Vitamin D status in primary hyperparathyroidism: a Southern European perspective.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT), and this could affect the clinical expression of the disease. However, few North American or North European studies have addressed this issue, showing vitamin D repletion in only about one-third of the patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Vitamin D status was evaluated both in an observational study in a series of 206 consecutive patients with pHPT at diagnosis and in a case-control analysis with 113 age- and sex-matched healthy blood donors. Vitamin D status was assessed by measuring plasma 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25OHD) levels and was defined as VDD or severe VDD if 25OHD was <20 ng/ml (<50 nm) and <10 ng/ml (<25 nm), respectively. RESULTS: No seasonal variability was observed in 25OHD levels. VDD was observed in 75 of 206 patients (36·4%). The VDD was severe in 24 of 75 patients (11·7%). There was no difference in prevalence of VDD between men and women nor between asymptomatic and 'bone and stone' symptomatic patients. 25OHD levels was negatively correlated with parathyroid hormone, ionized calcium, and bone turnover markers, and positively correlated with phosphate. 25OHD levels were also positively correlated with bone mineral density at all sites measured. In the case-control study, the overall prevalence of VDD and severe VDD was higher in patients with pHPT compared with controls (33·6% vs 10·6%, P < 0·0001, and 8·8% vs 1·8%, P = 0·0337, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that VDD occurs in about one-third of patients with pHPT resident in a Southern European area, a lower figure than previously reported. Moreover, VDD is related to a more severe bone disease, and its prevalence is higher in patients with pHPT than in healthy matched subjects.

The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on a reduced peak GH response to provocative tests, such as the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and the GH-releasing hormone-arginine (GHRH-ARG) test. However, the cut-off limits of peak GH response in lean subjects are not reliable in obese patients; this is noteworthy since adult GHD is often associated with obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic cut-off limits of peak GH response to the GHRH-ARG test in overweight and obese as well as in lean population. DESIGN AND METHODS: The GH responses to the GHRH-ARG test were studied in 322 patients with organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease and in 318 control subjects. Patients were subdivided into two groups on the basis of the number of pituitary hormone deficits, except for GH deficiency: (a) patients with total pituitary hormone deficit (TPHD) and (b) patients without or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (PHD). Both patients and control subjects were divided into three subgroups according to body mass index (BMI): lean (BMI <25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI > or = 25 and <30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)). TPHD patients were assumed to be GH deficient, whereas PHD patients may include subjects with either normal or impaired GH secretion. The statistical analysis was carried out by the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve analysis (Medcalc 7.2). The diagnostic cut-off points were calculated for lean, overweight and obese subjects to provide optimal separation of GH-deficient patients and control subjects according to two criteria: (1) a balance between high sensitivity and high specificity; (2) to provide the highest pair of sensitivity/specificity values for GH deficiency. RESULTS: In the lean population the best pair of values, with highest sensitivity as 98.7% and highest specificity as 83.7%, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 11.5 mug/l. In the overweight population the best pair of values, 96.7 and 75.5%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 8.0 mug/l. In the obese population the best pair of values, 93.5 and 78.3%, respectively, was found using a peak GH cut-off point of 4.2 mug/l. Applying the above mentioned cut-off points, among PHD patients we found that 80 subjects (72%) were GHD whereas 31 (28%) had normal GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion the GHRH-ARG test is a reliable tool for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in lean, overweight and obese patients, provided that specific BMI-related cut-off limits are assumed.