A Rare Skin Rash: Linezolid-Induced Purpuric Drug Eruption without Vasculitis in a Puerto Rican Man.

BACKGROUND Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are the skin's response to a systemic exposure to drugs. Linezolid is an oral oxazolidine used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Even though it has well-known adverse effects, purpuric cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely described. This report is of a Puerto Rican man in his 80s who developed an extensive purpuric drug eruption secondary to linezolid use. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon, since prompt identification and discontinuation of the agent are essential for recovery. CASE REPORT An 89-year-old Puerto Rican man was given oral linezolid therapy for healthcare-associated pneumonia and developed a widespread, purpuric cutaneous eruption 5 days into therapy. His condition prompted immediate discontinuation of the drug. Forty-eight hours after stopping the medication, he visited the Emergency Department. Abdominal punch biopsy revealed a superficial and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with dermal eosinophils, a pathologic finding consistent with a purpuric drug eruption. This allowed for a timely diagnosis, exclusion of other mimickers, such as cutaneous vasculitis, and effective management. CONCLUSIONS Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely reported in the literature. Due to the low incidence of this manifestation, the identification of the causative agent and accompanying treatment may be delayed. Mainstays in therapy are avoidance of the offending agent and treatment with corticosteroids, antihistamines, barrier ointments, and oral analgesics. Primary healthcare providers should be aware of linezolid-induced cutaneous manifestations, diagnostic clues, and treatment options so they can rapidly identify and effectively treat such complications.

Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum: A multicenter survey-based study assessing satisfaction and quality of life.

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) lacks consensus regarding treatment, and no prior studies assess treatment satisfaction in PG. The objective of this study was to determine patient-reported satisfaction in the treatment of PG, and associations with satisfaction. Methodology was a multicenter cross-sectional survey for patients who received systemic medication(s) to treat PG. Thirty-five patients completed the survey (mean age: 54.0 years, 65.7% female, response rate: 81.4%). Mean (± SD) SATMED-Q score was 75.0 (±16.2, range: 67.6-85.3). Older patients (72.6 ± 23.6 for 18-39 years, 74.4 ± 16.1 for 40-59, 77.1 ± 11.6 for 60+), plus those with higher incomes (72.9 ± 20.3 for $0-49 000; 74.0 ± 17.6 for $50 000-99 000; 79.0 ± 14.6 for $100 000+) and education status (69.4 ± 14.3 for high school equivalent, 72.9 ± 15.9 for undergraduate, 91.7 ± 10.6 for graduate), were more satisfied with treatment. Ulcerative PG had higher SATMED-Q scores (79.0 ± 13.2) than other subtypes (66.2 ± 19.3). For local therapy, wound care, or pain control, 63.2%, 100%, and 75% were satisfied, respectively. The mean DLQI was 8.6 (±7.6, range: 0-29), and higher DLQI was associated with decreased satisfaction. Satisfaction with providers was positively correlated with global satisfaction (Pearson's r = 0.638). The presence of pain and/or depression influenced both SATMED-Q (72.8 ± 18.8 with pain, 78.3 ± 11.2 without; 68.2 ± 18.8 with depression, 80.1 ± 12.2 without) and DLQI scores (12.1 ± 8.1 with pain, 3.9 ± 3.4 without; 10.3 ± 7.1 with depression, 7.4 ± 8.0 without). To optimize the patient experience, non-modifiable associations should be individually considered, and potentially modifiable associations such as satisfaction with specific providers, pain, and depression, may be targeted for management.