Economic Burden of Home Antimicrobial Therapy: OPAT Versus Oral Therapy.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is overused for children and that outcomes with oral therapy are equivalent. Our objective was to compare economic burden between OPAT and oral therapy, accounting for direct and indirect costs and caregiver quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of caregivers for children after hospitalization who were treated with prolonged antimicrobial therapy. We collected data about missed work and school and time spent administering therapy. Caregivers completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory to assess QoL. Clinical information included length of stay, treatment indication, and type of therapy (OPAT versus oral therapy). Direct medical costs were obtained by using a microcosting system and accounted for medication, supplies, and home-nursing visits. The primary cost outcome was the mean daily cost of therapy. Multivariable models were developed to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve caregivers completed surveys: 123 (58%) for oral therapy and 89 (42%) for OPAT. Caregivers administering OPAT reported more missed work, missed school for their children, time with daily medication administration (90 vs 6 minutes; P < .01) and lower QoL scores (77.8 vs 68.9) than caregivers administering oral therapy. The mean daily cost was $65 (95% confidence interval: $51-$78) for OPAT and $7 (95% confidence interval: $4-$9) for oral therapy. Relative differences in cost and QoL between groups did not change after model adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: The overall burden of OPAT is substantially higher than that of oral therapy, including higher direct and indirect costs and greater impact on caregiver QoL. These findings strongly support efforts to use oral therapy in place of OPAT when clinically appropriate.

Severe mania complicating treatment of narcolepsy with cataplexy.

We report the case of a 22-year-old male who exhibited severe manic behavior shortly after beginning treatment with modafinil and venlafaxine for narcolepsy with cataplexy. The manic episode persisted several weeks after medication cessation and required management with a mood stabilizer. Reinstitution of modafinil and an alternate antidepressant for recurrent sleepiness and cataplexy was well tolerated and very effective. Sleep physicians should be aware that psychostimulants, including modafinil, and antidepressant medications commonly prescribed for treatment of narcolepsy may precipitate mania in patients with underlying bipolar disorder.

Physicians' role in eye care of patients with diabetes mellitus--are we doing what we need to?

CONTEXT: The American Diabetes Association and the American Academy of Ophthalmology recommend that a dilated eye examination be performed on patients with diabetes mellitus during an initial assessment and at least annually there-after. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the extent to which patients with diabetes mellitus are aware that their condition can lead to ocular problems; (2) to determine the percentage of patients with diabetes mellitus who receive annual dilated eye examinations; (3) to discover reasons why patients with diabetes mellitus may not receive annual dilated eye examinations; and (4) to raise awareness among patients with diabetes mellitus of the importance of controlling their condition and of receiving frequent dilated eye examinations. METHODS: A 9-question oral survey of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus was administered in 2 clinical medical settings and 1 community setting in Harrison County, West Virginia, between April 7, 2007, and May 15, 2007. Questions covered participant knowledge of diabetes mellitus complications, frequency of receiving eye examinations, and other aspects of diabetes mellitus. Responses were statistically analyzed for correlations between participant knowledge and receiving eye examinations in the past year. RESULTS: A total of 147 individuals with diabetes mellitus participated in the survey. Among the various conditions that diabetes mellitus can lead to, the surveyed individuals were most aware that diabetes mellitus can lead to eye disease, followed by kidney problems, ulcers, and heart problems. Approximately 70% of survey respondents received a dilated eye examination in the past year. The most common reasons given by the 30% of respondents who did not receive an eye examination were-in order of frequency-procrastination, having never been told it was necessary, and financial issues. CONCLUSION: Roughly 1 of every 4 surveyed patients with diabetes mellitus in this West Virginia study who did not receive an annual dilated eye examination was not aware of the need to do so. As osteopathic physicians, we can do more to optimize compliance with current recommendations for good health by continually educating our patients with diabetes mellitus about the need for eye examinations.