Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J. coloproctol. (Rio J., Impr.) ; 34(4): 265-268, Oct-Dec/2014. ilus
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-732571

RESUMO

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an already established procedure in the treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer in its early stages. Colorectal lesions, initially approached by endoscopic mucosal resection en bloc or in fragments, are the current focus for submucosal approach, especially for superficial lateral spreading tumor of 20 mm-diameter. The experience of Japanese centers, which are reference in therapeutic endoscopy, demonstrates reduction in the rate of disease recurrence with this approach and, according to specific histopathological criteria, may avoid colectomy in some cases of malignant neoplasia. Case report: The patient was 50-year-old female. She underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection of a rectal lateral spreading tumor measuring 50 mm, located 8 cm from the anal margin. The procedure was performed without major complications, with just two points for muscle layer detachment, without gross perforation and closed with metal clips. However, the patient developed air leakage to the peritoneum, retroperitoneum, mediastinum and subcutaneous tissue, being only treated with clinical procedures and without additional intervention. Conclusion: It is vital to know and be able to apply the technique of ESD, in addition to addressing its complications, since despite the numerous benefits compared to surgery, ESD can result in serious outcomes. (AU)


Introdução: A dissecção endoscópica da submucosa (ESD) já é procedimento consagrado no tratamento do câncer gástrico e esofagiano em suas fases precoces. As lesões colorre-tais, inicialmente abordadas por mucossectomia, em bloco ou em fragmentos, são o foco atual para a abordagem submucosa, principalmente para os tumores de crescimento lateral superficial a partir de 20 mm de diâmetro. A experiência de centros japoneses, referências em endoscopia terapêutica, demonstram redução no índice de recidiva da doença com esta abordagem e, segundo critérios histopatológicos específicos, podem evitar uma colectomia em alguns casos de neoplasia maligna. Relato de caso: Trata-se de paciente de 50 anos, submetida à dissecção endoscópica da submucosa de lesão de crescimento lateral, com 50 mm, localizada no reto, a 8 cm da margem anal. O procedimento foi realizado sem maiores intercorrências, com apenas dois pontos de afastamento da muscular, sem perfuração grosseira, fechados com clipe. Entretanto, a paciente evoluiu com escape aéreo para peritônio, retroperitônio, mediastino e subcútis, sendo tratada sem intervenção adicional, apenas com manejo clínico. Conclusão: É de fundamental importância conhecer e saber aplicar a técnica da ESD, além de abordar suas complicações, uma vez que, mesmo repleta de benefícios em relação à cirurgia, ela pode apresentar desfechos graves. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Retropneumoperitônio/diagnóstico , Enfisema Subcutâneo/diagnóstico , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Enfisema Mediastínico/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia
2.
Mol Biol Rep ; 37(1): 375-80, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19784864

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The replication error status analysis of DNA, through microsatellite instability detection, has become an indispensable tool for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer screening. This study investigated the microsatellite instability in Brazilian individuals presenting colorectal cancer. In this study, 66 patients were clinically analyzed according to Amsterdam II and Bethesda guidelines. Normal and tumour tissues were collected and analyzed for MSI degree according to molecular markers BAT25, BAT26, BAT40, APC-D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250. Eight patients (12.1%) fulfilled the Amsterdam II guidelines, and 15 (22.7%) met the Bethesda guidelines. BAT25 was the most sensitive marker (86.7%), while BAT26 was the least sensitive (66.7%). The specificity of both markers was 100%, but all of the markers must be used since the contribution of each marker to the sensitivity and specificity of the test is complementary. Proximal tumours were significantly predominant among RER+ patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a family history of colorectal cancer with the tumour in the proximal colon must be screened to replication error status as early as possible in order to avoid the progression of the disease.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Adulto , Idoso , Brasil , Feminino , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...