Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 59 Suppl 3: S108-11, 2014 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25261537

RESUMO

We conducted a survey to compare antimicrobial stewardship outcomes considered to be most important with those used in practice as metrics. Respondent opinion of important outcomes compared with those collected as metrics were antimicrobial use (15% vs 73%), antimicrobial cost (10% vs 73%), appropriateness of antimicrobial use (56% vs 51%), infection-related mortality rate (34% vs 7%), and antibiotic-associated length of stay (22% vs 12%). Patient outcomes are important to many practitioners but are rarely used as metrics.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Anti-Infecciosos/economia , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Transmissíveis/mortalidade , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
2.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 104(2): 159-68, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24725036

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a serious, difficult-to-treat infection, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin has been the standard treatment for MRSA infection, but lower response rates in MRSA skin infections have been reported. This analysis assessed the outcome and safety of daptomycin therapy in patients with a DFI caused by MRSA. METHODS: Using the Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience and the European Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (2006-2009), 79 patients with MRSA DFI were identified and included in this analysis. RESULTS: In the 74 evaluable patients, daptomycin was administered at a median dose of 4.8 mg/kg primarily every 24 hours (85.1%) and for a median of 15.0 days. Overall, 77.0% of the patients (57 of 74) received initial therapy with activity against MRSA; however, of patients receiving daptomycin as second-line therapy (n = 31), only 45.2% were treated with an antibiotic agent active against MRSA. The overall clinical success and treatment failure rates were 89.2% and 10.8%, respectively. Success with daptomycin therapy was higher in patients who had surgery and in those whose initial therapy was daptomycin. Eleven patients had 14 adverse events, two of which were possibly related to daptomycin use and led to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of patients with MRSA DFI, daptomycin therapy was shown to be generally well tolerated and effective. The use of an anti-MRSA antibiotic agent should be considered when implementing first-line antibiotic drug therapy for DFI in countries where MRSA is common to avoid inappropriate empirical treatment and potential negative effects on outcomes.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Daptomicina/uso terapêutico , Pé Diabético/tratamento farmacológico , Pé Diabético/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...