Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(1): 57-62, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the detection of C. difficile is a highly sensitive test. Some clinical laboratories have included a 2-step testing algorithm utilizing PCR plus toxin enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to increase specificity. OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors and outcomes of C. difficile PCR-positive/toxin-positive encounters compared to PCR-positive/toxin-negative encounters. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A Veterans' Affairs hospital. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of patient encounters with a positive C. difficile test by PCR and either a toxin EIA-positive assay (ie, cases) or toxin EIA-negative assay (ie, controls). Clinically relevant exposures and risk factors were determined to assess CDI recurrence at 30 days. Available encounter stool specimens were cultured for C. difficile and were subjected to restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) strain typing. RESULTS: Among 130 C. difficile PCR-positive patient encounters, 80 (61.5%) were toxin EIA negative and 50 (38.5%) were toxin EIA positive. Encounters that were toxin positive were more frequently treated (96.0%) compared to toxin-negative encounters (71.3%; P < .01). A multivariable logistic regression model revealed that toxin-negative encounters were less likely to suffer a recurrent CDI episode within 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.83). Additionally, a higher C. difficile PCR cycle threshold predicted a lower risk of CDI recurrence at 30 days. (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98). During the study period, the REA group Y strain accounted for most toxin-negative encounters (32.5%; P = .05), whereas REA group BI strain accounted for most toxin-positive encounters (24.3%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A testing strategy of PCR plus toxin EIA helped predict recurrent CDI.


Assuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Humanos , Toxinas Bacterianas/análise , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos , Algoritmos , Fezes
2.
Am J Dermatopathol ; 45(4): 237-241, 2023 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36805355

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Prototheca species are achlorophyllic algae that are a rare cause of infection in humans. It most commonly causes localized cutaneous disease and rarely disseminated infection. Immunocompromised patients have the highest risk of disseminated protothecosis, with a higher mortality rate than localized cutaneous infections. At the species level, infections caused by Prototheca zopfii are reported less frequently than those caused by Prototheca wickerhamii. The diagnosis can be made using histopathology, culture, and molecular testing. There is no definitive evidence for an effective treatment, which currently consists of antifungals (primarily amphotericin B). With only a handful of cases of disseminated protothecosis reported worldwide that are caused by P. zopfii , we herein present an additional case of a postbone marrow transplant patient in the Midwest of the United States.


Assuntos
Infecções , Prototheca , Dermatopatias Infecciosas , Humanos , Infecções/diagnóstico , Infecções/etiologia , Infecções/patologia , Dermatopatias Infecciosas/complicações , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...