A breath of fresh air: A family ceremony.

Healing rituals and ceremonies are conducted with the hope of ushering a sick or impaired person back to wellness or preserving health against perceived threats (Burns, 1996). In medical settings, healing ceremonies can address biopsychosocial, existential, and spiritual aspects of difficult situations (Hammerschlag, 1989; Johnson, Feldman, Lubin, & Southwick, 1995; Mehl-Madrona, 1999). This article describes presents the case history of Lisa H. and her son, Anthony. Anthony experienced two medical crises within the first five days of his birth. The author suggested a healing ceremony might be valuable for Anthony's family. The ceremony opened the door to a candid conversation regarding everything that had transpired. It decreased the family's fear, anxiety, frustration, and guilt, and helped them cope better with the situation. Anthony sailed smoothly through his surgery and went home from the hospital a week later. The author notes that health care professionals generally set aside their spirituality while trying to help people, thus broaching the subject of ceremonies might make the care provider or the family feel uncomfortable. Care providers who are uncomfortable with participating could still provide a valuable service by presenting the notion of a ceremony as an option the patient or family may wish to consider, and directing them to useful resources.

Almond "Appetizer" Effect on Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT) Results.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which glucose intolerance can be acutely improved with dietary modification is unclear. The purpose of this study was to test the effect of ingesting a low-calorie almond preload ("appetizer") 30 minutes before oral glucose tolerance testing in glucose-intolerant individuals without diabetes. METHODS: Twenty adults with prediabetes or isolated 1-hour glucose ≥160 mg/dL underwent 2 fasting oral glucose tolerance tests (GTTs)-1 standard GTT and 1 GTT 30 minutes after eating a half ounce (12) of dry-roasted almonds. Fourteen participants met 1 or more prediabetes diagnostic criteria; 6 had only elevated 1-hour glucose ≥160 mg/dL. RESULTS: The mean 1-hour plasma glucose after the almond preload was 37.1 mg/dL (19.4%) lower (154.6 vs 191.7; P < .001) than in the standard GTT. The almond preload reduced the area under the glucose curve by 15.5% (P < .001). Eight individuals had a marked hypoglycemic effect (glucose reduced by 45 to 110 mg/dL); 4 had a moderate hypoglycemic effect (22-32 mg/dL). CONCLUSION: A low-calorie almond "appetizer" showed promise as an option for decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia in individuals with prediabetes or isolated 1-hour postprandial hyperglycemia. Further study is needed to confirm and refine the role of such a premeal appetizer in the self-care of prediabetes.

Evolution of preprofessional pharmacy curricula.

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in preprofessional pharmacy curricular requirements and trends, and determine rationales for and implications of modifications. METHODS: Prerequisite curricular requirements compiled between 2006 and 2011 from all doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) programs approved by the Accreditation Council of Pharmacy Education were reviewed to ascertain trends over the past 5 years. An online survey was conducted of 20 programs that required either 3 years of prerequisite courses or a bachelor's degree, and a random sample of 20 programs that required 2 years of prerequisites. Standardized telephone interviews were then conducted with representatives of 9 programs. RESULTS: In 2006, 4 programs required 3 years of prerequisite courses and none required a bachelor's degree; by 2011, these increased to 18 programs and 7 programs, respectively. Of 40 programs surveyed, responses were received from 28 (70%), 9 (32%) of which reported having increased the number of prerequisite courses since 2006. Reasons given for changes included desire to raise the level of academic achievement of students entering the PharmD program, desire to increase incoming student maturity, and desire to add clinical sciences and experiential coursework to the pharmacy curriculum. Some colleges and schools experienced a temporary decrease in applicants. CONCLUSIONS: The preprofessional curriculum continues to evolve, with many programs increasing the number of course prerequisites. The implications of increasing prerequisites were variable and included a perceived increase in maturity and quality of applicants and, for some schools, a temporary decrease in the number of applicants.

Proton pump inhibitor therapy associated with lower glycosylated hemoglobin levels in type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Oral hypoglycemic medications sometimes do not control type 2 diabetes well. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as adjunctive therapy might improve diabetes control through increasing serum gastrin and fasting insulin levels. METHODS: Electronic medical records in a family medicine residency program office practice were reviewed for 73 individuals with type 2 diabetes (not taking insulin), for whom PPIs were prescribed. Values for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for periods of time when a PPI had been prescribed were compared with HbA1c levels for periods of time with no record of PPI prescribing or over-the-counter PPI use. RESULTS: The mean HbA1c for patients not taking insulin was 7.11 during periods with recorded prescribing or over-the-counter use of PPIs, compared with 7.70 during periods without recorded PPI therapy (P = .001). Mean HbA1c for metformin monotherapy was not significantly different (6.81 with PPI vs. 7.10 without PPI; n = 16; P = .25). Mean HbA1c was significantly different for combination therapy that included metformin and/or sulfonylurea and/or giltazone (7.26 vs. 7.80; n = 27; P = .002). CONCLUSION: The observed association between PPI therapy and lower HbA1c levels suggests that PPIs may be useful as adjunctive therapy for type 2 diabetes.

Promoting knowledge of statins in patients with low health literacy using an audio booklet.

BACKGROUND: Statins are generally well tolerated and effective at reducing a patient's risk of both primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Many patients who would benefit from statin therapy either do not adhere to or stop taking their statin medication within the first year. We developed an audio booklet targeted to low health literacy patients to teach them about the benefits and risks of statins to help the patients adhere to their statin therapy. METHODS: Through focus groups and an iterative design, an audio booklet was developed for both English-speaking and Spanish-speaking patients. We then compared the booklet with standard of care in 132 patients from our target patient population to measure its impact on knowledge and understanding of statins. RESULTS: The patients enjoyed the audio booklet and showed significant increases in knowledge after listening to it when compared with those who received the standard of care materials. CONCLUSION: The audio booklet shows promise as a tool that can be used effectively in clinical practice to teach patients about statin therapy.

P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: integrating ticagrelor into the management of acute coronary syndrome.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a continuum of disease that includes non-ST-segment elevation ACS and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The purpose of this article is to define the developing role of ticagrelor in ACS and compare it to currently available P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. While clopidogrel remains the "workhorse" P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for many patients with ACS and prasugrel has an established role in select situations, clinicians must now assimilate the evolving role of ticagrelor. Although ticagrelor offers important advances in the management of ACS (eg, reversibility), there are also notable clinical considerations (eg, unique adverse effects such as dyspnea). Based on the current evidence, we propose an algorithm to aid clinicians in the selection of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for patients with ACS in various clinical situations.

Antithrombotic therapy for the CardioWest temporary total artificial heart.

The CardioWest temporary total artificial heart serves as a viable bridge to orthotopic heart transplantation in patients who are experiencing end-stage refractory biventricular heart failure. This device is associated with a low, albeit still substantial, risk of thrombosis. Platelet interactions with artificial surfaces are complex and result in continuous activation of contact proteins despite therapeutic anticoagulation. We searched the medical literature (publication dates, January 1962-October 2009) in order to evaluate means of mitigating adverse events that have occurred after implantation of the CardioWest temporary total artificial heart.We conclude that the use of a multitargeted antithrombotic approach, involving anticoagulation (bivalirudin and warfarin) and antiplatelet therapy (dipyridamole and aspirin), can mitigate the procoagulative effects of mechanical circulatory assist devices, particularly those that are associated with the CardioWest temporary total artificial heart. Careful monitoring with use of a variant multisystem approach, involving efficacy tests (thrombelastography and light transmittance aggregometry), safety tests (laboratory analyses), and warfarin genomics, may maximize the therapeutic actions and minimize the bleeding risks that are associated with the multitargeted antithrombotic approach. The development and monitoring of individualized antithrombotic regimens require that informed health professionals appreciate the complexities and grasp the hazards that are associated with these therapies.

Intrapericardial triamcinolone for acute pericarditis after electrophysiologic procedures.

PURPOSE: The use of intrapericardial triamcinolone for acute pericarditis after electrophysiologic procedures in three patients is described. SUMMARY: Treatment for idiopathic pericarditis and viral pericarditis, which account for about 85% of cases, focuses on pain management and decreasing pericardial inflammation. This is oftentimes achieved with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Colchicine may be used in combination with NSAIDs, specifically in postmyocardial infarction pericarditis and recurrent pericarditis. Because oral corticosteroid use has been shown to be an independent risk factor in pericarditis recurrence, their use in patients with refractory pericarditis is reserved as a last-resort option. Intrapericardial triamcinolone is an uncommon treatment approach, although it is recommended in select situations of pericarditis according to guidelines developed by the European Society of Cardiology. In this retrospective case series, three patients with pericarditis, tamponade, or both as a complication of radiofrequency ablation or implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation received triamcinolone. The drug was instilled intrapericardially, with doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg. In two patients, the need for pain medication and the perceived pain score decreased dramatically after triamcinolone administration. In the third patient, triamcinolone administration decreased the need for supportive therapy but was not deemed a complete clinical success. Additional study is necessary to better define the use of intrapericardial triamcinolone and determine long-term outcomes associated with this therapy. Other factors, including past medical history and renal function, also need to be taken into account when choosing the proper dosing regimen. CONCLUSION: Intrapericardial administration of triamcinolone acetonide may be an effective treatment for patients with acute pericarditis after electrophysiologic procedures.

An advanced cardiovascular pharmacotherapy course blending online and face-to-face instruction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of online instruction in a cardiology pharmacotherapy elective. DESIGN: Eight drug-focused lectures and 6 introductory presentations were added to a cardiology pharmacotherapy course. Students completed an online quiz after each online drug-focused lecture and scores were compared to quizzes taken at the beginning and end of the course, as well as on a cardiology advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE). For online introductory presentations, students completed a quiz at the beginning of the next face-to-face session. A survey was conducted at the end of the course to obtain student feedback. ASSESSMENT: Compared to baseline scores, student learning was demonstrated after online drug-focused lectures by higher quiz scores attained immediately after completing the lecture, at the end of the course, and at the beginning of the APPE. Furthermore, students performed better on quizzes at the beginning of face-to-face sessions if they first completed an online introductory presentation. Students expressed strong support for the online components of the course. CONCLUSIONS: A blended learning environment with online and face-to-face instruction is an effective way to teach a cardiology pharmacotherapy elective. The online component of this course was well received by students, improved student preparation before attending class, and appeared to enhance long-term cardiovascular drug knowledge.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anticoagulation strategies in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary studies document the outcomes of unfractionated heparin (UFH), enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). It remains unclear which anticoagulant regimen is the most cost-effective. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing 4 anticoagulant regimens in NSTE-ACS. METHODS: A decision analysis was conducted from a healthcare provider perspective. Data sources included the SYNERGY, OASIS-5, and ACUITY trials, including 2 subgroup analyses. A decision tree model was created incorporating the outcomes associated with 4 antithrombotic approaches: UFH with eptifibatide, enoxaparin with eptifibatide, bivalirudin alone, and fondaparinux with eptifibatide. The percentage of eptifibatide use in each arm was consistent with clinical trials. Probabilities of complications (eg, myocardial infarction, revascularization, major/minor bleeding at 30 days) were calculated. Costs were assigned to each outcome, incorporating the cost associated with diagnosis-related group and/or current procedural terminology codes, drug acquisition, and red blood cell infusions. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: The base case analysis showed bivalirudin monotherapy to be the least costly regimen ($1131 per average course), and it dominated enoxaparin plus eptifibatide ($1609) and UFH plus eptifibatide ($1739) in cost-effectiveness. The total average cost of fondaparinux with eptifibatide ($1184) was higher than bivalirudin alone, but the combination was more effective, resulting in an incremental cost of $2569 per each additional patient treated without complication. Sensitivity analyses showed the model's results to be sensitive to drug acquisition cost and complication probabilities. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses favored neither bivalirudin nor fondaparinux; however, when 2 or more vials of bivalirudin were necessary, bivalirudin was no longer a cost-effective alternative. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin is the least costly agent in moderate- to high-risk NSTE-ACS patients managed with an early invasive approach, if its use is consistent with the ACUITY trial. Fondaparinux is the preferred agent in patients undergoing a conservative treatment strategy.

Successful use and dosing of bivalirudin after temporary total artificial heart implantation: a case series.

The temporary total artificial heart (TAH-t) has emerged as an effective bridge to transplantation for individuals with biventricular failure. Implantation of a TAH-t creates a hypercoagulable state requiring a multidrug approach that includes low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) in order to minimize thromboembolism. A concern with UFH is the development of heparin-dependent antibodies, which develop in up to 50% of patients receiving the drug as part of cardiopulmonary bypass. If UFH therapy continues postoperatively, the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia approaches 3%. Small investigations have demonstrated that bivalirudin, given as a bolus of 0.75-1 mg/kg followed by an infusion at 1.75-2.5 mg/kg/hour, is an effective alternative to UFH for therapeutic anticoagulation during coronary artery bypass surgery, valve replacement, or both. We describe a series of five adults (age range 24-58 yrs) who received bivalirudin as an alternative to low-dose UFH after TAH-t implantation. None of the patients had documented heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Treatment was started at the discretion of the treating physician, and adjustments were based principally on the results of thromboelastography. Additional general monitoring included activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, platelet count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet aggregation studies. Bivalirudin therapy was continued until successful warfarin implementation. All five patients received bivalirudin in addition to standard antithrombotic therapy. Bivalirudin treatment started at a dosage of 0.005 or 0.01 mg/kg/hour with titration to maintain normocoagulability, which occurred (without concomitant warfarin therapy) within the dosage range of 0.01-0.02 mg/kg/hour. Duration of TAH-t implantation was a mean of 38.8 days (range 25-60 days), and bivalirudin was continued for a mean of 15.2 days (range 7-24 days). No major hemorrhagic events occurred during treatment, and all patients successfully transitioned to warfarin therapy. Low-dose bivalirudin, as an alternative to UFH, maintained normocoagulability after TAH-t implantation. Further investigation is warranted to define the role and dosing of bivalirudin in this situation.

Preprocedural statin therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature regarding the effectiveness of preprocedural statin therapy for the prevention of cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE (1966-May 2007) and Cochrane Database (1993-May 2007) were conducted using the search terms statins, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, percutaneous coronary intervention, and myocardial necrosis. Limits included articles written in English with human subjects. Additional data were identified through bibliographic reviews. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. Trials and studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the effectiveness of preprocedural statin therapy for the prevention of cardiac events after PCI. DATA SYNTHESIS: Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) provide benefits relative to morbidity and mortality as primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. In addition to lowering concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, statins have documented pleiotropic effects including plaque stabilization as well as reductions in inflammation, platelet activation/adhesion, thrombosis, and oxidative stress. One retrospective analysis, 4 prospective observational studies, and 3 randomized controlled trials evaluating preprocedural statin therapy for the prevention of cardiac events after PCI were reviewed. Included studies were limited by small sample sizes (N = 153-5052), short durations of follow-up (24 h-21 mo), use of surrogate markers of myocardial necrosis, various degrees of coronary disease and procedure-specific factors, and lack of consistent choice of agent, dose, and duration of statin therapy. Despite these limitations, the data suggest reduced post-PCI myocardial necrosis with preprocedural statin therapy when given before elective PCI in stable patients, as well as when given before PCI in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: There is growing evidence that preprocedural statin therapy reduces the incidence of post-PCI myocardial necrosis. The appropriate regimen (drug, dose, duration of treatment before the procedure), as well as the predictive role of concomitant disease states (eg, hyperlipidemia), requires further investigation.

Drug therapy recommendations from the 2005 ACC/AHA guidelines for treatment of chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To review and discuss key aspects of the drug therapy recommendations in the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure (HF) in the Adult. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained from the ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for Chronic HF. English-language clinical trials, observational studies, and pertinent review articles evaluating the pharmacotherapy of chronic HF were identified, based on MEDLINE searches through January 2006. STUDY SELECTION: Articles presenting information that impacts the evidence base for recommendations regarding the use of various drug therapies in patients with chronic HF were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: The ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for HF provides revised, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of chronic HF. The new guidelines are based on a staging system that recognizes both the development and progression of HF. Recommendations are provided for 2 stages of patients (A and B) who do not yet have clinical HF but are clearly at risk and 2 stages (C and D) that include patients with symptomatic HF. The guidelines continue to emphasize the important role of neurohormonal blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, and aldosterone antagonists. Based on recent trials, updated recommendations address the roles of combination therapy and the selective addition of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate. Along with specific drug recommendations, information on the practical use of various drugs is provided. Although the guidelines primarily focus on HF due to systolic dysfunction, general recommendations are also provided for patients with preserved systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update provides evidence-based recommendations for healthcare professionals involved in the care of adults with chronic HF. Recent clinical trial findings have further clarified the evolving role of neurohormonal-blocking drugs in the prevention and treatment of HF.

Pharmacotherapy implications of revised chronic heart failure guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of major drug therapy recommendations within recently revised chronic heart failure (CHF)guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Guideline statements and English-language articles from MEDLINE pertinent to CHF. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Recently published guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) served as the focus of this review. Prospective comparative trials, review articles, and editorials were also considered. DATA SYNTHESIS: Recommendations within the ACC/AHA and HFSA guidelines continue to provide a systematic, evidence-based approach regarding CHF management. The HFSA guidelines recommend that the severity of clinical disease and functional limitation be characterized using the New York Heart association (NYHA) functional classification system. A key feature of the ACC/AHA guidelines is the use of a staging system that recognizes the development and progression of heart failure. Both guidelines stress the importance of neurohormonal blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenergic blockers. Moreover, the guidelines expand the role of aldosterone antagonists, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate, particularly in combination with standard treatments. Diuretics and digoxin remain symptomatic treatments only. CONCLUSIONS: This article summarizes key drug therapy recommendations from the revised ACC/AHA and HFSA guideline statements. Pharmacists caring for CHF patients should be familiar with these recommendations and aid in their implementation.

Outcomes associated with vasoactive therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in patients receiving intravenous treatment with dobutamine, milrinone, or nesiritide, and to evaluate differences, based on treatment received, in the in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay (LOS), total health care costs, and 30-day hospital readmission rate. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. DATA SOURCE: University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical Database Pharmacy, a database with information from 32 academic hospitals. PATIENTS: Two thousand one hundred thirty patients with ADHF who received dobutamine (1311 patients), milrinone (433), or nesiritide (386). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients with ADHF were categorized according to the vasoactive therapy received. To evaluate baseline characteristics, chi(2) analysis was used; logistic regression was employed to assess the relationships between drug therapy and in-hospital mortality rates, and multivariate linear regression was used to assess whether drug therapy was related to LOS and total health care costs. All regression analyses controlled for age, sex, race, region of the United States where the hospital was located, primary payer for the hospital stay, UHC patient severity class, and chronic renal failure. In-hospital mortality rates were 10.2%, 7.9%, and 2.9% in the dobutamine, milrinone, and nesiritide groups, respectively. This resulted in an adjusted odds ratio for death of 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.8) for dobutamine and 3.9 (95% CI 1.8-8.3) for milrinone (p<0.0001). Compared with inotropic therapy (dobutamine and milrinone), mean LOS in the hospital and the intensive care unit were lower with nesiritide (p<0.001). Total health care costs were lowest with nesiritide, but this reached statistical significance only when compared with milrinone (p<0.001). Thirty-day hospital readmission rates with dobutamine, milrinone, and nesiritide were 5.0%, 9.5%, and 3.9%, respectively (p=NS). CONCLUSION: Nesiritide therapy was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality rate and shorter LOS compared with dobutamine and milrinone. In addition, total health care costs with nesiritide were decreased compared with milrinone. These observations need to be validated by a randomized controlled trial.

Evolving role of vasopressin in the treatment of cardiac arrest.

Sudden cardiac arrest is a major public heath problem, affecting more than 450,000 individuals annually. Response time and the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain the most important factors determining successful revival. During resuscitation, sympathomimetics are given to enhance cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures in an attempt to achieve restoration of spontaneous circulation. Epinephrine has been the preferred vasopressor since the inception of advanced cardiac life support, although the lack of definitive evidence regarding its effectiveness has created much controversy surrounding its use, including the optimum dosage. Vasopressin is an alternative vasopressor that, when given at high doses, causes vasoconstriction by directly stimulating smooth muscle V1 receptors. The 2000 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines commented that vasopressin is a reasonable first-line vasopressor in patients with ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Since release of those guidelines, additional human studies support an expanded role for vasopressin, whereas other studies cast doubt regarding its efficacy compared with epinephrine. The AHA recently released revised guidelines for CPR and emergency cardiovascular care. The consensus was that vasopressors should remain a part of pulseless sudden cardiac arrest management, with epinephrine 1 mg every 3-5 minutes being the recommended adrenergic of choice. In these revised guidelines, the role of vasopressin expanded beyond previous recommendations, despite the recommendation being downgraded to class indeterminate. The guidelines comment that one dose of vasopressin 40 U may replace the first or second dose of epinephrine in all pulseless sudden cardiac arrest scenarios, including asystole and pulseless electrical activity. A consistent theme with all vasopressors in sudden cardiac arrest is that additional studies are necessary to clearly document greater efficacy compared with no treatment. Further evaluation is warranted to better assess the role of vasopressin in asystolic sudden cardiac arrest, as well as its use with epinephrine, and to determine its optimal timing of administration and potential synergistic effects.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of antithrombotic therapy in nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing three treatment approaches during nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy, unfractionated heparin (UFH) with eptifibatide, and UFH with abciximab. DESIGN: Literature-based decision model from an institutional perspective. DATA SOURCE: Patient data from the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 study and three other randomized controlled trials that included UFH and routine GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide or abciximab) therapy. All included studies were comparable based on patient population, procedural techniques, and general treatment approaches. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included patient populations undergoing contemporary nonurgent PCI to identify probabilities of success or complications (myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, thrombocytopenia, and major or minor bleeding at 30 days). Costs were assigned to each outcome by incorporating diagnosis-related group-- and/or Current Procedural Terminology--associated costs, institutional drug acquisition costs, and unit replacement costs of platelets and red blood cells. In the base-case analysis, the use of bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy dominated the UFH and planned GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor approach: UFH with eptifibatide was 74 US dollars more expensive and 1.2% less effective, and UFH with abciximab was 777 US dollars more expensive and 2.3% less effective. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the model results were robust, but also revealed that bivalirudin lost its cost-effectiveness, resulting in UFH with eptifibatide becoming more cost-effective, when two or more vials of bivalirudin were necessary in greater than 27% of cases or when the use of provisional GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy exceeded 20%. CONCLUSION: This analysis indicates that bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy is the most cost-effective antithrombotic treatment strategy in nonurgent PCI when its use and dosing are consistent with the REPLACE-2 trial.

Family history of coronary heart disease: evidence-based applications.

Clinicians sometimes consider family history of CHD when evaluating CHD risk and deciding whether to prescribe a lipid medication. Most clinicians who take family history of CHD into account do so by categorically adjusting the aggressiveness of patient education and preventive medication recommendations (eg, from a low-key informational mode to a more direct influential or persuasive mode). Quantitative methods exist for taking into account any family history of CHD in parents and siblings, when estimating an individual's 10-year risk for a CHD event; at present, these methods are not readily available. For those individuals who have a positive family history of CHD, using family history-adjusted risk estimates could help clinicians more accurately target high-risk individuals who are the most appropriate candidates for therapeutic lifestyle changes and dyslipidemia drug therapy. Electronic health records (EHR) that now include CHD risk estimation as a decision support feature exclude family history from the calculation. Unless family CHD history is included in EHR decision support modules, family history of CHD will be increasingly discounted or ignored, as clinicians come to rely more and more on computerized decision support aids.