US Army two-surgeon teams operating in remote Afghanistan--an evaluation of split-based Forward Surgical Team operations.

BACKGROUND: United States Army Forward Surgical Teams (FSTs) consist of twenty personnel and are the Army's smallest surgical units. Currently, they provide the majority of resuscitative surgical care for combat casualties in Afghanistan where the mission of the FST has been further extended to include "split-based operations." The effectiveness of these 10-person teams is unknown and outcome data has not been previously reported in the literature. This article evaluates the effectiveness of one split FST during a 14-month period in remote Afghanistan. METHODS: The primary endpoint was died of wounds (DOW) outcomes among United States Forces, Coalition Afghani Forces, and local national citizens. Mortality was evaluated separately for patients who received a blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints of the study included number of blood products transfused, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-one patients were treated and 327 patients underwent an immediate surgery. The average ISS was 12.05, and the DOW percentage was 2.36%. There were 61 patients with an ISS of greater than 24 (mortality = 23.0%), and 47 patients with an ISS of 16 to 24 (mortality = 2.13%). Nine of 121 patients transfused (7.4%) died. A total of 27 patients required massive blood transfusion and on average received 12.6 units of fresh frozen plasma and 18.2 units of packed red blood cell (ratio 1:1.49). Seven of 27 patients who received massive blood transfusion (25.9%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Small two-surgeon surgical teams can achieve acceptable DOW rates when compared with other larger surgical units currently operating in the Global War on Terror.

US Army split forward surgical team management of mass casualty events in Afghanistan: surgeon performed triage results in excellent outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: U.S. Army "split"forward surgical teams (FST) currently provide most of the resuscitative surgical care for combat patients in Afghanistan. These small units typically comprised 10 personnel and two surgeons each, who frequently encounter mass casualty (MASCAL) situations in geographically isolated regions. This article evaluates the effectiveness of one split FST managing 43 MASCAL situations in two separate locations for more than a 14-month period in Afghanistan. DESIGN: An Institutional Review Board-approved review of all admission data of the 541st FST was conducted. Comparison was made between patients treated in MASCAL situations to those of patients treated in non-MASCAL events. SETTING: Split-based US Army forward surgical elements in a combat environment in Afghanistan. PATIENTS: Two hundred eighty-two patients were treated during MASCAL events and 479 in non-MASCAL situations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was survival outcomes among trauma patients when 5 or more patients arrived simultaneously or if3 or more patients required immediate surgery. RESULTS: Four patients (1.70 percent) died in the MASCAL group compared with 12 (3.30 percent) in the non-MASCAL group. The mortality of patients receiving surgery at the FST was 2.73 percent and the mortality was 0.93 percent in those transferred without surgery. In the MASCAL group, 41 patients (14.5 percent) were critically injured and the critical mortality rate was 6.25 percent. In MASCAL events, 39 percent of patients required surgery compared with 44.9 percent in the non-MASCAL group. The average Injury Severity Score (ISS) of the most severely injured patient was 21.19 and ISS rapidly decreased to scores consistent with mild injury suggesting over triage at the scene. CONCLUSIONS: Despite very limited resources, the split FST can achieve, with appropriate triage, acceptable mortality outcomes in MASCAL situations. Over triage at the wounding scene is common and surgical intervention is frequently required.

Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) for the detection of strangulated mechanical small bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), a protein released by necrotic enterocytes, is a useful marker for the detection of ischemia from mechanical small bowel obstruction. DESIGN: Validation cohort. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Cohort of 21 patients admitted with a clinical diagnosis of mechanical small bowel obstruction. Plasma and urine samples were collected from patients upon hospital admission and again immediately before laparotomy if surgical intervention was delayed. RESULTS: Plasma and urine I-FABP levels (pg/ml by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in patients found to have small bowel necrosis at the time of laparotomy were compared with those without significant ischemia upon laparotomy and those that did not require laparotomy and, by default, did not have small bowel ischemia. A positive test was defined as 1000-pg/ml I-FABP in urine and 100-pg/ml I-FABP in plasma. Small bowel necrosis was confirmed in 3 of 21 enrolled patients. Urine I-FABP levels were positive in 3 of 3 patients with necrosis and 3 of 18 patients without necrosis (sensitivity 100%, specificity 83%, PPV 50%, NPV 100%). Plasma I-FABP levels were positive in 3 of 3 patients with necrosis and 4 of 18 patients without necrosis (sensitivity 100%, specificity 78%, PPV 43%, NPV 100%). CONCLUSIONS: I-FABP is a sensitive marker for ischemia in mechanical small bowel obstruction. Additional work should be done to validate I-FABP in a variety of clinical settings and to develop a rapid I-FABP laboratory assay.

Are Army-trained surgeons satisfied with their residencies?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perceptions of training adequacy among surgeons educated in Army general surgical residencies as a tool for surgical program directors and students considering a military surgical career. DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to all general surgeons practicing in the Army during years 1999-2003 (n = 182). In addition to providing basic demographic information, subjects rated their perceptions of training experience in 13 areas on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = somewhat dissatisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = somewhat satisfied, 5 = very satisfied). Respondents were split into 3 groups based on graduation year (1968-1992, 1993-1998, 1999-2003) and thereby roughly on status of military obligation at the time of survey. Scores were compared with analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 96 (52.7%) questionnaires were returned, 84 of which were included in this study. The average score for all graduation groups and satisfaction areas was 4.37 +/- 0.91. No differences occurred among the 3 graduation groups in any of the 13 satisfaction areas evaluated, except for pediatric surgery experience, where the most recent graduates rated their satisfaction lower than the other 2 groups (1968-1992, 4.00 +/- 0.61; 1993-1998, 3.96 +/- 1.14; 1999-2003, 3.21 +/- 1.27, p < 0.05). With respect to comparison among the 13 satisfaction areas, several areas of note are present. Satisfaction with training in care for basic surgical problems and the ability to make correct decisions are both higher than 5 other areas (p < 0.01). By contrast, satisfaction with number of cases performed, research training, and pediatric surgery training are lower than at least 3 of the other 12 areas (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Army trained general surgeons, from the most distant to recent graduates, are satisfied with their residencies. Lower satisfaction scores in the areas of number of cases performed, research experience, and pediatric surgery training do, however, highlight aspects for continued research and improvement.