Real-World Analysis of Clinical and Demographic Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in Predominantly Older Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Abemaciclib in Routine Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) is the most frequently diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (mBC) subtype. Combinations of endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4 & 6is) improve outcomes compared with ET alone. The efficacy and safety of abemaciclib among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC has been demonstrated in the MONARCH clinical trials; however, there is a paucity of real-world evidence, particularly in older patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the electronic medical record data/charts of adult patients with HR+/HER2- mBC receiving abemaciclib in US-based community oncology settings (1 September 2017 to 30 September 2019). Patients with other primary malignancies, clinical trial enrollment, and incomplete charts were excluded. Patient characteristics, treatment attributes and patterns, and real-world outcomes (clinical benefit rate [CBR] and stable disease among patients with response data available, time to chemotherapy [TTC], time to treatment discontinuation [TTD], and progression-free survival [PFS]) were summarized. Multivariable models evaluated the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 448 final patients, 99% were female, with a median age of 67 years (25% were ≥ 75 years) and median follow-up of 11 months; most (60%) initiated abemaciclib within 2 years of mBC diagnosis. Patients received a median of 1 (P25 = 0, P75 = 3) prior line of therapy for mBC before abemaciclib, including other CDK4 & 6is (48%) and prior chemotherapy (31%); most (57%) had visceral disease. The CBR for the overall population was 53%, with 48% achieving stable disease. The median TTC was not reached; median TTD was 249 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 202, 304). The median PFS was 329 days (95% CI 266, 386). The discontinuation rate of abemaciclib owing to adverse events (30%) trended higher with age (years) (P = 0.027): 18-49 (n = 42; 19%), 50-64 (n = 155; 25%), 65-74 (n = 138; 32%), 75-84 (n = 82; 37%), ≥ 85 (n = 31; 49%); only 23% of patients overall had a dose hold or reduction prior to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: These patients were older than those in the MONARCH studies with substantial visceral disease, and prior chemotherapy and CDK4 & 6i use. Discontinuation rates were higher than in previous real-world studies (11.9%), highlighting the need for proactive management to optimize outcomes, particularly in older patients with mBC.

Treatment patterns and outcomes associated with sequential and non-sequential use of CDK4 & 6 inhibitors in patients with HR+, HER2- MBC in the real world.

PURPOSE: Cyclin Dependent Kinase 4 & 6 inhibitors (CDK4 & 6i) have transformed the management of HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC); however, the optimal sequence of these treatments and other systemic therapies for MBC remains unclear. METHODS: This study analyzed electronic medical records from the ConcertAI Oncology Dataset. US patients who received abemaciclib and at least one other systemic line of therapy (LOT) for HR+, HER2- MBC were eligible. Treatment sequences were grouped, and data for two pairs of groups are presented herein (N = 397): Group 1 (1L CDK4 & 6i to 2L CDK4 & 6i) vs. Group 2 (1L CDK4 & 6i to 2L non-CDK4 & 6i), and Group 3 (2L CDK4 & 6i to 3L CDK4 & 6i) vs. Group 4 (2L CDK4 & 6i to 3L non-CDK4 & 6i). Time-to-event outcomes (PFS and PFS-2) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: In the total cohort of 690 patients, the most prevalent sequence was 1L CDK4 & 6i to 2L CDK4 & 6i (n = 165). For the 397 patients across Groups 1-4, sequential CDK4 & 6i demonstrated numerically longer PFS and PFS-2 versus non-sequential CDK4 & 6i. Adjusted results demonstrate that patients in Group 1 demonstrated significantly longer PFS (p = 0.05) versus Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Although retrospective and hypothesis-generating, these data demonstrate numerically longer outcomes in the subsequent LOT associated with sequential CDK4 & 6i treatment.

Real-world ramucirumab and immune checkpoint inhibitor sequences in US patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.

Aim: To describe real-world treatment sequences of ramucirumab relative to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Methods: Retrospective, observational study including adult patients treated with ramucirumab (April 2014-June 2020) from a nationwide health-record database. Results: In 1117 eligible patients, ramucirumab + paclitaxel was the most common ramucirumab-containing regimen (72.0%). A total of 217 patients also received an ICI. For ramucirumab then ICI (n = 148) and ICI then ramucirumab (n = 50), ramucirumab + taxane and ICI monotherapy were the most frequent approaches, most commonly observed as second- and third-line (2L and 3L). Median time on ramucirumab in 2L and 3L was similar regardless of sequence with ICI. Conclusion: Most patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer received ramucirumab before ICI, with ramucirumab + paclitaxel as the most common ramucirumab-based regimen.

What is the Order of New Treatments for Gastroesophageal Cancers in the Real World? What is this summary about? Gastroesophageal cancers (cancers of the stomach or food pipe) which cannot be cured are first treated using traditional chemotherapy. Newer anti-cancer therapies with fewer side effects, such as ramucirumab (RAM) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are now available either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. We designed this study to describe the order of use for RAM and ICI. What were the results? The patients in this study were from Flatiron Health database, which includes electronic medical record data of US patients with gastroesophageal cancers. The included patients had been treated with RAM and were grouped based on the treatments received and in the order in which they received RAM and ICI. Of the patients who received both RAM and ICI, RAM then ICI was the most common order, followed by ICI then RAM and then RAM plus ICI at the same time. RAM in combination with paclitaxel (a chemotherapy) was the most common RAM-containing treatment. The duration of RAM therapy was the same whether patients received the treatment before or after ICI. What do results of the study mean? These findings can be used by patients with gastroesophageal cancers and oncologists when making treatment decisions, specifically if RAM might be an option when it is time to change treatments. Real-world studies like this help answer questions that were not addressed in clinical trials.

Characteristics and Outcomes in Cases of US Male Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Abemaciclib in Routine Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer in males constitutes approximately 1% of all breast cancer cases globally. Despite extensive treatment experience with abemaciclib in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), real-world evidence in male MBC is lacking. METHODS: This analysis was a part of a broader, retrospective study that analyzed electronic medical records and charts of 448 men and women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) MBC who initiated an abemaciclib-containing regimen from January 2017 through September 2019. Data were collected from the Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute and the Electronic Medical Office Logistics Health Oncology Warehouse Language™ databases and summarized descriptively. Real-world best response was described: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). RESULTS: Data for six male patients with MBC who were treated with abemaciclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant are presented. Four patients were aged ≥ 75 years, and four patients had ≥ 3 metastatic sites, including visceral involvement. Abemaciclib was initiated in/after third-line (≥ 3L) in four patients, and patients had history of treatment with AI (n = 4), chemotherapy (n = 3), and/or prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (n = 2) in the metastatic setting. Abemaciclib + fulvestrant was the most common abemaciclib-containing regimen (n = 4). Best response was documented in four patients: 1 each with CR, PR, SD, and PD. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of male MBC in this dataset was consistent with expected prevalence in the broader population. Most male patients received an abemaciclib-containing regimen in ≥ 3L, with anti-cancer activity observed despite heavy metastatic burden and prior treatments in a metastatic setting.

Real-world comparison between weekly versus biweekly dosing of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Aim: This real-world study aims to compare overall survival (OS) associated with biweekly (Q2W) versus weekly (Q1W) cetuximab dosing regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment in the US. Methods: Adult patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC who received cetuximab ± chemotherapy from 2013 to 2019 were selected using Flatiron Health's electronic health records database. Propensity score matching was used to balance Q2W and Q1W cohorts on baseline patient characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings from the main analysis. Results: Of 1075 patients in the study, 60.7% received cetuximab Q1W and 39.3% Q2W. Median OS (95% confidence interval) in months was 17.2 (15.3, 18.8) for Q2W versus 14.3 (12.8, 16.0) for Q1W; p = 0.246. Similar OS between the dosing cohorts was observed in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Weekly and biweekly cetuximab had comparable effectiveness in this real-world study.

Treatment heterogeneity and overall survival in patients with advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in the United States.

Background: Gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is the most common form of gastric cancer diagnosed in the United States (US) each year. Diagnosis typically is in later stages of disease when it has advanced. Patients have been treated with a variety of regimens. Methods: The goal of this retrospective study was to understand if treatment patterns were becoming more homogeneous or remaining heterogeneous using the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) and if treatments were becoming more concordant to treatment guidelines published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). HHI scores were calculated for each site by 2-year increments. Trend analyses were conducted for HHI scores over time using a linear regression model. Concordance to Category 1 and any category NCCN guidelines was determined based on the date treatment was initiated with the version of the NCCN guidelines at that time. Time trend analyses were conducted using linear regression models. This study utilized data from the Flatiron Advanced Gastric/Esophageal cohort. This study also examined overall survival (OS) rates estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method by line of therapy. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in HHI scores in the first-line setting over time, suggesting heterogeneity has not improved. Concordance to NCCN treatment guidelines for any category significantly increased over time, however Category 1 regimen concordance remained low in the first-line setting. Concordance over time improved in second-line treatment. Median OS from the start of first-line therapy was 13.57 months. There was no relationship between OS time from initiation of first-line therapy and HHI score, concordance with NCCN guidelines, or concordance with NCCN Category 1 guidelines in the first-line setting. Conclusions: Treatment heterogeneity persists in gastric cancer care, though there is a significant association between heterogeneity and concordance with both Category 1 and any category in the NCCN treatment guidelines, and that concordance has increased over time.

A real-world US study of recurrence risks using combined clinicopathological features in HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

Aim: To assess invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer with combined clinicopathological criteria from monarchE, a phase III study of abemaciclib. Methods: US electronic health records were used to compare outcomes between high-risk (≥4 lymph nodes, or 1-3 lymph nodes and grade 3, tumor ≥5 cm or Ki-67 ≥20%) versus nonhigh-risk groups using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models. Results: The high-risk group (n = 557) was at higher risk for IDFS and DRFS events than the nonhigh-risk group (n = 3471). IDFS events (hazard ratio: 3.07; 95% CI: 2.45-3.83) and DRFS events (hazard ratio: 3.15; 95% CI: 2.49-3.97) were significantly higher for the high-risk group. Conclusion: Risk of recurrence was three-times greater in the high-risk group, highlighting the need for better therapies.

Breast cancer is frequently diagnosed early, at a stage when patients can be cured. However, some patients have breast cancers (tumors) with a high risk of recurrence. When cancers come back, a cure is often not possible. This study looks at multiple high-risk tumor features and the risk of cancer returning, in the most common breast cancer type, known as hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. In patients with high-risk tumors, breast cancer returned in about 11.9% of patients within 2 years and in 29.8% of patients at 5 years. The risk of recurrence or death was three-times higher in patients with high-risk tumors compared to patients with nonhigh-risk tumors. These results suggest better treatments are needed to prevent breast cancers from coming back in patients at high risk of recurrence.

Generalizability of ORIENT-11 trial results to a US standard-of-care cohort with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aim: This retrospective study estimated efficacy and safety of sintilimab + pemetrexed + platinum (SPP) versus placebo + pemetrexed + platinum (PPP) in untreated locally advanced/metastatic, nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), after adjusting each ORIENT-11 trial patient's contribution to ORIENT-11 data based on characteristics of a target US population. Materials & methods: The target US population (n = 557) was selected from a real-world deidentified advanced NSCLC database based on key ORIENT-11 eligibility criteria. Inverse probability weights for ORIENT-11 patients (n = 397) relative to US patients were calculated. Efficacy and safety of SPP versus PPP were adjusted by inverse probability weights. Results: After adjustment, progression-free survival remained superior for SPP. Other efficacy and safety outcomes were consistent. Conclusion: These results provide evidence on how the effects observed with SPP in ORIENT-11 could translate to a US population with untreated locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC.

Sintilimab is an immunotherapy drug that was successfully developed and tested in China for untreated locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. To assess if results from the Chinese ORIENT-11 trial are applicable to the US population, this study used US real-world patient data to adjust the ORIENT-11 trial analysis. After adjustment, progression-free survival benefit observed in ORIENT-11 with the addition of sintilimab to standard chemotherapy remained superior, and other efficacy and safety end points were consistent. This finding may help inform clinical decisions about the applicability of ORIENT-11 trial results to US patients with untreated locally advanced/metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. In addition, this study offers another way real-world evidence can be applied to help complement clinical trial evidence and optimize treatment decisions.

Study of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, EGFR testing patterns and outcomes in real-world patients with EGFRm+ non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, observational study examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, testing patterns, and outcomes of US patients receiving first-/second- or third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: This study used an electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Eligible patients had advanced EGFRm+ non-small cell lung cancer. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Logistic regression models were used to identify patient characteristics that were associated with the use of osimertinib vs. a first-/second-generation EGFR TKI. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Of the 782 patients who received first-line (1L) therapy with first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs in cohort A, erlotinib was the most common (58%), and osimertinib was the most widely prescribed second-line (2L) therapy (52%). Of the patients who received 1L therapy with osimertinib, a greater range of treatments were prescribed in 2L. A third of patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs underwent EGFR testing near the end of 1L, and 44% of these patients had T790M positive disease. The median time on targeted therapy (TTT) of the cohort was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7, 12.3), and the median overall survival from the start of 1L therapy was 23.5 months (95% CI 20.7, 24.8). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs went on to receive osimertinib in the 2L setting, but overall, only a third of patients had received molecular testing at progression. Improved testing frequency is vital to inform treatment decisions.

Predicting optimal treatment regimens for patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer using machine learning based on electronic health records.

Aim: To predict optimal treatments maximizing overall survival (OS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) using machine learning methods on electronic health records. Patients/methods: Adult females with HR+/HER2- MBC on first- or second-line systemic therapy were eligible. Random survival forest (RSF) models were used to predict optimal regimen classes for individual patients and each line of therapy based on baseline characteristics. Results: RSF models suggested greater use of CDK4 & 6 inhibitor-based therapies may maximize OS and TTD. RSF-predicted optimal treatments demonstrated longer OS and TTD compared with nonoptimal treatments across line of therapy (hazard ratios = 0.44∼0.79). Conclusion: RSF may help inform optimal treatment choices and improve outcomes for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC.

Data Integration to Improve Real-world Health Outcomes Research for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States: Descriptive and Qualitative Exploration.

BACKGROUND: The integration of data from disparate sources could help alleviate data insufficiency in real-world studies and compensate for the inadequacies of single data sources and short-duration, small sample size studies while improving the utility of data for research. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe and evaluate a process of integrating data from several complementary sources to conduct health outcomes research in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The integrated data set is also used to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and mortality rates. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study integrated data from 4 sources: administrative claims from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database, clinical data from a Cancer Care Quality Program (CCQP), clinical data from abstracted medical records (MRs), and mortality data from the US Social Security Administration. Patients with lung cancer who initiated second-line (2L) therapy between November 01, 2015, and April 13, 2018, were identified in the claims and CCQP data. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and received atezolizumab, docetaxel, erlotinib, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, or ramucirumab in the 2L setting. The main analysis cohort included patients with claims data and data from at least one additional data source (CCQP or MR). Patients without integrated data (claims only) were reported separately. Descriptive and univariate statistics were reported. RESULTS: Data integration resulted in a main analysis cohort of 2195 patients with NSCLC; 2106 patients had CCQP and 407 patients had MR data. The claims-only cohort included 931 eligible patients. For the main analysis cohort, the mean age was 62.1 (SD 9.27) years, 48.56% (1066/2195) were female, the median length of follow-up was 6.8 months, and for 37.77% (829/2195), death was observed. For the claims-only cohort, the mean age was 66.6 (SD 12.69) years, 52.1% (485/931) were female, the median length of follow-up was 8.6 months, and for 29.3% (273/931), death was observed. The most frequent 2L treatment was immunotherapy (1094/2195, 49.84%), followed by platinum-based regimens (472/2195, 21.50%) and single-agent chemotherapy (441/2195, 20.09%); mean duration of 2L therapy was 5.6 (SD 4.9, median 4) months. We describe challenges and learnings from the data integration process, and the benefits of the integrated data set, which includes a richer set of clinical and outcome data to supplement the utilization metrics available in administrative claims. CONCLUSIONS: The management of patients with NSCLC requires care from a multidisciplinary team, leading to a lack of a single aggregated data source in real-world settings. The availability of integrated clinical data from MRs, health plan claims, and other sources of clinical care may improve the ability to assess emerging treatments.

Defining treatment regimens and lines of therapy using real-world data in oncology.

Retrospective observational research relies on databases that do not routinely record lines of therapy or reasons for treatment change. Standardized approaches to estimate lines of therapy were developed and evaluated in this study. A number of rules were developed, assumptions varied and macros developed to apply to large datasets. Results were investigated in an iterative process to refine line of therapy algorithms in three different cancers (lung, colorectal and gastric). Three primary factors were evaluated and included in the estimation of lines of therapy in oncology: defining a treatment regimen, addition/removal of drugs and gap periods. Algorithms and associated Statistical Analysis Software (SAS®) macros for line of therapy identification are provided to facilitate and standardize the use of real-world databases for oncology research.

Lay abstract Most, if not all, real-world healthcare databases do not contain data explaining treatment changes, requiring that rules be applied to estimate when treatment changes may reflect advancement of underlying disease. This study investigated three tumor types (lung, colorectal and gastric cancer) to develop and provide rules that researchers can apply to real-world databases. The resulting algorithms and associated SAS^® macros from this work are provided for use in the Supplementary data.

Healthcare resource utilization in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: post hoc analysis of the randomized phase 3 REVEL study.

PURPOSE: In REVEL, patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) and patients with increased tumor aggressiveness (rapid disease progression (RDP), platinum-refractory disease (PRD), and high symptom burden (HSB)) benefited from second-line treatment with ramucirumab plus docetaxel over placebo plus docetaxel. This post hoc analysis describes healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with the treatment. METHODS: aNSCLC patients who had progressed during or after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive docetaxel and either ramucirumab or placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or death. HCRU included hospitalizations, transfusions, and concomitant medications. Categorical variables (counts and percentages) were compared using Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables (mean, standard deviation (SD), median, minimum, and maximum) were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were largely similar between treatment arms. Within the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 1253), the mean treatment duration was 19.7 and 16.9 weeks in the ramucirumab and control arms, respectively; 51.0% versus 54.9% of patients received subsequent anticancer therapy, respectively. Hospitalization rates were 41.9% versus 42.6% (p = 0.863), mean length of hospital stay was 14.5 days versus 11.3 days (p = 0.066), transfusion rates were 9.9% versus 12.3% (p = 0.206), and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors was 41.8% versus 36.6% (p = 0.063), respectively. No significant difference was observed in HCRU between treatment arms in both ITT population and in aggressive disease subgroups including RDP (n = 209), PRD (n = 360), and HSB (n = 497). CONCLUSION: In REVEL, the addition of ramucirumab to docetaxel did not increase HCRU among patients with aggressive aNSCLC disease. These results may help inform economic evaluation of treatment for patients with aNSCLC.

Treatment sequencing for the care of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic advances for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have led to additional options for care. This observational study was designed to describe emerging treatment patterns and survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Flatiron Health's oncology electronic health records database was to identify eligible patients who were age 18+ who initiated second-line therapy for NSCLC Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard model using SAS 9.4. both unadjusted and adjusted, using generalized propensity score, to account for imbalances between groups. RESULTS: The 10,060 eligible patients from Dec 2014 to Feb 2019 were 52.6% male; mean age 67.1 years; 70.3% white; 26.0% squamous/70.0% non-squamous (4.1% not specified); and 92.7% were treated at community practices. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were used by 79.9% of the cohort during any line of therapy; 12.1% and 53.7% used ICIs during first- and second-line therapy, respectively. There was heterogeneity in treatment sequencing, as the three most common first→second line sequences accounted for 7.7% (carboplatin + paclitaxel→nivolumab), 5.0% (carboplatin + pemetrexed→nivolumab), and 3.8% (carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel→nivolumab) of the total population, respectively. Unadjusted median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 20.5-21.6) from metastatic diagnosis. Median survival was 23.0 months (95% CI, 22.3-23.6) for non-squamous and 18.1 months (95% CI, 17.3-18.8) for squamous disease. CONCLUSION: There is heterogeneity in sequencing strategies that limit the ability to conduct robust comparative effectiveness research of treatment sequences. Since few patients follow a similar treatment trajectory, comparative effectiveness research will be challenged to identify treatment sequences with sufficient sample size.

Reliability of Conclusions from Early Analyses of Real-World Data for Newly Approved Drugs in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the United States.

BACKGROUND: As real-world data resources expand and improve, there will increasingly be opportunities to study the effectiveness of interventions. There is a need to ensure that study designs explore potential sources of bias and either acknowledge or mitigate them, in order to improve the accuracy of findings. The objective of this study was to understand newly approved drug utilization patterns in real-world clinical settings over time. METHODS: This retrospective study included three sources of real-world data (claims, electronic health records, and recoded data from a quality care program) collected from patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who initiated therapy with either trastuzumab or ramucirumab. Linear regression was used to investigate trends in the use of these drugs for the care of patients with gastric cancer over time from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. RESULTS: Eligible patients (n=1700) had consistent demographic and clinical characteristics over time. After regulatory approval, trastuzumab was used in later lines of therapy and then shifted to earlier lines (p=0.002), while ramucirumab utilization remained consistent over time after FDA approval (p=0.49). Ramucirumab augmentation, defined as the addition of the drug after initiation of a line of therapy, decreased over time (p=0.03), and trastuzumab augmentation remained consistent over time (p=0.58). CONCLUSION: Since treatment effectiveness may change across lines of treatment, bias may arise if there are changes in the use of the drug (such as line migration) during the time period of analysis using real-world data.

Value of clinical trial narrative data to estimate the costs of adverse event management: a feasibility study.

Aims: The objective of this feasibility study was to determine the extent to which data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may serve as a useful source for collecting health care resource use (HCRU) for the purposes of estimating costs of managing adverse events (AEs), specifically, grade 3-4 nausea and thrombocytopenia, which may be experienced during chemotherapy treatment.Materials and Methods: The feasibility study was conducted in four steps: (1) HCRU data were extracted from patient narratives in four phase 3 RCTs in non-small cell lung cancer; (2) missing HCRU data were imputed; (3) unit costs were applied to the resulting HCRU data set and costs of managing AEs were estimated; and (4) the overall utility of using RCT data as a source for estimating costs of AEs was evaluated.Results: 33 nausea and 68 thrombocytopenia AEs met eligibility criteria and were evaluated in this study. Medication usage was recorded as a treatment in 76% of nausea AEs, although only 14% of the instances of medication usage included the minimum data elements required for costing. Platelet transfusions were provided in 24% of thrombocytopenia AEs; however, in only one instance were the minimum data elements recorded. Of nausea and thrombocytopenia AEs, 18% and 72%, respectively, required no missing data assumptions or imputation.Limitations: Only two AEs were considered, and they may not be representative of all AEs in terms of suitability for use in estimating HCRU and costs of managing AEs. Not all grade 3-4 AEs met the criteria for requiring a patient narrative. HCRU data in the narratives were incomplete.Conclusions: The usefulness of RCTs for estimating the costs of AEs may be improved by using a standardized form to collect HCRU data for key AEs, including an appropriate level of detail required to estimate costs of managing the AEs.

Sequential therapy with ramucirumab and/or checkpoint inhibitors for non-small-cell lung cancer in routine practice.

Aim: To describe treatment patterns and outcomes for advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with single-agent or combination ramucirumab (ramucirumab-based) and/or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI-based) therapy. Materials & methods: Retrospective study of aNSCLC patients (n = 4054) identified in the Flatiron Health database, who received at least two treatment lines including ramucirumab- and/or ICI-based regimens between December 2014 and May 2017. Results: Median overall survival (95% CI) from aNSCLC diagnosis was 29.3 (25.5-33.0) months for patients receiving sequential ramucirumab- and ICI-based therapy (n = 245), 15.1 (12.6-18.2) months for patients receiving sequences including ramucirumab- without ICI-based therapy (n = 112), and 23.1 (21.9-24.2) months for patients receiving ICI-based therapy without ramucirumab-based therapy in sequence (n = 3697). Conclusion: Results provide real-world survival estimates for aNSCLC treated with sequences including ramucirumab- and/or ICI-based therapies.

Treatment patterns and survival outcomes for patients receiving second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death in the USA. It is important to identify patients who may experience poor outcomes from available treatments. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, treatment patterns and survival outcomes were described among adult patients from the Flatiron Health electronic medical records database who were treated with at least two lines of therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in the USA between January 2013 and May 2018. Patients with rapid progression were defined as those whose time from start of first- to second-line therapy was ≤ 183 days. RESULTS: A total of 14,315 patients formed the study cohort. The most common first-line treatments were FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab, received by 34.7% (n = 4962) of patients, followed by FOLFOX alone (17.1%, n = 2445). Of all patients, 6991 (48.9%) also received second-line anti-cancer therapy and of those, 3338 (47.7%) had rapid progression and 3653 (52.3%) did not. Median overall survival from the start of first- and second-line therapy was 20.8 months (95% CI 20.2-21.3) and 14.5 months (95% CI 13.9-15.0) for the entire study population, respectively. Median overall survival from the start of second-line therapy was 14.1 (95% CI 13.2-14.8) for patients with rapid progression and 14.6 months (95% CI 13.8-15.4) for patients without rapid progression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer lived less than 2 years in this real-world database. While the time to initiation of second-line therapy was by definition longer among patients without rapidly progressing disease, survival outcomes were comparable from initiation of second-line therapy.

Association of quality of life with disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis of RAINBOW and REGARD phase III trials.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate understanding of interpretation of quality of life (QoL) instruments leads to unsatisfactory data reporting and clinical decision-making, including in gastric cancer care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled QoL data from two phase III studies of ramucirumab with or without paclitaxel in previously treated patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer were used to explore associations with clinical attributes, including tumour response, disease measurability and performance status (PS). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 was used in both studies. Changes in QLQ-C30 scores from baseline to week 6 as a predictor of clinical outcomes and impacts of changes in clinical status on QoL were estimated by multivariate logistic regression and analyses of variance, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline QoL data were available for 989 patients. Fatigue, pain and appetite loss were prominent baseline symptoms. Disease progression resulted in worse QoL in all functional scales (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.0306), global QoL (p = 0.0011) and symptom scales (fatigue, p < 0.0001; nausea/vomiting, p = 0.0007; pain, p = 0.0052; appetite loss, p = 0.0061). Similar trends were seen with deterioration of PS on QoL. A 15- to 20-point change in global QoL and functional scale scores predicted change in tumour status as did change in fatigue, pain and appetite loss scores. Smaller QoL changes (5-15 points) predicted PS change. Results were similar in patients regardless of baseline disease measurability. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the importance of disease control for maintaining or improving QoL. These data could improve future trial design and routine clinical care for patients receiving therapy for previously treated gastric cancer. NCT00917384, NCT01170663.