Supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas have distinctive clinical features and prognosis based on subregion.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma localized to different supraglottic subregions. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were reviewed retrospectively for 111 patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma who were diagnosed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 and were initially treated with surgery. DNA from human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and (or /and) HPV 18 were detected in all the 111 supraglottic carcinoma specimens using in situ hybridization. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, factors were compared using log-rank test, and prognostic factors were determined using Cox proportional hazards model. The relationship between subregions and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: HPV prevalence differed between patients with aryepiglottic fold carcinoma and ventricle carcinoma (P < .05). The local-regional control rates, overall survival rates or cancer specific survival rates were significantly different between different subregions. Univariate analysis indicated that pTNM classification, pN spread, and subregion were associated with prognosis (P < .05). Multivariate analysis indicated that pTNM classification and subregion were associated with supraglottic carcinoma prognosis. The survival rate was better for patients with carcinoma of the epiglottis or ventricular bands compared to those with carcinoma in the aryepiglottic fold or ventricle (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Subregion may be a new prognostic factor for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. Different supraglottic carcinoma subregions have distinct clinical features such as HPV expression, lymph node metastasis rate, local-regional control and prognosis. Therefore, it is necessary to subdivide supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas into several subregion groups to individualize therapy.

[Clinical analysis of the laryngeal injury].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the management of the laryngeal injury. METHOD: The forty five patients of laryngeal injury had been rescued. Twenty eight patients were treated with the tracheotomy and twenty four patients of them were treated with the laryngoplasty. RESULT: All the patients were survived. Tracheostomy tube of twenty eight patients was taken away without the cicatricial structure of larynx. CONCLUSION: With the reasonable management after the laryngeal injury, the injury could be cured in time without complications.