RESUMO
The unenlightened clinician may submit a skin specimen to the lab and expect an "answer." The experienced clinician knows that in performing skin biopsies, it is critical to select the most appropriate: 1) anatomic location for the biopsy1,2; 2) type of biopsy1,2; 3) depth and breadth of the biopsy; and 4) medium for hematoxylin and eosin staining (formalin) or direct immunofluorescence (Michel's Transport Medium or normal saline).2 Demographic information, anatomic location, clinical context, and differential diagnosis are all critical components of a properly completed requisition form.3-5 Proper biopsy design and appropriate grossing of the tissue at the bedside should be added to this list. In this article, we review the basics of gross pathologic examination and then provide four examples to demonstrate that optimal clinical-pathologic correlation requires the clinician consider the needs of the pathologist when tissue is presented to the lab.
RESUMO
CONTEXT.: Blistering diseases comprise a large group of clinically polymorphic and sometimes devastating diseases. During the past few decades, we have developed an elegant understanding of the broad variety of blistering diseases and the specific histopathologic mechanism of each. OBJECTIVE.: To review examples of the classic findings of specific blistering diseases and emphasize the importance of considering unrelated conditions that can mimic the classic finding. DATA SOURCES.: This article combines data from expert review, the medical literature, and dermatology and pathology texts. CONCLUSIONS.: We have chosen several common examples of classic blistering diseases that are mimicked by other cutaneous conditions to highlight the basic findings in blistering conditions and the importance of clinician-to-pathologist communication.
Assuntos
Vesícula/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias Vesiculobolhosas/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Pele/patologia , Vesícula/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Dermatopatias/patologia , Dermatopatias Vesiculobolhosas/patologiaRESUMO
Skin cancer (SC) is the most common carcinoma affecting 3 million people annually in the United States and millions of people worldwide. It is classified as melanoma SC (MSC) and non-melanoma SC (NMSC). NMSC represents approximately 80% of SC and includes squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. MSC, however, has a higher mortality rate than SC because of its ability to metastasize. SC is a major health problem in the United States with significant morbidity and mortality in the Caucasian population. Treatment options for SC include cryotherapy, excisional surgery, Mohs surgery, curettage and electrodessication, radiation therapy, photodynamic therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. Treatment is chosen based on the type of SC and the potential for side effects. Novel targeted therapies are being used with increased frequency for large tumors and for metastatic disease. A scoping literature search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cancer Registry websites revealed that traditional chemotherapeutic drugs have little effect against SC after the cancer has metastasized. Following an overview of SC biology, epidemiology, and treatment options, this review focuses on the mechanisms of advanced technologies that use silver nanoparticles in SC treatment regimens.
Assuntos
Monilétrix/diagnóstico , Alopecia , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
A 74-YEAR-OLD CAUCASIAN MAN presented to the hospital with intractable back and chest pain, a diffuse skin rash, and altered mental status. He said that 2 days ago, he'd gone to a different local hospital for treatment of back pain and a headache that had begun 3 days earlier. He was treated with intravenous hydromorphone and sent home with a prescription for meperidine. He said that several hours after being treated with the hydromorphone, the rash developed on his head and then spread to his trunk and upper extremities. WHAT IS YOUR DIAGNOSIS? HOW WOULD YOU TREAT THIS PATIENT?