treatment while surgically down-staging the cancer. This down-staging was initially to convert inoperable patients to operable and later to increase rates of breast conservation in patients initially deemed mastectomy only candidates. Unexpectedly, in recent neoadjuvant trials lower rates of breast conservation have been observed than in past decades, despite remarkable advances in systemic therapies, which have increased pathologic complete response rates. These results point to factors aside from response and eligibility for breast conservation that may lead surgeons and/or patients to recommend and choose mastectomy. Here, we aim to examine the surgical benefits offered by the modern era neoadjuvant therapy and explore factors that have contributed to this decrease in breast conservation rates. If the main benefit of neoadjuvant therapy is to increase the opportunity for breast conservation, then our review suggests that to optimize less invasive surgical approaches, we will need to address both surgeon and patient-level variables and biases that may be limiting our ability to identify patients appropriate for less aggressive options. As an oncology community, we must be aware of the surgical overtreatment of breast cancer, especially in a time where systemic therapies have remarkably improved outcomes and responses.

Somatic mutation, copy number and transcriptomic profiles of primary and matched metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers (BCs) constitute the most frequent BC subtype. The molecular landscape of ER+ relapsed disease is not well characterized. In this study, we aimed to describe the genomic evolution between primary (P) and matched metastatic (M) ER+ BCs after failure of adjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 182 ER+ metastatic BC patients with long-term follow-up were identified from a single institution. P tumor tissue was available for all patients, with 88 having matched M material. According to the availability of tumor material, samples were characterized using a 120 mutational hotspot qPCR, a 29 gene copy number aberrations (CNA) and a 400 gene expression panels. ESR1 mutations were assayed by droplet digital PCR. Molecular alterations were correlated with overall survival (OS) using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.4 years (range 0.5-26.6 years). Genomic analysis of P tumors revealed somatic mutations in PIK3CA, KRAS, AKT1, FGFR3, HRAS and BRAF at frequencies of 41%, 6%, 5%, 2%, 1% and 2%, respectively, and CN amplification of CCND1, ZNF703, FGFR1, RSF1 and PAK1 at 23%, 19%, 17%, 12% and 11%, respectively. Mutations and CN amplifications were largely concordant between P and matched M (>84%). ESR1 mutations were found in 10.8% of the M but none of the P. Thirteen genes, among which ESR1, FOXA1, and HIF1A, showed significant differential expression between P and M. In P, the differential expression of 18 genes, among which IDO1, was significantly associated with OS (FDR < 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the large concordance between P and matched M for the evaluated molecular alterations, potential actionable targets such as ESR1 mutations were found only in M. This supports the importance of characterizing the M disease. Other targets we identified, such as HIF1A and IDO1, warrant further investigation in this patient population.

Surgery of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer: To do or not to do?

Approximately five percent of all breast cancer patients in developed countries present with distant metastases at initial diagnosis. Due to its incurability, metastatic breast cancer is generally treated with systemic therapies to achieve disease control and reduce tumor-related symptoms. Primary treatments for metastatic breast cancer are chemotherapy, endocrine- and biologic therapy, whereas surgery with or without radiotherapy is usually performed to treat impending wound issues. Since 2002, several retrospective non-randomized clinical studies have shown that extirpation of the primary tumor correlates with a significantly improved survival in patients with primary metastatic breast cancer. Others have argued that this survival benefit associated with surgery may be due to selection biases. Therefore, in the absence of published results from randomized controlled trials carried out in India and Turkey and completion of a trial in the United States, there is no clear conclusion on whether surgical excision of the primary breast cancer translates into a survival benefit for patients with de novo metastatic disease. Furthermore, timing and type of surgical procedure, as well as selection of patients who could benefit the most from this approach, represent additional points of uncertainty. Despite the epidemiological burden of this condition, there are no guidelines on how to manage breast cancer patients presenting with de novo metastatic breast cancer; and decisions are often left to provider and patient preferences. Here, we present a critical overview of the literature focusing on the rationale and potential role of primary tumour excision in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer.

The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

BACKGROUND: The morphological evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer (BC) is gaining momentum as evidence strengthens for the clinical relevance of this immunological biomarker. Accumulating evidence suggests that the extent of lymphocytic infiltration in tumor tissue can be assessed as a major parameter by evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumor sections. TILs have been shown to provide prognostic and potentially predictive value, particularly in triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing BC. DESIGN: A standardized methodology for evaluating TILs is now needed as a prerequisite for integrating this parameter in standard histopathological practice, in a research setting as well as in clinical trials. This article reviews current data on the clinical validity and utility of TILs in BC in an effort to foster better knowledge and insight in this rapidly evolving field, and to develop a standardized methodology for visual assessment on H&E sections, acknowledging the future potential of molecular/multiplexed approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology provided is sufficiently detailed to offer a uniformly applied, pragmatic starting point and improve consistency and reproducibility in the measurement of TILs for future studies.

Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on residual disease after primary chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to develop surrogates for treatment efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting to speed-up drug development and stratify patients according to outcome. Preclinical studies showed that chemotherapy induces an antitumor immune response. In order to develop new surrogates for drug efficacy, we assessed the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) on residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred four TNBC patients with residual disease after NACT were retrospectively identified in three different hospitals. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from surgical postchemotherapy specimens were evaluated for intratumoral (It-TIL) and stromal (Str-TIL) TIL. Cases were classified as High-TIL if It-TIL and/or Str-TIL >60%. RESULTS: TIL were assessable for 278 cases. Continuous It-TIL and Str-TIL variables were strong prognostic factors in the multivariate model, both for metastasis-free [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.96, P = 0.01 and HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, P = 0.02 for Str-TIL and It-TIL, respectively] and overall survival (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97, P = 0.01 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.03 for Str-TIL and It-TIL, respectively). The 5-year overall survival rate was 91% (95% CI 68% to 97%) for High-TIL patients (n = 27) and 55% (95% CI 48% to 61%) for Low-TIL patients (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.61, log-rank P = 0.0017). The major prognostic impact of TIL was seen for patients with large tumor burden following NACT (residual tumor >2 cm and/or node metastasis). In all but one High-TIL case, It-TIL and Str-TIL values were lower on the prechemotherapy sample. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of TIL in residual disease after NACT is associated with better prognosis in TNBC patients. This parameter may represent a new surrogate of drug efficacy to test investigational agents in the neoadjuvant setting and a new prognostic marker to select patients at high risk of relapse.

Tumour dormancy and clinical implications in breast cancer.

The aim of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer is to reduce the risk of recurrence. Some patients develop metastases many years after apparently successful treatment of their primary cancer. Tumour dormancy may explain the long time between initial diagnosis and treatment of cancer, and occurrence of relapse. The regulation of the switch from clinical dormancy to cancer regrowth in locoregional and distant sites is poorly understood. In this review, we report some data supporting the existence of various factors that may explain cancer dormancy including genetic and epigenetic changes, angiogenic switch, microenvironment, and immunosurveillance. A better definition and understanding of these factors should allow the identification of patients at high risk of relapse and to develop new therapeutic strategies in order to improve prognosis.

Factors associated with surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the NeoALTTO phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: The NeoALTTO trial showed that dual HER2 blockade nearly doubles the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancer. However, this did not translate into a higher rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In NeoALTTO, patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either trastuzumab, lapatinib or their combination with paclitaxel before surgery with pCR as the primary end point. We investigated the association between the surgery type and clinicopathological factors and response to treatment, adjusting for the treatment arm. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-nine patients were subjected to breast surgery. Two hundred and forty-two (56%) and 187 (44%) patients underwent mastectomy and BCS, respectively. In a logistic regression model, negative estrogen receptor (ER), multicentricity and the presence of a palpable mass before surgery were significantly associated with a low chance of BCS. Conversely, patients with small tumors and those eligible for BCS at diagnosis were managed more with BCS, independent of the treatment arm. Radiological response was not associated with the surgical decision. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor characteristics before neoadjuvant therapy play a main role in deciding the type of surgery calling for a clear consensus on the role of BCS in patients responding to neoadjuvant therapy.

Understanding the biology of triple-negative breast cancer.

Greater understanding of the biology of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is needed to discern the roughly 60% of node-negative patients who are already cured with locoregional therapy from the 40% who need adjuvant systemic therapy to be cured. Recent evidence suggests that patients with TNBC whose tumours have an activated immune response gene signature have a more favourable outcome than TNBC patients without this signature. For the group who needs additional systemic therapy, the challenge remains to choose the right systemic drug combination for the right TNBC sub-type. Significant heterogeneity exists within the TNBC class that is exemplified by differing chemotherapeutic sensitivity observed for some sub-types. This heterogeneity establishes the need for identifying differentiating molecular markers within the overall class of TNBC disease, which may help refine therapeutic management. In this review, we discuss some of these promising predictive molecular markers for tailoring therapy. In addition, several gene expression profiling and functional studies employing genetic screens that help to establish TNBC sub-groups with varying sensitivities to a variety of targeted therapies currently under clinical investigation are conferred. It is anticipated that a greater understanding of the biology of TNBC and its complex heterogeneity will reveal novel targets or identify markers around which clinical trials in molecularly well-defined sub-groups can be designed.