Fever, urticaria, lymphadenopathy, and protracted arthralgia and myalgia resistant to corticosteroid therapy.

Allergen immunotherapy is commonly incorporated in the management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergic asthma, and insect sting hypersensitivity. It is generally safe, but systemic reactions occasionally occur, mainly of the immediate type and rarely of the delayed type. We report a case of a 50-year-old man with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis on immunotherapy for 3 years and then received an injection from another patient's extract. The latter contained a higher concentration of house-dust mite and pollens of grasses, trees, and weeds. It also contained molds that the patient's correct extract did not have. Within half an hour, he developed a systemic reaction that resolved with symptomatic treatment. Two weeks later, he received one-half of his usual immunotherapy dose. Within a week, he developed urticaria, arthralgia, myalgia, fever, and lymphadenopathy. Laboratory abnormalities included leukocytosis, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, hematuria, and elevated liver enzymes. Oral corticosteroid therapy for 3 weeks was ineffective. He developed significant myalgia and apparent mood changes, attributable to corticosteroid intake. After a single plasmapheresis, he felt remarkable improvement within <24 hours. Corticosteroid therapy was gradually withdrawn over 10 weeks without relapse of symptoms. This is a rare case of probable serum sickness after the administration of a wrong allergy immunotherapy extract. However, a causal relationship could not be proven. The response was poor to prolonged corticosteroid therapy but was remarkable to one plasmapheresis.

Follow-up study of immune defects in patients with dysmorphic disorders.

BACKGROUND: In a previous study, we noted immunologic abnormalities in 46 (54.8%) of 84 individuals with dysmorphic disorders. OBJECTIVE: To reevaluate patients with dysmorphic disorders and immunologic abnormalities 2 to 3 years after an initial study to determine any changes in those abnormalities. METHODS: Information was gathered regarding significant infections during the previous 12 months. Blood samples were drawn for the immunologic tests that were previously performed (IgG, IgA, and IgM level determinations; complete blood cell count; and lymphocyte subset enumeration) and for determination of IgG subclasses and T-cell activation by CD69 expression. RESULTS: In the 21 patients available, 26 (63.4%) of the previously noted 41 low immunologic values were still present. In 5 patients, all previously noted immunologic abnormalities resolved. Of the 17 low values noted in 6 patients with Down syndrome, 12 (70.6%) were still present. Also, the 2 patients with Turner syndrome continued to have low IgA and IgM levels. Two patients had a low IgG4 level. A history of significant clinical infections within the previous 12 months was noted in 10 (58.8%) of 17 patients; 8 (47%) had current immune defects. There was a significantly lower T-cell response to staphylococcal enterotoxin B than in healthy controls. The T-lymphocyte activation response was low in 8 (38.1%) of the 21 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a high rate of immune defects in patients with dysmorphic disorders, both during the initial study and 2 to 3 years later, which may contribute to their increased susceptibility to infections. This association was most obvious in patients with Down syndrome and Turner syndrome. The findings should alert for early immunologic evaluation when such patients have infections.

Survey of physicians' approach to food allergy, Part 2: Allergens, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.

BACKGROUND: Food allergy (FA) practice varies widely. OBJECTIVE: To report differences between allergists and nonallergists regarding diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of FA. METHODS: A 2-page questionnaire was mailed to 3,000 allergists and 4,000 nonallergists. We previously published the findings on prevalence and manifestations. Herein, we report the findings on food allergens, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. RESULTS: Responses were received from 584 (19.5%) of the allergists and 77 (1.9%) of the nonallergists. Because of the nonallergists' low response rate, descriptive comparisons were made without emphasis on statistical significance. Allergists and nonallergists differed in their rankings of the 5 most common food allergens. Nonallergists differed markedly from allergists in the diagnostic methods, using more leukocytotoxic tests (10.9% vs 0.3%), specific IgG4 tests (33.8% vs 6.0%), and intradermal tests (40.0% vs 9.5%), but fewer percutaneous skin tests (44.7% vs 98.9%), specific IgE tests (73.4% vs 97.8%), and challenges (61.1% vs 87.6%). They also differed in their use of open, single-blind, and double-blind challenge tests. Allergists were more likely to rely on elimination of proven food allergens and less likely to use conventional elimination diets, rotation diets, and sublingual or subcutaneous hyposensitization. Allergists were more likely to recommend a diet regimen during pregnancy (76.7% vs 35.3%) and lactation (91.1% vs 72.9%), breastfeeding (93.6% vs 84.3%), hydrolysate formulas (83.5% vs 64.3%), and withholding solids until the age of 6 months (89.4% vs 70.0%). CONCLUSION: Differences were noted between nonallergists and allergists regarding causes, diagnostic methods, treatment, and prevention of FA, indicating the need for more education in this area.

Survey of physicians' approach to food allergy, Part 1: Prevalence and manifestations.

INTRODUCTION: Food allergy (FA) prevalence is increasing and is being popularly claimed by the general population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate attitudinal differences between allergists and nonallergists with regard to prevalence, manifestations, offending food component, and time of onset of FA reactions. METHODS: A 2-page questionnaire was mailed to 3,000 members of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and 4,000 nonallergists (1,000 each of internists, pediatricians, family practitioners, and otolaryngologists). RESULTS: Responses were received from 584 allergists and 77 nonallergists. The overall estimated prevalence of FA was significantly higher for nonallergists than allergists (12.1% vs 4.6%) and in each age group. The most common gastrointestinal manifestation of FA was oropharyngeal itching according to allergists (67.2%) vs diarrhea according to nonallergists (42.5%). More nonallergists than allergists reported neurobehavioral manifestations, musculoskeletal symptoms, and upper airway symptoms as common in FA. On the other hand, more allergists than nonallergists considered atopic dermatitis, acute urticaria or angioedema, and anaphylaxis to be common. Nonallergists considered carbohydrates, fat, and additives as causing allergy much more than allergists did (34.4% vs 6.9%; P < .001). With regard to time of onset of FA, nonallergists had higher estimates than allergists for both late (25.5.% vs 13.0%; P < .001) and delayed (22.1% vs 4.5%; P < .001) reactions. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in attitudes toward FA were revealed between allergists and nonallergists, which highlights the need to enhance education in this area.

Do food or additives cause behavior disorders?

The possible role of foods or additives in causing behavioral disorders in children, particularly ADHD, has been a controversial subject both among health care providers and the public. However, a critical review of the literature provides very limited support for such a relationship. On encountering such cases, the healthcare professional should first establish an accurate diagnosis of the suspected "abnormal" behavior based on specific standard criteria. It is important to counsel the family regarding the standard of care practice and about the limited evidence of a role of foods and additives in causing behavior problems. If parents strongly suspect a specific dietary item, a trial of elimination may be warranted. If the child's behavior shows definite improvement, a challenge in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion under the supervision of an experienced physician would be necessary to verify the relationship.